Ovarian Cancer Stage IVPhase 2NEOPEMBROVNCT03275506
PEMBRO With Chemo in Neo Adj Treatment of Ovarian Cancer .
A Phase 2 study testing Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab in people with Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, run by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP at 22 sites in France.
Trial summary
There are several data suggesting that pembrolizumab and bevacizumab may be synergistic. Enhanced tumor angiogenesis is commonly associated with absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer Stage IV
- What is being tested?
- Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 91 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 26 Feb 2018to 19 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial.
- Woman ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old on day of signing informed consent
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma or fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peri-toneal carcinoma with the exception of mucinous histology. Histology should be obtained by laparoscopy (or by laparotomy).
- High grade serous or endometrioid (see appendix 1 bis)
- Advanced FIGO stage IIIC to IV patient not able to receive primary debulking surgery for which neo adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended (primary debulking surgery has been denied after an evaluation through laparoscopy or laparotomy). Patients with extra abdominal metastasis (FIGO 2014 Stage IV) can be included in case of completely resectable metastasis.
- Primary debulking surgery denied and maximum surgical effort of cytoreduction with the goal of no residual disease planned at interval debulking surgery. Sugarbaker index before inclusion must be less than 30
Show all 29Show fewer
- Eligible for carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in accordance with local standards of care following cy-toreductive surgery.
- Interval complete surgery anticipated in a center with excellence.
- ECOG performance status (PS) ≤ 2.
- Life expectancy of at least 6 months,
- Interval between diagnosis and enrolment (informed consent) ≤ 8 weeks,
- Be willing to provide blood, and tissue from a newly obtained core or excisional biopsy of a tumor lesion. Newly-obtained is defined as a specimen obtained up to 8 weeks (56 days) prior to initiation of treatment on Day 1.
- Demonstrate adequate organ function as defined in the table below, all screening labs should be performed within 7 days before randomization.
- Adequate hematological laboratory value: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC): ≥1,500/mm3
- Platelets : ≥100,000/mm3
- Hemoglobin : ≥9 g/dL or ≥5.6 mmol/L without transfusion or EPO dependency (within 7 days of assessment)
- Adequate renal laboratory value:
- Serum creatinine and Measured or calculated creatinine clearance a (GFR can also be used in place of creatinine or CrCl) ≤1.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN) OR ≥60 mL/min for subject with creatinine levels > 1.5 X institutional ULN (Creatinine clearance is calculated according to Cockcroft formula or to MDRD formula for patients older than 65 years-old. Glo-merular filtration rate or creatinine clearance according to MDRD formula is: GFR = 186 x (creatinine (μmol/l) x 0,0113)-1,154 x age- 0,203 x 0.742.)
- Adequate hepatic laboratory value:
- Serum total bilirubin: ≤ 1.5 X ULN OR
- Direct bilirubin: ≤ ULN for subjects with total bilirubin levels > 1.5 ULN
- LDH, CRP
- AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT): ≤ 2.5 X ULN OR ≤ 5 X ULN for subjects with liver metastases
- Adequate coagulation laboratory value:
- International Normalized Ratio (INR) or Prothrombin Time (PT) : ≤1.5 X ULN unless subject is receiving anticoagulant therapy as long as PT or PTT is within therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants
- Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): ≤1.5 X ULN unless subject is receiving anticoagulant therapy as long as PT or PTT is within therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants
- Female subject of childbearing potential should have a negative urine or serum pregnancy within 72 hours prior randomization. If the urine test is positive or cannot be confirmed as negative, a serum pregnancy test will be required.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential should be willing to use 1 or 2 methods of birth control or be surgically sterile, or abstain from heterosexual activity for the course of the study through 4 months after the last dose of study medication and 6 months after the last dose of bevacizumab, or paclitaxel, or carboplatin. Subjects of childbearing potential are those who have not been surgically sterilized or have not been free from menses for > 1 year. (see below NB: contraception requirement)
- Patient should be beneficiary of healthcare coverage under the social security system.
Who cannot join
- Histological diagnosis of malignant tumor of non-epithelial origin (e.g. germ cell tumor, sex cord-stromal tumor) of the ovary, the fallopian tube or peritoneum or borderline tumor of the ovary (tumor of low malignant potential).
