AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationNCT03238287

Manual and Mechanical Chest Compression During In-hospital Witnessed Cardiac Arrests Using Cerebral Oximetry

A study testing Mechanical chest compression and Manuel chest compression in people with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by Eskisehir Osmangazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Post-resuscitation neurological impairment is associated with morbidity and especially with late mortality. Thus, because good neurological outcome is vital for a successful resuscitation, it is essential to have sufficient cerebral tissue perfusion and oxygenation during its application. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
What is being tested?
Mechanical chest compression and Manuel chest compression
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
16 Oct 2017to 1 Jul 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older.
  • In hospital (emergency service) witnessed cardiac arrest.
  • Cardiac arrest caused reasons other than trauma.
  • Length of sternum between 170- 303 mm (devise requirements).
  • Patients' chest width not more than 449 mm (devise requirements).
  • Informed consent of first-degree relatives of patients.

Who cannot join

  • Younger than 18 years old.
  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
  • Exposure to trauma.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Length of sternum not between 170- 303 mm (devise requirements).
  • Patients' chest width more than 449 mm (devise requirements).
  • Intracranial mass, large infarct or bleeding in the frontal part of the head (rSO2 monitoring area) which might effect the evaluation.
  • Lack of informed consent of first-degree relatives of patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical School

    Eskişehir, 26000

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Effectiveness of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With Manual and Mechanical Chest Compression Systems During In-hospital (at the Emergency Department) Witnessed Cardiac Arrests Using Cerebral Oximetry

Post-resuscitation neurological impairment is associated with morbidity and especially with late mortality. Thus, because good neurological outcome is vital for a successful resuscitation, it is essential to have sufficient cerebral tissue perfusion and oxygenation during its application. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) is used to evaluate such conditions. NIRS is a non-invasive technique which provides real-time, continuous information about regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation levels (regional SO2/rSO2). Research on NIRS has been done in many studies including cardiovascular surgery, neurosurgery and their intensive care processes and its effectiveness has been approved. However, there is limited data on its use in cardiac arrests.

As stated in the current guidelines, sufficient speed and depth of chest compressions, few interruptions of compressions are key to a successful outcome of resuscitation. The studies with the mechanical chest compression devices showed that the earlier it was applied in out-of-hospital cases, the higher the rates of survival until hospitalization. There is not sufficient number of studies on the routine use of mechanical chest compression devices for in-hospital cases. In case the application of manual resuscitation is not convenient (during patient relocation, procedure at the angiography laboratory, and rush hours of emergency services when staff might fall short), alternative methods will be required.

The aim of our study is to compare rSO2 levels measured during resuscitation with manual and mechanical devices in in-hospital (at the emergency department) witnessed cardiac arrest cases and to analyze the impact of both application method and perfusion levels on survival and neurological outcome.

Read the detailed description

The study will be a single-center, prospective and randomized study. It will be conducted at the Emergency Department of Eskisehir Osmangazi University Education, Application and Research Hospital.

Patients will be allocated to treatment groups by blocked randomization (www.randomizer.org). Advanced cardiac life support algorithm will be initiated as outlined in the current resuscitation guidelines and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) will be continued either manually or mechanically (with the chest compression system), according to the randomization scheme. Due to the nature of the interventions carried out in the study process, blinding of healthcare providers was not possible.

Before the initiation of the study, the team members participating in the study will receive theoretical and practical training on CPR, mechanical chest compression system utilization and NIRS.

Patients who develop cardiopulmonary arrest during their clinical evaluation in the emergency department will receive CPR, and the chest compression method will be determined by the senior physician according to the randomization scheme.

  1. The manual CPR group will receive chest compressions, respiratory support and medical treatment in accordance with the recommendations of current guidelines. If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved, post-resuscitation care will be provided. If ROSC is not achieved, CPR will be terminated in accordance with the recommendations of current guidelines.
  2. The patients on the mechanical chest compression group will receive manual chest compressions until the mechanical compression device is installed (about 15-20 seconds). In this time interval, thorax and sternum measurements will be evaluated for suitability for the study, and mechanical compression device will be installed on patients who are deemed suitable. The patients will receive chest compressions, respiratory support and medical treatment in accordance with the recommendations of current guidelines. If ROSC is achieved, post-resuscitation care will be provided. If ROSC is not achieved, CPR will be terminated in accordance with the recommendations of current guidelines.

