Atrial FibrillationNCT03254134
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Warfarin and Dabigatran
An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
This is a comparative effectiveness and safety study of clinical events among patients taking either dabigatran or warfarin. There is no formal hypothesis to be tested, but rather to provide the estimates on the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and bleeding events (safety) using 95% confidence… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Warfarin and Dabigatran
- How many people
- 22,490 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- 20 Oct 2017to 3 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Any patients with atrial fibrillation contained in the Medical Data Vision (MDVI) database which is a Japanese, nationwide claims data containing approximately 16 million patients cumulatively. The data cut is between March 2011 to June 2016, and the patients in the MDV database are those who have visited DPC hospitals (diagnostic procedure combination, a lump-sum payment system based on disease diagnosis to be treated similar to Medicare/Medicaid in the USA) hospitals which provide acute in-patient, as well as outpatient care.
Who may be able to join
- patients aged >18 year-old with confirmed diagnosis of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) (ICD 10 code I48)
- having a first prescription (index date) of either dabigatran or warfarin between 14 March 2011 to 30 June 2016
- having no prescription of any Oral Anticoagulants (OACs) for 12 months prior to the index date (this period is defined as the baseline period)
Who cannot join
- patients having less than 12 months of enrolment prior to the index date
- being dialysis or kidney transplant recipients in baseline period
- having either atrial flutter, valvular atrial fibrillation (AF)
- mechanical valve placement, rheumatic AF
- and/or mitral valve prolapse/regurge/stenosis in baseline period
- having record of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism < 6 months before AF diagnosis in baseline period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Warfarin and Dabigatran Using Real World Claims Data of Japanese Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
This is a comparative effectiveness and safety study of clinical events among patients taking either dabigatran or warfarin. There is no formal hypothesis to be tested, but rather to provide the estimates on the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and bleeding events (safety) using 95% confidence interval for comparison between those non0-valvular atrial fibrillation patients taking dabigatran vs. warfarin using a large, nation-wide claims data in Japan.
Read the detailed description
This is a comparative effectiveness and safety study of clinical events among patients taking either dabigatran or warfarin. There is no formal hypothesis to be tested, but rather to provide the estimates on the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and bleeding events (safety) using 95% confidence interval for comparison between those non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients taking dabigatran vs. warfarin using a large, nation-wide claims data in Japan.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Warfarin, Dabigatran
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
WarfarinDrug
patients treated with warfarin
DabigatranDrug
Also called PRADAXA
patients treated with Dabigatran
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Atrial Fibrillation | patients with atrial fibrillation Receives: Drug: Warfarin; Drug: Dabigatran |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence Rate of Stroke and Systemic Embolism (SE)
Incidence rate of stroke and systemic embolism (SE).
Measured: From the index date to end of treatment with > 14 day grace period, switch to another OAC, end of continuous enrolment, end of study period or death, outcome event of stroke and systemic embolism, ie., up to 6.5 years.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence Rate of Major Bleeding
Incidence rate of major bleeding defined by any bleeding event associated with hospitalization claims and/or transfusion claims.
Measured: From the index date to end of treatment with > 14 day grace period, switch to another OAC, end of continuous enrolment, end of study period or death, outcome event of major bleeding, ie., up to 6.5 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2017
- Study start20 Oct 2017
- Primary completion30 Oct 2017
- Study completion3 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 22,490 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03254134
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1160-0288
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Warfarin and Dabigatran Using Real World Claims Data of Japanese Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03254134
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1160-0288
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22,490 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a comparative effectiveness and safety study of clinical events among patients taking either dabigatran or warfarin. There is no formal hypothesis to be tested, but rather to provide the estimates on the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and bleeding events (safety) using 95% confidence interval for comparison between those non0-valvular atrial fibrillation patients taking dabigatran vs. warfarin using a large, nation-wide claims data in Japan.
Detailed description
This is a comparative effectiveness and safety study of clinical events among patients taking either dabigatran or warfarin. There is no formal hypothesis to be tested, but rather to provide the estimates on the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and bleeding events (safety) using 95% confidence interval for comparison between those non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients taking dabigatran vs. warfarin using a large, nation-wide claims data in Japan.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Atrial Fibrillation | – | Drug: Warfarin, Drug: Dabigatranpatients with atrial fibrillation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Any patients with atrial fibrillation contained in the Medical Data Vision (MDVI) database which is a Japanese, nationwide claims data containing approximately 16 million patients cumulatively. The data cut is between March 2011 to June 2016, and the patients in the MDV database are those who have visited DPC hospitals (diagnostic procedure combination, a lump-sum payment system based on disease diagnosis to be treated similar to Medicare/Medicaid in the USA) hospitals which provide acute in-patient, as well as outpatient care.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients aged >18 year-old with confirmed diagnosis of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) (ICD 10 code I48)
- having a first prescription (index date) of either dabigatran or warfarin between 14 March 2011 to 30 June 2016
- having no prescription of any Oral Anticoagulants (OACs) for 12 months prior to the index date (this period is defined as the baseline period)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- patients having less than 12 months of enrolment prior to the index date
- being dialysis or kidney transplant recipients in baseline period
- having either atrial flutter, valvular atrial fibrillation (AF)
- mechanical valve placement, rheumatic AF
- and/or mitral valve prolapse/regurge/stenosis in baseline period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Warfarinpatients treated with warfarin | Drug | Atrial Fibrillation |
| DabigatranAlso: PRADAXApatients treated with Dabigatran | Drug | Atrial Fibrillation |
Primary outcome
Incidence Rate of Stroke and Systemic Embolism (SE)
Time frame: From the index date to end of treatment with > 14 day grace period, switch to another OAC, end of continuous enrolment, end of study period or death, outcome event of stroke and systemic embolism, ie., up to 6.5 years.
Incidence rate of stroke and systemic embolism (SE).
1 secondary outcome
Incidence Rate of Major Bleeding
Time frame: From the index date to end of treatment with > 14 day grace period, switch to another OAC, end of continuous enrolment, end of study period or death, outcome event of major bleeding, ie., up to 6.5 years.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
ARIADNE Clinical Trial
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Treatment With BTK Inhibitors or Venetoclax
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Waldenstr(SqrRoot)(Delta)m s Macroglobulinemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
A Comparison of Beta-blockers and Calcium Channel Blockers in Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
CATCH AF - Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Cryptogenic Stroke
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Energy Lattice-Tip Assisted Marshall-Plan Strategy in Redo Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence Rate of Stroke and Systemic Embolism (SE) (time frame: From the index date to end of treatment with > 14 day grace period, switch to another OAC, end of continuous enrolment, end of study period or death, outcome event of stroke and systemic embolism, ie., up to 6.5 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2019.