Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2BEYONCT03237975
BEYO Project to Promote Sense of Coherence and Self-care of Elderly People With Type 2 Diabetes
A study testing Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) and Routine health education in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Sense of Coherence, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
1. Objectives of the Project The BEYO project is designed based on the middle range theory of self-care of chronic illness and salutogenic theory. The aim of this project is to facilitate self-care behaviours of community-dwelling elderly patients with type 2 diabetes through promoting SOC, and accordingly improve… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Sense of Coherence, Self Care
- What is being tested?
- Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) and Routine health education
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 27 Mar 2017to Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A medical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes according to diagnostic criteria recommended by WHO (2006);
- Older than aged 60 years;
- Diagnosed with diabetes at least six months before the intervention;
- Residing in the community, able to read and communicate in Chinese;
- Having intact cognitive function as indicated by the Abbreviated Mental Test of score >=6;
- Having some degree of self-care deficit as indicated by the Chinese version of SDSCA of score <=23.
Who cannot join
- Presence of serious mental problem or terminal illness;
- Previously participated in similar programs;
- Visual or audio impaired.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites
He Xinyuan Community Health Care Center
Changsha, Hunan, 410000
Yannong Neighborhood Health Care Clinics
Changsha, Hunan, 410000
About this study
Official title: A Strengths-based Intervention Based on Salutogenic Theory to Promote Sense of Coherence and Self-care of Elderly People With Type 2 Diabetes
- Objectives of the Project The BEYO project is designed based on the middle range theory of self-care of chronic illness and salutogenic theory. The aim of this project is to facilitate self-care behaviours of community-dwelling elderly patients with type 2 diabetes through promoting SOC, and accordingly improve their health outcomes, including promoting quality of life and reducing diabetes-related emotional distress.
- Content of the Project
BEYO is a group-based consultation project. Each group contains 1 facilitator, 1 assistant and 8 elderly patients. 5 weekly sessions are provided to let patients receive health knowledge, discuss problems and experiences, explore available resources and build up goals and solutions. Each session lasts for 40 minutes. Session 1 aims to build social network among group members and introduce group goals and tasks. Session 2-4 covers six topics based on the Chinese guideline for type 2 diabetes released by Chinese diabetes society: (i) healthy dietary, (ii) exercise and activity, (iii) taking medication, (iv) blood glucose monitoring, (v) reducing risks for complication, (vi) healthy coping with mental stress. These middle sessions execute a common session flow to construct an action plan utilizing patients' resources and strengths to achieve the client-centered goal. Session 5 aims to review the process, summarize effective solutions, and set up plans for the future. One-week, one-month and three-month telephone follow-ups are delivered to help patients solve problems encountered during implementing the action plan and evaluate their self-care, SOC and other health outcomes.
Read the detailed description
- Overall aims The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the effects of a strengths-based group intervention called Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes to facilitate their SOC and self-care, and accordingly improve their health outcomes.
- Study Design This study is designed to be a mixed method research incorporating both quantitative and qualitative components. A two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to assess the effects of a strengths-based group intervention compared with routine health education on SOC and self-care of elderly people with type 2 diabetes. The theoretical framework for BEYO program is based on salutogenic theory proposed by Antonovsky (1987). Qualitative study will be conducted at the end of the program to explore patients' experience about BEYO and the mechanism through which BEYO can facilitate self-care, in terms of what component and how.
- Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) program
- Overview The BEYO protocol consists of 5 structured sessions among intervention facilitator and 8 type 2 diabetes patients.The common flow for structured sessions contains 7 steps. Rationale and aims for designing each step are described as follows. Step 1 - "Health education" As supported by the middle range theory and results from integrated review, knowledge acquisition is essential among patients with chronic disease to perform reflective, sufficient and reasoned self-care actions with a pattern. This step aims to equip patients with basic knowledge and essential skills to manage their disease. Step 2 - "Discuss self-care experience and identify deficit" This step aims to collect basic information about clients' experience of performing self-care in each specific area and identify major problems they encounter in this process. This step facilitates information exchange and experience sharing among clients and provides reference for intervention facilitator about clients' basic situation. Besides, giving enough opportunity to describe the problem makes it easier to redirect the conversation later if attendees restart talking about the problem. Step 3 - "Describe exceptions" One of the central beliefs for SFT is that there are always exceptions to problems. There are always times and situations when the problem occurs less or when the client feels like successfully managing even a slight part of the problem. After identifying self-care deficit, clients are asked to describe these exceptional times in this step to help them find out skills, resources, and strengths at their disposal. The close attention for exceptions improves clients' sense of self-mastery and their ability to plan further steps. Step 4 - "Identify the strengths" On the basis of review and analysis for exceptions, it is the right time to list out and summarize clients' strengths revealed in these exceptions. This step lays a foundation for establishing solutions later, for that detected strengths can be amplified and repeated to ultimately dismantle the problem. Step 5 - "Miracle question and scaling" The miracle question is a common tool in SFT as a way to build clear, client-centered and practical goals. Scaling questions help to break the goal down into small manageable steps that can be carried out in the short term. This step helps clients find out what they want to achieve through this program. Setting the goal by themselves facilitates an empowering and optimistic experience for clients that promoting goal-focused thinking during the self-care process and highlighting their responsibility for the future actions. Step 6 - "Establish the solution" After exploring strengths and setting up the goal, this step aims to link strengths and goals together to establish the solution. As the basic principles for SFT is focusing on strengths rather than weakness, resources rather than deficits, the created solution is more concerned with achievement than with solving problems, with hoping not just coping. It helps clients move forward in their lives. Step 7 - "Action plan" As the final step, a structured action plan is generated to transform the solution into arranged tasks. The action plan guides the behaviors of the clients and tracks the progress of implementation.
- The role of facilitator Different with the traditional teacher-centered didactic model, facilitators in BEYO program need to get out of the expert role and appreciate patients' capabilities from the aspect of truly human beings. Rather than being at the center of the group, the facilitator is a supporter to assist patients to identify what they want to achieve, to help them to think about strengths and resources during the group interactions, to build up solutions for their own situations and to make plans to reach the goal step by step. To build a hope-inducing relationship between the facilitator and clients has been emphasized as the context for practice to enhance the effectiveness of strengths-based techniques (Fischer, 1978). The foundation for a hope-inducing relationship includes empathy, genuineness and unconditional positive regard (Maluccio, 1979). To be empathy, facilitators need to perceive and communicate feelings of attendees with sensitivity, and think about the meaning of these feelings. Genuineness means that facilitators should be themselves in the helping process rather than presenting a professional facade. Unconditional positive regard asks facilitators to give positive feedback to every good change and to express the respect, acceptance, caring and concern for the client in a non-dominating way.
- Objectives for each session Session 1 aims to build social network among group members and make clients feel welcome. Group goals and task will be introduced to gel the clients around the group. Session 2-4 execute a common session flow to finally construct an action plan to achieve the client-centered goal. Themes for the total 3 sessions respectively cover the six areas as mentioned earlier. Except session 2, all the other sessions will start with reinforcing the positive change happening since the last session. Session 5 aims to celebrate the achievement, review the process, summarize clients' strengths and effective solutions, and set up plans for the future.
- Acceptability and feasibility evaluation Researchers will record numbers and proportions for recruitment, consent, attendance, and attrition rate. Duration of sessions and intervention activities will be recorded using field notes. The research team and the facilitator will discuss the delivery of the program and study progress every week.
The focus-group interview will be conducted at the end of the study to explore patients' experience and opinions about the content and process, and barriers and enablers to compliance with the intervention.
- Subjects
3.1 Sampling and recruitment The group of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes living in Changsha, a city in central China, is selected as the study population. Multi-stage random sampling will be used to recruit community-dwelling participants. First, two of the five municipal districts of Changsha City based on present administrative system will be randomly selected. Second, detailed information including names and numbers of community health service centers belong to each district can be achieved through government official websites. Two community health service centers respectively belong to the two districts will be randomly selected. Third, based on national standards of public health services, all the community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes should be recorded in the electronic medical system charged by the department of chronic disease management in the community health service center. Random number table method will be used to select potential participants in each of the two communities, using this electronic system. No private information of type 2 diabetes patients will be retrieved except for their name, mailing address and contact number.
