Liver DiseasesBLOCSNCT03245580
Benign Liver Optimal Core Study (Tissue Acquisition Comparison in Benign Liver Disease)
A study testing Core Liver Biopsy in people with Liver Diseases, run by Parkview Health at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this prospective, randomized, multicenter study is to evaluate and compare the amount and quality of tissue samples yielded in a liver biopsy comparing 2 different techniques of EUS guided CORE liver biopsy for benign disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Core Liver Biopsy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 153 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Mar 2018to 15 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects that plan to undergo a liver biopsy via EUS to confirm possible underlying liver disease or to determine stage, grade and presence of fibrosis for suspected benign etiology.
- History of abnormal LFTs
- Documented history of chronic liver disease
- Question of underlying liver disease as cause of abnormal imaging or symptoms which may be attributed to liver disorder
- Fatty liver disease
- Subjects 18 years of age or older
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subject must be able to hold anticoagulants as per institutional standard of care
- Subjects must be deemed physically able to undergo anesthesia. This includes either Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) or general anesthesia.
- Subjects (or the subjects Legally Authorized Representative [LAR]) that have agreed to participate in the study and have signed Informed Consent
- Women of child bearing potential who are not pregnant as proven by a negative pregnancy test may be included.
Who cannot join
- Subjects that are unable to tolerate anesthesia for the procedure
- Subjects 17 or under
- Subjects whose anticoagulants cannot be held
- Subjects who cannot have or refuse EUS guided procedure
- Subjects who are pregnant
- INR >1.5
Show all 11Show fewer
- Platelets 50,000 or less
- Subjects requiring control of bleeding on initial upper endoscopy
- Subjects requiring endoscopic mucosal resection
- Subjects with large volume ascites
- Subjects requiring pancreatic biopsies
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Parkview Regional Medical Center
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46845
Baylor Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University South Alabama
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Oschner Health System
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Santa CLara Valley Medical Center
San Jose, California, 95128
About this study
Official title: Comparison of 2 Techniques Using EUS Guided Liver Biopsies Via 19g CORE Biopsy Needle to Obtain Optimal Core Liver Biopsies in Benign Disease
The primary purpose of this prospective, randomized, multicenter study is to evaluate and compare the amount and quality of tissue samples yielded in a liver biopsy comparing 2 different techniques of EUS guided CORE liver biopsy for benign disease. The two techniques: "modified Wet suction" and "Slow pull" technique of collecting tissue from a liver biopsy via Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS).
Read the detailed description
Each subject will have a biopsy performed via one of 2 different techniques: "modified wet suction", or "slow pull" technique. A randomization process will determine which technique. Each subject shall undergo 2 passes (2 cores of tissue will be obtained - ideally from the right and left lobe of the liver.
Quality of tissue obtained via the 2 different techniques will be evaluated by number of fragments, length of specimens and number of tracts observed by the local pathologist and compared between the tissues obtained from the two techniques. .
- Conditions
- Liver Diseases
- Being tested
- Core Liver Biopsy
- Medical subject headings
- Liver Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Core Liver BiopsyDiagnostic test
Diagnostic EUS examination followed by liver biopsy to obtain core sample in benign liver disease.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 -modified wet suction | Other | Intervention:Procedure Core Liver Biopsy Technique: Modified Wet Suction Receives: Diagnostic Test: Core Liver Biopsy |
| Arm 2- Slow Pull | Other | Intervention: Procedure Core Liver Biopsy Technique: Slow Pull Receives: Diagnostic Test: Core Liver Biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pathological Yield Fragmentation
To determine if there is a significant difference in pathological yield as determined by fragmentation of portal tracts of the biopsy sample between a "modified wet suction," and "slow pull" techniques in obtaining CORE of histologic tissue. Pathological yield will be measured by assessment of portal tracts fragmentation by designated pathologists with experience in liver biopsy specimens.
Measured: At day 7 post biopsy
Pathological Yield Length
To determine if there is a significant difference in pathological yield as determined by length of portal tracts of the biopsy sample between a "modified wet suction," and "slow pull" techniques in obtaining CORE of histologic tissue. Length of portal tracts will be measured in mm by designated pathologists with experience in liver biopsy assessment techniques.
Measured: At time of completion of pathology report
Pathological Yield Quantity
To determine if there is a significant difference in pathological yield as determined by number of portal tracts of the biopsy sample between a "modified wet suction," and "slow pull" techniques in obtaining CORE of histologic tissue. The number of portal tracts will be assesses and tallied by designated pathologists with experience in the assessment of liver biopsies.
