Plasma Cell MyelomaPhase 3IKEMANCT03275285
Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab, Carfilzomib And Dexamethasone To Carfilzomib And Dexamethasone In Relapse And/Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients
A Phase 3 study testing isatuximab SAR650984, carfilzomib and dexamethasone in people with Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Sanofi at 70 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study it to compare the efficacity of isatuximab when combined to carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma already treated with 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Plasma Cell Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- isatuximab SAR650984, carfilzomib and dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 302 participants
- Where
- 70 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 25 Oct 2017to 3 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants with MM previously treated with prior 1 to 3 lines and with measurable serum M-protein (>= 0.5 gram/deciliter) and/or urine M-protein (>= 200 milligram/24 hours).
Who cannot join
- Participants previously pretreated with carfilzomib, who never achieved at least one minor response during previous therapies and/or last previous therapy completed within 14 last days.
- Participants with serum free light chain (FLC) measurable disease only.
- Participants less than 18 years old, participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status more than 2.
- Participants with inadequate biological tests.
- Participants with myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, superior or equal to grade 3 arrhythmias, stroke or transient ischemic attack within last 6 months, and/or left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 40%.
- Participants with previous cancer unless disease free for more than 5 years or in situ cancer curatively treated.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Participants with known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome related illness or human immunodeficiency virus requiring antiretroviral treatment, or hepatitis A, B, or C active infection.
- Women of childbearing potential or male participant with women of childbearing potential who do not agree to use highly effective method of birth control.
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
70 sites in 16 countries.
70 sites in 16 countries
Australia7 sites
Investigational Site Number : 0360005
Blacktown, New South Wales, 2148
Investigational Site Number : 0360001
Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065
Investigational Site Number : 0360004
Heidelberg West, Victoria, 3081
Investigational Site Number : 0360007
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Investigational Site Number : 0360006
Tweed Heads, New South Wales, 2485
Investigational Site Number : 0360008
West Perth, Western Australia, 6005
Investigational Site Number : 0360002
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500
Japan7 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3920007
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556
Investigational Site Number : 3920004
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-8935
Investigational Site Number : 3920006
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666
Investigational Site Number : 3920005
Shiwa-gun, Iwate, 028-3695
Investigational Site Number : 3920003
Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777
Investigational Site Number : 3920001
Suwa-shi, Nagano, 392-8510
Investigational Site Number : 3920002
Yamagata, 990-9585
France6 sites
Investigational Site Number : 2500003
Lille, 59037
Investigational Site Number : 2500001
Nantes, 44093
Investigational Site Number : 2500006
Paris, 75012
Investigational Site Number : 2500002
Pessac, 33600
Investigational Site Number : 2500005
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Investigational Site Number : 2500004
Poitiers, 86021
Brazil5 sites
Hospital de Amor - Hospital do Cancer de Barretos - Fundacao Pio XII Site Number : 0760001
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400
Hospital Mae de Deus Site Number : 0760003
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90110-270
Instituto COI de Educacao e Pesquisa Site Number : 0760004
Rio de Janeiro, 22775-002
Hospital Sao Rafael - Rede D'OR Sao Luiz Site Number : 0760005
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 41253-900
Hospital das Clinicas de Sao Paulo Site Number : 0760002
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000
Greece5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3000002
Athens, 10676
Investigational Site Number : 3000005
Athens, 11527
Investigational Site Number : 3000001
Athens, 11528
Investigational Site Number : 3000004
Pátrai, 26504
Investigational Site Number : 3000003
Thessaloniki, 57010
South Korea5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 4100006
Busan, Busan, 602-715
Investigational Site Number : 4100002
Gangnam-gu, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 06351
Investigational Site Number : 4100001
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 03080
Investigational Site Number : 4100004
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 03722
Investigational Site Number : 4100005
Seoul, 06591
Spain5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7240001
Badalona, Catalunya [Cataluña], 08916
Investigational Site Number : 7240005
Barcelona, Catalunya [Cataluña], 08036
Investigational Site Number : 7240003
Madrid, 28041
Investigational Site Number : 7240004
Seville, 41013
Investigational Site Number : 7240002
Valencia, Valenciana, Comunidad, 46017
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7920003
Adana, 01250
Investigational Site Number : 7920001
Ankara, 06500
Investigational Site Number : 7920005
Bursa, 16059
Investigational Site Number : 7920002
Istanbul, 34381
Investigational Site Number : 7920004
Samsun, 55139
Czechia4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 2030002
Brno, 62500
Investigational Site Number : 2030004
Olomouc, 77900
Investigational Site Number : 2030003
Ostrava - Poruba, 70852
Investigational Site Number : 2030001
Prague, 12808
Hungary4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3480003
Budapest, 1083
Investigational Site Number : 3480001
Budapest, 1097
Investigational Site Number : 3480004
Budapest, 1125
Investigational Site Number : 3480005
Kaposvár, 7400
Italy4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3800003
Bologna, 40138
Investigational Site Number : 3800001
Pisa, 56126
Investigational Site Number : 3800004
Reggio Emilia, 42123
Investigational Site Number : 3800002
Torino, 10126
Canada3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1240002
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Investigational Site Number : 1240001
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Investigational Site Number : 1240003