- Patients with extra abdominal metastasis (FIGO 2014 Stage IV) not completely resectable, as e.g. multiple parenchymal lung metastases (preferably histologically proven), non resectable lymph node metastases, brain me-tastases.
- Prior systemic therapy for ovarian cancer (e.g. chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, oral targeted therapy, hormonal therapy),
- Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or prior radiotherapy to an extra-abdominal target volume that would bear the risk of increased toxicity of chemotherapy,
- Serious illness or concomitant non-oncological disease such as neurologic, psychiatric or infectious disease, active ulcers (gastrointestinal tract, skin) or a laboratory abnormality that may Increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration and in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the study,
- Any contraindications for therapy with paclitaxel or carboplatin, e.g. a history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel or platinum-containing compounds and their excipients, or other drugs formulated with Pol-yoxyl 35Is currently participating and receiving study therapy or has participated in a study of an investigational agent and received study therapy or used an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of treatment.
Show all 26Show fewer
- Diagnosis of immunodeficiency or receiving prolonged period of systemic steroid therapy or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment.
- Known history of active Bacillus Tuberculosis (TB)
- Hypersensitivity to pembrolizumab or any of its excipients.
- Prior anti-cancer monoclonal antibody (mAb) within 4 weeks prior to study Day 1 or no recovery (i.e., ≤ Grade 1 or at baseline) from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier.
- Known additional malignancy that is progressing or requires active treatment. Exceptions include basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has undergone potentially curative therapy or in situ cervical cancer.
- Known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis. Subjects with previously treated brain metastases may participate provided they are stable (without evidence of progression by imaging for at least four weeks prior to the first dose of trial treatment and any neurologic symptoms have returned to baseline), have no evidence of new or enlarging brain metastases, and are not using steroids for at least 7 days prior to trial treatment. This exception does not include carcinomatous meningitis which is excluded regardless of clinical stability.
- Active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years (i.e. with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (e.g., thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency, etc.) is not considered a form of systemic treatment.
- Prior therapy with an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-L2 agent.
- History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (HIV 1/2 antibodies).
- Active Hepatitis B (e.g., HbsAg reactive) or Hepatitis C (e.g., HCV RNA [qualitative] is detected).
- Vaccination with a live vaccine within 30 days of planned start of study therapy.
- Note: Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally inactivated flu vaccines and are allowed; however intranasal influenza vaccines (e.g., Flu-Mist®) are live attenuated vaccines, and are not allowed.
- History of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or current pneumonitis.
- Active infection requiring systemic therapy.
- History or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might confound the results of the trial, interfere with the subject's participation for the full duration of the trial, or is not in the best interest of the subject to participate, in the opinion of the treating investigator.
- Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical factors potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule,
- Psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial.
- Active alcohol or drug abuse,
- Pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the pre-screening or screening visit through 4 months after the last dose of trial treatment, and six months after the last dose of bevacizumab, or paclitaxel, or carboplatin.
- Patient unable to give their consent by their own (guardianship and curatorship)
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 1 country.
22 sites in 1 country
France22 sites
Hôpital Henri Duffaut
Avignon, 84000
CHRU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25030
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, 14000
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil
Créteil, 94010
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, 21079
Centre Hospitalier Départemental Les Oudairies
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69373
Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz
Lyon, 69373
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
Orléans, 45067
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix Saint Simon
Paris, 75020
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris-Jourdan
Paris, 75674
Centre CARIO-HPCA
Plérin, 22190
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims, 51056
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
ICO Centre René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, 44805
CHU Saint-Etienne - Pôle de Cancérologie
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42271
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, 31059
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Multicentric Phase II Trial of PEMBROLIZUMAB (Keytruda®) With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone (Standard of Care) as Neo Adjuvant Treatment of Ovarian Cancer Not Amenable to Front Line Debulking Surgery.
There are several data suggesting that pembrolizumab and bevacizumab may be synergistic. Enhanced tumor angiogenesis is commonly associated with absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients. There is evidence in OC that tumor expression of VEGF is negatively correlated to the density of CD3+TILs and this phenotype is associated with early recurrence, consistent with prior studies showing a correlation of VEGF to early recurrence and short survival. Furthermore, in ascites, high levels of VEGF correlate to low numbers of NK T-like CD3+CD56+ cells
This randomized phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combina-tion with the standard neo adjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS and the safety of this strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We assume that its administration in the neo adjuvant setting combination with standard of care (4 cycles of standard chemotherapy) would improve the response rate and consequently will help to achieve optimal debulking rate at IDS.
