Fluorescein AngiographyPhase 4NCT03244982
Fluorescein Angiography With a Full-dose Versus a Half-dose of Intravenous Fluorescein
A Phase 4 study testing Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg and Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg in people with Fluorescein Angiography, run by Kresge Eye Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the eye. The standard dose of fluorescein dye used in fluorescein angiography is 500mg. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fluorescein Angiography
- What is being tested?
- Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg and Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 79 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Apr 2018to 1 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients scheduled for fluorescein angiography at Kresge Eye Institute.
Who cannot join
- Patients with known major profusion defects on fluorescein angiography.
- Patients with prior adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography.
- Patients with significant photophobia as judged by the photographer.
- Patients with visually significant cataracts.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Timing and Image Quality of Different Phases of Optos Fluorescein Angiography Between Two Doses of Intravenous Fluorescein: 250mg Versus 500mg
Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the eye. The standard dose of fluorescein dye used in fluorescein angiography is 500mg. It is common practice to give patients who have previously had an adverse reaction to fluorescein dye a half-dose, or 250mg, of fluorescein. It has been determined by our institution that anecdotally, there is no difference in image quality between the images created by a half-dose of fluorescein versus a full dose of fluorescein. Therefore, this study seeks to determine whether these doses are actually equivalent in terms of image quality. Patients who consent to participate in the study will be randomized to receive either a half or a full dose of intravenous fluorescein, and their images will be compared subjectively using a masked team of retinal surgeons and residents. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference between the images obtained using a half-dose versus a full dose of intravenous fluorescein.
Read the detailed description
Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the retinal and choroidal blood vessels. The most commonly seen adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography include nausea, vomiting, and urticaria. More severe reactions such as anaphylaxis are rare, occurring in only 1 of 2247 patients (0.4%) in a recent retrospective study. The standard dose of intravenous fluorescein used for fluorescein angiography is 500mg given intravenously in a 10% or 25% solution. One study from 2008 attempted to compare a 200mg dose versus a 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein, and found that 200mg produced inferior image quality. However, the quality of the cameras used for fluorescein angiography has improved significantly in the last 10 years, and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope currently used for fluorescein angiography in our clinic (Optos) is significantly more effective than the fundus camera used in the 2008 study (Topcon). The scanning laser ophthalmoscope uses a fundamentally different imaging technique than the traditional fundus camera, with a much narrower illumination source, and has been shown to be significantly more sensitive in the detection of retinal vascular leakage.
A commonly used method for preventing adverse reactions in patients who have previously had an adverse reaction to intravenous fluorescein is to use a 250mg dose instead of the standard 500mg dose, despite the lack of evidence to this effect. In our anecdotal experience, a 250mg dose of intravenous fluorescein, used in patients whom have previously experienced an adverse reaction, has produced images of equivalent quality to the images produced using a full 500mg dose. To our knowledge, no study has compared a 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein with a lower dose since the 2008 study previously mentioned, despite the advances in camera quality.
The study will aim to recruit a sample size of approximately 100 patients. Adult patients scheduled for fluorescein angiography at the Kresge Eye Institute will be recruited into the study by one of the study members if they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once a patient has consented to participate in the study, they will be randomized to receive either a 250mg or 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein with their fluorescein angiography procedure. All fluorescein angiograms will be done only if clinically indicated, and therefore the patient will not be placed at any increased risk by participating in this study. If a participant returns for a repeat fluorescein angiogram within the next four months, they will receive the dose (250mg or 500mg) which they did not receive with their previous angiogram. Patients who experience an adverse reaction during their first angiogram will be removed from the study in order to prevent a patient who had an adverse reaction with a half-dose from receiving a full-dose with a subsequent procedure. The photographer will adjust the image brightness settings in order to create the "best possible" image for each patient, and there will be no change between procedures with the 250mg and 500mg doses. A single camera (Optos) will be used for each patient in the study.
Data collection will be obtained from the patient, the imaging procedure, and the patient's electronic medical records at the Kresge Eye Institute. Information to be collected includes age, gender, race, visual acuity, and ophthalmologic medical history. The timing and quality of images at different phases of fluorescein angiography will be compared between 500mg and 250mg doses in each eye using objective and subjective measures. Subjective criteria will include grading of the images by a panel of masked retinal surgeons and residents. Grading will look at specific factors of a fluorescein angiography such as macula detail, macrovasculature, and microvasculature. These subjective criteria will then be used to determine whether any appreciable difference exists in the image quality between 250mg and 500mg doses of intravenous fluorescein given prior to Optos fluorescein angiography.
- Conditions
- Fluorescein Angiography
- Being tested
- Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg, Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg
- Keywords
- fluorescein, angiography
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mgDrug
Also called AK-Fluor
Full-dose intravenous Fluorescein Na prior to fluorescein angiography.
Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mgDrug
Also called AK-Fluor
Half-dose intravenous Fluorescein Na prior to fluorescein angiography.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Full-Dose | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg pushed over several seconds one time, prior to their fluorescein angiogram. If they return for a second (clinically indicated) angiogram, they will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg pushed over several seconds one time. Receives: Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg; Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg |
| Half-Dose | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg pushed over several seconds one time, prior to their fluorescein angiogram. If they return for a second (clinically indicated) angiogram, they will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg pushed over several seconds one time. Receives: Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg; Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography performed on the same patient.
Participants who receive two clinically-indicated fluorescein angiography procedures within the time frame of the study will receive both doses of Fluorescein Na (250mg and 500mg). These two images will then be compared to each other in terms of image quality by a team of masked retinal surgeons.
Measured: Six months.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography among all patients enrolled in the study.
All of the images obtained during the patient recruitment phase of the study will be evaluated subjectively in terms of image quality by a panel of masked retinal surgeons. The images will then be compared between patients to determine if there is a subjective difference in image quality between a 250mg and 500mg dose.
Measured: One month.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2017
- Study start5 Apr 2018
- Primary completion17 Jul 2019
- Study completion1 Dec 2020 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Additional data may be required once preliminary data is analyzed.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fluorescein AngiographyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either a half-dose (250mg) or a full-dose (500mg) of intravenous fluorescein prior to their angiography procedure. If they return for a second fluorescein angiography study during the proceeding four months, they will receive the dose of fluorescein (250mg or 500mg) which they did not receive during their first study. Images will be evaluated subjectively by a masked panel of retinal surgeons for image quality, and image quality will be compared between images that are full dose and images that are half dose.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kresge Eye Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gary W Abrams, MD, Principal investigator, Kresge Eye Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03244982
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23897543
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Xu K, Tzankova V, Li C, Sharma S. Intravenous fluorescein angiography-associated adverse reactions. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;51(5):321-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
PubMed 27769320Moosbrugger KA, Sheidow TG. Evaluation of the side effects and image quality during fluorescein angiography comparing 2 mL and 5 mL sodium fluorescein. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;43(5):571-5. doi: 10.3129/i08-122.
PubMed 18982034Nicholson BP, Nigam D, Miller D, Agron E, Dalal M, Jacobs-El N, da Rocha Lima B, Cunningham D, Nussenblatt R, Sen HN. Comparison of wide-field fluorescein angiography and 9-field montage angiography in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;157(3):673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
PubMed 24321475
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Timing and Image Quality of Different Phases of Optos Fluorescein Angiography Between Two Doses of Intravenous Fluorescein: 250mg Versus 500mg
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03244982
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 23897543
- Conditions
- Fluorescein Angiography
- Keywords
- fluorescein, angiography
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- SuspendedReason stopped: Additional data may be required once preliminary data is analyzed.
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kresge Eye InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the eye. The standard dose of fluorescein dye used in fluorescein angiography is 500mg. It is common practice to give patients who have previously had an adverse reaction to fluorescein dye a half-dose, or 250mg, of fluorescein. It has been determined by our institution that anecdotally, there is no difference in image quality between the images created by a half-dose of fluorescein versus a full dose of fluorescein. Therefore, this study seeks to determine whether these doses are actually equivalent in terms of image quality. Patients who consent to participate in the study will be randomized to receive either a half or a full dose of intravenous fluorescein, and their images will be compared subjectively using a masked team of retinal surgeons and residents. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference between the images obtained using a half-dose versus a full dose of intravenous fluorescein.
Detailed description
Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the retinal and choroidal blood vessels. The most commonly seen adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography include nausea, vomiting, and urticaria. More severe reactions such as anaphylaxis are rare, occurring in only 1 of 2247 patients (0.4%) in a recent retrospective study. The standard dose of intravenous fluorescein used for fluorescein angiography is 500mg given intravenously in a 10% or 25% solution. One study from 2008 attempted to compare a 200mg dose versus a 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein, and found that 200mg produced inferior image quality. However, the quality of the cameras used for fluorescein angiography has improved significantly in the last 10 years, and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope currently used for fluorescein angiography in our clinic (Optos) is significantly more effective than the fundus camera used in the 2008 study (Topcon). The scanning laser ophthalmoscope uses a fundamentally different imaging technique than the traditional fundus camera, with a much narrower illumination source, and has been shown to be significantly more sensitive in the detection of retinal vascular leakage.
A commonly used method for preventing adverse reactions in patients who have previously had an adverse reaction to intravenous fluorescein is to use a 250mg dose instead of the standard 500mg dose, despite the lack of evidence to this effect. In our anecdotal experience, a 250mg dose of intravenous fluorescein, used in patients whom have previously experienced an adverse reaction, has produced images of equivalent quality to the images produced using a full 500mg dose. To our knowledge, no study has compared a 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein with a lower dose since the 2008 study previously mentioned, despite the advances in camera quality.