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
Russia3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6430003
Kirov, 610027
Investigational Site Number : 6430004
Novosibirsk, 630047
Investigational Site Number : 6430002
Yekaterinburg, 620102
United Kingdom3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 8260001
Bristol, Somerset, BS2 8ED
Investigational Site Number : 8260005
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 5WW
Investigational Site Number : 8260004
Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8DH
United States2 sites
UCSF MS Center Site Number : 8400002
San Francisco, California, 94117
Spartanburg Medical Center Site Number : 8400003
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303-3040
New Zealand2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 5540001
Auckland, 1640
Investigational Site Number : 5540002
Wellington, 6021
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing The Clinical Benefit Of Isatuximab Combined With Carfilzomib (Kyprolis®) And Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib With Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapse And/Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With 1 to 3 Prior Lines
The purpose of this study it to compare the efficacity of isatuximab when combined to carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma already treated with 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy.
Read the detailed description
The duration of the study for a patient will include a period for screening of up to 3 weeks. Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable AE, or patient decision to stop the study treatment. After study treatment discontinuation, patients will have follow-up visits until the analysis of overall survival.
- Conditions
- Plasma Cell Myeloma
- Being tested
- isatuximab SAR650984, carfilzomib, dexamethasone
- Keywords
- Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
isatuximab SAR650984Drug
Also called Sarclisa
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion
Route of administration: intravenous
carfilzomibDrug
Also called Kyprolis
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion
Route of administration: intravenous
dexamethasoneDrug
Pharmaceutical form: tablets or solution for infusion
Route of administration: oral or intravenous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (IKd) | Experimental | Isatuximab (intravenous) on day 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 1st cycle, then on day 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles in combination with carfilzomib (intravenous) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 + dexamethasone (intravenous or by mouth [po]) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23 of a 28 day cycle. Receives: Drug: isatuximab SAR650984; Drug: carfilzomib; Drug: dexamethasone |
| Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (Kd) | Active comparator | Carfilzomib (intravenous) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 + dexamethasone (intravenous or po) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23 of a 28 day cycle. Receives: Drug: carfilzomib; Drug: dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) As Determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC): Primary Analysis
Time (in months) from randomization to date of 1st documentation of progressive disease (PD)/date of death from any cause, whichever comes 1st. If PD \& death are not observed before cut-off date/date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD performed prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/cut-off date, whichever comes 1st. PD(IMWG criteria):any 1 of following:Increase(inc) of >=25% in serum M-component from nadir; serum M component inc >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component >=5 g/dL; and/or inc of >=25% in urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion if >1 lesion/ >=50% increase in longest diameter of previous soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm in short axis. Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Progression Free Survival as Determined by Independent Response Committee: [Event Censored if Occurred >8 Weeks From Last Disease Assessment]: Primary Analysis
Time (in months) from randomization to date of 1st PD documentation/death date, whichever is 1st. If PD \& death not observed before cut-off date/date of further anti-myeloma treatment initiation, PFS censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD performed prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Progression/deaths occurring >8 weeks after last disease assessment censored at earliest date of last disease assessment without evidence of progression before initiation of new anti-myeloma treatment \& cut-off date. PD (IMWG criteria): meeting any 1: Inc >=25% in Serum M-component from nadir; serum M component inc >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component >=5 g/dL; and/or inc >=25% in Urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm short axis.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Progression Free Survival as Determined by Independent Response Committee: Final Analysis
PFS: time (in months) from randomization to date of first documentation of PD or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If PD and death are not observed before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment or analysis cut-off date, whichever comes first. PD as per IMWG criteria: any 1 of following: Inc of >=25% in Serum M-component from nadir; serum M component increase >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component was >=5 g/dL; and/or inc of >=25% in Urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion if >1 lesion/ >=50% inc in longest diameter of previous soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm in short axis. PFS estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 January 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Progression Free Survival as Determined by Independent Response Committee [Event Censored if Occurred >8 Weeks From Last Disease Assessment]: Final Analysis
Time (in months) from randomization to date of 1st documentation of PD/date of death from any cause, whichever comes 1st. If PD \& death are not observed before cut-off date/date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD/cut-off date, whichever comes 1st. Progressions/deaths occurring >8 weeks after last disease assessment were censored at earliest date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD before initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment \& cut-off date. PD (per IMWG criteria): meeting any 1 criteria: Inc of >=25% in serum M-component from nadir; serum M component inc >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component was >=5 g/dL; and/or inc of >=25% in urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm in short axis.