After surgery, patients will continue to be treated with standard of care (chemotherapy for 2 to 5 cycles plus or less bevacizumab) or the same combination plus pembrolizumab (keytruda).
Read the detailed description
The standard procedure for initial diagnosis recommends the realization of laparoscopy first for all suspicious advanced ovarian carcinoma. This procedure should able to confirm histo-logical diagnosis and to describe the all abdominal extension of the disease.
For advanced stages, complete primary cyto-reductive surgery followed by 6 cycles of chemotherapy based remains the standard of care as first treatment in ovarian cancer. It is part of a large surgery including total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy, lymphadenectomy and removal of all peritoneal carcinomatosis.
More recently, complete resection of all macroscopic disease at primary debulking surgery has been shown to be the single most important independent prognostic factor in advanced ovarian carcinoma , and this was confirmed for interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neo adjuvant chemotherapy in the EORTC-GCG study . These results suggest that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical cytoreduction is an acceptable management strategy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer and is more and more frequently used in Europe in advanced ovarian cancer patients with high burden of tumor . Due to these confirmed results, the rate of patients receiving neo adjuvant chemotherapy increased over time compared to up front surgery Hence, we hypothesize that improving the response rate to neo adjuvant chemotherapy would improve the optimal debulking rate at IDS and ultimately the survival. This change of medical practices over time opened the possibility to explore new agent in combination with chemotherapy. For patients whose extent of disease is not amenable to complete or optimal upfront debulking surgery, neo adjuvant treatment with carboplatin plus paclitaxel should be considered, followed by an interval debulking surgery. A minimum of 3 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel must be administered before to propose interval surgery. After interval surgery, completion of the chemotherapy with 3 or 4 more chemotherapy regimen is proposed.
For patients with macroscopic residual disease or when disease remains unresectable, combination with bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy then a maintenance phase of bevacizumab alone can be proposed as a standard of care Given that facts, there is a strong rationale to introduce additional neo adjuvant therapies that would strengthen the tumor shrinkage and improve the resectability rate.
Furthermore, immune surveillance plays an important role in tumor outcome of ovarian cancer patients. Indeed, clinical data in ovarian cancer patients have demonstrated that an antitumor immune response and immune evasion mechanisms are correlated, respectively, with a better and lower survival). Thus, immunotherapies are emerging as potential strategies to enhance classical EOC treatments.
More recently, they also have demonstrated significant efficacy in aggressive cancers of other histology such as metastatic Lung Cancer , metastatic Renal Cell Cancer or metastatic Bladder Cancer .
Approximately half of OC patients display a spontaneous antitumor immune response by antibodies and oligoclonal T-cells which recognize autologous tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). OC exhibits an extreme degree of heterogeneity of TAAs with an average of 60 private nonsynonymous mutations per tumor which are rarely shared among different tumors.
Though data remains scarce, high IHC PD-L1 expression (score 2 \& 3) has been detected in 68% of ovarian cancer patients (n=70) and that expression of PD-L1 had a strong prognostic value . The authors found also that the density of intraepithelial CD8+ T cells was inversely correlated to expression of PD-L1 by tumors, suggesting that the expres-sion of PD-L1 on tumor cells may inhibit invasion of tumor epithelium by CD8+ T cells.
In addition, PD-1 expression at the surface of intra-tumoral CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs was found to show the highest levels in ovarian cancer (around 20% of the cells) compared to other tumor types, including melanoma, renal cell cancer or hepatoma . Thus targeting PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may inhibit Treg expression, one of the major component of ovarian cancer immunosuppression. Also Curiel et al showed that myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs) from ovarian cancer express PD-1 and that blockade of PD-1 enhanced MDC-mediated T-cell activation, including upregulation of IL-2 and interferon-gamma, and down regulation of IL-10, which resulted in enhanced T-cell immunity against autologous ovarian human tumors into NOD-SCID mice.
