Hepatitis CNCT03252483
Integrating HIV and Hepatitis C Screening in an Urban Emergency Department
A study testing Bundled HCV/HIV Screening and HIV Screening in people with Hepatitis C and Hiv, run by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This randomized controlled trial was implemented to evaluate the effect of integrating rapid Hepatitis C (HCV) testing into a pre-existing screening program for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on HIV test acceptance and diagnosis of both HCV and HIV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C, Hiv, HIV/AIDS
- What is being tested?
- Bundled HCV/HIV Screening and HIV Screening
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 478 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to May 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults 18 years of age or older
- Speak English or Spanish
Who cannot join
- Inability to consent
- Medically unstable as determined by healthcare provider
- Does not speak English or Spanish
- Known HIV and/or HCV positive
- Already tested for HIV and/or HCV within past 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Feasibility of Bundled HCV/HIV Rapid Screening
This randomized controlled trial was implemented to evaluate the effect of integrating rapid Hepatitis C (HCV) testing into a pre-existing screening program for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on HIV test acceptance and diagnosis of both HCV and HIV. A sample of 478 adults in a New York City Emergency Department participated in the study. Participants were randomized to receive either an offer of bundled HIV/HCV testing or HIV testing alone. Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the Emergency Department, performed HIV and HCV raid testing, and delivered test results to participants with post-test counseling. The primary outcome, HIV test acceptance, was compared between the two groups to evaluate whether the addition of an HCV test adversely impacted participants' consent to test for HIV. Questionnaires were also distributed to participants to assess HCV knowledge.
Read the detailed description
The high prevalence of HIV and HCV co-infection, similarity in testing strategies, and interrelated risk factors suggest a practical overlap in integrating screening services. This integration could effectively utilize existing resources and infrastructure to address both epidemics and facilitate the linkage of HCV-infected individuals to care.
The objective of this study was to integrate rapid HCV testing into a well-established HIV testing and counseling program to evaluate the effect of rapid bundled screening on HIV test acceptance rate. Secondary outcomes include HCV test acceptance, identification of newly diagnosed HCV- and HIV-positive patients, HCV knowledge, risk assessment, and refusal reasons.
The two-armed, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Jacobi Medical Center, a Level 1 trauma and tertiary care center located in the Bronx, New York. Upon recruitment, all participants completed questionnaires that included demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge questions. Participants were randomized either to the control arm or the intervention arm. The control arm was offered HIV testing only and the intervention arm was offered HIV testing concurrently with HCV testing (bundled HIV/HCV screening).
Sample size was determined using the following parameters: 1) 80% power; 2) significance level of 0.05; 3) two-sided significant test; and 4) 10% difference between groups on the acceptance of HIV testing. Using these parameters, a sample of 227 in each group was needed to test the primary outcome: acceptance of an integrated screening program for HIV and HCV infection. Groups of at least 333 were used to allow for drop-outs and protocol violations.
Patients were recruited from the adult Emergency Department (ED) at Jacobi Medical Center. Recruitment took place during a six-month period from December 2012 to May 2013, and 478 patients were enrolled in the study.
Research Assistants were trained as Public Health Advocates to perform HIV and HCV testing and counseling. The Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the ED and followed a script to ask patients if they were interested in participating in a study through which they would be offered free screenings recommended for their general health. Patients who refused the offer of the HIV and/or HCV tests completed a test-refusal questionnaire. All enrolled participants completed a questionnaire including demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge.
After providing verbal consent, participants were randomized to either an HIV test only group (control) or a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention). Randomization was performed by an independent statistician who used a computer generated allocation schedule. Randomization assignments were placed in sealed opaque envelopes that were opened sequentially after verbal consent was obtained for the study.
Those randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test, and those randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV tests. The OraQuick® HCV Rapid Antibody Test was employed as a rapid blood fingerstick test for HCV antibodies. The OraQuick Rapid Antibody Test Advance® HIV-1/2 Antibody test was used to test for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies in oral fluid. Both point-of-care tests provide results in 20 minutes.
