Vaccine Decision MakingEPICC-HPVNCT03267251
Engaging Patients and Providers in Collaborative Communication on HPV Vaccination (EPICC-HPV)
A study testing Vacteens Web app for mobile devices and Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphlet in people with Vaccine Decision Making, run by University of New Mexico.
Trial summary
Vaccination against Human Papillomavirus is recommended for adolescent females by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), physicians, and many medical organizations, yet uptake of HPV vaccines remains very low. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 26 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Vaccine Decision Making
- What is being tested?
- Vacteens Web app for mobile devices and Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphlet
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 28 Aug 2017to 28 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 26 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parent of an adolescent girl ages 11-14, adolescent girl has not yet received HPV vaccination
Who cannot join
- adolescent girl has received HPV vaccination
About this study
Vaccination against Human Papillomavirus is recommended for adolescent females by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), physicians, and many medical organizations, yet uptake of HPV vaccines remains very low. CDC data reveal that in 2013 only 44.3% of 13-17 year old females in New Mexico (and 37.6% nationwide) had completed the 3-dose HPV vaccine series. These data reveal the uptake of the HPV vaccines is unacceptably low, thereby diminishing its ability to provide population-level protection against the HPV types known to cause cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers in women, oropharyngeal and anal cancers in men and women, and penile cancers in men. The danger of very low vaccination rates is that adolescents of all ages will continue to be vulnerable to HPV and the associated cancer risks.
Despite recommendations for HPV, parents continue to have concerns about HPV vaccination. Clinicians often lack a clear frame for discussions about HPV vaccination with parents, so much so that recent research indicates that pediatricians' discussions with parents about vaccinations in general often take the form of bargaining, e.g., "since this may be too early for the vaccination, can we delay the vaccination schedule?" Effective messaging is needed to close a knowledge gap among parents around HPV and HPV vaccines, improve communication and shared decision-making about HPV vaccination between adolescent girls' parents and physicians, and ultimately prompt uptake of HPV vaccines.
This project will employ a web-based intervention on HPV as a way to improve knowledge, communication and shared decision-making about HPV vaccination for 11-13 year old girls and their parents. A clinic-based comparative effectiveness randomized trial will be used to examine the impact of the website on vaccine-related outcomes and vaccine uptake. New Mexico pediatric clinics will be randomly assigned to either the usual care clinic-based communication about HPV vaccination or to usual care plus web-based dissemination. Assessments of vaccine-related outcomes, including shared decision-making between girls, parents and physicians, will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months and vaccine uptake and dose adherence will be abstracted from clinic vaccine records at 9 months. An effective web-based resource should increase parents' knowledge, intentions and motivations to vaccinate
Read the detailed description
Uptake of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in the U.S. remains very low. (RQ-1) The quadrivalent HPV vaccine has been routinely recommended for adolescent females by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that in 2013, the uptake of HPV vaccines (all three doses) was 37.6% for females (ages 13-17 years). The Healthy People 2020 target for vaccination coverage of adolescent females aged 13-15 years is 80.0% for ≥3 doses of HPV, far above current national rates for HPV vaccine uptake. In New Mexico, the 3-dose completion rate for HPV vaccination for females ages 13-17 is currently 44.3%. However, for girls in the recommended early age vaccination range (11-13), a recent estimate provided by the New Mexico Dept. of Public Health Vaccination Program reveals that in 2012 approximately 7% of 11-12 year old New Mexico adolescent girls completed all 3 doses of HPV vaccine, and in 2013 approximately 9% had completed all 3 doses. In the simplest terms, the uptake of the HPV vaccines is unacceptably low, diminishing its ability to confer population-level protection against the HPV types known to cause cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers in women, oropharyngeal and anal cancers in men and women, and penile cancers in men. The danger given the very low vaccination rates reported above is that a significant proportion of adolescents of all ages will not receive the HPV vaccine and continue to be vulnerable to HPV and the associated cancer risks.