Measured: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Secondary outcomes (35)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR) as Determined by Independent Response Committee: Primary Analysis
OR: participants with sCR, CR, VGPR \& partial response (PR) as best overall response assessed by IRC using IMWG response criteria (from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/cutoff date, whichever occurs 1st). sCR: negative immunofixation on serum \& urine, disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytoma, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirate (BMA) + normal FLC ratio (0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. CR: negative immunofixation on serum \& urine, disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytoma, <5% plasma cells in BMA. VGPR: serum \& urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein \& decrease in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h, if present at baseline,>=50% decrease in SPD of soft tissue plasmacytoma.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Determined by Independent Response Committee: Primary Analysis
VGPR or better: defined as participants with sCR, CR and VGPR as the best overall response (defined as best response from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or cut-off date whichever occurs first) as per IRC. As per IMWG response criteria: sCR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in BMAs plus normal FLC ratio (0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in BMAs. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Percentage of Participants With VGPR or Better With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity: Primary Analysis
Percentage of participants with sCR, CR and VGPR for whom MRD assessed by sequencing was negative at any time after first dose of study treatment. MRD was assessed centrally by next-generation sequencing in bone marrow aspiration samples from participants who achieve VGPR or better, to determine depth of response at molecular level. VGPR or better: percentage of participants with sCR, CR and VGPR. sCR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in BMAs plus normal FLC ratio (0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in BMAs. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Percentage of Participants With VGPR or Better With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity: Final Analysis
Percentage of participants with sCR, CR and VGPR for whom MRD assessed by sequencing was negative at any time after first dose of study treatment. MRD was assessed centrally by next-generation sequencing in BM aspiration samples from participants who achieve VGPR or better, to determine depth of response at molecular level. VGPR or better: percentage of participants with sCR, CR and VGPR. sCR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma.
Measured: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) as Per Independent Response Committee: Final Analysis
Complete response was defined as the participants with sCR and CR. IMWG response criteria for sCR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio (0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. Complete response at the time of the final analysis was assessed with hydrashift isatuximab immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) assay, which separated immunoglobulin G (IgG) isatuximab from IgG M protein.
Measured: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response With MRD Negativity: Final Analysis
MRD negativity was defined as the percentage of participants for whom MRD was negative by next-generation sequencing at any timepoint after first dose of study treatment. Threshold for negativity is 10^-5. MRD status in a participant was negative if at least one result of the assessment was negative in the participant otherwise MRD was considered as positive (MRD status reported as positive, missing or unevaluable). CR: participants with sCR and CR. IMWG response criteria for sCR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal FLC ratio (0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. Complete response at the time of the final analysis was assessed with Hydrashift isatuximab IFE assay, which separated IgG isatuximab from IgG M protein.
Measured: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival, defined as the time from the date of randomization to death from any cause. The data reported is based on cut-off date of 7 Feb 2023.
