AzTrials
AzTrials

Arrhythmias, CardiacNCT03256812

ICT-based Monitoring for Arrhythmia Detection After AF Ablation

A study testing ICT-based ECG monitoring and Holter monitoring in people with Arrhythmias, Cardiac and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the efficacy and stability of an ICT-based centralized clinical trial monitoring system against the efficacy and stability of an existing outpatient-based electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter monitoring system for arrhythmia detection after atrial fibrillation ablation, and to test whether such continuous… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
ICT-based ECG monitoring and Holter monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Mar 2017to 31 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 20 years, but < 80 years
  • Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with sustained atrial fibrillation despite ≥ 6 weeks of continuous antiarrhythmia therapy or those who underwent an ablation procedure for tachy-bradycardia syndrome within the previous week
  • Patients who can be followed-up for at least 3 months after ablation
  • Patients who can use and consent to use smartphone-based ECG monitoring
  • Patients who can use a smartphone (Android, version 5.0 or lower; development planned for version 6.0 or higher)
  • Those who can connect to the internet via LAN or WiFi and are in an environment where they can use a gateway and smartphone.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who cannot be monitored by a smartphone or Bluetooth device
  • Patients who cannot use a smartphone, Bluetooth device, or the internet due to old age
  • Patients with contraindications to standard therapy, such as continued anticoagulant therapy before and after atrial fibrillation ablation
  • Patients belonging to a population vulnerable to clinical trials

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

    Daegu, 700-712

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Stability of an Information and Communication Technology (ICT)-Based Centralized Monitoring System for Arrhythmia Detection After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Study

To compare the efficacy and stability of an ICT-based centralized clinical trial monitoring system against the efficacy and stability of an existing outpatient-based electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter monitoring system for arrhythmia detection after atrial fibrillation ablation, and to test whether such continuous monitoring can better detect arrhythmia that is undetectable by existing methods and how this may affect treatment outcomes

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study in patients who are capable of using and consent to use a smartphone-based ECG monitoring after ablation for atrial fibrillation. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the Holter monitoring or ICT-based centralized clinical trial monitoring system group in a 1:1 ratio and will undergo monitoring from immediately after the procedure to 12 months after discharge.

Being tested
ICT-based ECG monitoring, Holter monitoring
Keywords
Arrhythmias, Atrial Fibrillation
Medical subject headings
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ICT-based ECG monitoringDevice

    Continuous monitoring will begin from the time of participation in the trial in the ICT-based centralized monitoring group. 24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in this group, as in the Holter monitoring group. If heart rate drops below 40 beats/min or increases above 120 beats/min on ECG during ICT-based ECG home monitoring, the participant will be notified first through an alarm function.

  • Holter monitoringDevice

    24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups

Study groups in NCT03256812
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ICT-based ECG monitoring groupExperimentalContinuous monitoring with ICT-based ECG monitoring will begin from the time of participation in the trial in the ICT-based monitoring group. Depending on the lifestyle pattern of the patient, the specific time will be set to allow 30 min of monitoring per day, even if there are no symptoms. If symptoms do appear, additional monitoring will be performed for at least 10 more minutes. 24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in this group, as in the Holter monitoring group.
Receives: Device: ICT-based ECG monitoring
Holter monitoring groupActive comparator24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in the Holter monitoring group
Receives: Device: Holter monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The difference in arrhythmia detection rate

    The difference in arrhythmia detection rate between Holter monitoring and ICT-based centralized monitoring

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The difference in the number of hospital visits

    The difference in the number of hospital visits during the study period due to arrhythmia

    Measured: 12 months

  2. The difference in the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia

    The difference in the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia within 1 year from atrial fibrillation ablation

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Aug 2017
  2. Study start1 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03256812
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICT_CM_P03_AF
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
16 Aug 2017
Last updated
18 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ICT-based ECG monitoring and Holter monitoring in people with Arrhythmias, Cardiac and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The difference in arrhythmia detection rate (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in