Together with the aforementioned data on immune infiltration, these data provide the rationale for a therapeutic PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade in ovarian cancer.
In ovarian carcinoma patients, the anti-PD1 compound nivolumab has been reported to achieve 3 objectives responses out of 13 (23%) heavily pre-treated patients. Response was prolonged over 1 year in 2 out of the 3 responders. Similarly, the anti-PD1 pembrozilumab achieved 3 confirmed responses (11.5% [(95% CI, 2.4-30.2]) in 26 patients treated in a phase IB study and 3 additional patients had a tumor reduction of at least 30%. Most common AEs were fatigue (42.3%), anemia (30.8%), and decreased appetite (30.8%). Drug-related AEs occurred in 69.2% of pts (grade ≥ 3, 1/26 pts).
The anti-PD-L1 avelumab has reported a 10.7% objective response and a 44% stabilization rate in 75 patients with ovarian cancer in relapse. In this study, con-firmed or unconfirmed responses (n=11) tend to be more frequently observed in patients with low burden of tumor, limited number of prior lines of chemotherapy and in the setting of platinum-sensitivity. Toxicity was minimal. Considering all grades, fatigue was observed in 16% of the patients, chills in 12%, nausea in 10.7%, diarrhea in 10.7%, rash in 8% and hypothyroidism in 5.3%.
Rationale for combining pembrolizumab and standard chemotherapy Kryczek et al compared the PD-1 expression level at the surface of intra-tumoral CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs among many cancer types. Interestingly, the higher level of PD-1 expression (around 20%) was found on Tregs of ovarian cancers whereas it was much lower (<10%) in other cancer types (Colon cancer, Hepatic cancer, Melanoma, Pancreatic carcinoma, Renal cell carcinoma). PD-L1 expression has also been detected in ovarian cancer tissue analysis by Immunohistochemistry staining and its level of expression has been correlated to a bad outcome of patients (59). Together with the aforementioned data on immune infiltration, these results provide rationale for a therapeutic PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade in ovarian cancer. In the published trials on such compounds, addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy or using alone has been shown to improve the response rates with a median time to response at 8 weeks (60,61).
Rationale for combining pembrolizumab and bevacizumab There are several data suggesting that pembrolizumab and bevacizumab may be synergistic. Enhanced tumor angiogenesis is commonly associated with absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients. There is evidence in OC that tumor expression of VEGF is negatively correlated to the density of CD3+TILs and this phenotype is associated with early recurrence, consistent with prior studies showing a correlation of VEGF to early recurrence and short survival. Furthermore, in ascites, high levels of VEGF correlate to low numbers of NK T-like CD3+CD56+ cells.
This randomized phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combina-tion with the standard neo adjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS and the safety of this strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We assume that its administration in the neo adjuvant setting combination with standard of care (4 cycles of standard chemotherapy) would improve the response rate and consequently will help to achieve optimal debulking rate at IDS.
After surgery, patients will continue to be treated with standard of care (chemotherapy for 2 to 5 cycles plus or less bevacizumab) or the same combination plus pembrolizumab (keytruda).
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer Stage IV
- Being tested
- Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab, Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab
- Keywords
- neoadjuvant, debulking surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - BevacizumabDrug
Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W)
Chemotherapy - BevacizumabDrug
Carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy | Experimental | Arm B (n=60): 4 neo-adjuvant cycles of standard 3 weekly Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²)
Arm B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W)
The total number of cycles of chemotherapy will be 6 cycles from the start of the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Three additional cycles are allowed if required (maximum 9 cycles in total).
The planning of administration or not of bevacizumab will be defined before the randomization and could not be modified (stratification factor).
After chemotherapy:
* In the Arm A \& B, for patients receiving bevacizumab (as standard therapy) (15 mg/kg Q3W), this will be continue until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy.
* In the arm B, patient will receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy. Receives: Drug: Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab |
| Chemotherapy alone | Active comparator | Arm A (n=30): 4 neo-adjuvant cycles of standard 3 weekly carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²)
Arm A: carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), q3 weeks +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W)
The total number of cycles of chemotherapy will be 6 cycles from the start of the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Three additional cycles are allowed if required (maximum 9 cycles in total).
The planning of administration or not of bevacizumab will be defined before the randomization and could not be modified (stratification factor).