A Public Health Advocate delivered the test(s) results to the patient and conducted post-test counseling. In the case of a preliminary positive result on either test, the Public Health Advocate informed the patient and the patient's provider and scheduled a follow up appointment for the patient.
Data was recorded in an electronic database using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Data obtained from subjects were entered using unique subject numbers, without specific identifiers. Acceptance rates for HIV testing in experimental and intervention arms was compared using chi square with fisher's exact derived confidence intervals. Stata statistical software was used to tabulate participant demographics and testing frequencies for HIV, HCV, or both.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Hiv, HIV/AIDS, HCV Coinfection, HIV/AIDS and Infections
- Being tested
- Bundled HCV/HIV Screening, HIV Screening
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bundled HCV/HIV ScreeningOther
Participants were randomized to a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention) to evaluate whether integrating HIV and HCV rapid screening would adversely impact HIV test acceptance.
HIV ScreeningOther
Participants were randomized to an HIV-only screening group as a control comparator.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Only | Active comparator | Those randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test. Receives: Other: HIV Screening |
| Bundled HCV/HIV | Experimental | Those randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV test.s Receives: Other: Bundled HCV/HIV Screening |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HIV Test Acceptance
Participant agreement to test for HIV with a rapid Oraquick oral swab
Measured: Through study completion, 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
HCV Test Acceptance
Participant agreement to test for HCV with a rapid Orasure fingerstick
Measured: Through study completion, 6 months
HIV and HCV Incidence
Diagnoses of either infection
Measured: Through study completion, 6 months
HCV Knowledge and Risk
As assessed from a knowledge and risk assessment questionnaire distributed to each participant
Measured: Through study completion, 6 months
Test Refusals
Reasons for refusal of either HIV or HCV tests
Measured: Through study completion, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2017
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatitis CStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 478 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jason Leider, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
- Investigators
- Jason Leider, MD, PhD, FACP, Study chair, Jacobi Medical Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03252483
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012-491
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data includes HIV/HCV screening information and HCV knowledge and risk assessment. Study has been completed.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Feasibility of Bundled HCV/HIV Rapid Screening
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03252483
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2012-491
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Hiv, HIV/AIDS, HCV Coinfection, HIV/AIDS and Infections
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 478 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- New York City Health and Hospitals CorporationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled trial was implemented to evaluate the effect of integrating rapid Hepatitis C (HCV) testing into a pre-existing screening program for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on HIV test acceptance and diagnosis of both HCV and HIV. A sample of 478 adults in a New York City Emergency Department participated in the study. Participants were randomized to receive either an offer of bundled HIV/HCV testing or HIV testing alone. Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the Emergency Department, performed HIV and HCV raid testing, and delivered test results to participants with post-test counseling. The primary outcome, HIV test acceptance, was compared between the two groups to evaluate whether the addition of an HCV test adversely impacted participants' consent to test for HIV. Questionnaires were also distributed to participants to assess HCV knowledge.
Detailed description
The high prevalence of HIV and HCV co-infection, similarity in testing strategies, and interrelated risk factors suggest a practical overlap in integrating screening services. This integration could effectively utilize existing resources and infrastructure to address both epidemics and facilitate the linkage of HCV-infected individuals to care.
The objective of this study was to integrate rapid HCV testing into a well-established HIV testing and counseling program to evaluate the effect of rapid bundled screening on HIV test acceptance rate. Secondary outcomes include HCV test acceptance, identification of newly diagnosed HCV- and HIV-positive patients, HCV knowledge, risk assessment, and refusal reasons.
The two-armed, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Jacobi Medical Center, a Level 1 trauma and tertiary care center located in the Bronx, New York. Upon recruitment, all participants completed questionnaires that included demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge questions. Participants were randomized either to the control arm or the intervention arm. The control arm was offered HIV testing only and the intervention arm was offered HIV testing concurrently with HCV testing (bundled HIV/HCV screening).
