UndernutritionNCT03240094
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Nutritional Telemonitoring in Community-dwelling Elderly.
A study testing Nutritional telemonitoring in people with Undernutrition and Aging, run by Wageningen University at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
An optimal nutritional status is essential for healthy ageing. Telemonitoring might contribute to maintaining or improving nutritional status in elderly people.The objectives of this effect study are to test the feasibility and effectiveness of telemonitoring of nutritional parameters in community-dwelling older… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Undernutrition, Aging
- What is being tested?
- Nutritional telemonitoring
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 213 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 26 Feb 2016to 9 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Having a care referral for at least one of the following types of care:
- Domestic care
- Personal care
- Nursing care
- Individual or group support
- Living in a sheltered home or service flat
Who cannot join
- Severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) < 20)
- Receiving terminal care
- Not having a television at home
- Clients with a visual impairment (not able to watch the television screen)
- Clients with a physical impairment in such a way, that they are not able to use the telemonitoring system
- Clients with nursing home care
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PhysioDom Home Dietary Intake Monitoring: Telemonitoring of Nutritional Parameters and Other Outcomes in Community Dwelling Elderly People: a Process and Effect Study.
An optimal nutritional status is essential for healthy ageing. Telemonitoring might contribute to maintaining or improving nutritional status in elderly people.The objectives of this effect study are to test the feasibility and effectiveness of telemonitoring of nutritional parameters in community-dwelling older adults.
- Conditions
- Undernutrition, Aging
- Being tested
- Nutritional telemonitoring
- Keywords
- Ehealth, Older adults, Undernutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nutritional telemonitoringOther
Participants receive a weighing scale, pedometer and television channel in order to perform self measurements and receive guidance on nutrition and physical activity. Nurses use a website in order to receive telemonitoring measurements and decide about proper follow-up. In case of risk of undernutrition, nurses provide personal advice to optimize nutritional status of the participant.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional telemonitoring | Experimental | Participants in the intervention group receive a telemonitoring intervention, including self-measurements of body weight, nutritional status, appetite, diet quality, and physical activity. Additionally, participants receive guidance on nutrition and physical activity by means of customized and general television messages and/or if necessary personal guidance by a nurse. Receives: Other: Nutritional telemonitoring |
| Usual care | No intervention | Participants in the control group receive usual care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nutritional status (MNA)
Measured by Mini Nutritional Assessment
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Behavioural determinant: Knowledge
Measured with 11 knowledge statements to be answered by true/false/don't know
Measured: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Goalsetting
Measured by three items to be answered on a 5 point likert scale on a 5-point likert scale.
Measured: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Intention to eat healthy
Measured by three items to be answered on a 5 point likert scale on a 5-point likert scale.
Measured: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Intention to improve physical activity
Measured by three items to be answered on a 5 point likert scale on a 5-point likert scale.
Measured: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Self efficacy
Measured by two items to be answered on a 5 point likert scale on a 5-point likert scale.
Measured: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Perceived behavioural control
Measured by five items to be answered on a 5 point likert scale on a 5-point likert scale.
Measured: 6 months
Behavioural determinants: Attitude
Measured by 14 items to be answered on a 5 point likert scale
Measured: 6 months
Diet quality (DHD-index)
Measured by Dutch Healthy Diet index (DHD-index)
Measured: 6 months
Appetite (SNAQ)
Measured by Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Body weight (kg)
Measured by weighing scale of the brand A\&D, type UC-411PBT-C
Measured: 6 months
Physical functioning (SPPB)
Measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Measured: 6 months
Functional status (KATZ-15)
Measured by KATZ-15
Measured: 6 months
Quality of life (SF-36)
Measured by Short-Form 36
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2017
- Study start26 Feb 2016
- Primary completion9 May 2017
- Study completion9 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for UndernutritionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wageningen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Union, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Viveris Technologies SA, STMicroelectronics Grenoble 2 SAS, Sirlan Technologies SAS, Habitat Health Environment, Universite Paris 13, Meditecnologia SA, Cybermoor Ltd, Telecom Sante, Zorggroep Noordwest-Veluwe, Opella
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lisette de Groot, Professor, Study chair, Wageningen University & ResearchMarije van Doorn, MSc, Principal investigator, Wageningen University & ResearchJeanne de Vries, PhD, Principal investigator, Wageningen University & ResearchAnnemien Haveman, PhD, Principal investigator, Wageningen University & Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03240094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL53619.081.15
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
van Doorn-van Atten MN, Haveman-Nies A, Pilichowski P, Roca R, de Vries JHM, de Groot CPGM. Telemonitoring to improve nutritional status in community-dwelling elderly: design and methods for process and effect evaluation of a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0973-2.
