Malar and Sub-malar Volume DeficiencyNCT03270293
Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of a Bio-revitalizing Product Containing Hyaluronic Acid With High and Low Molecular Weight
A study testing Profhilo in people with Malar and Sub-malar Volume Deficiency, run by Derming SRL at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Primary end point of the study was to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations tolerance and efficacy of a bio-revitalizing product containing hyaluronic acid with high (H-HA) and low (L-HA) molecular weight; the micro-injection of the study product was performed by a specialized dermatologist… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 60 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malar and Sub-malar Volume Deficiency
- What is being tested?
- Profhilo
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Aug 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 60 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- female sex
- age 30-60 years
- agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up
- accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products
- accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study, without appropriate sun protection
- accepting to sign the Informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- pregnancy
- lactation
- subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study
- subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test during the basal visit, 4 and 8 weeks after the first biomineralising treatment execution
- performing skin treatments for aesthetic correction (biomaterials implants, face lifting, botox injections, laser, chemical peeling) in the 12 months prior to the study start
- performing permanent filler in the past
Show all 25Show fewer
- change in the normal habits regarding food, physical activity, face cosmetic, cleansing and make-up use during the month preceding the test
- sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (an accurate anamnestic assessment will performed by the investigator)
- subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable
- participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 3 months.
- presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area, as lesions, scars, malformations
- recurrent facial/labial herpes
- clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
- diabetes
- endocrine disease
- hepatic disorder
- renal disorder
- cardiac disorder
- pulmonary disease
- cancer
- neurological or psychological disease
- inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease
- drug allergy.
- anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of contraceptive or hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago)
- assumption of drugs able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Primary end point of the study was to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations tolerance and efficacy of a bio-revitalizing product containing hyaluronic acid with high (H-HA) and low (L-HA) molecular weight; the micro-injection of the study product was performed by a specialized dermatologist, bilaterally on the face (zygomatic protuberance, nostril's angle, inferior margin of tragus, lip marionette lines, mandibular angle) of healthy female volunteers aged 30-60 years.
It was also aim of this study to evaluate efficacy by the volunteers and tolerance both by investigator and volunteers.
- Conditions
- Malar and Sub-malar Volume Deficiency
- Being tested
- Profhilo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ProfhiloDevice
Also called IBSA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Profhilo | Experimental | The intradermal procedure was performed bilaterally on the face, at level of the following five points:
1. zygomatic protuberance
2. nostril's angle
3. inferior margin of tragus
4. lip marionette lines
5. mandibular angle. The amount of product injected, was 0.2 ml for each injection-point. Receives: Device: Profhilo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) improvement
Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where:
Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature.
Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched.
Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; <2mm visible fold when stretched.
Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
Measured: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) improvement
Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where Grade 1 Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature.
Grade 2 An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3 Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature.
Grade 4 An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5 Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.
Measured: 16 weeks
Surface microrelief's regularity improvement
Improvement of skin surface microrelief corresponding to a reduction of the clinical score of microrelief's regularity grade where Grade 1:very regular, Grade 2: regular, Grade 3: irregular, Grade 4: very irregular.
Clinical evaluation of surface microrelief's regularity grade is carried out on the digital picture acquired by FotoFinderDermoscope with a magnification of 20X
Measured: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Determination of profilometric parameters
Reduction of the nasolabial fold and marionette lines profilometric parameters versus baseline where Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.
Replicas of nasolabial fold and marionette lines are obtained using silicone rubber. A picture of the skin replicas is taken thanks to Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik); Primos software is able to elaborate 3D representations of skin wrinkles as well as to measure skin principal profilometric parameters.
Measured: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Skin plastoelasticity improvement
Improvement of the principal torsiometric parameters Ue (immediate extensibility), Uf (final extensibility), Uv (viscoelasticity) and Ur (immediate elastic recovery).Skin firmness is measured with the instrument Dermal Torque Meter (Dia-Stron Ltd., UK).
Measured: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Superficial skin hydration improvement
Improvement of skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany).
The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.
Measured: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Deep skin hydration improvement
Improvement of tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)
Measured: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2017
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionAug 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Malar and Sub-malar Volume DeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Derming SRL
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adele Sparavigna, Derming SRL
- Investigators
- Adele Sparavigna, Doctor, Principal investigator, Derming SRL
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03270293
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E1214
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of a Bio-revitalizing Product Containing Hyaluronic Acid With High and Low Molecular Weight
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03270293
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E1214
- Conditions
- Malar and Sub-malar Volume Deficiency
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Derming SRLUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2015
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary end point of the study was to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations tolerance and efficacy of a bio-revitalizing product containing hyaluronic acid with high (H-HA) and low (L-HA) molecular weight; the micro-injection of the study product was performed by a specialized dermatologist, bilaterally on the face (zygomatic protuberance, nostril's angle, inferior margin of tragus, lip marionette lines, mandibular angle) of healthy female volunteers aged 30-60 years.
It was also aim of this study to evaluate efficacy by the volunteers and tolerance both by investigator and volunteers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Profhilo | Experimental | Device: ProfhiloThe intradermal procedure was performed bilaterally on the face, at level of the following five points: 1. zygomatic protuberance 2. nostril's angle 3. inferior margin of tragus 4. lip marionette lines 5. mandibular angle. The amount of product injected, was 0.2 ml for each injection-point. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- female sex
- age 30-60 years
- agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up
- accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products
- accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study, without appropriate sun protection
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- pregnancy
- lactation
- subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study
- subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test during the basal visit, 4 and 8 weeks after the first biomineralising treatment execution
- performing skin treatments for aesthetic correction (biomaterials implants, face lifting, botox injections, laser, chemical peeling) in the 12 months prior to the study start
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ProfhiloAlso: IBSA | Device | Profhilo |
Primary outcome
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) improvement
Time frame: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where: Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature. Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched. Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; <2mm visible fold when stretched. Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) improvement
Time frame: 16 weeks
Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where Grade 1 Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 2 An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3 Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 4 An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5 Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.
Surface microrelief's regularity improvement
Time frame: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Improvement of skin surface microrelief corresponding to a reduction of the clinical score of microrelief's regularity grade where Grade 1:very regular, Grade 2: regular, Grade 3: irregular, Grade 4: very irregular. Clinical evaluation of surface microrelief's regularity grade is carried out on the digital picture acquired by FotoFinderDermoscope with a magnification of 20X
Determination of profilometric parameters
Time frame: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Reduction of the nasolabial fold and marionette lines profilometric parameters versus baseline where Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth. Replicas of nasolabial fold and marionette lines are obtained using silicone rubber. A picture of the skin replicas is taken thanks to Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik); Primos software is able to elaborate 3D representations of skin wrinkles as well as to measure skin principal profilometric parameters.
Skin plastoelasticity improvement
Time frame: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Improvement of the principal torsiometric parameters Ue (immediate extensibility), Uf (final extensibility), Uv (viscoelasticity) and Ur (immediate elastic recovery).Skin firmness is measured with the instrument Dermal Torque Meter (Dia-Stron Ltd., UK).
Superficial skin hydration improvement
Time frame: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Improvement of skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany). The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.
Deep skin hydration improvement
Time frame: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).
Improvement of tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2017.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adele Sparavigna, Doctor principal investigator
Derming SRL
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Profhilo in people with Malar and Sub-malar Volume Deficiency, run by Derming SRL at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) improvement (time frame: Basal visit (T0), Week 4 (T4W) , Week 8 (T8W), Week 12 (T12W), Week 16 (T16W).). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2017.