AzTrials
AzTrials

To Determine the Onset of Analgesia (Numerical Rating Scale for Pain = 1) in MinutesNCT03258879

Comparison of Labor Analgesia Between Modified Combined Spinal-Epidural and Dural Puncture Epidural Techniques

A study testing Modified CSE and Dural puncture epidural in people with To Determine the Onset of Analgesia (Numerical Rating Scale for Pain = 1) in Minutes, run by Western University, Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Epidural, Combined Spinal-Epidural, and more recently dural puncture epidural are forms of neuraxial anesthesia used to provide pain relief in laboring women . The investigators want to assess the onset of pain relief with 2 different neuraxial techniques performed at our center, but which have not yet been compared… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Modified CSE and Dural puncture epidural
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2018to Aug 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA II healthy adult parturients, at 37-40 weeks gestation with singleton pregnancy and vertex presentation.
  • Parturients in early labor with cervical dilatation less than 6 cm requesting epidural analgesia
  • Parturients able to provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal to participate in the study.
  • Presence of clinically significant disease
  • Contraindications to neuraxial analgesia.
  • Presence of conditions associated with an increased risk of a cesarean delivery like history of uterine anomaly or surgery, morbid obesity and known fetal anomalies or non-reassuring fetal heart rate.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Yamini Subramani, MD contact

519-902-4715

yaminisrs@rediffmail.com

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Quality of Labor Analgesia Between Modified Combined Spinal-Epidural and Dural Puncture Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial

Epidural, Combined Spinal-Epidural, and more recently dural puncture epidural are forms of neuraxial anesthesia used to provide pain relief in laboring women . The investigators want to assess the onset of pain relief with 2 different neuraxial techniques performed at our center, but which have not yet been compared in the literature: (1) Modified CSE, with only local anesthetic injected into the spinal fluid to reduce side effects of opioids that are seen with the traditional CSE and (2) Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE), involving puncture of the spinal membrane, but without injection of medication into the spinal space. The investigators hypothesize that the onset of labor analgesia will be faster with modified CSE compared to DPE.

Read the detailed description

Purpose of the research:

  • To determine the onset of effective analgesia (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain </= 1/10 in minutes with the modified CSE and DPE techniques, which is our primary outcome.
  • To assess block quality (time to T10 sensory block, motor block, asymmetric block, inadequate block) between the 2 techniques.
  • To assess incidence of breakthrough pain as determined by number of physician interventions.
  • To determine the incidence of side effects (maternal hypotension, pruritus, nausea, and fetal bradycardia).
  • To assess delivery outcomes (vaginal vs. instrumental vs. CS).
  • To compare fetal Apgar scores.
  • To assess maternal satisfaction with pain relief using Likert scale at 24h.
  • To evaluate for potential complications (Post-dural puncture headache, back pain, leg weakness, numbness and infection) related to the techniques at 24h.

Hypothesis:

The investigators hypothesize that the onset of effective analgesia (NRS pain </= 1, in minutes) will be faster with the modified CSE compared to DPE.

Methodology:

Study Design: Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial.

Study Implementation:

Once participants are consented for the study, usual care is established with IV cannula insertion, fluid bolus and standard monitors will be applied. Participants will then be randomly assigned into two groups by a computer-generated randomization sequence. Group assignments will be concealed in opaque numbered envelopes and will be opened by the anesthesiologist performing the block immediately before initiation of analgesia. Group 1 will receive a modified combined spinal-epidural (MCSE) and Group 2 will receive a dural puncture epidural (DPE).

The epidural space will be located at the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace using a midline approach with a 17-G, 9 cm Touhy epidural needle using a loss of resistance technique. A single dural puncture with confirmation of free flow of CSF will be performed with a 25-G, 12 cm Whitacre needle placed through the epidural needle. Subsequent intervention varies with the group allocation.

MCSE group: 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected intrathecally DPE group: No medication will be injected intrathecally. Both the groups will subsequently have the epidural catheter placed 4-6 cm into the space and will be checked for a negative aspiration of blood/CSF. In the DPE group, 15 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine will be given as 5ml fractionated boluses. Both groups will have patient controlled epidural analgesia started after the study interventions as follows: Bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL with fentanyl 2 microgram/ml, background infusion at 8 mL/h, demand dose of 4 mL, lockout interval of 20 minutes.

