Colorectal NeoplasmsPhase 2CRC-PIPACNCT03246321
PIPAC for Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing repetitive ePIPAC-OX in people with Colorectal Neoplasms and Peritoneal Neoplasms, run by Koen Rovers at 2 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
This is multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II study that investigates the feasibility, safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, costs, and pharmacokinetics or repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC-OX) as a palliative monotherapy for patients with isolated… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Appendiceal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- repetitive ePIPAC-OX
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2017to 1 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligible patients are adults who have:
- a World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status of ≤1;
- histological or cytological proof of PM of a colorectal or appendiceal carcinoma;
- unresectable disease determined by abdominal computed tomography (CT) and a diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy;
- adequate organ functions (haemoglobin ≥5.0 mmol/L, neutrophils ≥1.5 x 109/L, platelets ≥100 x 109/L, serum creatinine <1.5 x ULN, creatinine clearance ≥30 ml/min, and liver transaminases <5 x ULN);
- no symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction;
- no radiological evidence of systemic metastases;
- no contraindications for oxaliplatin or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin;
- no contraindications for a laparoscopy;
- no previous PIPAC-procedures.
Enrolled patients are excluded from the analyses in case they did not receive a first ePIPAC-OX, e.g.:
- due to systemic metastases on baseline thoracoabdominal CT, or;
- due to non-access during first ePIPAC-OX, or;
- due to resectable disease during first ePIPAC-OX.
Importantly, enrolment is allowed for patients with an unresected primary tumour (if asymptomatic) and for patients in various lines of palliative treatment, including patients who refuse, have not had, or do not qualify for first-line palliative systemic therapy. All potentially eligible patients are discussed by a multidisciplinary team. Enrolled patients are informed about the potential consequences of postponing or discontinuing standard palliative treatment by a medical oncologist prior to enrolment.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands2 sites
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven
St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein
About this study
Official title: Repetitive Electrostatic Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) as a Palliative Monotherapy for Isolated Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Protocol of a Multicentre, Open-label, Single-arm, Phase II Study (CRC-PIPAC)
This is multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II study that investigates the feasibility, safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, costs, and pharmacokinetics or repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC-OX) as a palliative monotherapy for patients with isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) is offered as a palliative treatment option for patients with isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in several centres worldwide. However, little is known about its feasibility, safety, tolerability, efficacy, costs, and pharmacokinetics in this setting.
Objectives: to prospectively explore the feasibility, safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, costs, and pharmacokinetic profile of repetitive ePIPAC-OX as a palliative monotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal PM under controlled circumstances.
Study design: multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study.
Setting: two Dutch tertiary referral hospitals for the surgical treatment of colorectal PM.
Study population: adults who have a World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ functions, histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable PM of a colorectal or appendiceal carcinoma, no systemic metastases, no symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction, no contraindications for the planned intervention, and no previous pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).
Intervention: instead of standard palliative treatment, enrolled patients receive laparoscopy-controlled ePIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2 body-surface area [BSA]) with intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2 BSA) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 BSA) every six weeks. Four weeks after each procedure, patients undergo clinical, radiological, and biochemical evaluation. ePIPAC-OX is repeated until clinical, radiological, or macroscopic disease progression, after which standard palliative treatment is (re)introduced.