An information sheet will be sent as a letter from the research team to the potential participant followed by a telephone call two days later. The phone call is mainly designed to (i) further make sure if the referrals meet the inclusion criteria, such as age and time of diagnosis; (ii) discuss the information sheet and obtain verbal informed consent for the project, (iii) verbally deliver Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) to make sure the participants have intact cognitive function and experience at least some degree of self-care deficit for diabetes.
3.2 Sample size calculation The significance level and the power are set at 5% and 80% respectively. The primary outcome is self-care of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. However, based on the result of literature review, no previous studies used strengths-based intervention reported its effects on self-care. Based on the result of a meta-analysis assessing effects of group-based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment (Steinsbekk, Rygg, Lisulo, Rise, \& Fretheim, 2012), the standardized mean difference for self-care skills was 0.55. Thus, a sample size of 53 in each group is enough to detect the difference in the means of self-care between two groups. Allowing for a dropout rate of 20%, a total of 132 participants will be required.
3.3 Randomization After obtaining the signed informed consent form and collecting the baseline data, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group, using a computerized permuted block randomization with concealment.
- Data Collection Data collection will be commenced after receiving written informed consent voluntarily signed by participants. The baseline information (T0) will be collected before the randomization. After completing the intervention or control protocol, a follow-up data collection (T1) will be conducted immediately by a group of trained research assistants, who are blinded to the participants' group assignment and workshop attendance. Repeated data collection (T2) will take place at 3 months after the completion of the strength-based intervention by the same group of research assistants.
- Data Analysis Plan Invalid questionnaire (questionnaire with obvious logic error, or with more than 20% unanswered questions) will be excluded before put into the database. SPSS version 22.0 will be used to process data. The level of statistical significance will be set at 0.05. Q-Q plot, Skewness and Kurtosis will be used to examine the normality of continuous data. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the demographic characteristics, health status and patient-centered outcomes. The effectiveness of the intervention will be assessed based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) model will be used to estimate the intervention effect over time. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis will be conducted to examine the mediating effect of sense of coherence.
- Being tested
- Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO), Routine health education
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, sense of coherence, self-care, strengths-based intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO)Behavioural
The BEYO program is structured adopting solution focused therapy (SFT). The basic principles for SFT are focusing on positive change and establishing groups driven by goals rather than problems. Solutions are generated through searching for strengths, skills, resources that working in clients' lives.
The common flow for structured sessions contains 7 steps: 1) Health education; 2) Discuss self-care experience and identify deficit; 3) Describe exceptions; 4) Identify the strengths; 5) Miracle question and scaling; 6) Establish the solution; 7) Action plan.
Routine health educationOther
The control group will receive routine health education.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) | Experimental | BEYO is a group-based consultation project. Each group contains 1 facilitator, 1 assistant and 8 elderly patients. 5 weekly sessions are provided to let patients receive health knowledge, discuss problems and experiences, explore available resources and build up goals and solutions. Each session lasts for 40 minutes. Session 1 aims to build social network among group members and introduce group goals and tasks. Session 2-4 covers six topics: (i) healthy dietary, (ii) exercise and activity, (iii) taking medication, (iv) blood glucose monitoring, (v) reducing risks for complication, (vi) healthy coping with mental stress. Session 5 aims to review the process, summarize effective solutions, and set up plans for the future. Receives: Behavioral: Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) |
| Routine health education | Active comparator | To neutralize the effect of extra attention from the facilitator, participants in control group will receive routine health education on topics related to type 2 diabetes. Contents for the routine education will be based on the national guideline of basic public health service for diabetes and specific implementation protocols in each community. Participants in control group will receive 5-weekly education packet at the same time with participants in intervention group. The patients will not be given any strengths-based information, but they are free to discuss their disease status with nurses or physicians at their regular follow-up appointments. Receives: Other: Routine health education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA)
SDSCA is a brief self-report measure for assessing levels of self-care across different components of the diabetes regimen. The new version revised by Toobert's team (2000) uses 11 items to include 6 aspects of diabetes regimen: general diet, specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking.
