Giant Cell ArteritisPhase 4NCT03244709
Tocilizumab Dose-tapering and Interruption in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis Achieving the Clinical Remission.
A Phase 4 study testing Tocilizumab in people with Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Hospital of Prato at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, has been found to have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Giant cel arteritis (GCA). Based on this rationale, several recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-IL-6 targeted monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Giant Cell Arteritis
- What is being tested?
- Tocilizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2015to 31 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All consecutive patients meeting the 1990 ACR classification criteria for GCA.
Who cannot join
- Corticosteroid treatment during the previous 6 months.
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- History of cancer within the past 5 years.
- History of frequent infections in the past.
- Positivity of screening procedures for latent tuberculosis infection.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Uncontrolled dyslipidemia at baseline.
- Known intestinal diverticulosis.
- Concomitant hematologic disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fabrizio Cantini
Prato, Tuscany, 59100
Fabrizio Cantini, MD, +393408075607, fbrzcantini@gmail.com
Carlotta Nannini, MD, +390574807578, nannini.car@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Tocilizumab Dose-tapering and Interruption in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis Achieving the Clinical Remission: a Prospective, Pilot Study.
Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, has been found to have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Giant cel arteritis (GCA). Based on this rationale, several recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-IL-6 targeted monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of patients with refractory GCA. Confirming previous reports,in a recent retrospective study the investigators successfully treated 10 patient with refractory GCA with TCZ. All patients achieved a complete disease remission evaluated by clinical, laboratory, and positron emission tomography (PET). In a considerable number of GCA patients treated with corticosteroids (CS) the therapy may be interrupted with no disease flares. No data are available on the management of patients achieving the remission with TCZ.
Read the detailed description
Study design. Open-label, prospective, pilot study on patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) resistant to corticosteroids (CS) .
Setting. Rheumatology department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy. Treatment. All refractory GCA patients with or without involvement of aorta and its thoracic branches treated with intravenous TCZ at the dose of 8 mg/Kg/monthly or subcutaneous TCZ at the dose of 162 mg/weekly who achieved a stable remission over a 6-month period should receive reduced TCZ doses with the following schedules: intravenous TCZ tapering to 2 mg/Kg/monthly with drug withdrawal at month 4, and subcutaneous TCZ monthly reduction through the lengthening of injection intervals every 2, 3 , and 4 weeks, and with drug interruption at month 4.
Primary end-point. To investigate the maintenance of clinical remission after TCZ interruption over a 6-month follow-up period.
Secondary end-points. To assess the maintenance of clinical remission during the treatment, to evaluate the role of acute-phase reactants and PET in predicting the relapse and remission, and to assess the occurrence of adverse event (AEs).
- Conditions
- Giant Cell Arteritis
- Being tested
- Tocilizumab
- Keywords
- Giant cell arteritis,, Tocilizumab, Aortitis, Remission
- Medical subject headings
- Giant Cell Arteritis, Aortitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TocilizumabDrug
Intravenous Tocilizumab followed by subcutaneousTocilizumab
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with GCA (ACR 1990 criteria) | Experimental | At diagnosis, all GCA patients with or without involvement of aorta and its thoracic branches will receive PDN 50 mg/day and TCZ 8 mg/Kg/iv monthly. In all patients PDN dose will be reduced of 10 mg every 2 weeks until interruption at week 12.
Week 12. Subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg/weekly will be administered for additional 12 weeks.
Week 24. TCZ tapering every 8 weeks as follows:
* 1 injection every 2 weeks
* 1 injection every 3 weeks
* 1 injection every 4 weeks Week 48. TCZ withdrawal. Week 72. Remission evaluation. Receives: Drug: Tocilizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The percentage of patients maintaining the off-therapy clinical remission over the follow-up as expressed by absence of GCA symptoms and signs, normal ESR and CRP values, absence of arterial wall inflammation at PET examination
ESR ≤15 mm/h; CRP ≤0.5 mg/dl; VAS pain ≤10; PET: normalized SUVmax ≤1
Measured: 6-month off-therapy period
Secondary outcomes (3)
The percentage of patients achieving and maintaining the clinical remission during the treatment with TCZ as expressed by the absence of GCA symptoms and signs, normal ESR and CRP values, absence of arterial wall inflammation at PET examination
Absence of GCA symptoms and signs, ESR ≤15 mm/h, CRP ≤0.5 mg/dL, PET: normalized SUVmax ≤1
Measured: 12 months
To compare the role of acute-phase reactants and 18F-FDG-PET in the evaluation of remission.