Outcomes: the primary outcome is the number of patients with major toxicity (grade ≥3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0) up to four weeks after the last procedure. Secondary outcomes are the environmental safety of ePIPAC-OX, procedure-related characteristics, the number of procedures in each patient and reasons for discontinuation, minor toxicity, organ-specific toxicity, postoperative complications, hospital stay, readmissions, quality of life, costs, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the radiological, histopathological, cytological, biochemical, and macroscopic tumour response. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry is used to measure concentrations of oxaliplatin in plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, urine, ascites, PM, and normal peritoneum during and after ePIPAC-OX.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Appendiceal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Being tested
- repetitive ePIPAC-OX
- Keywords
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Intraperitoneal Injections, Laparoscopy, Aerosols, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion, Antineoplastic Agents, Leucovorin, Fluorouracil, Platinum, Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Disease-free survival, Survival, Mortality, Quality of Life, Costs and Cost Analysis, Translational Medical Research, Clinical Trials, Phase II as topic
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Appendiceal Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Cecal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
repetitive ePIPAC-OXCombination product
Instead of standard palliative treatment, enrolled patients receive laparoscopy-controlled electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) (92 mg/m2 body-surface area [BSA]) with intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2 BSA) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 BSA) every six weeks. Four weeks after each procedure, patients undergo clinical, radiological, and biochemical evaluation. ePIPAC-OX is repeated until clinical, radiological, or macroscopic disease progression, after which standard palliative treatment is (re)considered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| repetitive ePIPAC-OX | Experimental | Not described Receives: Combination Product: repetitive ePIPAC-OX |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major toxicity
Number of patients with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 grade III-V, up to 4 weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (23)
Minor toxicity
Number of patients with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 grade II, up to 4 weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Organ-specific toxicity
Number of patients that develops bone marrow, kidney, or liver function disorders, up to four weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Major postoperative complications
Number of patients with Clavien-Dindo grade III-V postoperative complications, up to four weeks after the last ePIPAC
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Minor postoperative complications
Number of patients with Clavien-Dindo grade II postoperative complications, up to four weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Hospital stay
Number of days between ePIPAC-OX and initial discharge, up to four weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Readmissions
Number of hospital admissions after initial discharge after ePIPAC-OX, up to four weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Radiological tumour response
Number of patients with radiological response/stable disease/progression, based on central review of thoracoabdominal CT and diffusion-weighted MRI at baseline and four weeks after each ePIPAC-OX, performed by two independent radiologists blinded to clinical outcomes (classification not defined a priori)
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Histopathological tumour response
Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS), based on central review of collected peritoneal biopsies during each ePIPAC-OX, performed by two independent pathologists blinded to clinical outcomes
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Cytological tumour response
Number of patients with positive/negative cytology, based on collected ascites or peritoneal washing cytology during each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Macroscopic tumour response
Peritoneal Cancer Index and ascites volume during each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Biochemical tumour response
Tumour marker value measured at baseline, each postoperative day, and four weeks after each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L at baseline and one and four weeks after each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Quality of life: QLQ-C30
QLQ-C30 at baseline and one and four weeks after each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Quality of life: QLQ-CR29
QLQ-CR29 at baseline and one and four weeks after each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Costs
Costs of treatment, based on questionnaires (iMTA PCQ, iMTA MCQ) four weeks after each ePIPAC-OX, derived from the Dutch costing guidelines for health care research at the time of analysis
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Progression-free survival
Time between enrolment and clinical, radiological, or macroscopic progression, or death
Measured: 24 months
Overall survival
Time between enrolment and death
Measured: 24 months
Environmental safety of ePIPAC-OX
Platinum concentrations in the air of the operating room and on the surface of the operating room during ePIPAC-OX
Measured: 1 week (measured only during the first three procedures in the study)
Pharmacokinetics
Platinum concentrations in plasma and plasma ultrafiltrate (collected before ePIPAC-OX and 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 1080 minutes after oxaliplatin injection), urine (collected before ePIPAC-OX and on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7), and two pieces of normal peritoneum and two peritoneal metastases collected during each ePIPAC-OX.
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 13 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: intraoperative complications
Number of procedures with intraoperative complications determined during each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: adhesions
Zühlke score determined during each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: operating time
Operating time in minutes determined during each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: blood loss
Blood loss in minutes determined during each ePIPAC-OX
Measured: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2017
- Study start1 Oct 2017
- Primary completion1 Oct 2019
- Study completion1 Oct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Koen Rovers
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Koen Rovers, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
- Investigators
- Ignace de Hingh, MD, PhD, Study chair, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, NetherlandsDjamila Boerma, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03246321
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL60405.100.17
- Other IDs
- 2017-000927-29, NTR6603, ISRCTN89947480, NL60405.100.17, 2017
- Acronym
- CRC-PIPAC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Available on request
Publications
Giger-Pabst U, Tempfer CB. How to Perform Safe and Technically Optimized Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): Experience After a Consecutive Series of 1200 Procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Dec;22(12):2187-2193. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3916-5. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
PubMed 30132291Tempfer C, Giger-Pabst U, Hilal Z, Dogan A, Rezniczek GA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):243-257. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4784-7. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
PubMed 29869089Grass F, Vuagniaux A, Teixeira-Farinha H, Lehmann K, Demartines N, Hubner M. Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):669-678. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10521.