Measured: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2023 (the median duration of follow-up was 56.61 months)
Duration of Response (DOR): Primary Analysis
DOR: time (in months) from date of 1st IRC determined response for participants achieving PR/better to date of 1st documented PD determined by IRC/death, whichever happens 1st. If disease progression/death before analysis cut-off date was not observed, DOR was censored at date of last valid disease assessment performed prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/data cut-off date, whichever was 1st. PD (IMWG criteria): inc of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any 1 of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute inc must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein inc >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute inc must be >=200mg/24 hour),appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% inc from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% inc in the longest diameter of previous lesion >1 cm in short axis. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein \& reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24 h. Estimated by Kaplan Meier method.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time to Progression (TTP): Primary Analysis
TTP was defined as time in months from randomization to the date of first documentation of PD (as determined by the IRC). If progression was not observed before the analysis cut-off date or the date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, TTP was censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment not showing disease progression performed prior to initiation of a further anti-myeloma treatment (if any) or the analysis cut-off date, whichever comes first. As per IMWG criteria, PD was defined for participants with inc of >= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute inc must be >= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein inc >=1 g/dL if the lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (the absolute inc must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% inc from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% inc in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time to First Response: Primary Analysis
Time to first response was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to the date of first IRC determined response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. In the absence of response, participants were censored at the earliest of the date of the last valid disease assessment before disease progression or death, the date of the last valid disease assessment before initiation of a further anti-myeloma treatment (if any) or the analysis cut-off date, whichever comes first. PR per IMWG criteria was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time to Best Response: Primary Analysis
Time to best response was defined as time (in months) from randomization to the date of first occurrence of IRC determined as best overall response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. In absence of response, participants were censored at earliest date of last valid disease assessment before disease progression/death, date of last valid disease assessment before initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment (if any)/ analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. PR (IMWG criteria) was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. Best Overall Response was defined as the best response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or cut-off date, whichever occurs 1st.
Measured: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Second Progression Free Survival (PFS2): Final Analysis - Data Cut-off Date of 14 Jan 2022
PFS2 defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to date of 1st documentation of PD (as assessed by investigator) after initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment /death from any cause, whichever comes 1st. Participants alive without progression after initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment before analysis cut-off date, PFS2 censored at date of last follow-up visit not showing disease progression after initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment /analysis cut-off date, whichever comes 1st. As per IMWG criteria, PD: defined for participants with increase of >= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any 1 of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in longest diameter of previous lesion >1 centimeter short axis.
Measured: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Second Progression Free Survival (PFS2): Overal Survival Analysis - Data Cut-off Date of 07 Feb 2023
PFS2 defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to date of 1st documentation of PD (as assessed by investigator) after initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment /death from any cause, whichever comes 1st. Participants alive without progression after initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment before analysis cut-off date, PFS2 censored at date of last follow-up visit not showing disease progression after initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment /analysis cut-off date, whichever comes 1st. As per IMWG criteria, PD: defined for participants with increase of >= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any 1 of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in longest diameter of previous lesion >1 centimeter short axis.
Measured: From randomization until the overal survival analysis data cut-off date of 07 Feb 2023 (the median duration of follow-up was 56.61 months)
Number of Participants With Renal Response (RR): Primary Analysis
RR comprises of complete RR (CR renal), partial RR (PR renal) \& minor RR (MR renal). CR renal was defined as an improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from <50 mL/min/1.73m^2 at Baseline to >=60 mL/min/1.73m^2 in at least 1 assessment during the treatment period (time from first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment); PR renal was defined as improvement in eGFR from <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 at baseline to at least 1 assessment in the range of 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73m^2 during the on-treatment-period and MR renal was defined as an improvement in eGFR from <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 at Baseline to at least 1 assessment in the range of 15 to 30 mL/min/1.73m^2 during the on-treatment-period or from 15 to 30 mL/min/1.73m^2 at Baseline to at least 1 assessment in the range of 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73m^2 during the on-treatment-period.
