Type 1 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3CITYNCT03263494
CGM Intervention in Teens and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
A Phase 3 study testing Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 14 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Adolescents and young adults with T1D and poor glycemic control (age 14-< 25 years, T1D duration >12 months, HbA1c 7.5-<11.0%, using an insulin pump or MDI)) will be randomly assigned to either CGM or BGM. Sample size will be 150. The primary outcome assessment will be HbA1c after 6 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 24 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 153 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2018to 7 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 24 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of T1D, with either age of T1D diagnosis < 10 years of age OR a history of positive T1D related antibodies in the medical record
- Age 14-<25 years
- Diabetes duration ≥ 1 year
- Total daily insulin requirement ≥ 0.4 units/kg/day
- HbA1c 7.5% to <11.0% (Point of care device or local lab measured as part of study at screening visit)
- Insulin regimen involves a consistent modality of insulin administration with either use of an insulin pump or at least 3 multiple daily injections of basal and bolus (meal time) analogue insulin. Insulin pump must not have been started within 3 months of consent with no plans to change regimens in the next 6 months
Show all 10Show fewer
- Perform at least 2 blood glucose meter checks per day from self-report at screening and an average of at least 2 checks per day from meter download during blinded CGM run in
- Blinded CGM must be used a minimum of 200 hours (equivalent to 8.3 days) with an average of 1.8 calibrations per day during the blinded CGM screening period.
- Participant comprehends written and spoken English
- Participant understands the study protocol and agrees to it (if applicable)
Who cannot join
- Use of unblinded personal CGM and/or flash CGM, outside of a research study, as part of real-time diabetes management in the last 3 months
- Unable to use CGM device for minimum number of hours during blinded pre-randomization period or skin reaction from adhesive that would preclude participation in the randomized trial
- Started on non-insulin medication for blood glucose control within the past 3 months or plans to begin within the next 6 months
- The presence of a significant medical disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect the wearing of the sensors (such as a skin condition), or the completion of any aspect of the protocol.
- More than 1 episode of DKA in the past 6 months as defined in the adverse events chapter.
- The presence of any of the following diseases:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Asthma or any condition present in the last 6 months where treatment is a systemic or daily inhaled corticosteroid (Intermittent treatment with inhaled corticosteroids does not exclude subjects from enrollment)
- Cystic fibrosis
- Addison's disease (Adequately treated thyroid disease and celiac disease do not exclude subjects from enrollment)
- Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months or daily intensive outpatient psychiatric day treatment in the past 3 months.
- Pregnant (positive test confirmed at screening) or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months.
- Need for use of acetaminophen or acetaminophen-containing products on a regular basis during the 6 months of the trial
- Participation in a diabetes related intervention study in the past 6 weeks.
- Any medical, psychological or social situation where per investigator discretion it may be difficult for participant to participate fully in the intervention
- Any condition, per investigator assessment, that could impact reliability of the A1C measurement, such as (but not limited to) hemoglobinopathy, hemolytic anemia, chronic liver disease; chronic GI blood loss, red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin administration within 3 months prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
United States14 sites
Barbara Davis Center--University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27713
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Rocky Mountain Diabetes & Osteoporosis Center
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center at Columbia University
New York, New York, 10032
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
IDC at Park Nicollet
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
About this study
Official title: CGM Intervention in Teens and Young Adults With T1D (CITY): A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Adults 14-<25 With Type 1 Diabetes
Adolescents and young adults with T1D and poor glycemic control (age 14-< 25 years, T1D duration >12 months, HbA1c 7.5-<11.0%, using an insulin pump or MDI)) will be randomly assigned to either CGM or BGM. Sample size will be 150. The primary outcome assessment will be HbA1c after 6 months. Secondary outcomes will include HbA1c, CGM metrics (control group will wear blinded CGM at 13 and 24 weeks), and quality of life measures. The randomized trial will be followed by a 6-month extension study during which the RCT control group will initiate CGM and the RCT CGM group will continue CGM.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)Device
Participants randomized to the CGM Group will receive a Dexcom CGM device and be instructed on how to utilize the CGM data in real time for diabetes management.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CGM | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) |
| BGM | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 26 Weeks Adjusted for Baseline
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (20)
% With HbA1c <7.0%
Measured: 6 months
% With HbA1c <7.5%
Measured: 6 months
% With Relative Reduction ≥ 10%
Measured: 6 months
% With Absolute Reduction ≥ 0.5%
Measured: 6 months
% With Absolute Reduction ≥ 1%
Measured: 6 months
% With Absolute Reduction ≥ 0.5% or HbA1c < 7.0%
Measured: 6 months
CGM % Time in Range 70-180 mg/dl
Measured: 6 months
CGM Mean Glucose
Measured: 6 months
CGM Glucose Variability Measured by Coefficient of Variation
Measured: 6 months
CGM % Time > 180 mg/dl
Measured: 6 months
CGM % Time > 300 mg/dl
Measured: 6 months
CGM % Time < 54 mg/dl
Measured: 6 months
CGM % Time < 70 mg/dl
Measured: 6 months
Rate of CGM Measured Hypoglycemic Episodes (Using <54 mg/dL)
Measured: 6 months
CGM Self Efficacy Questionnaire Score
Questionnaire containing 15 questions with possible responses 0-6. Total score is calculated by taking the mean of the non-missing responses. Then multiply by 100 and divide by 6 to put on the scale 0-100. Higher total score indicates higher perceived ability.
