AzTrials
AzTrials

Fluorescein AngiographyPhase 4NCT03244982

Fluorescein Angiography With a Full-dose Versus a Half-dose of Intravenous Fluorescein

A Phase 4 study testing Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg and Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg in people with Fluorescein Angiography, run by Kresge Eye Institute at 1 site in United States.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the eye. The standard dose of fluorescein dye used in fluorescein angiography is 500mg. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
Conditions the study is for
Fluorescein Angiography
What is being tested?
Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg and Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
79 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Apr 2018to 1 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients scheduled for fluorescein angiography at Kresge Eye Institute.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with known major profusion defects on fluorescein angiography.
  • Patients with prior adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography.
  • Patients with significant photophobia as judged by the photographer.
  • Patients with visually significant cataracts.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Kresge Eye Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Timing and Image Quality of Different Phases of Optos Fluorescein Angiography Between Two Doses of Intravenous Fluorescein: 250mg Versus 500mg

Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the eye. The standard dose of fluorescein dye used in fluorescein angiography is 500mg. It is common practice to give patients who have previously had an adverse reaction to fluorescein dye a half-dose, or 250mg, of fluorescein. It has been determined by our institution that anecdotally, there is no difference in image quality between the images created by a half-dose of fluorescein versus a full dose of fluorescein. Therefore, this study seeks to determine whether these doses are actually equivalent in terms of image quality. Patients who consent to participate in the study will be randomized to receive either a half or a full dose of intravenous fluorescein, and their images will be compared subjectively using a masked team of retinal surgeons and residents. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference between the images obtained using a half-dose versus a full dose of intravenous fluorescein.

Read the detailed description

Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the retinal and choroidal blood vessels. The most commonly seen adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography include nausea, vomiting, and urticaria. More severe reactions such as anaphylaxis are rare, occurring in only 1 of 2247 patients (0.4%) in a recent retrospective study. The standard dose of intravenous fluorescein used for fluorescein angiography is 500mg given intravenously in a 10% or 25% solution. One study from 2008 attempted to compare a 200mg dose versus a 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein, and found that 200mg produced inferior image quality. However, the quality of the cameras used for fluorescein angiography has improved significantly in the last 10 years, and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope currently used for fluorescein angiography in our clinic (Optos) is significantly more effective than the fundus camera used in the 2008 study (Topcon). The scanning laser ophthalmoscope uses a fundamentally different imaging technique than the traditional fundus camera, with a much narrower illumination source, and has been shown to be significantly more sensitive in the detection of retinal vascular leakage.

A commonly used method for preventing adverse reactions in patients who have previously had an adverse reaction to intravenous fluorescein is to use a 250mg dose instead of the standard 500mg dose, despite the lack of evidence to this effect. In our anecdotal experience, a 250mg dose of intravenous fluorescein, used in patients whom have previously experienced an adverse reaction, has produced images of equivalent quality to the images produced using a full 500mg dose. To our knowledge, no study has compared a 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein with a lower dose since the 2008 study previously mentioned, despite the advances in camera quality.

The study will aim to recruit a sample size of approximately 100 patients. Adult patients scheduled for fluorescein angiography at the Kresge Eye Institute will be recruited into the study by one of the study members if they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once a patient has consented to participate in the study, they will be randomized to receive either a 250mg or 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein with their fluorescein angiography procedure. All fluorescein angiograms will be done only if clinically indicated, and therefore the patient will not be placed at any increased risk by participating in this study. If a participant returns for a repeat fluorescein angiogram within the next four months, they will receive the dose (250mg or 500mg) which they did not receive with their previous angiogram. Patients who experience an adverse reaction during their first angiogram will be removed from the study in order to prevent a patient who had an adverse reaction with a half-dose from receiving a full-dose with a subsequent procedure. The photographer will adjust the image brightness settings in order to create the "best possible" image for each patient, and there will be no change between procedures with the 250mg and 500mg doses. A single camera (Optos) will be used for each patient in the study.

Data collection will be obtained from the patient, the imaging procedure, and the patient's electronic medical records at the Kresge Eye Institute. Information to be collected includes age, gender, race, visual acuity, and ophthalmologic medical history. The timing and quality of images at different phases of fluorescein angiography will be compared between 500mg and 250mg doses in each eye using objective and subjective measures. Subjective criteria will include grading of the images by a panel of masked retinal surgeons and residents. Grading will look at specific factors of a fluorescein angiography such as macula detail, macrovasculature, and microvasculature. These subjective criteria will then be used to determine whether any appreciable difference exists in the image quality between 250mg and 500mg doses of intravenous fluorescein given prior to Optos fluorescein angiography.

Being tested
Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg, Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg
Keywords
fluorescein, angiography

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mgDrug

    Also called AK-Fluor

    Full-dose intravenous Fluorescein Na prior to fluorescein angiography.

  • Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mgDrug

    Also called AK-Fluor

    Half-dose intravenous Fluorescein Na prior to fluorescein angiography.

Study groups in NCT03244982
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Full-DoseActive comparatorParticipants in this arm will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg pushed over several seconds one time, prior to their fluorescein angiogram. If they return for a second (clinically indicated) angiogram, they will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg pushed over several seconds one time.
Receives: Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg; Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg
Half-DoseExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg pushed over several seconds one time, prior to their fluorescein angiogram. If they return for a second (clinically indicated) angiogram, they will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg pushed over several seconds one time.
Receives: Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg; Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography performed on the same patient.

    Participants who receive two clinically-indicated fluorescein angiography procedures within the time frame of the study will receive both doses of Fluorescein Na (250mg and 500mg). These two images will then be compared to each other in terms of image quality by a team of masked retinal surgeons.

    Measured: Six months.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography among all patients enrolled in the study.

    All of the images obtained during the patient recruitment phase of the study will be evaluated subjectively in terms of image quality by a panel of masked retinal surgeons. The images will then be compared between patients to determine if there is a subjective difference in image quality between a 250mg and 500mg dose.

    Measured: One month.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2017
  2. Study start5 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion17 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Additional data may be required once preliminary data is analyzed.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either a half-dose (250mg) or a full-dose (500mg) of intravenous fluorescein prior to their angiography procedure. If they return for a second fluorescein angiography study during the proceeding four months, they will receive the dose of fluorescein (250mg or 500mg) which they did not receive during their first study. Images will be evaluated subjectively by a masked panel of retinal surgeons for image quality, and image quality will be compared between images that are full dose and images that are half dose.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
79 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03244982
Sponsor's protocol ID
23897543
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
7 Aug 2017
Last updated
16 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Xu K, Tzankova V, Li C, Sharma S. Intravenous fluorescein angiography-associated adverse reactions. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;51(5):321-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

    PubMed 27769320
  • Moosbrugger KA, Sheidow TG. Evaluation of the side effects and image quality during fluorescein angiography comparing 2 mL and 5 mL sodium fluorescein. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;43(5):571-5. doi: 10.3129/i08-122.

    PubMed 18982034
  • Nicholson BP, Nigam D, Miller D, Agron E, Dalal M, Jacobs-El N, da Rocha Lima B, Cunningham D, Nussenblatt R, Sen HN. Comparison of wide-field fluorescein angiography and 9-field montage angiography in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;157(3):673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

    PubMed 24321475

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg and Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg in people with Fluorescein Angiography, run by Kresge Eye Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography performed on the same patient. (time frame: Six months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03244982, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in