AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDNCT03268616

Analyse the Correlation Between sEMG and EMGdi

A study testing inspiratory threshold load device and NPPV in people with COPD, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The most significant pathophysiology change of COPD patients is persistent incompletely reversible airflow obstruction and increased lung volume. As a result, the work of breathing(WB) and neural respiratory drive (NRD)increased. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
COPD
What is being tested?
inspiratory threshold load device and NPPV
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2016to 2 Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • normal cardio-pulmonary function
  • without low inspiratory muscle strength
  • non-smoker
  • without history of the nervous system and respiratory system disease
  • sever to very severe stable stage

Who cannot join

  • systemic application of corticosteroids nearly 4 weeks

About this study

Official title: Investigation of the Correlation of Surface Respiratory EMG With Esophageal Diaphragm EMG

The most significant pathophysiology change of COPD patients is persistent incompletely reversible airflow obstruction and increased lung volume. As a result, the work of breathing(WB) and neural respiratory drive (NRD)increased. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) can reduce the load of respiratory muscles. Detection of NRD can be the index of monitoring for titration of optimal level of ventilator support in the future. As electromyography(EMG) is the most reliable measurement in evaluating NRD that can be used for human. Currently the standard method for evaluation of NRD with EMG is using esophageal multi-paired electrodes catheter(EMGdi) ,it is reliable but invasive .Surface respiratory EMG (sEMG)is a noninvasive measurement. Although it subjected to contamination and less sensitive, recently, advance in technology with multiple pair of surface electrodes is possible to sufficient signals for evaluation of NRD.So the investigator compare the NRD measured by EMGdi and sEMG,and consider that the correlation between them is well in different levels.

Read the detailed description

The most significant pathophysiology change of COPD patients is persistent incompletely reversible airflow obstruction and increased lung volume. As a result, the work of breathing (WB) and neural respiratory drive (NRD) increased. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is the first-line treatment in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). One of the mechanisms is to reduce the load of respiratory muscles. It has been reported that NRD decreased in response to increase of pressure support. Detection of NRD can be the index of monitoring for titration of optimal level of ventilator support in the future.

NRD can be measured with minute ventilation, inspiratory pressure change、mean inspiration flow and electromyography(EMG) of inspiratory muscles. However, the first three methods are subjected to the influenced of lung volume, airway resistance and compliance of respiratory system. So, electromyography is the most reliable measurement in evaluating NRD that can be used for human. Currently the standard method for evaluation of NRD with EMG is using esophageal multi-paired electrodes catheter ,since it is far away from chest wall and close to diaphragm , so the contamination from other respiratory muscles can be reduced .However, catheter placement into esophagus is necessary for this measurement, which limits its use in daily practice. Surface respiratory EMG is a noninvasive measurement. Although it subjected to contamination and less sensitive, recent advance in technology with multiple pair of surface electrodes, including surface diaphragm EMG、parasternal EMG and so on, it is possible to sufficient signals for evaluation of NRD. It has been the hot topics of research recently due to its noninvasive, easiness of use and appropriate for continuing monitor.

Purpose:

  1. To explore the feasibility of surface respiratory electromyography and its correlation with esophageal EMG in conditions of different level of respiratory central drive.
  2. To investigate the dynamic change esophageal EMG and surface EMG in response to increase of pressure support level during noninvasive ventilation, in order to evaluate the feasibility of using surface EMG for titration of pressure support during noninvasive ventilation.

Methodology:

  1. Electromyography: Multi-paired electrodes esophageal catheter was used for detection of esophageal diaphragm electromyography (EMGdi); Surface electrodes for left and right diaphragm and parasternal muscle were used to detect surface electromyography (sEMG).
  2. Monitoring of respiratory physiology parameters: Pneumotachometer and differential pressure transducer were used for measurement of respiratory flow and pressures. lung volume change was calculated with integration of flow.
  3. Regulate neural respiratory drive:1.in normal volunteer,increase the inspiratory threshold load step by step(30%-80%MIP),in order to increase neural respiratory drive;2.in sever COPD patients,increase the pressure support ventilation step by step, in order to decrease neural respiratory drive.
  4. Methods for adjustment of respiratory central drive: (1) The increase of respiratory central drive was induced by inspiratory threshold load step by step (30%-80%MIP) in normal volunteer. (2) The reduction of respiratory central drive was induced by stepwise increase of pressure support level with noninvasive ventilation in COPD patients.

Analysis and statistics:

  1. The correlation between sEMG and EMGdi at different level of respiratory central drive was analyzed with Pearson correlation analysis. The change of Ventilation central drive coupling was calculated.
  2. In COPD patients, the change of respiratory central drive in response to increase of pressure support level (IPAP increase from 8cmH2O to 20cmH2O) during NPPV was evaluated.
  3. The feasibility using sEMG as guidance for adjustment of pressure support level during NPPV was analyzed.
Conditions
COPD
Being tested
inspiratory threshold load device and NPPV
Keywords
neural respiratory drive, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, electromyography
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • inspiratory threshold load device and NPPVDevice

    before experiment ,every subject use a flanged mouthpiece attached to a manually operated occlusion valve in order to measure maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)at functional residual capacity .

    healthy subjects:increase the pressure in a water-sealed inspiratory threshold loading device in order to increase the neural respiratory drive.