Physicians' views of and recommendations for HPV vaccination and parents' perceptions of the HPV vaccines predict HPV vaccine uptake. Despite convincing data on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, and a wide variety of medical organizations recommending them, parents continue to have concerns about HPV vaccination. The pattern of vaccine uptake also increases the risk of vaccine-related health disparity across gender and ethnic groups. While minority youth are more likely to begin vaccination programs, they are significantly less likely to complete vaccination programs for reasons that remain in debate. As a result, minority youth lack adequate protection from preventable illnesses. This is particularly problematic as such deficits can build into larger medical consequences later in life.
Diffusion of Innovations theory (DI) provides a framework for explaining vaccine uptake. DI is a theory that seeks to explain how, what, and why new ideas (e.g., vaccines) are spread through different populations at different rates. One tenet of DI is that effective messaging is necessary for the diffusion of a new innovation, and there is a lack of effective messaging to parents to close the knowledge gap about HPV vaccines, resulting in poor uptake. Both the CDC and the President's Cancer Advisory Board call for the development of effective and accessible messaging to improve decision-making around adolescent vaccination, particularly for the HPV vaccines. Effective messaging is especially important to reach minority groups who experience health disparities, especially to parents for whom English may not be the first language. Because parents drive the decision-making around vaccine uptake, messaging should be focused on them, but should include adolescents as well. Clinicians also often lack a clear frame for discussions about HPV vaccination with parents. The topic of vaccines is a polarizing one for many physicians and their patients (parents and children). Physicians often find their expertise and recommendations being accepted by parents for certain areas of their child's care (e.g., diet, seatbelt use), but not others. Providers are using many strategies in response, but think few are effective. Very little research has been conducted on clinic interventions that improve vaccine uptake, or on interventions that would help physicians effectively frame HPV vaccination discussion with parents. With the recent approval of the new 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil 9), a further premium is placed on effective communication between parents and physicians communicating about HPV vaccines. The focus in this project is to employ a developed and efficacious digital intervention on HPV messaging (GoHealthyGirls.org) as a way to improve the communication and shared decision-making about HPV vaccination between girls' parents and pediatricians. An effective web-based resource in pediatric and family practice clinics should increase parents' knowledge, intentions and motivations to vaccinate, enhance pediatrician-parent shared decision making for HPV vaccination, and increase HPV vaccination rates.
A clinic-based comparative effectiveness randomized trial will be used to examine the impact of the GoHealthyGirls website on vaccine-related outcomes and vaccine uptake. Pediatric clinics within established health care networks in New Mexico will be randomly assigned to either the usual care clinic-based communication about HPV vaccination (UC) or to usual care plus web-based dissemination (UC+GHG). Assessments of vaccine-related outcomes, including shared decision making between parents and physicians, will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months. Vaccine uptake and dose adherence will be abstracted from clinic vaccine records. Comparative effectiveness, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity of treatment effects analyses are planned. An extensive parent and stakeholder engagement plan will be utilized, and includes an Adolescent HPV Immunization Advocacy Coalition that will involve parents across New Mexico, and an Adolescent HPV Immunization Expert Advisory Board that will involve clinicians, vaccine experts and researchers in New Mexico. Quarterly meetings of these groups will review project plans, protocols, and processes, and link the project to the communities and population of New Mexico.
- Conditions
- Vaccine Decision Making
- Being tested
- Vacteens Web app for mobile devices, Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphlet
- Keywords
- Vaccine Decision Making, Public Health, Health Communication, Digital Interventions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vacteens Web app for mobile devicesOther
The Web app provides parents of young adolescent girls (ages 11-14) accurate information about HPV Vaccination, and a number of tools to aid informed decision making.
Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphletOther
The usual communication about HPV Vaccination in clinics is for parents to be issued the CDC pamphlet on HPV Vaccination.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Clinic communication - HPV Vaccine | Active comparator | Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphlet Receives: Other: Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphlet |
| Usual Care and Web App on HPV Vaccine | Experimental | Usual Care and Web app on HPV Vaccine: Vacteens Web app for mobile devices Receives: Other: Vacteens Web app for mobile devices |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vaccine Adoption
Shot records of initial and second HPV vaccination
Measured: 9-month follow up
Secondary outcomes (3)
Parental HPV vaccination knowledge - questionnaire
Assessment of HPV-related knowledge among parents, developed by Perez, et al.
Measured: Baseline, 3-month and 9-month follow-up
Shared decision-making (SDM-Q9) questionnaire
Assessment of Shared Decision Making, developed by Kriston, et al.
Measured: 3-month and 9-month follow-up
Physician-Patient Communication questionnaire
Satisfaction of communication between healthcare provider and parent, developed by Street, et al.
Measured: 3-month and 9-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2017
- Study start28 Aug 2017
- Primary completion28 Aug 2017
- Study completion28 Aug 2017
Why it stopped: Parallel record under the prime awardee (Klein Buendel)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Vaccine Decision MakingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This research project will compare usual care clinic-based communication about HPV vaccination (UC) to usual care plus web-based dissemination (UC+GHG) of information on HPV vaccination to parents and adolescent girls using a pair-matched group-randomized pretest-posttest design protocol. Pediatric/family practice clinics in New Mexico (n=30 clinics) will be pair-mated and one clinic per pair will be randomized to UC+GHG condition via the website, GoHealthyGirls.org. The remaining clinic will continue to receive UC only. Assessment protocols will be conducted at pretest, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up points, measuring knowledge, compatibility and relative advantage principles in DI, shared decision making, and vaccine adoption by girls. Thus, the proposed trial design will be a 2 (UC v. UC+GHG) intervention x 3 (level of time - pretest vs. 3-month follow-up vs. 9-month follow-up) mixed factorial design with participants nested within clinics.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Klein Buendel, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- William Lawrence, MD, Study chair, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Organization
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03267251
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UNewMexico
- Acronym
- EPICC-HPV
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan at this time.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Engaging Patients and Providers in Collaborative Communication on HPV Vaccination (EPICC-HPV)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03267251
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EPICC-HPV / UNewMexico
- Conditions
- Vaccine Decision Making
- Keywords
- Vaccine Decision Making, Public Health, Health Communication, Digital Interventions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Parallel record under the prime awardee (Klein Buendel)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of New MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Klein Buendel, Inc.
- Study start
- 28 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Vaccination against Human Papillomavirus is recommended for adolescent females by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), physicians, and many medical organizations, yet uptake of HPV vaccines remains very low. CDC data reveal that in 2013 only 44.3% of 13-17 year old females in New Mexico (and 37.6% nationwide) had completed the 3-dose HPV vaccine series. These data reveal the uptake of the HPV vaccines is unacceptably low, thereby diminishing its ability to provide population-level protection against the HPV types known to cause cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers in women, oropharyngeal and anal cancers in men and women, and penile cancers in men. The danger of very low vaccination rates is that adolescents of all ages will continue to be vulnerable to HPV and the associated cancer risks.
Despite recommendations for HPV, parents continue to have concerns about HPV vaccination. Clinicians often lack a clear frame for discussions about HPV vaccination with parents, so much so that recent research indicates that pediatricians' discussions with parents about vaccinations in general often take the form of bargaining, e.g., "since this may be too early for the vaccination, can we delay the vaccination schedule?" Effective messaging is needed to close a knowledge gap among parents around HPV and HPV vaccines, improve communication and shared decision-making about HPV vaccination between adolescent girls' parents and physicians, and ultimately prompt uptake of HPV vaccines.