Measured: From the first dose of study treatment to 30 days following the last administration of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 114 weeks)
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL): Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status Score at Specified Timepoints
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument that contains 30 items \& provides multidimensional assessment of HRQL. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 are 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale \& are 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). GHS total score is calculated as ([{Q29+Q30}/2]-1)/6*100. Answers are converted into grading scale, with values between 0 (worse outcome) to100 (best outcome). High score represents a favorable outcome with best quality of life for participant. Results reported for primary analysis with data cut-off date 7-Feb-2020.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. It is used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess symptoms and side effects due to treatment or the disease. Disease symptoms domain is one of the four domain scores. Disease symptoms domain consist of 6 questions and the score uses 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Disease Symptoms Domain Score is calculated as ([{Q31+Q32+Q33+Q34+Q35+Q36}/6]-1)/3*100. Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower HRQL.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Side effects of treatment domain is one of the four domain scores. Side effects of treatment domain consists of 10 questions and the score uses a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Side Effects of Treatment Score (MYSE) is calculated as ([{Q37+Q38+Q39+Q40+Q41+Q42+Q43+Q44+Q45+Q46}/10]-1)/3*100. Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more side effects and lower HRQL and lower scores = less side effects and better HRQL.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Body Image Score at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. It is used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess symptoms and side effects due to treatment or the disease. It consists of one question and scores are based on the 4-point Likert scale ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much". Body image score is calculated as: (1 - [Q47-1]/3)*100. Scores are averaged, and transformed to scale ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Future Perspective at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. It is used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess symptoms and side effects due to treatment or the disease. It consists of three questions and the scores are based on the 4-point Likert scale ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much". Future Perspective score is calculated as (1 - ([{Q48+Q49+Q50}/3] -1)/3)*100. Scores are averaged and transformed to scale ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Group Questionnaire With 5 Dimensions and 5 Levels Per Dimension (EQ-5D-5L): Health State Utility Index Value at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health utility and consist in 2 sections a descriptive system comprising 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Each dimension has a 5-level response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Response options are measured with a 5-point Likert scale. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state and lower score indicate worse health state.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health utility and consist of 2 sections; descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and a VAS. The VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 centimeter (cm) vertical VAS; the scale went from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). This information can be used as a quantitative measure of health as judged by the individual respondents.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentration at End of Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab: Primary Analysis
Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion.
Measured: End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1
Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough: Primary Analysis
Ctrough was the plasma concentration observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.
Measured: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1 and Cycle 10 Day 1
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first infusion calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 minutes (min), 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Clast of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Clast was defined as the last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Tlast of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
AUC was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity according to the equation: AUC= AUClast + Clast/λz. AUC was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration. AUClast was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Percentage of Extrapolation of AUC (AUCext) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
AUCext was defined as the percentage of the extrapolation of AUC, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Terminal Half-life (t1/2z) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Clearance at Steady State (CLss) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
CLss was defined as a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body at steady state, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Volume of Distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Vss is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of carfilzomib with isatuximab.
Measured: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA): Primary Analysis
ADA were categorized as: pre-existing, treatment induced, and treatment boosted response. Pre-existing ADA was defined as ADA that were present in samples drawn during the pretreatment period (i.e., before the first isatuximab administration). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA, including participants without pretreatment samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA with an increase in titer during the ADA on-study observation period.
Measured: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: 111 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): LPLV Analysis
Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatments). An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event.
Measured: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose of study treatment administration, up to 349 weeks for Kd arm and 356 weeks for IKd arm (maximum duration of treatment exposure)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2017
- Study start25 Oct 2017
- Primary completion14 Jan 2022
- Study completion3 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plasma Cell MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03275285
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC15246
- Other IDs
- U1111-1195-5957, 2017-001940-37, 2017
- Acronym
- IKEMA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Yong K, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Risse ML, Asset G, Mace S, Martin T; IKEMA study group. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2361-2371. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00592-4. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
PubMed 34097854Martin TG, Capra M, Mohty M, Suzuki K, Quach H, Cavo M, Moreau P, Dimopoulos M, Yong K, Tekle C, Foster MC, Barnes Y, Risse ML, Mikhael J. Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: IKEMA Subgroup Analysis by Prior Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Feb;29(2):134.e1-134.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
PubMed 36372355Chami B, Okuda M, Moayeri M, Pirenne F, Hidaka Y, Nambiar A, Song Z, Bedel O, Zhang B, Hopke J, Deng G, Zhu C, Mace S, Chiron M, Adrian F, Fukao T, Basile FG, Martin T. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody interference with blood compatibility testing: Differentiating isatuximab and daratumumab via functional epitope mapping. Transfusion. 2022 Nov;62(11):2334-2348. doi: 10.1111/trf.17137. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
PubMed 36239134Yong K, Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Casca F, Mace S, Moreau P. Plain language summary of publication of how long people with relapsed multiple myeloma lived after treatment in the IKEMA study: Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone. Future Oncol. 2026 Jun;22(15):1737-1749. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2026.2683336. Epub 2026 Jun 27.