The presence of ROSC or the decision to terminate CPR will be determined according to the vital signs (arterial blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation with pulse oximeter), end tidal carbon dioxide (ETco2) measurement (with the module device used for the measurement of rSO2) and cardiac assessment with bedside ultrasonography (Vivid e, General Electric Healthcare, China).

As soon as cardiopulmonary arrest is identified, sensors measuring the value of rSO2 will be placed on the patient's head bifrontally (forehead area) in order to measure the cerebral perfusion. During CPR, rSO2 values will be continuously recorded. The placement of the sensors and the measurements will be carried out by a medical staff who received necessary training prior to the study. In order not to affect the clinical decisions made during CPR, the rSO2 device will be placed in a convenient area which is out of the CPR performers' eyesight.

Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, oxygen saturation on pulse oximeter, primary arrest rhythm, any known diseases (if existent) and defibrillation attempts (if existent) will be recorded on the case report form during CPR.

In patients with ROSC, 6-hour and 24-hour survival after CPR, discharge from the hospital with favorable neurologic outcome and the presence of additional pathologies (such as heart failure and neurologic sequelae) will be evaluated. Favorable neurologic outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2. In patients with ROSC, post-resuscitation care will be provided as recommended in the current guidelines.

Being tested
Mechanical chest compression, Manuel chest compression
Keywords
Emergency, Mechanical chest compression, Cerebral oximetry
Medical subject headings
Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mechanical chest compressionDevice

    Also called LUCAS2

    In the application of advanced cardiac life support, chest compression is done with mechanical chest compression device. rSO2 measurements are used to detect the impact of the compression on brain perfusion. The application is performed in accordance with the recommendations on advanced cardiac life support in the current guidelines.

  • Manuel chest compressionOther

    In the application of advanced cardiac life support, chest compression is done with hands. rSO2 measurements are used to detect the impact of the compression on brain perfusion. The application is performed in accordance with the recommendations on advanced cardiac life support in the current guidelines

Study groups in NCT03238287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Manuel chest compressionActive comparatorIn the application of advanced cardiac life support, chest compression is done with hands. rSO2 measurements are used to detect the impact of the compression on brain perfusion. The application is performed in accordance with the recommendations on advanced cardiac life support in the current guidelines.
Receives: Other: Manuel chest compression
Mechanical chest compressionActive comparatorIn the application of advanced cardiac life support, chest compression is done with mechanical chest compression device. rSO2 measurements are used to detect the impact of the compression on brain perfusion. The application is performed in accordance with the recommendations on advanced cardiac life support in the current guidelines.
Receives: Device: Mechanical chest compression

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation level

    Comparison of regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation levels between two groups during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    Measured: 20-45 second

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Survival at the 6th hour and 24th hour after resuscitation,

    Survival at the 6th hour and 24th hour after resuscitation and evaluation of neurological outcome (cerebral performance category scale 1-2)

    Measured: 6th hour and 24th hours

  2. Hospital discharge

    Hospital discharge with good neurological outcome (cerebral performance category scale 1-2)

    Measured: 1- 30 days

  3. Additional pathology

    Evaluation of additional pathology (e.g., renal failure and cardiac failure) after resuscitation during in-hospital observation.

    Measured: 1- 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2017
  2. Study start16 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion4 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
75 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03238287
Sponsor's protocol ID
3939444
Other IDs
2016-1385
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
25 Jul 2017
Last updated
31 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participants data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.

Publications

  • Baloglu Kaya F, Acar N, Ozakin E, Canakci ME, Kuas C, Bilgin M. Comparison of manual and mechanical chest compression techniques using cerebral oximetry in witnessed cardiac arrests at the emergency department: A prospective, randomized clinical study. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jun 28.

    PubMed 33071075

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mechanical chest compression and Manuel chest compression in people with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by Eskisehir Osmangazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation level (time frame: 20-45 second). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03238287, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in