    COPD patients:increase the pressure in a non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in order to decrease the neural respiratory drive

Study groups in NCT03268616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy SubjectsExperimentalincrease the inspiratory threshold load step by step(30%-80%MIP),in order to increase neural respiratory drive.
Receives: Device: inspiratory threshold load device and NPPV
Sever COPD PatientsExperimentalincrease the pressure support ventilation step by step, in order to decrease neural respiratory drive.
Receives: Device: inspiratory threshold load device and NPPV

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. correlation between sEMG and EMGdi

    the correlation between sEMG and EMGdi at different level of respiratory central drive was analyzed with Pearson correlation analysis

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 5 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2017
  2. Study start1 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion7 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion2 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03268616
Sponsor's protocol ID
487201278
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
24 Aug 2017
Last updated
1 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Whitelaw WA, Derenne JP. Airway occlusion pressure. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Apr;74(4):1475-83. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.4.1475.

    PubMed 8514660
  • Luo YM, Moxham J, Polkey MI. Diaphragm electromyography using an oesophageal catheter: current concepts. Clin Sci (Lond). 2008 Oct;115(8):233-44. doi: 10.1042/CS20070348.

    PubMed 18782085
  • Reilly CC, Ward K, Jolley CJ, Lunt AC, Steier J, Elston C, Polkey MI, Rafferty GF, Moxham J. Neural respiratory drive, pulmonary mechanics and breathlessness in patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2011 Mar;66(3):240-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.142646. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

    PubMed 21285244
  • Laghi F, Shaikh HS, Morales D, Sinderby C, Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Diaphragmatic neuromechanical coupling and mechanisms of hypercapnia during inspiratory loading. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014 Jul 1;198:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

    PubMed 24747754
  • American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 15;166(4):518-624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12186831
  • Wanke T, Lahrmann H, Formanek D, Zwick H. Effect of posture on inspiratory muscle electromyogram response to hypercapnia. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;64(3):266-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00626290.

    PubMed 1563372
  • Jolley CJ, Luo YM, Steier J, Reilly C, Seymour J, Lunt A, Ward K, Rafferty GF, Polkey MI, Moxham J. Neural respiratory drive in healthy subjects and in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2009 Feb;33(2):289-97. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00093408. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

    PubMed 18829678
  • Li Y, Li YH, Li S, Luo YW, Xiao R, Huang YX, Huang JL, Chen YT, Zhi RC, Chen X. Efficiency of neural respiratory drive for the assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an exploratory study. J Thorac Dis. 2016 May;8(5):958-65. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.70.

    PubMed 27162672
  • Murphy PB, Kumar A, Reilly C, Jolley C, Walterspacher S, Fedele F, Hopkinson NS, Man WD, Polkey MI, Moxham J, Hart N. Neural respiratory drive as a physiological biomarker to monitor change during acute exacerbations of COPD. Thorax. 2011 Jul;66(7):602-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.151332. Epub 2011 May 19.

    PubMed 21597112
  • Suh ES, Mandal S, Harding R, Ramsay M, Kamalanathan M, Henderson K, O'Kane K, Douiri A, Hopkinson NS, Polkey MI, Rafferty G, Murphy PB, Moxham J, Hart N. Neural respiratory drive predicts clinical deterioration and safe discharge in exacerbations of COPD. Thorax. 2015 Dec;70(12):1123-30. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207188. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

    PubMed 26194996
  • Jensen D, O'Donnell DE, Li R, Luo YM. Effects of dead space loading on neuro-muscular and neuro-ventilatory coupling of the respiratory system during exercise in healthy adults: implications for dyspnea and exercise tolerance. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011 Dec 15;179(2-3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

    PubMed 21888993
  • Duiverman ML, van Eykern LA, Vennik PW, Koeter GH, Maarsingh EJ, Wijkstra PJ. Reproducibility and responsiveness of a noninvasive EMG technique of the respiratory muscles in COPD patients and in healthy subjects. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 May;96(5):1723-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00914.2003. Epub 2003 Dec 5.

    PubMed 14660508
  • Maarsingh EJ, van Eykern LA, Sprikkelman AB, Hoekstra MO, van Aalderen WM. Respiratory muscle activity measured with a noninvasive EMG technique: technical aspects and reproducibility. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Jun;88(6):1955-61. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.1955.

    PubMed 10846005
  • Nava S, Ambrosino N, Rubini F, Fracchia C, Rampulla C, Torri G, Calderini E. Effect of nasal pressure support ventilation and external PEEP on diaphragmatic activity in patients with severe stable COPD. Chest. 1993 Jan;103(1):143-50. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.1.143.

    PubMed 8417869
  • Reilly CC, Jolley CJ, Ward K, MacBean V, Moxham J, Rafferty GF. Neural respiratory drive measured during inspiratory threshold loading and acute hypercapnia in healthy individuals. Exp Physiol. 2013 Jul;98(7):1190-8. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2012.071415. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

    PubMed 23504646

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing inspiratory threshold load device and NPPV in people with COPD, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

correlation between sEMG and EMGdi (time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03268616, which also lists 25 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in