Measured: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks
Short form of the sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC-13)
The SOC questionnaire was developed by Antonovsky (1987) to measure three components of sense of coherence: comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness.
Measured: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks
the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA)
SDSCA is a brief self-report measure for assessing levels of self-care across different components of the diabetes regimen. The new version revised by Toobert's team (2000) uses 11 items to include 6 aspects of diabetes regimen: general diet, specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking.
Measured: 5 weeks after the project started
Short form of the sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC-13)
The SOC questionnaire was developed by Antonovsky (1987) to measure three components of sense of coherence: comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness.
Measured: 5 weeks after the project started
the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA)
SDSCA is a brief self-report measure for assessing levels of self-care across different components of the diabetes regimen. The new version revised by Toobert's team (2000) uses 11 items to include 6 aspects of diabetes regimen: general diet, specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking.
Measured: 3-month after the project ended
Short form of the sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC-13)
The SOC questionnaire was developed by Antonovsky (1987) to measure three components of sense of coherence: comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness.
Measured: 3-month after the project ended
Secondary outcomes (3)
the Chinese version of the Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (CN-ADDQoL)
The ADDQoL is a diabetes-specific health related quality of life instrument (Bradley et al., 1999) assessed perceived impact of diabetes on 19 life domains containing physical functioning, symptoms, psychological well-being, social well-being, role activities and personal construct.
Measured: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks; 5 weeks after the project started; 3-month after the project ended
Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
The DDS is developed by Polonsky et al (2005) to assess diabetes-related emotional distress. DDS contains 17 items to cover 4 dimensions: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and diabetes-related interpersonal distress.
Measured: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks; 5 weeks after the project started; 3-month after the project ended
Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES)
DSES was developed by Stanford Patient Education Research Center (Lorig et al., 2009), including 8 items to assess patients' confidence in areas including dietary, exercise and symptom management.
Measured: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks; 5 weeks after the project started, 3-month after the project ended
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Aug 2017
- Study start27 Mar 2017
- Primary completionOct 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chinese University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants were assigned to two groups in parallel for the duration of the study. One group received usual care for diabetes patients. One group received strengths-based intervention.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lei Yang, Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Yang Lei, Principal investigator, Chinese University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03237975
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BEYO Project-LYCUHK
- Acronym
- BEYO
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 3 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Strengths-based Intervention Based on Salutogenic Theory to Promote Sense of Coherence and Self-care of Elderly People With Type 2 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03237975
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEYO / BEYO Project-LYCUHK
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, sense of coherence, self-care, strengths-based intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Objectives of the Project The BEYO project is designed based on the middle range theory of self-care of chronic illness and salutogenic theory. The aim of this project is to facilitate self-care behaviours of community-dwelling elderly patients with type 2 diabetes through promoting SOC, and accordingly improve their health outcomes, including promoting quality of life and reducing diabetes-related emotional distress.
- Content of the Project
BEYO is a group-based consultation project. Each group contains 1 facilitator, 1 assistant and 8 elderly patients. 5 weekly sessions are provided to let patients receive health knowledge, discuss problems and experiences, explore available resources and build up goals and solutions. Each session lasts for 40 minutes. Session 1 aims to build social network among group members and introduce group goals and tasks. Session 2-4 covers six topics based on the Chinese guideline for type 2 diabetes released by Chinese diabetes society: (i) healthy dietary, (ii) exercise and activity, (iii) taking medication, (iv) blood glucose monitoring, (v) reducing risks for complication, (vi) healthy coping with mental stress. These middle sessions execute a common session flow to construct an action plan utilizing patients' resources and strengths to achieve the client-centered goal. Session 5 aims to review the process, summarize effective solutions, and set up plans for the future. One-week, one-month and three-month telephone follow-ups are delivered to help patients solve problems encountered during implementing the action plan and evaluate their self-care, SOC and other health outcomes.