Linear regression analysis for the correlation between ESR and CRP values and nSUVmax at baseline and after therapy
Measured: Months 6,12,18
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0" MeDRA 12.1.
Overall AEs and serious AEs will be recorded
Measured: Month 18
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2015
- Primary completion31 Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Giant Cell ArteritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital of Prato
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fabrizio Cantini, Hospital of Prato
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03244709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hospital of Prato, Italy
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Salvarani C, Cantini F, Hunder GG. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. Lancet. 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):234-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61077-6.
PubMed 18640460Soussan M, Nicolas P, Schramm C, Katsahian S, Pop G, Fain O, Mekinian A. Management of large-vessel vasculitis with FDG-PET: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(14):e622. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000622.
PubMed 25860208Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, Klearman M, Aringer M, Blockmans D, Brouwer E, Cid MC, Dasgupta B, Rech J, Salvarani C, Schett G, Schulze-Koops H, Spiera R, Unizony SH, Collinson N. Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849.
PubMed 28745999Unizony S, Arias-Urdaneta L, Miloslavsky E, Arvikar S, Khosroshahi A, Keroack B, Stone JR, Stone JH. Tocilizumab for the treatment of large-vessel vasculitis (giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis) and polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Nov;64(11):1720-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.21750.
PubMed 22674883Loricera J, Blanco R, Hernandez JL, Castaneda S, Mera A, Perez-Pampin E, Peiro E, Humbria A, Calvo-Alen J, Aurrecoechea E, Narvaez J, Sanchez-Andrade A, Vela P, Diez E, Mata C, Lluch P, Moll C, Hernandez I, Calvo-Rio V, Ortiz-Sanjuan F, Gonzalez-Vela C, Pina T, Gonzalez-Gay MA. Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: Multicenter open-label study of 22 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Jun;44(6):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
PubMed 25697557Proven A, Gabriel SE, Orces C, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Oct 15;49(5):703-8. doi: 10.1002/art.11388.
PubMed 14558057
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tocilizumab Dose-tapering and Interruption in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis Achieving the Clinical Remission: a Prospective, Pilot Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03244709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hospital of Prato, Italy
- Conditions
- Giant Cell Arteritis
- Keywords
- Giant cell arteritis,, Tocilizumab, Aortitis, Remission
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital of PratoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, has been found to have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Giant cel arteritis (GCA). Based on this rationale, several recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-IL-6 targeted monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of patients with refractory GCA. Confirming previous reports,in a recent retrospective study the investigators successfully treated 10 patient with refractory GCA with TCZ. All patients achieved a complete disease remission evaluated by clinical, laboratory, and positron emission tomography (PET). In a considerable number of GCA patients treated with corticosteroids (CS) the therapy may be interrupted with no disease flares. No data are available on the management of patients achieving the remission with TCZ.
Detailed description
Study design. Open-label, prospective, pilot study on patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) resistant to corticosteroids (CS) .
Setting. Rheumatology department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy. Treatment. All refractory GCA patients with or without involvement of aorta and its thoracic branches treated with intravenous TCZ at the dose of 8 mg/Kg/monthly or subcutaneous TCZ at the dose of 162 mg/weekly who achieved a stable remission over a 6-month period should receive reduced TCZ doses with the following schedules: intravenous TCZ tapering to 2 mg/Kg/monthly with drug withdrawal at month 4, and subcutaneous TCZ monthly reduction through the lengthening of injection intervals every 2, 3 , and 4 weeks, and with drug interruption at month 4.
Primary end-point. To investigate the maintenance of clinical remission after TCZ interruption over a 6-month follow-up period.