PubMed 28407227van de Vlasakker VCJ, Lurvink RJ, Wassenaar EC, Rauwerdink P, Bakkers C, Rovers KP, Bonhof CS, Burger JWA, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Nienhuijs SW, Mols F, de Hingh IHJT. Comparing patient reported abdominal pain between patients treated with oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) and primary colorectal cancer surgery. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47510-0.
PubMed 37993560Lurvink RJ, Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Bakkers C, Burger JWA, Creemers GM, Los M, Mols F, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. Patient-reported outcomes during repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (CRC-PIPAC). Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4486-4498. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08802-6. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
PubMed 34757489Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Lurvink RJ, Creemers GM, Burger JWA, Los M, Huysentruyt CJR, van Lijnschoten G, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Deenen MJ, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (Oxaliplatin) for Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial (CRC-PIPAC). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5311-5326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09558-4. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
PubMed 33544279Lurvink RJ, Tajzai R, Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Moes DAR, Pluimakers G, Boerma D, Burger JWA, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT, Deenen MJ. Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Oxaliplatin After Intraperitoneal Administration by Electrostatic Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases in the CRC-PIPAC Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):265-272. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08743-9. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
PubMed 32572849Rovers KP, Lurvink RJ, Wassenaar EC, Kootstra TJ, Scholten HJ, Tajzai R, Deenen MJ, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Huysentruyt CJ, van 't Erve I, Fijneman RJ, Constantinides A, Kranenburg O, Los M, Thijs AM, Creemers GM, Burger JW, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC) with oxaliplatin as a palliative monotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a Dutch, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (CRC-PIPAC). BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e030408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030408.
PubMed 31352425
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Repetitive Electrostatic Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) as a Palliative Monotherapy for Isolated Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Protocol of a Multicentre, Open-label, Single-arm, Phase II Study (CRC-PIPAC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03246321
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRC-PIPAC / NL60405.100.17
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Appendiceal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Keywords
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Intraperitoneal Injections, Laparoscopy, Aerosols, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion, Antineoplastic Agents, Leucovorin
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Koen RoversUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II study that investigates the feasibility, safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, costs, and pharmacokinetics or repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC-OX) as a palliative monotherapy for patients with isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases.
Detailed description
Rationale: repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) is offered as a palliative treatment option for patients with isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in several centres worldwide. However, little is known about its feasibility, safety, tolerability, efficacy, costs, and pharmacokinetics in this setting.
Objectives: to prospectively explore the feasibility, safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, costs, and pharmacokinetic profile of repetitive ePIPAC-OX as a palliative monotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal PM under controlled circumstances.
Study design: multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study.
Setting: two Dutch tertiary referral hospitals for the surgical treatment of colorectal PM.
Study population: adults who have a World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ functions, histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable PM of a colorectal or appendiceal carcinoma, no systemic metastases, no symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction, no contraindications for the planned intervention, and no previous pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).
Intervention: instead of standard palliative treatment, enrolled patients receive laparoscopy-controlled ePIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2 body-surface area [BSA]) with intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2 BSA) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 BSA) every six weeks. Four weeks after each procedure, patients undergo clinical, radiological, and biochemical evaluation. ePIPAC-OX is repeated until clinical, radiological, or macroscopic disease progression, after which standard palliative treatment is (re)introduced.