Detailed description
- Overall aims The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the effects of a strengths-based group intervention called Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes to facilitate their SOC and self-care, and accordingly improve their health outcomes.
- Study Design This study is designed to be a mixed method research incorporating both quantitative and qualitative components. A two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to assess the effects of a strengths-based group intervention compared with routine health education on SOC and self-care of elderly people with type 2 diabetes. The theoretical framework for BEYO program is based on salutogenic theory proposed by Antonovsky (1987). Qualitative study will be conducted at the end of the program to explore patients' experience about BEYO and the mechanism through which BEYO can facilitate self-care, in terms of what component and how.
- Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) program
- Overview The BEYO protocol consists of 5 structured sessions among intervention facilitator and 8 type 2 diabetes patients.The common flow for structured sessions contains 7 steps. Rationale and aims for designing each step are described as follows. Step 1 - "Health education" As supported by the middle range theory and results from integrated review, knowledge acquisition is essential among patients with chronic disease to perform reflective, sufficient and reasoned self-care actions with a pattern. This step aims to equip patients with basic knowledge and essential skills to manage their disease. Step 2 - "Discuss self-care experience and identify deficit" This step aims to collect basic information about clients' experience of performing self-care in each specific area and identify major problems they encounter in this process. This step facilitates information exchange and experience sharing among clients and provides reference for intervention facilitator about clients' basic situation. Besides, giving enough opportunity to describe the problem makes it easier to redirect the conversation later if attendees restart talking about the problem. Step 3 - "Describe exceptions" One of the central beliefs for SFT is that there are always exceptions to problems. There are always times and situations when the problem occurs less or when the client feels like successfully managing even a slight part of the problem. After identifying self-care deficit, clients are asked to describe these exceptional times in this step to help them find out skills, resources, and strengths at their disposal. The close attention for exceptions improves clients' sense of self-mastery and their ability to plan further steps. Step 4 - "Identify the strengths" On the basis of review and analysis for exceptions, it is the right time to list out and summarize clients' strengths revealed in these exceptions. This step lays a foundation for establishing solutions later, for that detected strengths can be amplified and repeated to ultimately dismantle the problem. Step 5 - "Miracle question and scaling" The miracle question is a common tool in SFT as a way to build clear, client-centered and practical goals. Scaling questions help to break the goal down into small manageable steps that can be carried out in the short term. This step helps clients find out what they want to achieve through this program. Setting the goal by themselves facilitates an empowering and optimistic experience for clients that promoting goal-focused thinking during the self-care process and highlighting their responsibility for the future actions. Step 6 - "Establish the solution" After exploring strengths and setting up the goal, this step aims to link strengths and goals together to establish the solution. As the basic principles for SFT is focusing on strengths rather than weakness, resources rather than deficits, the created solution is more concerned with achievement than with solving problems, with hoping not just coping. It helps clients move forward in their lives. Step 7 - "Action plan" As the final step, a structured action plan is generated to transform the solution into arranged tasks. The action plan guides the behaviors of the clients and tracks the progress of implementation.
- The role of facilitator Different with the traditional teacher-centered didactic model, facilitators in BEYO program need to get out of the expert role and appreciate patients' capabilities from the aspect of truly human beings. Rather than being at the center of the group, the facilitator is a supporter to assist patients to identify what they want to achieve, to help them to think about strengths and resources during the group interactions, to build up solutions for their own situations and to make plans to reach the goal step by step. To build a hope-inducing relationship between the facilitator and clients has been emphasized as the context for practice to enhance the effectiveness of strengths-based techniques (Fischer, 1978). The foundation for a hope-inducing relationship includes empathy, genuineness and unconditional positive regard (Maluccio, 1979). To be empathy, facilitators need to perceive and communicate feelings of attendees with sensitivity, and think about the meaning of these feelings. Genuineness means that facilitators should be themselves in the helping process rather than presenting a professional facade. Unconditional positive regard asks facilitators to give positive feedback to every good change and to express the respect, acceptance, caring and concern for the client in a non-dominating way.