After chemotherapy:
- In the Arm A \& B, for patients receiving bevacizumab (as standard therapy) (15 mg/kg Q3W), this will be continue until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy. Receives: Drug: Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary objective
Efficacy: Complete Resection Rate (CC0) after interval debulking surgery
Measured: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Secondary outcomes (11)
Secondary objective
Efficacy : CCI score evaluated by centers and by central review
Measured: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Secondary objective
Efficacy : PCI score evaluated by centers and by central review
Measured: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Secondary objective
Efficacy : Rate of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) after surgery
Measured: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Secondary objective
Efficacy : Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Measured: Average of 3 months after the first neo-adjuvant cycle.
Secondary objective
Efficacy : Best Overall Response
Measured: From the date of randomization until the end of treatment.
Secondary objective
Efficacy : Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Measured: From the date of randomization to date event, assessed up to 5 years.
Secondary objective
Efficacy : Biological Progression-Free Interval (PFIBIO)
Measured: From the date of randomization to date event, assessed up to 5 years.
Secondary objective
Efficacy : Overall survival (OS)
Measured: From the date of randomization to death, assessed up to 5 years.
Secondary objective
Safety and Tolerability of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy : Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Measured: 30 days after last treatment intake.
Secondary objective
Post-operative mortality
Measured: 30 days after the interval debulking surgery.
Secondary objective
Post-operative morbidity
Measured: 30 days after the interval debulking surgery.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2017
- Study start26 Feb 2018
- Primary completion30 Sep 2020
- Study completion19 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian Cancer Stage IVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- open-label, multicentric
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Isabelle RAY-COQUARD, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, isabelle.ray-coquard@lyon.unicancer.fr
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03275506
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OV126b
- Acronym
- NEOPEMBROV
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Collet L, Ardin M, Venet D, Berthet J, Ghamry-Barrin S, Treilleux I, Noel JC, Leheurteur M, Meunier J, Bengrine Lefevre L, Martinez M, Priou F, Selle F, Just PA, Bataillon G, Rothe F, Sotiriou C, Caux C, Dubois B, Ray-Coquard I, Le Saux O. Unraveling the Tumor Microenvironment and PD-L1 Expression across Tissue Types in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in the NeoPembrOV/GINECO Phase II Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 1;31(15):3317-3331. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2712.
PubMed 40378056Le Saux O, Ardin M, Berthet J, Barrin S, Bourhis M, Cinier J, Lounici Y, Treilleux I, Just PA, Bataillon G, Savoye AM, Mouret-Reynier MA, Coquan E, Derbel O, Jeay L, Bouizaguen S, Labidi-Galy I, Tabone-Eglinger S, Ferrari A, Thomas E, Menetrier-Caux C, Tartour E, Galy-Fauroux I, Stern MH, Terme M, Caux C, Dubois B, Ray-Coquard I. Immunomic longitudinal profiling of the NeoPembrOv trial identifies drivers of immunoresistance in high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 16;15(1):5932. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47000-5.
PubMed 39013886Ray-Coquard IL, Savoye AM, Schiffler C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Derbel O, Kalbacher E, LeHeurteur M, Martinez A, Cornila C, Martinez M, Bengrine Lefevre L, Priou F, Cloarec N, Venat L, Selle F, Berton D, Collard O, Coquan E, Le Saux O, Treilleux I, Gouerant S, Angelergues A, Joly F, Tredan O. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab in advanced high-grade serous carcinoma: the randomized phase II NeoPembrOV clinical trial. Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 16;15(1):5931. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46999-x.
PubMed 39013870
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label, Multicentric Phase II Trial of PEMBROLIZUMAB (Keytruda®) With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone (Standard of Care) as Neo Adjuvant Treatment of Ovarian Cancer Not Amenable to Front Line Debulking Surgery.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03275506
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEOPEMBROV / OV126b
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer Stage IV
- Keywords
- neoadjuvant, debulking surgery
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUPUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are several data suggesting that pembrolizumab and bevacizumab may be synergistic. Enhanced tumor angiogenesis is commonly associated with absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients. There is evidence in OC that tumor expression of VEGF is negatively correlated to the density of CD3+TILs and this phenotype is associated with early recurrence, consistent with prior studies showing a correlation of VEGF to early recurrence and short survival. Furthermore, in ascites, high levels of VEGF correlate to low numbers of NK T-like CD3+CD56+ cells
This randomized phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combina-tion with the standard neo adjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS and the safety of this strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We assume that its administration in the neo adjuvant setting combination with standard of care (4 cycles of standard chemotherapy) would improve the response rate and consequently will help to achieve optimal debulking rate at IDS.