This project will employ a web-based intervention on HPV as a way to improve knowledge, communication and shared decision-making about HPV vaccination for 11-13 year old girls and their parents. A clinic-based comparative effectiveness randomized trial will be used to examine the impact of the website on vaccine-related outcomes and vaccine uptake. New Mexico pediatric clinics will be randomly assigned to either the usual care clinic-based communication about HPV vaccination or to usual care plus web-based dissemination. Assessments of vaccine-related outcomes, including shared decision-making between girls, parents and physicians, will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months and vaccine uptake and dose adherence will be abstracted from clinic vaccine records at 9 months. An effective web-based resource should increase parents' knowledge, intentions and motivations to vaccinate
Detailed description
Uptake of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in the U.S. remains very low. (RQ-1) The quadrivalent HPV vaccine has been routinely recommended for adolescent females by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that in 2013, the uptake of HPV vaccines (all three doses) was 37.6% for females (ages 13-17 years). The Healthy People 2020 target for vaccination coverage of adolescent females aged 13-15 years is 80.0% for ≥3 doses of HPV, far above current national rates for HPV vaccine uptake. In New Mexico, the 3-dose completion rate for HPV vaccination for females ages 13-17 is currently 44.3%. However, for girls in the recommended early age vaccination range (11-13), a recent estimate provided by the New Mexico Dept. of Public Health Vaccination Program reveals that in 2012 approximately 7% of 11-12 year old New Mexico adolescent girls completed all 3 doses of HPV vaccine, and in 2013 approximately 9% had completed all 3 doses. In the simplest terms, the uptake of the HPV vaccines is unacceptably low, diminishing its ability to confer population-level protection against the HPV types known to cause cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers in women, oropharyngeal and anal cancers in men and women, and penile cancers in men. The danger given the very low vaccination rates reported above is that a significant proportion of adolescents of all ages will not receive the HPV vaccine and continue to be vulnerable to HPV and the associated cancer risks.
Physicians' views of and recommendations for HPV vaccination and parents' perceptions of the HPV vaccines predict HPV vaccine uptake. Despite convincing data on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, and a wide variety of medical organizations recommending them, parents continue to have concerns about HPV vaccination. The pattern of vaccine uptake also increases the risk of vaccine-related health disparity across gender and ethnic groups. While minority youth are more likely to begin vaccination programs, they are significantly less likely to complete vaccination programs for reasons that remain in debate. As a result, minority youth lack adequate protection from preventable illnesses. This is particularly problematic as such deficits can build into larger medical consequences later in life.
Diffusion of Innovations theory (DI) provides a framework for explaining vaccine uptake. DI is a theory that seeks to explain how, what, and why new ideas (e.g., vaccines) are spread through different populations at different rates. One tenet of DI is that effective messaging is necessary for the diffusion of a new innovation, and there is a lack of effective messaging to parents to close the knowledge gap about HPV vaccines, resulting in poor uptake. Both the CDC and the President's Cancer Advisory Board call for the development of effective and accessible messaging to improve decision-making around adolescent vaccination, particularly for the HPV vaccines. Effective messaging is especially important to reach minority groups who experience health disparities, especially to parents for whom English may not be the first language. Because parents drive the decision-making around vaccine uptake, messaging should be focused on them, but should include adolescents as well. Clinicians also often lack a clear frame for discussions about HPV vaccination with parents. The topic of vaccines is a polarizing one for many physicians and their patients (parents and children). Physicians often find their expertise and recommendations being accepted by parents for certain areas of their child's care (e.g., diet, seatbelt use), but not others. Providers are using many strategies in response, but think few are effective. Very little research has been conducted on clinic interventions that improve vaccine uptake, or on interventions that would help physicians effectively frame HPV vaccination discussion with parents. With the recent approval of the new 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil 9), a further premium is placed on effective communication between parents and physicians communicating about HPV vaccines. The focus in this project is to employ a developed and efficacious digital intervention on HPV messaging (GoHealthyGirls.org) as a way to improve the communication and shared decision-making about HPV vaccination between girls' parents and pediatricians. An effective web-based resource in pediatric and family practice clinics should increase parents' knowledge, intentions and motivations to vaccinate, enhance pediatrician-parent shared decision making for HPV vaccination, and increase HPV vaccination rates.