PubMed 42363804Yong K, Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Casca F, Mace S, Risse ML, Moreau P. Isatuximab plus carfilzomib-dexamethasone versus carfilzomib-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): overall survival analysis of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Oct;11(10):e741-e750. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00148-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
PubMed 39067465Thoren K, Menad S, Nouadje G, Mace S. Isatuximab-Specific Immunofixation Electrophoresis Assay to Remove Interference in Serum M-Protein Measurement in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. J Appl Lab Med. 2024 Jul 1;9(4):661-671. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae028.
PubMed 38573925Facon T, Moreau P, Baker R, Min CK, Leleu X, Mohty M, Karlin L, Armstrong NM, Tekle C, Schwab S, Risse ML, Martin T. Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with early versus late relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis. Haematologica. 2024 Feb 1;109(2):604-616. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283073.
PubMed 37584290Kawano Y, Kim K, Min CK, Koh Y, Ishizawa K, Kim SH, Ito S, Tanaka J, Uchiyama M, Ishida T, Kim JS, Moreau P, Martin T, Tada K, Risse ML, Suzuki K. Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Updated IKEMA Subgroup Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Oct;23(10):e360-e367. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
PubMed 37479547Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Yong K, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Casca F, Mace S, Risse ML, Moreau P. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: updated results from IKEMA, a randomized Phase 3 study. Blood Cancer J. 2023 May 9;13(1):72. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00797-8.
PubMed 37156782Beksac M, Spicka I, Hajek R, Bringhen S, Jelinek T, Martin T, Mikala G, Moreau P, Symeonidis A, Rawlings AM, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Evaluation of isatuximab in patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas: An analysis from ICARIA-MM and IKEMA. Leuk Res. 2022 Nov;122:106948. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106948. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
PubMed 36108425Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Yong K, Mikhael J, Risse ML, Asset G, Martin T. Isatuximab plus carfilzomib/dexamethasone versus carfilzomib/dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: IKEMA Phase III study design. Future Oncol. 2020 Jan;16(2):4347-4358. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0431. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
PubMed 31833394
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing The Clinical Benefit Of Isatuximab Combined With Carfilzomib (Kyprolis®) And Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib With Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapse And/Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With 1 to 3 Prior Lines
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03275285
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IKEMA / EFC15246
- Conditions
- Plasma Cell Myeloma
- Keywords
- Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Feb 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study it to compare the efficacity of isatuximab when combined to carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma already treated with 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy.
Detailed description
The duration of the study for a patient will include a period for screening of up to 3 weeks. Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable AE, or patient decision to stop the study treatment. After study treatment discontinuation, patients will have follow-up visits until the analysis of overall survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (IKd) | Experimental | Drug: isatuximab SAR650984, Drug: carfilzomib, Drug: dexamethasoneIsatuximab (intravenous) on day 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 1st cycle, then on day 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles in combination with carfilzomib (intravenous) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 + dexamethasone (intravenous or by mouth [po]) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23 of a 28 day cycle. |
| Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (Kd) | Active comparator | Drug: carfilzomib, Drug: dexamethasoneCarfilzomib (intravenous) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 + dexamethasone (intravenous or po) on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23 of a 28 day cycle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants with MM previously treated with prior 1 to 3 lines and with measurable serum M-protein (>= 0.5 gram/deciliter) and/or urine M-protein (>= 200 milligram/24 hours).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Participants previously pretreated with carfilzomib, who never achieved at least one minor response during previous therapies and/or last previous therapy completed within 14 last days.
- Participants with serum free light chain (FLC) measurable disease only.
- Participants less than 18 years old, participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status more than 2.
- Participants with inadequate biological tests.