PubMed 30445922van Doorn-van Atten MN, Haveman-Nies A, van Bakel MM, Ferry M, Franco M, de Groot LCPGM, de Vries JHM. Effects of a multi-component nutritional telemonitoring intervention on nutritional status, diet quality, physical functioning and quality of life of community-dwelling older adults. Br J Nutr. 2018 May;119(10):1185-1194. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000843.
PubMed 29759110
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PhysioDom Home Dietary Intake Monitoring: Telemonitoring of Nutritional Parameters and Other Outcomes in Community Dwelling Elderly People: a Process and Effect Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03240094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL53619.081.15
- Conditions
- Undernutrition, Aging
- Keywords
- Ehealth, Older adults, Undernutrition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wageningen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Union, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Viveris Technologies SA, STMicroelectronics Grenoble 2 SAS, Sirlan Technologies SAS, Habitat Health Environment, Universite Paris 13, Meditecnologia SA, Cybermoor Ltd, Telecom Sante, Zorggroep Noordwest-Veluwe, Opella
- Study start
- 26 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An optimal nutritional status is essential for healthy ageing. Telemonitoring might contribute to maintaining or improving nutritional status in elderly people.The objectives of this effect study are to test the feasibility and effectiveness of telemonitoring of nutritional parameters in community-dwelling older adults.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional telemonitoring | Experimental | Other: Nutritional telemonitoringParticipants in the intervention group receive a telemonitoring intervention, including self-measurements of body weight, nutritional status, appetite, diet quality, and physical activity. Additionally, participants receive guidance on nutrition and physical activity by means of customized and general television messages and/or if necessary personal guidance by a nurse. |
| Usual care | No intervention | –Participants in the control group receive usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Domestic care
- Personal care
- Nursing care
- Individual or group support
- Living in a sheltered home or service flat
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) < 20)
- Receiving terminal care
- Not having a television at home
- Clients with a visual impairment (not able to watch the television screen)
- Clients with a physical impairment in such a way, that they are not able to use the telemonitoring system
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional telemonitoringParticipants receive a weighing scale, pedometer and television channel in order to perform self measurements and receive guidance on nutrition and physical activity. Nurses use a website in order to receive telemonitoring measurements and decide about proper follow-up. In case of risk of undernutrition, nurses provide personal advice to optimize nutritional status of the participant. | Other | Nutritional telemonitoring |
Primary outcome
Nutritional status (MNA)
Time frame: 6 months
Measured by Mini Nutritional Assessment
13 secondary outcomes
Behavioural determinant: Knowledge
Time frame: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Goalsetting
Time frame: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Intention to eat healthy
Time frame: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Intention to improve physical activity
Time frame: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Self efficacy
Time frame: 6 months
Behavioural determinant: Perceived behavioural control
Time frame: 6 months
Behavioural determinants: Attitude
Time frame: 6 months
Diet quality (DHD-index)
Time frame: 6 months
Appetite (SNAQ)
Time frame: 6 months
Body weight (kg)
Time frame: 6 months
Physical functioning (SPPB)
Time frame: 6 months
Functional status (KATZ-15)
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life (SF-36)
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30445922van Doorn-van Atten MN, Haveman-Nies A, Pilichowski P, Roca R, de Vries JHM, de Groot CPGM. Telemonitoring to improve nutritional status in community-dwelling elderly: design and methods for process and effect evaluation of a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0973-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29759110van Doorn-van Atten MN, Haveman-Nies A, van Bakel MM, Ferry M, Franco M, de Groot LCPGM, de Vries JHM. Effects of a multi-component nutritional telemonitoring intervention on nutritional status, diet quality, physical functioning and quality of life of community-dwelling older adults. Br J Nutr. 2018 May;119(10):1185-1194. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000843.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Undernutrition
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Maternal Probiotic Intervention to Improve Gut Health-Trial II-Pakistan
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), Stunting
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Biomarkers in EV Associated With Marrow Adiposity in Anorexia
Anorexia Nervosa Restricting Type, Anorexia Nervosa (DSM-IV Revised Criteria)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisette de Groot, Professor study chair
Wageningen University & Research
Marije van Doorn, MSc principal investigator
Wageningen University & Research
Jeanne de Vries, PhD principal investigator
Wageningen University & Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nutritional telemonitoring in people with Undernutrition and Aging, run by Wageningen University at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nutritional status (MNA) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03240094, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2017.