Measured: 6 months
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire Score
Survey containing 20 questions with possible responses 0-5. Total score is calculated by taking the mean of the non-missing items and multiplying by 20 to put on the scale 0-100. A higher total score indicates more of a problem.
Measured: 6 months
Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Questionnaire Score
Survey containing 15 questions. Total score ranges from 0-100. A higher total score indicates more satisfaction with their current glucose monitor.
Measured: 6 months
Hypoglycemia Confidence Questionnaire Score
Survey containing 9 questions with possible responses 0-4. Total score is calculated by taking the mean of non-missing responses and multiplying by 25 to put on the scale 0-100. Higher total score indicates more confidence.
Measured: 6 months
Diabetes Technology Attitudes Questionnaire Score
Survey containing 5 questions with possible responses 0-4. Total score is calculated by taking the mean of non-missing responses and multiplying by 25 to put on the scale 0-100. Higher total score indicates a more positive attitude towards diabetes technology.
Measured: 6 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Survey containing 19 questions. Total score ranges from 0-21. A lower score indicates a healthier sleep quality.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2017
- Study start25 Jan 2018
- Primary completion8 May 2019
- Study completion7 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03263494
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CITY
- Acronym
- CITY
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bilionis I, Berrios RC, de Arriba Munoz A, Fernandez-Luque L, Castillo C. A framework for assessing algorithmic discrimination risks in training data: a case of pediatric type 1 diabetes. JAMIA Open. 2026 Jul 14;9(4):ooag125. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag125. eCollection 2026 Aug.
PubMed 42459945Miller KM, Bauza C, Kanapka LG, Clements MA, DeSalvo DJ, Hood K, Messer LH, Sherr J, Bergamo K, Criego A, Freiner E, Lyons SK, Monzavi R, Moore W, Prahalad P, Simmons JH, Sulik M, Wadwa RP, Weinstock RS, Willi SM, Williams K, Laffel LM; CITY Study Group. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Provides Durable Glycemic Benefit in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: 12-Month Follow-Up Results. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Oct 26;2023:6718115. doi: 10.1155/2023/6718115. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 40303270Laffel LM, Kanapka LG, Beck RW, Bergamo K, Clements MA, Criego A, DeSalvo DJ, Goland R, Hood K, Liljenquist D, Messer LH, Monzavi R, Mouse TJ, Prahalad P, Sherr J, Simmons JH, Wadwa RP, Weinstock RS, Willi SM, Miller KM; CGM Intervention in Teens and Young Adults with T1D (CITY) Study Group; CDE10. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2388-2396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6940.