A clinic-based comparative effectiveness randomized trial will be used to examine the impact of the GoHealthyGirls website on vaccine-related outcomes and vaccine uptake. Pediatric clinics within established health care networks in New Mexico will be randomly assigned to either the usual care clinic-based communication about HPV vaccination (UC) or to usual care plus web-based dissemination (UC+GHG). Assessments of vaccine-related outcomes, including shared decision making between parents and physicians, will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months. Vaccine uptake and dose adherence will be abstracted from clinic vaccine records. Comparative effectiveness, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity of treatment effects analyses are planned. An extensive parent and stakeholder engagement plan will be utilized, and includes an Adolescent HPV Immunization Advocacy Coalition that will involve parents across New Mexico, and an Adolescent HPV Immunization Expert Advisory Board that will involve clinicians, vaccine experts and researchers in New Mexico. Quarterly meetings of these groups will review project plans, protocols, and processes, and link the project to the communities and population of New Mexico.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This research project will compare usual care clinic-based communication about HPV vaccination (UC) to usual care plus web-based dissemination (UC+GHG) of information on HPV vaccination to parents and adolescent girls using a pair-matched group-randomized pretest-posttest design protocol. Pediatric/family practice clinics in New Mexico (n=30 clinics) will be pair-mated and one clinic per pair will be randomized to UC+GHG condition via the website, GoHealthyGirls.org. The remaining clinic will continue to receive UC only. Assessment protocols will be conducted at pretest, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up points, measuring knowledge, compatibility and relative advantage principles in DI, shared decision making, and vaccine adoption by girls. Thus, the proposed trial design will be a 2 (UC v. UC+GHG) intervention x 3 (level of time - pretest vs. 3-month follow-up vs. 9-month follow-up) mixed factorial design with participants nested within clinics.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Clinic communication - HPV Vaccine | Active comparator | Other: Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphletStandard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphlet |
| Usual Care and Web App on HPV Vaccine | Experimental | Other: Vacteens Web app for mobile devicesUsual Care and Web app on HPV Vaccine: Vacteens Web app for mobile devices |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 26 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Parent of an adolescent girl ages 11-14, adolescent girl has not yet received HPV vaccination
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- adolescent girl has received HPV vaccination
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vacteens Web app for mobile devicesThe Web app provides parents of young adolescent girls (ages 11-14) accurate information about HPV Vaccination, and a number of tools to aid informed decision making. | Other | Usual Care and Web App on HPV Vaccine |
| Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphletThe usual communication about HPV Vaccination in clinics is for parents to be issued the CDC pamphlet on HPV Vaccination. | Other | Usual Clinic communication - HPV Vaccine |
Primary outcome
Vaccine Adoption
Time frame: 9-month follow up
Shot records of initial and second HPV vaccination
3 secondary outcomes
Parental HPV vaccination knowledge - questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month and 9-month follow-up
Shared decision-making (SDM-Q9) questionnaire
Time frame: 3-month and 9-month follow-up
Physician-Patient Communication questionnaire
Time frame: 3-month and 9-month follow-up
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jul 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan at this time.
Related trials for Vaccine Decision Making
Active, not recruiting
Conversational AI for Adult Flu Vaccination Decisions
Influenza, Human, Vaccine Hesitancy
Not yet recruiting
Addressing HPV Vaccine Hesitancy by Co-Designing a Digital Health Intervention
HPV, Vaccine Acceptance
Not yet recruiting
Media Orientation to Improve Childhood Vaccine Uptake and Address Parent and Caregivers Vaccine-related Anxiety: A Pilot Study
Anxiety, Vaccination Hesitancy
Recruiting
Older People's Preventive Care Utilization
Health Communication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William Lawrence, MD study chair
Patient Centered Outcomes Research Organization
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vacteens Web app for mobile devices and Standard Usual and Customary HPV Information - CDC pamphlet in people with Vaccine Decision Making, run by University of New Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vaccine Adoption (time frame: 9-month follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2023.