The anesthesiologist and nurse will be asked not to reveal the group assignment to the patient or study co-investigators so that the patients and the study investigators collecting the data will be blinded to the techniques. The anesthesiologist performing the technique will prepare the medications according to group allocation and will not be involved in any data collection. Attending, fellow or resident anesthesiologists will perform all the techniques.

After block completion, an independent blinded co-investigator will assess the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores from 0-10 and other outcomes after the initial dosing, at the 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20 and 30 minute marks. The time taken to achieve a NRS equal to or less than 1 will be recorded for all the three groups. Sensory levels will be assessed using ice starting caudad at the S2 dermatome and moving cephalad. Time taken to achieve a block of T10 will be recorded. Patients will be assessed for pruritus and nausea/vomiting every hour, by grading the severity on a scale ranging from 0-3; 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2= moderate and 3 = severe. Motor strength will be assessed hourly with a modified Bromage score (0 = full flexion of knees and ankles, 1 = partial flexion of knees, full flexion of ankles, 2 = inability to flex knees and partial flexion of ankles and 3 = inability to flex knees and ankles). Presence of motor blockade will be defined as modified Bromage score of more than or equal to 1. Following the first 30 minutes, assessments will continue at 60-minute intervals until delivery.

The participant will be monitored for hypotension and fetal bradycardia during this period and up to 1 hour after the procedure. Hypotension is defined as a 20% reduction in the systolic blood pressure from the admission blood pressure in the absence of uterine contraction and will be treated with vasopressors as per the standard of care. Fetal bradycardia is defined as a fetal heart rate of less than 100 beats per minute, persisting for more than 1 minute.

In the event of inadequate analgesia and a unilateral block defined by a difference of more than 2 dermatomal levels between the 2 sides, the participant will be placed on the less blocked side and a supplemental epidural dose will be administered. If the unilateral block persists, the catheter will be withdrawn 1 cm and an additional supplemental epidural dose of 5 ml 2% lidocaine will be given over 2 min. In the event of inadequate analgesia and the presence of inadequate sensory level bilaterally, supplemental epidural dose will be administered. If improvement of analgesia is not observed, the epidural catheter will be replaced.

Mode of delivery and fetal Agar scores will be recorded for all the patients. All the study subjects will be visited on postpartum day 1 and will be assessed for satisfaction with labor analgesia using a Likert scale and any potential complications such as headache, back pain, leg weakness or numbness and paresthesia.

Being tested
Modified CSE, Dural puncture epidural
Keywords
Combined spinal epidural analgesia, dural puncture epidural

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified CSEProcedure or surgery

    MCSE group: 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected intrathecally

  • Dural puncture epiduralProcedure or surgery

    DPE group: Dural puncture performed, but no medication will be injected intrathecally.

Study groups in NCT03258879
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Modified CSEExperimentalMCSE group: 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected intrathecally
Receives: Procedure: Modified CSE
Dural puncture epiduralActive comparatorDural puncture performed with a spinal needle, but no medication will be injected intrathecally.
Receives: Procedure: Dural puncture epidural

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of the onset of effective analgesia between the study techniques

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain </= 1/10 in minutes

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Comparison of block quality between the study techniques

    Time to T10 sensory block in minutes will be measured

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Comparison of the incidence of pruritus between the study techniques

    Participants will be assessed for pruritus every hour, by grading the severity on a scale ranging from 0-3; 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2= moderate and 3 = severe

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Comparison of the incidence of fetal bradycardia between the study techniques

    Fetal bradycardia is defined as a fetal heart rate of less than 100 beats per minute, persisting for more than 1 minute.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2017
  2. Study startJan 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionAug 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03258879
Sponsor's protocol ID
10017388
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
12 Jul 2017
Last updated
14 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Modified CSE and Dural puncture epidural in people with To Determine the Onset of Analgesia (Numerical Rating Scale for Pain = 1) in Minutes, run by Western University, Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yamini Subramani, MD (519-902-4715, yaminisrs@rediffmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of the onset of effective analgesia between the study techniques (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in