- Participants with myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, superior or equal to grade 3 arrhythmias, stroke or transient ischemic attack within last 6 months, and/or left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 40%.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| isatuximab SAR650984Also: SarclisaPharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous | Drug | Isatuximab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (IKd) |
| carfilzomibAlso: KyprolisPharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous | Drug | Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (Kd), Isatuximab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (IKd) |
| dexamethasonePharmaceutical form: tablets or solution for infusion Route of administration: oral or intravenous | Drug | Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (Kd), Isatuximab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (IKd) |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS) As Determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC): Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time (in months) from randomization to date of 1st documentation of progressive disease (PD)/date of death from any cause, whichever comes 1st. If PD \& death are not observed before cut-off date/date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD performed prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/cut-off date, whichever comes 1st. PD(IMWG criteria):any 1 of following:Increase(inc) of >=25% in serum M-component from nadir; serum M component inc >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component >=5 g/dL; and/or inc of >=25% in urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion if >1 lesion/ >=50% increase in longest diameter of previous soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm in short axis. Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression Free Survival as Determined by Independent Response Committee: [Event Censored if Occurred >8 Weeks From Last Disease Assessment]: Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time (in months) from randomization to date of 1st PD documentation/death date, whichever is 1st. If PD \& death not observed before cut-off date/date of further anti-myeloma treatment initiation, PFS censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD performed prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Progression/deaths occurring >8 weeks after last disease assessment censored at earliest date of last disease assessment without evidence of progression before initiation of new anti-myeloma treatment \& cut-off date. PD (IMWG criteria): meeting any 1: Inc >=25% in Serum M-component from nadir; serum M component inc >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component >=5 g/dL; and/or inc >=25% in Urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm short axis.
Progression Free Survival as Determined by Independent Response Committee: Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 January 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
PFS: time (in months) from randomization to date of first documentation of PD or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If PD and death are not observed before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment or analysis cut-off date, whichever comes first. PD as per IMWG criteria: any 1 of following: Inc of >=25% in Serum M-component from nadir; serum M component increase >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component was >=5 g/dL; and/or inc of >=25% in Urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion if >1 lesion/ >=50% inc in longest diameter of previous soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm in short axis. PFS estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression Free Survival as Determined by Independent Response Committee [Event Censored if Occurred >8 Weeks From Last Disease Assessment]: Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Time (in months) from randomization to date of 1st documentation of PD/date of death from any cause, whichever comes 1st. If PD \& death are not observed before cut-off date/date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD/cut-off date, whichever comes 1st. Progressions/deaths occurring >8 weeks after last disease assessment were censored at earliest date of last valid disease assessment not showing PD before initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment \& cut-off date. PD (per IMWG criteria): meeting any 1 criteria: Inc of >=25% in serum M-component from nadir; serum M component inc >=1 g/dL in 2 consecutive assessment, if starting M component was >=5 g/dL; and/or inc of >=25% in urine M-component from nadir and/or development of new bone lesion/soft tissue extramedullary disease/inc >=50% from nadir in sum of perpendicular diameters of existing soft tissue extramedullary disease lesion >1 cm in short axis.
35 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR) as Determined by Independent Response Committee: Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Determined by Independent Response Committee: Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Percentage of Participants With VGPR or Better With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity: Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Percentage of Participants With VGPR or Better With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity: Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) as Per Independent Response Committee: Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response With MRD Negativity: Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2023 (the median duration of follow-up was 56.61 months)
Duration of Response (DOR): Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time to Progression (TTP): Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time to First Response: Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Time to Best Response: Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (the median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)
Second Progression Free Survival (PFS2): Final Analysis - Data Cut-off Date of 14 Jan 2022
Time frame: From randomization until the final analysis data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2022 (the median duration of follow-up was 43.96 months)
Second Progression Free Survival (PFS2): Overal Survival Analysis - Data Cut-off Date of 07 Feb 2023
Time frame: From randomization until the overal survival analysis data cut-off date of 07 Feb 2023 (the median duration of follow-up was 56.61 months)
Number of Participants With Renal Response (RR): Primary Analysis
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment to 30 days following the last administration of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 114 weeks)
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL): Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status Score at Specified Timepoints