The study will aim to recruit a sample size of approximately 100 patients. Adult patients scheduled for fluorescein angiography at the Kresge Eye Institute will be recruited into the study by one of the study members if they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once a patient has consented to participate in the study, they will be randomized to receive either a 250mg or 500mg dose of intravenous fluorescein with their fluorescein angiography procedure. All fluorescein angiograms will be done only if clinically indicated, and therefore the patient will not be placed at any increased risk by participating in this study. If a participant returns for a repeat fluorescein angiogram within the next four months, they will receive the dose (250mg or 500mg) which they did not receive with their previous angiogram. Patients who experience an adverse reaction during their first angiogram will be removed from the study in order to prevent a patient who had an adverse reaction with a half-dose from receiving a full-dose with a subsequent procedure. The photographer will adjust the image brightness settings in order to create the "best possible" image for each patient, and there will be no change between procedures with the 250mg and 500mg doses. A single camera (Optos) will be used for each patient in the study.
Data collection will be obtained from the patient, the imaging procedure, and the patient's electronic medical records at the Kresge Eye Institute. Information to be collected includes age, gender, race, visual acuity, and ophthalmologic medical history. The timing and quality of images at different phases of fluorescein angiography will be compared between 500mg and 250mg doses in each eye using objective and subjective measures. Subjective criteria will include grading of the images by a panel of masked retinal surgeons and residents. Grading will look at specific factors of a fluorescein angiography such as macula detail, macrovasculature, and microvasculature. These subjective criteria will then be used to determine whether any appreciable difference exists in the image quality between 250mg and 500mg doses of intravenous fluorescein given prior to Optos fluorescein angiography.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either a half-dose (250mg) or a full-dose (500mg) of intravenous fluorescein prior to their angiography procedure. If they return for a second fluorescein angiography study during the proceeding four months, they will receive the dose of fluorescein (250mg or 500mg) which they did not receive during their first study. Images will be evaluated subjectively by a masked panel of retinal surgeons for image quality, and image quality will be compared between images that are full dose and images that are half dose.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Full-Dose | Active comparator | Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg, Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mgParticipants in this arm will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg pushed over several seconds one time, prior to their fluorescein angiogram. If they return for a second (clinically indicated) angiogram, they will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg pushed over several seconds one time. |
| Half-Dose | Experimental | Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg, Drug: Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mgParticipants in this arm will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg pushed over several seconds one time, prior to their fluorescein angiogram. If they return for a second (clinically indicated) angiogram, they will receive Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg pushed over several seconds one time. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients scheduled for fluorescein angiography at Kresge Eye Institute.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with known major profusion defects on fluorescein angiography.
- Patients with prior adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography.
- Patients with significant photophobia as judged by the photographer.
- Patients with visually significant cataracts.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mgAlso: AK-FluorFull-dose intravenous Fluorescein Na prior to fluorescein angiography. | Drug | Full-Dose, Half-Dose |
| Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mgAlso: AK-FluorHalf-dose intravenous Fluorescein Na prior to fluorescein angiography. | Drug | Full-Dose, Half-Dose |
Primary outcome
Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography performed on the same patient.
Time frame: Six months.
Participants who receive two clinically-indicated fluorescein angiography procedures within the time frame of the study will receive both doses of Fluorescein Na (250mg and 500mg). These two images will then be compared to each other in terms of image quality by a team of masked retinal surgeons.
1 secondary outcome
Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography among all patients enrolled in the study.
Time frame: One month.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 27769320Xu K, Tzankova V, Li C, Sharma S. Intravenous fluorescein angiography-associated adverse reactions. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;51(5):321-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
- Background: PubMed 18982034Moosbrugger KA, Sheidow TG. Evaluation of the side effects and image quality during fluorescein angiography comparing 2 mL and 5 mL sodium fluorescein. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;43(5):571-5. doi: 10.3129/i08-122.
- Background: PubMed 24321475Nicholson BP, Nigam D, Miller D, Agron E, Dalal M, Jacobs-El N, da Rocha Lima B, Cunningham D, Nussenblatt R, Sen HN. Comparison of wide-field fluorescein angiography and 9-field montage angiography in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;157(3):673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fluorescein Angiography
Active, not recruiting
Prevention of Onset and Transition to an Advanced Form of Diabetic Retinopathy in Children
Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Feasibility and Safety of MB-102 in Ocular Angiography as Compared to Fluorescein Sodium
Retinopathy, Retinal Vein Occlusion
Not yet recruiting
Fluorescein Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B
RecruitingObservational study
Visual Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis
Giant Cell Arteritis, Visual Impairment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gary W Abrams, MD principal investigator
Kresge Eye Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 500mg and Fluorescein Na 10% Inj 250mg in people with Fluorescein Angiography, run by Kresge Eye Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography performed on the same patient. (time frame: Six months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03244982, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2020.