AzTrials
AzTrials

Obesity, ChildhoodNCT03245775

A Trial of Two Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programs

A study testing iChoose and Family Connections in people with Obesity, Childhood, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim is to determine the relative effectiveness in child BMI z-scores at 3, 6, and 12-months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections. Secondary aims are to determine (1) ongoing reach, fidelity, and implementation costs, (2) community capacity for implementation and sustainability, (3) relative… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Obesity, Childhood
What is being tested?
iChoose and Family Connections
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
267 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2017to 30 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Parent/child dyads will be eligible for participation if they reside in the Dan River Region
  • English speaking
  • child with a BMI percentile ranking of 85 or higher
  • Cohort 3 age eligibility changed from 8-12 to 5-15

Who cannot join

  • children with a major cognitive impairment and parents or children with a medical contraindication for moderate physical activity.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908-0717

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized-controlled Trial to Compare the Reach, Effectiveness and Maintenance of Two Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programs in a Medically Underserved Region

The primary aim is to determine the relative effectiveness in child BMI z-scores at 3, 6, and 12-months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections. Secondary aims are to determine (1) ongoing reach, fidelity, and implementation costs, (2) community capacity for implementation and sustainability, (3) relative impact on family eating/physical activity and parental weight, and (4) relative adherence and potential dose response relationships.

Read the detailed description

In partnership with the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team, with a goal to improve the magnitude of weight reductions and increase the likelihood of iChoose sustainability in the community, the investigators propose to test iChoose+ that will (1) extend iChoose to a 6-month program, followed by 12 bi-weekly maintenance telephone calls, congruent with the 12-month Bright Bodies program duration, (2) formalize a Parent Health Advisory model of previous iChoose families to serve as a 'peer support safety net' for new program participants, and (3) deliver support calls using interactive voice response (IVR) automation to reduce the burden on community stakeholder implementation. When reflecting on and interpreting the outcomes of the previous planning grant, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team also identified the need to use a study design that allowed all participants the opportunity to benefit and, with this in mind, to test alternative family-based childhood obesity program options that improve reach within the broad Dan River Region population of minority, low-income, and geographically dispersed families. Thus, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team returned to a potential option for delivery that was considered earlier in the planning grant process and was rated highly for scalability- Family Connections, an adaptation of Golan's Home Environmental Change model that focuses exclusively on parents as the agents of change. When compared to iChoose+ (12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months), Family Connections has fewer sessions and fewer IVR support calls over a shorter period of time (2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months), delivers intervention to parents only, and promotes physical activity, but does not include structured exercise sessions. Still, in previous studies Family Connections led to significant reductions in child weight status, though smaller in magnitude than Bright Bodies, that were sustained 6-month post intervention completion. Committed to the goal of allowing all participating families an opportunity to benefit from study participation and the need for a sustainable family-based childhood obesity option, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team propose a comparative effectiveness trial where eligible families will be randomly assigned to: (1) iChoose+ (n=87) or to (2) Family Connections (n=87). Given the need to optimize program enrollment, participation, and retention in each program, both iChoose+ and Family Connections will include Parent Health Advisor support63-68 as refined by the Parent Advisory Team. The primary aim is to determine the relative changes in child BMI z-scores at 6 months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections, though additional assessments will occur at 3 and 12 months post baseline. Secondary aims include (1) determine ongoing reach, fidelity, and costs of implementation, (2) assess community capacity to implement and sustain childhood obesity programs, (3) determine impact on family eating and physical activity and parental weight by intervention, and (4) assess the adherence by intervention and potential dose response relationships. The primary study hypotheses are: (a) children in both conditions will reduce BMI-z scores significantly, when compared to baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months, but iChoose+ reductions will be significantly larger than Family Connections, (b) reach-the sample will be representative of the eligible regional population on demographic and behavioral factors, (c) implementation-the intervention components will be delivered with high fidelity in both conditions, but costs will be lower for Family Connections, (d) maintenance-a sustainability action plan will be completed to include strategies for continued delivery of iChoose+ and/or Family Connections (outcome dependent), (e) parent weight, parent/child behaviors, \& tertiary outcomes that follow the same patterns as BMI z-scores, and (f), community capacity for implementing and sustaining a locally relevant FBCO treatment and maintenance program will remain high over time.

Being tested
iChoose, Family Connections
Keywords
health disparities, community-based participatory research
Medical subject headings
Pediatric Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • iChooseBehavioural

    12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only

  • Family ConnectionsBehavioural

    2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only

Study groups in NCT03245775
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
iChooseExperimental12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only
Receives: Behavioral: iChoose
Family ConnectionsExperimental2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only
Receives: Behavioral: Family Connections

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Child Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score at 6 Months

    child BMI is converted to a BMI Z score which uses a standardized distribution. A BMI z score of 0 indicates an average BMI for the childs height, weight, age, and gender. Positive z-scores indicate the number of standard deviations above the norm, while negative numbers indicate the number of standard deviations below the norm. Higher z scores indicate a greater BMI status for the child. The primary outcome is a change score, or the difference between the 6 month BMI z-score and the Baseline BMI z-score. A negative score will indicate BMI z score status reductions and is a positive finding.

    Measured: Baseline and 6-months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change From Baseline of Parent Body Mass Index (BMI) at 6 Months

    BMI is the persons weight divided by the square of their height. BMI categories help to classify individuals as underweight (less than 18.5), normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), and obese (30 or higher). Parent BMI change scores are the difference between the 6 month calculated BMI and the Baseline BMI. Negative scores indicate improvement in BMI status over this 6 month period.

    Measured: Baseline and 6-months

  2. Change From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory for Children Score at 6 Months

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory is a 23-item instruments that assesses four domains of health (physical, emotional, social, and school functioning). Scoring is reported as a percent (0-100), higher scores indicate better health related quality of life. The change score is calculated as the difference between the 6 month and baseline scores. A positive difference is considered an improvement in quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 6-months

  3. Change From Baseline in the Healthy Days Core Module for Parents at 6 Months

    The Healthy Days Core Module is a measure of quality of life through self reports of the total number of physical and mental health "sick days" (e.g., unable to do daily activities) in the past month. Higher scores indicate more unhealthy days, or lower quality of life. Change scores are calculated as the difference between 6 month and baseline scores. A negative change score indicates a decrease in unhealthy days and thereby and increase in quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 6-months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
267 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03245775
Sponsor's protocol ID
19748
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
7 Aug 2017
Last updated
28 Jun 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zoellner JM, You W, Hill JL, Brock DP, Yuhas M, Alexander RC, Price B, Estabrooks PA. A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region: Rationale, design & methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Sep;84:105801. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

    PubMed 31260792

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing iChoose and Family Connections in people with Obesity, Childhood, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Child Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score at 6 Months (time frame: Baseline and 6-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03245775, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in