Sample size was determined using the following parameters: 1) 80% power; 2) significance level of 0.05; 3) two-sided significant test; and 4) 10% difference between groups on the acceptance of HIV testing. Using these parameters, a sample of 227 in each group was needed to test the primary outcome: acceptance of an integrated screening program for HIV and HCV infection. Groups of at least 333 were used to allow for drop-outs and protocol violations.
Patients were recruited from the adult Emergency Department (ED) at Jacobi Medical Center. Recruitment took place during a six-month period from December 2012 to May 2013, and 478 patients were enrolled in the study.
Research Assistants were trained as Public Health Advocates to perform HIV and HCV testing and counseling. The Public Health Advocates approached eligible patients in the ED and followed a script to ask patients if they were interested in participating in a study through which they would be offered free screenings recommended for their general health. Patients who refused the offer of the HIV and/or HCV tests completed a test-refusal questionnaire. All enrolled participants completed a questionnaire including demographic information, HCV risk assessment, and HCV knowledge.
After providing verbal consent, participants were randomized to either an HIV test only group (control) or a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention). Randomization was performed by an independent statistician who used a computer generated allocation schedule. Randomization assignments were placed in sealed opaque envelopes that were opened sequentially after verbal consent was obtained for the study.
Those randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test, and those randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV tests. The OraQuick® HCV Rapid Antibody Test was employed as a rapid blood fingerstick test for HCV antibodies. The OraQuick Rapid Antibody Test Advance® HIV-1/2 Antibody test was used to test for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies in oral fluid. Both point-of-care tests provide results in 20 minutes.
A Public Health Advocate delivered the test(s) results to the patient and conducted post-test counseling. In the case of a preliminary positive result on either test, the Public Health Advocate informed the patient and the patient's provider and scheduled a follow up appointment for the patient.
Data was recorded in an electronic database using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Data obtained from subjects were entered using unique subject numbers, without specific identifiers. Acceptance rates for HIV testing in experimental and intervention arms was compared using chi square with fisher's exact derived confidence intervals. Stata statistical software was used to tabulate participant demographics and testing frequencies for HIV, HCV, or both.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Only | Active comparator | Other: HIV ScreeningThose randomized to the control group were offered only an HIV test. |
| Bundled HCV/HIV | Experimental | Other: Bundled HCV/HIV ScreeningThose randomized to the intervention group were offered both HCV and HIV test.s |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults 18 years of age or older
- Speak English or Spanish
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Inability to consent
- Medically unstable as determined by healthcare provider
- Does not speak English or Spanish
- Known HIV and/or HCV positive
- Already tested for HIV and/or HCV within past 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bundled HCV/HIV ScreeningParticipants were randomized to a bundled HIV/HCV test group (intervention) to evaluate whether integrating HIV and HCV rapid screening would adversely impact HIV test acceptance. | Other | Bundled HCV/HIV |
| HIV ScreeningParticipants were randomized to an HIV-only screening group as a control comparator. | Other | HIV Only |
Primary outcome
HIV Test Acceptance
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
Participant agreement to test for HIV with a rapid Oraquick oral swab
4 secondary outcomes
HCV Test Acceptance
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
HIV and HCV Incidence
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
HCV Knowledge and Risk
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
Test Refusals
Time frame: Through study completion, 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data includes HIV/HCV screening information and HCV knowledge and risk assessment. Study has been completed.
Related trials for Hepatitis C
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elimination of Hepatitis C Virus Among Users of Substances
Hepatitis C in Substance Users
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for CLIA-Waived Use
HCV Infection
Not yet recruiting
Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for Point-of-Care Use in Individuals at Risk for HCV Infection or Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of HCV Infection
HCV Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jason Leider, MD, PhD, FACP study chair
Jacobi Medical Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bundled HCV/HIV Screening and HIV Screening in people with Hepatitis C and Hiv, run by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HIV Test Acceptance (time frame: Through study completion, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2017.