Outcomes: the primary outcome is the number of patients with major toxicity (grade ≥3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0) up to four weeks after the last procedure. Secondary outcomes are the environmental safety of ePIPAC-OX, procedure-related characteristics, the number of procedures in each patient and reasons for discontinuation, minor toxicity, organ-specific toxicity, postoperative complications, hospital stay, readmissions, quality of life, costs, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the radiological, histopathological, cytological, biochemical, and macroscopic tumour response. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry is used to measure concentrations of oxaliplatin in plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, urine, ascites, PM, and normal peritoneum during and after ePIPAC-OX.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| repetitive ePIPAC-OX | Experimental | Combination Product: repetitive ePIPAC-OX |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| repetitive ePIPAC-OXInstead of standard palliative treatment, enrolled patients receive laparoscopy-controlled electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) (92 mg/m2 body-surface area [BSA]) with intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2 BSA) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 BSA) every six weeks. Four weeks after each procedure, patients undergo clinical, radiological, and biochemical evaluation. ePIPAC-OX is repeated until clinical, radiological, or macroscopic disease progression, after which standard palliative treatment is (re)considered. | Combination product | repetitive ePIPAC-OX |
Primary outcome
Major toxicity
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Number of patients with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 grade III-V, up to 4 weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX
23 secondary outcomes
Minor toxicity
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Organ-specific toxicity
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Major postoperative complications
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Minor postoperative complications
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Hospital stay
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Readmissions
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Radiological tumour response
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Histopathological tumour response
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Cytological tumour response
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Macroscopic tumour response
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Biochemical tumour response
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Quality of life: QLQ-C30
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Quality of life: QLQ-CR29
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Costs
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 24 months
Overall survival
Time frame: 24 months
Environmental safety of ePIPAC-OX
Time frame: 1 week (measured only during the first three procedures in the study)
Pharmacokinetics
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 13 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: intraoperative complications
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: adhesions
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: operating time
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Procedure-related characteristics: blood loss
Time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2019.
- Background: PubMed 30132291Giger-Pabst U, Tempfer CB. How to Perform Safe and Technically Optimized Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): Experience After a Consecutive Series of 1200 Procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Dec;22(12):2187-2193. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3916-5. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 29869089Tempfer C, Giger-Pabst U, Hilal Z, Dogan A, Rezniczek GA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):243-257. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4784-7. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 28407227Grass F, Vuagniaux A, Teixeira-Farinha H, Lehmann K, Demartines N, Hubner M. Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):669-678. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10521.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37993560van de Vlasakker VCJ, Lurvink RJ, Wassenaar EC, Rauwerdink P, Bakkers C, Rovers KP, Bonhof CS, Burger JWA, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Nienhuijs SW, Mols F, de Hingh IHJT. Comparing patient reported abdominal pain between patients treated with oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) and primary colorectal cancer surgery. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47510-0.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34757489Lurvink RJ, Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Bakkers C, Burger JWA, Creemers GM, Los M, Mols F, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. Patient-reported outcomes during repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (CRC-PIPAC). Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4486-4498. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08802-6. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33544279Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Lurvink RJ, Creemers GM, Burger JWA, Los M, Huysentruyt CJR, van Lijnschoten G, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Deenen MJ, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (Oxaliplatin) for Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial (CRC-PIPAC). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5311-5326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09558-4. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32572849Lurvink RJ, Tajzai R, Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Moes DAR, Pluimakers G, Boerma D, Burger JWA, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT, Deenen MJ. Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Oxaliplatin After Intraperitoneal Administration by Electrostatic Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases in the CRC-PIPAC Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):265-272. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08743-9. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31352425Rovers KP, Lurvink RJ, Wassenaar EC, Kootstra TJ, Scholten HJ, Tajzai R, Deenen MJ, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Huysentruyt CJ, van 't Erve I, Fijneman RJ, Constantinides A, Kranenburg O, Los M, Thijs AM, Creemers GM, Burger JW, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC) with oxaliplatin as a palliative monotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a Dutch, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (CRC-PIPAC). BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e030408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030408.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Available on request
Related trials for Colorectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ignace de Hingh, MD, PhD study chair
Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Djamila Boerma, MD, PhD principal investigator
St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing repetitive ePIPAC-OX in people with Colorectal Neoplasms and Peritoneal Neoplasms, run by Koen Rovers at 2 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major toxicity (time frame: Expected (in case of three ePIPAC-OX): 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03246321, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2019.