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Body Image Score at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Future Perspective at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Group Questionnaire With 5 Dimensions and 5 Levels Per Dimension (EQ-5D-5L): Health State Utility Index Value at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
HRQL: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) at Specified Timepoints: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 25), at the End of Treatment visit (any day up to 114 weeks)
Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentration at End of Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab: Primary Analysis
Time frame: End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1
Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1 and Cycle 10 Day 1
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 minutes (min), 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Clast of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Tlast of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Percentage of Extrapolation of AUC (AUCext) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Terminal Half-life (t1/2z) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Clearance at Steady State (CLss) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Pharmacokinetics: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Carfilzomib: Primary Analysis
Time frame: Cycle 1: pre-dose (0 hour), 30 min, 35 min, 45 min, 60 min, 1 hour 30 min, 2 hours 30 min and 4 hours 30 min post-dose on Day 15
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA): Primary Analysis
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: 111 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): LPLV Analysis
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose of study treatment administration, up to 349 weeks for Kd arm and 356 weeks for IKd arm (maximum duration of treatment exposure)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 34097854Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Yong K, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Risse ML, Asset G, Mace S, Martin T; IKEMA study group. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2361-2371. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00592-4. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 36372355Martin TG, Capra M, Mohty M, Suzuki K, Quach H, Cavo M, Moreau P, Dimopoulos M, Yong K, Tekle C, Foster MC, Barnes Y, Risse ML, Mikhael J. Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: IKEMA Subgroup Analysis by Prior Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Feb;29(2):134.e1-134.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 36239134Chami B, Okuda M, Moayeri M, Pirenne F, Hidaka Y, Nambiar A, Song Z, Bedel O, Zhang B, Hopke J, Deng G, Zhu C, Mace S, Chiron M, Adrian F, Fukao T, Basile FG, Martin T. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody interference with blood compatibility testing: Differentiating isatuximab and daratumumab via functional epitope mapping. Transfusion. 2022 Nov;62(11):2334-2348. doi: 10.1111/trf.17137. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42363804Yong K, Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Casca F, Mace S, Moreau P. Plain language summary of publication of how long people with relapsed multiple myeloma lived after treatment in the IKEMA study: Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone. Future Oncol. 2026 Jun;22(15):1737-1749. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2026.2683336. Epub 2026 Jun 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39067465Yong K, Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Casca F, Mace S, Risse ML, Moreau P. Isatuximab plus carfilzomib-dexamethasone versus carfilzomib-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): overall survival analysis of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Oct;11(10):e741-e750. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00148-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38573925Thoren K, Menad S, Nouadje G, Mace S. Isatuximab-Specific Immunofixation Electrophoresis Assay to Remove Interference in Serum M-Protein Measurement in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. J Appl Lab Med. 2024 Jul 1;9(4):661-671. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae028.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37584290Facon T, Moreau P, Baker R, Min CK, Leleu X, Mohty M, Karlin L, Armstrong NM, Tekle C, Schwab S, Risse ML, Martin T. Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with early versus late relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis. Haematologica. 2024 Feb 1;109(2):604-616. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283073.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37479547Kawano Y, Kim K, Min CK, Koh Y, Ishizawa K, Kim SH, Ito S, Tanaka J, Uchiyama M, Ishida T, Kim JS, Moreau P, Martin T, Tada K, Risse ML, Suzuki K. Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Updated IKEMA Subgroup Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Oct;23(10):e360-e367. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37156782Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Yong K, Capra M, Facon T, Hajek R, Spicka I, Baker R, Kim K, Martinez G, Min CK, Pour L, Leleu X, Oriol A, Koh Y, Suzuki K, Casca F, Mace S, Risse ML, Moreau P. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: updated results from IKEMA, a randomized Phase 3 study. Blood Cancer J. 2023 May 9;13(1):72. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00797-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36108425Beksac M, Spicka I, Hajek R, Bringhen S, Jelinek T, Martin T, Mikala G, Moreau P, Symeonidis A, Rawlings AM, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Evaluation of isatuximab in patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas: An analysis from ICARIA-MM and IKEMA. Leuk Res. 2022 Nov;122:106948. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106948. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31833394Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Yong K, Mikhael J, Risse ML, Asset G, Martin T. Isatuximab plus carfilzomib/dexamethasone versus carfilzomib/dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: IKEMA Phase III study design. Future Oncol. 2020 Jan;16(2):4347-4358. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0431. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Plasma Cell Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
70 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing isatuximab SAR650984, carfilzomib and dexamethasone in people with Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Sanofi at 70 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 70 sites in Australia, Japan, France, Brazil, Greece and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Feb 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) As Determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC): Primary Analysis (time frame: From randomization until the primary analysis data cut-off date of 7 Feb 2020 (median duration of follow-up was 20.73 months)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03275285, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2026.