- Objectives for each session Session 1 aims to build social network among group members and make clients feel welcome. Group goals and task will be introduced to gel the clients around the group. Session 2-4 execute a common session flow to finally construct an action plan to achieve the client-centered goal. Themes for the total 3 sessions respectively cover the six areas as mentioned earlier. Except session 2, all the other sessions will start with reinforcing the positive change happening since the last session. Session 5 aims to celebrate the achievement, review the process, summarize clients' strengths and effective solutions, and set up plans for the future.
- Acceptability and feasibility evaluation Researchers will record numbers and proportions for recruitment, consent, attendance, and attrition rate. Duration of sessions and intervention activities will be recorded using field notes. The research team and the facilitator will discuss the delivery of the program and study progress every week.
The focus-group interview will be conducted at the end of the study to explore patients' experience and opinions about the content and process, and barriers and enablers to compliance with the intervention.
- Subjects
3.1 Sampling and recruitment The group of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes living in Changsha, a city in central China, is selected as the study population. Multi-stage random sampling will be used to recruit community-dwelling participants. First, two of the five municipal districts of Changsha City based on present administrative system will be randomly selected. Second, detailed information including names and numbers of community health service centers belong to each district can be achieved through government official websites. Two community health service centers respectively belong to the two districts will be randomly selected. Third, based on national standards of public health services, all the community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes should be recorded in the electronic medical system charged by the department of chronic disease management in the community health service center. Random number table method will be used to select potential participants in each of the two communities, using this electronic system. No private information of type 2 diabetes patients will be retrieved except for their name, mailing address and contact number.
An information sheet will be sent as a letter from the research team to the potential participant followed by a telephone call two days later. The phone call is mainly designed to (i) further make sure if the referrals meet the inclusion criteria, such as age and time of diagnosis; (ii) discuss the information sheet and obtain verbal informed consent for the project, (iii) verbally deliver Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) to make sure the participants have intact cognitive function and experience at least some degree of self-care deficit for diabetes.
3.2 Sample size calculation The significance level and the power are set at 5% and 80% respectively. The primary outcome is self-care of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. However, based on the result of literature review, no previous studies used strengths-based intervention reported its effects on self-care. Based on the result of a meta-analysis assessing effects of group-based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment (Steinsbekk, Rygg, Lisulo, Rise, \& Fretheim, 2012), the standardized mean difference for self-care skills was 0.55. Thus, a sample size of 53 in each group is enough to detect the difference in the means of self-care between two groups. Allowing for a dropout rate of 20%, a total of 132 participants will be required.
3.3 Randomization After obtaining the signed informed consent form and collecting the baseline data, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group, using a computerized permuted block randomization with concealment.
- Data Collection Data collection will be commenced after receiving written informed consent voluntarily signed by participants. The baseline information (T0) will be collected before the randomization. After completing the intervention or control protocol, a follow-up data collection (T1) will be conducted immediately by a group of trained research assistants, who are blinded to the participants' group assignment and workshop attendance. Repeated data collection (T2) will take place at 3 months after the completion of the strength-based intervention by the same group of research assistants.