Secondary end-points. To assess the maintenance of clinical remission during the treatment, to evaluate the role of acute-phase reactants and PET in predicting the relapse and remission, and to assess the occurrence of adverse event (AEs).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with GCA (ACR 1990 criteria) | Experimental | Drug: TocilizumabAt diagnosis, all GCA patients with or without involvement of aorta and its thoracic branches will receive PDN 50 mg/day and TCZ 8 mg/Kg/iv monthly. In all patients PDN dose will be reduced of 10 mg every 2 weeks until interruption at week 12. Week 12. Subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg/weekly will be administered for additional 12 weeks. Week 24. TCZ tapering every 8 weeks as follows: * 1 injection every 2 weeks * 1 injection every 3 weeks * 1 injection every 4 weeks Week 48. TCZ withdrawal. Week 72. Remission evaluation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All consecutive patients meeting the 1990 ACR classification criteria for GCA.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Corticosteroid treatment during the previous 6 months.
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- History of cancer within the past 5 years.
- History of frequent infections in the past.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TocilizumabIntravenous Tocilizumab followed by subcutaneousTocilizumab | Drug | Patients with GCA (ACR 1990 criteria) |
Primary outcome
The percentage of patients maintaining the off-therapy clinical remission over the follow-up as expressed by absence of GCA symptoms and signs, normal ESR and CRP values, absence of arterial wall inflammation at PET examination
Time frame: 6-month off-therapy period
ESR ≤15 mm/h; CRP ≤0.5 mg/dl; VAS pain ≤10; PET: normalized SUVmax ≤1
3 secondary outcomes
The percentage of patients achieving and maintaining the clinical remission during the treatment with TCZ as expressed by the absence of GCA symptoms and signs, normal ESR and CRP values, absence of arterial wall inflammation at PET examination
Time frame: 12 months
To compare the role of acute-phase reactants and 18F-FDG-PET in the evaluation of remission.
Time frame: Months 6,12,18
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0" MeDRA 12.1.
Time frame: Month 18
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2017.
- Background: PubMed 18640460Salvarani C, Cantini F, Hunder GG. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. Lancet. 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):234-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61077-6.
- Background: PubMed 25860208Soussan M, Nicolas P, Schramm C, Katsahian S, Pop G, Fain O, Mekinian A. Management of large-vessel vasculitis with FDG-PET: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(14):e622. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000622.
- Background: PubMed 28745999Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, Klearman M, Aringer M, Blockmans D, Brouwer E, Cid MC, Dasgupta B, Rech J, Salvarani C, Schett G, Schulze-Koops H, Spiera R, Unizony SH, Collinson N. Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849.
- Results publication: PubMed 22674883Unizony S, Arias-Urdaneta L, Miloslavsky E, Arvikar S, Khosroshahi A, Keroack B, Stone JR, Stone JH. Tocilizumab for the treatment of large-vessel vasculitis (giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis) and polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Nov;64(11):1720-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.21750.
- Results publication: PubMed 25697557Loricera J, Blanco R, Hernandez JL, Castaneda S, Mera A, Perez-Pampin E, Peiro E, Humbria A, Calvo-Alen J, Aurrecoechea E, Narvaez J, Sanchez-Andrade A, Vela P, Diez E, Mata C, Lluch P, Moll C, Hernandez I, Calvo-Rio V, Ortiz-Sanjuan F, Gonzalez-Vela C, Pina T, Gonzalez-Gay MA. Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: Multicenter open-label study of 22 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Jun;44(6):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 14558057Proven A, Gabriel SE, Orces C, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Oct 15;49(5):703-8. doi: 10.1002/art.11388.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Giant Cell Arteritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Aspirin for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications in Giant Cell Arteritis
Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of the Natural History, Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Idiopathic Systemic Vasculitis
Takayasu's Arteritis, Giant Cell Arteritis
RecruitingObservational study
Optic Nerve Sheath Ultrasound in Giant Cell Arteritis
Giant Cell Arteritis, Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Applanation Tonometry in GCA Pilot
Giant Cell Arteritis
RecruitingObservational study
Early Temporal Dynamics of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter After Therapy in GCA
Giant Cell Arteritis, Temporal Arteritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tocilizumab in people with Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Hospital of Prato at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The percentage of patients maintaining the off-therapy clinical remission over the follow-up as expressed by absence of GCA symptoms and signs, normal ESR and CRP values, absence of arterial wall inflammation at PET examination (time frame: 6-month off-therapy period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03244709, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2017.