PubMed 32543683
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CGM Intervention in Teens and Young Adults With T1D (CITY): A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Adults 14-<25 With Type 1 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03263494
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CITY / CITY
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Jul 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adolescents and young adults with T1D and poor glycemic control (age 14-< 25 years, T1D duration >12 months, HbA1c 7.5-<11.0%, using an insulin pump or MDI)) will be randomly assigned to either CGM or BGM. Sample size will be 150. The primary outcome assessment will be HbA1c after 6 months. Secondary outcomes will include HbA1c, CGM metrics (control group will wear blinded CGM at 13 and 24 weeks), and quality of life measures. The randomized trial will be followed by a 6-month extension study during which the RCT control group will initiate CGM and the RCT CGM group will continue CGM.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CGM | Active comparator | Device: Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) |
| BGM | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 24 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of T1D, with either age of T1D diagnosis < 10 years of age OR a history of positive T1D related antibodies in the medical record
- Age 14-<25 years
- Diabetes duration ≥ 1 year
- Total daily insulin requirement ≥ 0.4 units/kg/day
- HbA1c 7.5% to <11.0% (Point of care device or local lab measured as part of study at screening visit)
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Use of unblinded personal CGM and/or flash CGM, outside of a research study, as part of real-time diabetes management in the last 3 months
- Unable to use CGM device for minimum number of hours during blinded pre-randomization period or skin reaction from adhesive that would preclude participation in the randomized trial
- Started on non-insulin medication for blood glucose control within the past 3 months or plans to begin within the next 6 months
- The presence of a significant medical disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect the wearing of the sensors (such as a skin condition), or the completion of any aspect of the protocol.
- More than 1 episode of DKA in the past 6 months as defined in the adverse events chapter.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)Participants randomized to the CGM Group will receive a Dexcom CGM device and be instructed on how to utilize the CGM data in real time for diabetes management. | Device | CGM |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 26 Weeks Adjusted for Baseline
Time frame: 6 months
20 secondary outcomes
% With HbA1c <7.0%
Time frame: 6 months
% With HbA1c <7.5%
Time frame: 6 months
% With Relative Reduction ≥ 10%
Time frame: 6 months
% With Absolute Reduction ≥ 0.5%
Time frame: 6 months
% With Absolute Reduction ≥ 1%
Time frame: 6 months
% With Absolute Reduction ≥ 0.5% or HbA1c < 7.0%
Time frame: 6 months
CGM % Time in Range 70-180 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 months
CGM Mean Glucose
Time frame: 6 months
CGM Glucose Variability Measured by Coefficient of Variation
Time frame: 6 months
CGM % Time > 180 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 months
CGM % Time > 300 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 months
CGM % Time < 54 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 months
CGM % Time < 70 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of CGM Measured Hypoglycemic Episodes (Using <54 mg/dL)
Time frame: 6 months
CGM Self Efficacy Questionnaire Score
Time frame: 6 months
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire Score
Time frame: 6 months
Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Questionnaire Score
Time frame: 6 months
Hypoglycemia Confidence Questionnaire Score
Time frame: 6 months
Diabetes Technology Attitudes Questionnaire Score
Time frame: 6 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42459945Bilionis I, Berrios RC, de Arriba Munoz A, Fernandez-Luque L, Castillo C. A framework for assessing algorithmic discrimination risks in training data: a case of pediatric type 1 diabetes. JAMIA Open. 2026 Jul 14;9(4):ooag125. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag125. eCollection 2026 Aug.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40303270Miller KM, Bauza C, Kanapka LG, Clements MA, DeSalvo DJ, Hood K, Messer LH, Sherr J, Bergamo K, Criego A, Freiner E, Lyons SK, Monzavi R, Moore W, Prahalad P, Simmons JH, Sulik M, Wadwa RP, Weinstock RS, Willi SM, Williams K, Laffel LM; CITY Study Group. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Provides Durable Glycemic Benefit in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: 12-Month Follow-Up Results. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Oct 26;2023:6718115. doi: 10.1155/2023/6718115. eCollection 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32543683Laffel LM, Kanapka LG, Beck RW, Bergamo K, Clements MA, Criego A, DeSalvo DJ, Goland R, Hood K, Liljenquist D, Messer LH, Monzavi R, Mouse TJ, Prahalad P, Sherr J, Simmons JH, Wadwa RP, Weinstock RS, Willi SM, Miller KM; CGM Intervention in Teens and Young Adults with T1D (CITY) Study Group; CDE10. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2388-2396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6940.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
A Novel Miniature Equine-Assisted Diabetes Education Program for Youth: Evaluating the Diabetes Equine Empowerment Program (DEEP).
Diabetes (Insulin-requiring, Type 1 or Type 2), Pediatric Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Diabetes in African Youth
type1diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 14 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 26 Weeks Adjusted for Baseline (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03263494, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2026.