- Data Analysis Plan Invalid questionnaire (questionnaire with obvious logic error, or with more than 20% unanswered questions) will be excluded before put into the database. SPSS version 22.0 will be used to process data. The level of statistical significance will be set at 0.05. Q-Q plot, Skewness and Kurtosis will be used to examine the normality of continuous data. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the demographic characteristics, health status and patient-centered outcomes. The effectiveness of the intervention will be assessed based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) model will be used to estimate the intervention effect over time. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis will be conducted to examine the mediating effect of sense of coherence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants were assigned to two groups in parallel for the duration of the study. One group received usual care for diabetes patients. One group received strengths-based intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) | Experimental | Behavioral: Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO)BEYO is a group-based consultation project. Each group contains 1 facilitator, 1 assistant and 8 elderly patients. 5 weekly sessions are provided to let patients receive health knowledge, discuss problems and experiences, explore available resources and build up goals and solutions. Each session lasts for 40 minutes. Session 1 aims to build social network among group members and introduce group goals and tasks. Session 2-4 covers six topics: (i) healthy dietary, (ii) exercise and activity, (iii) taking medication, (iv) blood glucose monitoring, (v) reducing risks for complication, (vi) healthy coping with mental stress. Session 5 aims to review the process, summarize effective solutions, and set up plans for the future. |
| Routine health education | Active comparator | Other: Routine health educationTo neutralize the effect of extra attention from the facilitator, participants in control group will receive routine health education on topics related to type 2 diabetes. Contents for the routine education will be based on the national guideline of basic public health service for diabetes and specific implementation protocols in each community. Participants in control group will receive 5-weekly education packet at the same time with participants in intervention group. The patients will not be given any strengths-based information, but they are free to discuss their disease status with nurses or physicians at their regular follow-up appointments. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- A medical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes according to diagnostic criteria recommended by WHO (2006);
- Older than aged 60 years;
- Diagnosed with diabetes at least six months before the intervention;
- Residing in the community, able to read and communicate in Chinese;
- Having intact cognitive function as indicated by the Abbreviated Mental Test of score >=6;
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Presence of serious mental problem or terminal illness;
- Previously participated in similar programs;
- Visual or audio impaired.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO)The BEYO program is structured adopting solution focused therapy (SFT). The basic principles for SFT are focusing on positive change and establishing groups driven by goals rather than problems. Solutions are generated through searching for strengths, skills, resources that working in clients' lives. The common flow for structured sessions contains 7 steps: 1) Health education; 2) Discuss self-care experience and identify deficit; 3) Describe exceptions; 4) Identify the strengths; 5) Miracle question and scaling; 6) Establish the solution; 7) Action plan. | Behavioural | Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) |
| Routine health educationThe control group will receive routine health education. | Other | Routine health education |
Primary outcome
the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA)
Time frame: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks
SDSCA is a brief self-report measure for assessing levels of self-care across different components of the diabetes regimen. The new version revised by Toobert's team (2000) uses 11 items to include 6 aspects of diabetes regimen: general diet, specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking.
Short form of the sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC-13)
Time frame: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks
The SOC questionnaire was developed by Antonovsky (1987) to measure three components of sense of coherence: comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness.
the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA)
Time frame: 5 weeks after the project started
SDSCA is a brief self-report measure for assessing levels of self-care across different components of the diabetes regimen. The new version revised by Toobert's team (2000) uses 11 items to include 6 aspects of diabetes regimen: general diet, specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking.
Short form of the sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC-13)
Time frame: 5 weeks after the project started
The SOC questionnaire was developed by Antonovsky (1987) to measure three components of sense of coherence: comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness.
the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA)
Time frame: 3-month after the project ended
SDSCA is a brief self-report measure for assessing levels of self-care across different components of the diabetes regimen. The new version revised by Toobert's team (2000) uses 11 items to include 6 aspects of diabetes regimen: general diet, specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking.
Short form of the sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC-13)
Time frame: 3-month after the project ended
The SOC questionnaire was developed by Antonovsky (1987) to measure three components of sense of coherence: comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness.
3 secondary outcomes
the Chinese version of the Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (CN-ADDQoL)
Time frame: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks; 5 weeks after the project started; 3-month after the project ended
Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
Time frame: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks; 5 weeks after the project started; 3-month after the project ended
Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES)
Time frame: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks; 5 weeks after the project started, 3-month after the project ended
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Aug 2017.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yang Lei principal investigator
Chinese University of Hong Kong
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Be the Expert for Your Own (BEYO) and Routine health education in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Sense of Coherence, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) (time frame: From the date of recruitment, until the date of randomization, up to 2 weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2017.