AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionDUCS-HTNNCT03250702

DUCS-DHD Determinants of Hypertension in Tanzania

An observational study of Hypertension and Obesity, run by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the Dar es Salaam Urban Cohort Hypertension Study (DUCS-HTN) was to determine the current prevalence, risk factors, and barriers to diagnosis and treatment for hypertension in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension, Obesity
How many people
2,290 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2014to Jun 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: DUCS-HTN is a cohort of adults living in the Ukonga ward of Dar es Salaam who had been registered in the Dar es Salaam Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) in 2011. Due to the large size of Ukonga, we chose to randomly sample two of the seven neighborhoods that compose Ukonga and then conducted a census of these two randomly selected neighborhoods, Mwembe Madafu and Markazi. We attempted to contact all 4896 HDSS participants who were at least 40 years of age and lived in one of these neighborhoods. Trained interviewers conducted face-to-face interviews and physical examinations in participants' homes from March to June 2014. Follow-up visits were conducted from April to June 2015. Among 4896 potentially eligible participants from the HDSS baseline survey, 3604 (74%) were still living at the same address in 2014. Of these, 2290 (64%) enrolled in the DUCS-HTN study. Of the participants enrolled at baseline, 1752 (77%) participated in the follow-up study.

Who may be able to join

  • Lived in Madafu or Markazi neighborhoods of Ukonga Ward in Tanzania

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant
  • Mentally or physically disabled

About this study

Official title: Dar es Salaam Urban Cohort Hypertension Study

The aim of the Dar es Salaam Urban Cohort Hypertension Study (DUCS-HTN) was to determine the current prevalence, risk factors, and barriers to diagnosis and treatment for hypertension in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Few previous studies in Tanzania have analyzed the modifiable determinants of high BP as well as barriers to diagnosis and treatment of hypertension.

DUCS-HTN is a cohort of adults living in the Ukonga ward of Dar es Salaam who had been registered in the Dar es Salaam Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) in 2011. Due to the large size of Ukonga, the investigators chose to randomly sample two of the seven neighborhoods that compose Ukonga and then conducted a census of these two randomly selected neighborhoods, Mwembe Madafu and Markazi. The investigators attempted to contact all 4896 HDSS participants who were at least 40 years of age and lived in one of these neighborhoods.

Read more

Trained interviewers conducted face-to-face interviews and physical examinations in participants' homes from March to June 2014. Follow-up visits were conducted from April to June 2015.

Among 4896 potentially eligible participants from the HDSS baseline survey, 3604 (74%) were still living at the same address in 2014. Of these, 2290 (64%) enrolled in the DUCS-HTN study. Of the participants enrolled at baseline, 1752 (77%) participated in the follow-up study.

Blood pressure measurements

Trained interviewers measured blood pressure with digital blood pressure monitors (15 Omron M2 and 5 Beurer BM 40 monitors). Standard, large, and extra-large cuff sizes were used according to the size of a participant's arm. Blood pressure was measured three times with at least a 5-minute rest before the first measurement and 3-minute rests between each subsequent measurement. Blood pressure was taken on the left arm with the participant seated and the arm straight at heart level. Usual blood pressure values were calculated as the mean of the second and third readings. If a second visit was conducted, usual blood pressure values were defined as the mean of the second and third readings at both the first and second visits.

Hypertension was defined as SBP≥140 mmHg or DBP≥90 mmHg, or self-reported use of anti-hypertensive medication. Grade I hypertension was defined as SBP of 140 to 159 or DBP of 90 to 99 mmHg; grade II hypertension was defined as SBP of 160 to 179 or DBP of 100 to 109 mmHg; and grade III hypertension was defined as SBP≥180 or DBP≥110 mmHg. Hypertension control was defined as current antihypertensive use and blood pressure of less than 140/90 mmHg. If a participant was found to have grade I or II hypertension, a second visit was scheduled, at least three days later. Those with grade III hypertension at the last reading of the first visit or grade I or II hypertension at the last reading of the second visit were told that they had high blood pressure, advised to see a health professional and were given a referral letter. In addition, a second visit and blood pressure reading was scheduled for a random sample of one-fifth of participants, who were selected for additional blood, urinary, and dietary measurements.

Assessment of covariates

All participants were administered a socio-demographic and lifestyle questionnaire and had their height, weight, and waist and hip circumference measured. Some demographic information (age, sex, neighborhood, religion, and assets used to create a household wealth index) was previously recorded during the HDSS baseline. Information on household health insurance coverage was collected in 2015 as part of routine HDSS updates.

Standard protocols were used to take anthropometric measurements. Participants were weighed with minimal clothing using a digital scale (Seca, Germany) to the nearest 0.1kg and height was measured, with participants not wearing shoes, to the nearest 1cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight in kilograms to height in meters squared (kg/m2) and categorized according to WHO categories.

The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) was used to assess physical activity for work, transportation, and leisure. The investigators defined physical inactivity according to WHO guidelines. Number of servings of alcoholic beverages consumed was reported over the past 30 days. The investigators assumed 14 grams of alcohol as a standard drink portion size. A household wealth index was created through a principal component analysis of household characteristics and assets, and was categorized into quintiles. In the follow-up visit, participants were asked about their health over the past year and the reasons for not seeking hypertension care.

A subsample of ~ one fifth of the participants completed a food frequency questionnaire, two 24-hour dietary recalls, a 24-hour urine collection for sodium, creatinine, protein, and potassium, and had capillary total cholesterol and blood glucose measurements taken.

Keywords
Tanzania, Observational, Sub-Saharan Africa, Treatment
Medical subject headings
Hypertension, Obesity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Systolic blood pressure

    Continuous variable

    Measured: baseline

  2. Visited health professional for hypertension care

    Self report of visiting health professional for hypertension care between baseline and follow-up

    Measured: 1-year follow-up

  3. Taking antihypertensive medication

    Self report of taking antihypertensive treatment at time of follow-up

    Measured: 1-year follow-up

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Diastolic blood pressure

    Measured: baseline

  2. Hypertension

    SBP >=140 or DBP >=90 or using antihypertensive medication

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2017
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2015
  4. Study completionJun 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,290 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03250702
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB13-0852
Acronym
DUCS-HTN
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
11 Aug 2017
Last updated
17 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hypertension and Obesity, run by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Systolic blood pressure (time frame: baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in