Patient SatisfactionNCT03274336
Influence of Audiovisual Aids in the Preanesthetic Interview
A study testing questionnaire, face-to-face interview and brochure in people with Patient Satisfaction, run by Schulthess Klinik.
Trial summary
1000 patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about preanesthetic visit right after the interview. On a daily randomization the Groups will be assigned to: Group A = face-to-face interview; Group B = interview plus brochure, Group C= interview plus movie. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Patient Satisfaction
- What is being tested?
- questionnaire, face-to-face interview and brochure
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,172 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2015to 30 Sep 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- voluntary
Who cannot join
- language Problems
- not able to read or write
- patients does not want to fill out questionnaire
About this study
Official title: Influence of Audiovisual Aids in the Preanesthetic Interview: A Comparison of the Effect of Face-to-face-interview Versus a Brochure and Video Assisted Interview
1000 patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about preanesthetic visit right after the interview. On a daily randomization the Groups will be assigned to: Group A = face-to-face interview; Group B = interview plus brochure, Group C= interview plus movie.
Evaluation of patient satisfaction und knowledge transfer will be evaluated with a questionnaire filled out right after the interview with the anesthesist.
- Conditions
- Patient Satisfaction
- Being tested
- questionnaire, face-to-face interview, brochure, movie
- Keywords
- patient satisfaction, preanesthesia, movie, brochure, face-to-face interview
- Medical subject headings
- Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
questionnaireBehavioural
questionnaire post preanesthetic interview
face-to-face interviewBehavioural
Group A = face-to-face interview
brochureBehavioural
after reading a brochure a face to face interview will take place
movieBehavioural
after seeing a film about the procedure a face-to-face interview will take place
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| interview | Active comparator | questionnaire after face-to-face interview Receives: Behavioral: questionnaire; Behavioral: face-to-face interview; Behavioral: brochure; Behavioral: movie |
| brochure | Placebo comparator | questionnaire interview plus brochure Receives: Behavioral: questionnaire; Behavioral: brochure |
| movie | Placebo comparator | questionnaire interview plus movie Receives: Behavioral: questionnaire; Behavioral: movie |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient satisfaction on a questionnaire
Patient satisfaction after the preanesthetic interview is measured
Measured: 15 Minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
time
time needed for the preanesthetic interview in Minutes
Measured: 30 Minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2015
- Primary completion1 Sep 2015
- Study completion30 Sep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Patient SatisfactionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,172 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Schulthess Klinik
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Berthold Moser, MD, Principal investigator, Schulthess Klinik
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03274336
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Schulthess_Anä_12
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Influence of Audiovisual Aids in the Preanesthetic Interview: A Comparison of the Effect of Face-to-face-interview Versus a Brochure and Video Assisted Interview
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03274336
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Schulthess_Anä_12
- Conditions
- Patient Satisfaction
- Keywords
- patient satisfaction, preanesthesia, movie, brochure, face-to-face interview
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,172 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Schulthess KlinikUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
1000 patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about preanesthetic visit right after the interview. On a daily randomization the Groups will be assigned to: Group A = face-to-face interview; Group B = interview plus brochure, Group C= interview plus movie.
Evaluation of patient satisfaction und knowledge transfer will be evaluated with a questionnaire filled out right after the interview with the anesthesist.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| interview | Active comparator | Behavioral: questionnaire, Behavioral: face-to-face interview, Behavioral: brochure, Behavioral: moviequestionnaire after face-to-face interview |
| brochure | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: questionnaire, Behavioral: brochurequestionnaire interview plus brochure |
| movie | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: questionnaire, Behavioral: moviequestionnaire interview plus movie |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- voluntary
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- language Problems
- not able to read or write
- patients does not want to fill out questionnaire
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| questionnairequestionnaire post preanesthetic interview | Behavioural | brochure, interview, movie |
| face-to-face interviewGroup A = face-to-face interview | Behavioural | interview |
| brochureafter reading a brochure a face to face interview will take place | Behavioural | brochure, interview |
| movieafter seeing a film about the procedure a face-to-face interview will take place | Behavioural | interview, movie |
Primary outcome
Patient satisfaction on a questionnaire
Time frame: 15 Minutes
Patient satisfaction after the preanesthetic interview is measured
1 secondary outcome
time
Time frame: 30 Minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Sep 2017.
Related trials for Patient Satisfaction
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Hybrid mHealth and Telerehabilitation vs Conventional Physiotherapy for Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Subacromial Pain Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Mandala Coloring on Anxiety, Pain, Vital Signs, and Patient Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
Mandala Coloring
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Web-based Single-session Intervention Combined With Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention for Patients With Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Awaiting Inpatient Treatment
PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Berthold Moser, MD principal investigator
Schulthess Klinik
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing questionnaire, face-to-face interview and brochure in people with Patient Satisfaction, run by Schulthess Klinik.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient satisfaction on a questionnaire (time frame: 15 Minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2017.