Measured: At time of completion of pathology report
Secondary outcomes (1)
Complications
Tracking any complications that may be associated with each technique. Complications will be assessed and tracked following CTCAE V4.
Measured: Complications occurring at time of consent, at procedure time and at day 7 post procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2017
- Study start8 Mar 2018
- Primary completion15 Sep 2020
- Study completion15 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Liver DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- prospective, randomized, multicenter study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Parkview Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Neil Sharma, M.D., Parkview Health
- Investigators
- Neil R Sharma, MD, Principal investigator, parkview cancer institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03245580
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRC17-0714
- Acronym
- BLOCS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of 2 Techniques Using EUS Guided Liver Biopsies Via 19g CORE Biopsy Needle to Obtain Optimal Core Liver Biopsies in Benign Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03245580
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BLOCS / PRC17-0714
- Conditions
- Liver Diseases
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Parkview HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 7 Apr 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this prospective, randomized, multicenter study is to evaluate and compare the amount and quality of tissue samples yielded in a liver biopsy comparing 2 different techniques of EUS guided CORE liver biopsy for benign disease. The two techniques: "modified Wet suction" and "Slow pull" technique of collecting tissue from a liver biopsy via Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS).
Detailed description
Each subject will have a biopsy performed via one of 2 different techniques: "modified wet suction", or "slow pull" technique. A randomization process will determine which technique. Each subject shall undergo 2 passes (2 cores of tissue will be obtained - ideally from the right and left lobe of the liver.
Quality of tissue obtained via the 2 different techniques will be evaluated by number of fragments, length of specimens and number of tracts observed by the local pathologist and compared between the tissues obtained from the two techniques. .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- prospective, randomized, multicenter study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 -modified wet suction | Other | Diagnostic Test: Core Liver BiopsyIntervention:Procedure Core Liver Biopsy Technique: Modified Wet Suction |
| Arm 2- Slow Pull | Other | Diagnostic Test: Core Liver BiopsyIntervention: Procedure Core Liver Biopsy Technique: Slow Pull |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Subjects that plan to undergo a liver biopsy via EUS to confirm possible underlying liver disease or to determine stage, grade and presence of fibrosis for suspected benign etiology.
- History of abnormal LFTs
- Documented history of chronic liver disease
- Question of underlying liver disease as cause of abnormal imaging or symptoms which may be attributed to liver disorder
- Fatty liver disease
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Subjects that are unable to tolerate anesthesia for the procedure
- Subjects 17 or under
- Subjects whose anticoagulants cannot be held
- Subjects who cannot have or refuse EUS guided procedure
- Subjects who are pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Core Liver BiopsyDiagnostic EUS examination followed by liver biopsy to obtain core sample in benign liver disease. | Diagnostic test | Arm 1 -modified wet suction, Arm 2- Slow Pull |
Primary outcome
Pathological Yield Fragmentation
Time frame: At day 7 post biopsy
To determine if there is a significant difference in pathological yield as determined by fragmentation of portal tracts of the biopsy sample between a "modified wet suction," and "slow pull" techniques in obtaining CORE of histologic tissue. Pathological yield will be measured by assessment of portal tracts fragmentation by designated pathologists with experience in liver biopsy specimens.
Pathological Yield Length
Time frame: At time of completion of pathology report
To determine if there is a significant difference in pathological yield as determined by length of portal tracts of the biopsy sample between a "modified wet suction," and "slow pull" techniques in obtaining CORE of histologic tissue. Length of portal tracts will be measured in mm by designated pathologists with experience in liver biopsy assessment techniques.
Pathological Yield Quantity
Time frame: At time of completion of pathology report
To determine if there is a significant difference in pathological yield as determined by number of portal tracts of the biopsy sample between a "modified wet suction," and "slow pull" techniques in obtaining CORE of histologic tissue. The number of portal tracts will be assesses and tallied by designated pathologists with experience in the assessment of liver biopsies.
1 secondary outcome
Complications
Time frame: Complications occurring at time of consent, at procedure time and at day 7 post procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Liver Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension
Cystic Fibrosis, Immunologic Deficiency Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Unraveling the Mechanisms Underlying Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Through a Multidisciplinary, Integrative Research Approach
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prevalence and Development of Liver Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Meal Macronutrients on Postprandial Lipids
Nephrotic Syndrome, Lipodystrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Neil R Sharma, MD principal investigator
parkview cancer institute
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Core Liver Biopsy in people with Liver Diseases, run by Parkview Health at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pathological Yield Fragmentation (time frame: At day 7 post biopsy). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.