After surgery, patients will continue to be treated with standard of care (chemotherapy for 2 to 5 cycles plus or less bevacizumab) or the same combination plus pembrolizumab (keytruda).
Detailed description
The standard procedure for initial diagnosis recommends the realization of laparoscopy first for all suspicious advanced ovarian carcinoma. This procedure should able to confirm histo-logical diagnosis and to describe the all abdominal extension of the disease.
For advanced stages, complete primary cyto-reductive surgery followed by 6 cycles of chemotherapy based remains the standard of care as first treatment in ovarian cancer. It is part of a large surgery including total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy, lymphadenectomy and removal of all peritoneal carcinomatosis.
More recently, complete resection of all macroscopic disease at primary debulking surgery has been shown to be the single most important independent prognostic factor in advanced ovarian carcinoma , and this was confirmed for interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neo adjuvant chemotherapy in the EORTC-GCG study . These results suggest that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical cytoreduction is an acceptable management strategy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer and is more and more frequently used in Europe in advanced ovarian cancer patients with high burden of tumor . Due to these confirmed results, the rate of patients receiving neo adjuvant chemotherapy increased over time compared to up front surgery Hence, we hypothesize that improving the response rate to neo adjuvant chemotherapy would improve the optimal debulking rate at IDS and ultimately the survival. This change of medical practices over time opened the possibility to explore new agent in combination with chemotherapy. For patients whose extent of disease is not amenable to complete or optimal upfront debulking surgery, neo adjuvant treatment with carboplatin plus paclitaxel should be considered, followed by an interval debulking surgery. A minimum of 3 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel must be administered before to propose interval surgery. After interval surgery, completion of the chemotherapy with 3 or 4 more chemotherapy regimen is proposed.
For patients with macroscopic residual disease or when disease remains unresectable, combination with bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy then a maintenance phase of bevacizumab alone can be proposed as a standard of care Given that facts, there is a strong rationale to introduce additional neo adjuvant therapies that would strengthen the tumor shrinkage and improve the resectability rate.
Furthermore, immune surveillance plays an important role in tumor outcome of ovarian cancer patients. Indeed, clinical data in ovarian cancer patients have demonstrated that an antitumor immune response and immune evasion mechanisms are correlated, respectively, with a better and lower survival). Thus, immunotherapies are emerging as potential strategies to enhance classical EOC treatments.
More recently, they also have demonstrated significant efficacy in aggressive cancers of other histology such as metastatic Lung Cancer , metastatic Renal Cell Cancer or metastatic Bladder Cancer .
Approximately half of OC patients display a spontaneous antitumor immune response by antibodies and oligoclonal T-cells which recognize autologous tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). OC exhibits an extreme degree of heterogeneity of TAAs with an average of 60 private nonsynonymous mutations per tumor which are rarely shared among different tumors.
Though data remains scarce, high IHC PD-L1 expression (score 2 \& 3) has been detected in 68% of ovarian cancer patients (n=70) and that expression of PD-L1 had a strong prognostic value . The authors found also that the density of intraepithelial CD8+ T cells was inversely correlated to expression of PD-L1 by tumors, suggesting that the expres-sion of PD-L1 on tumor cells may inhibit invasion of tumor epithelium by CD8+ T cells.
In addition, PD-1 expression at the surface of intra-tumoral CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs was found to show the highest levels in ovarian cancer (around 20% of the cells) compared to other tumor types, including melanoma, renal cell cancer or hepatoma . Thus targeting PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may inhibit Treg expression, one of the major component of ovarian cancer immunosuppression. Also Curiel et al showed that myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs) from ovarian cancer express PD-1 and that blockade of PD-1 enhanced MDC-mediated T-cell activation, including upregulation of IL-2 and interferon-gamma, and down regulation of IL-10, which resulted in enhanced T-cell immunity against autologous ovarian human tumors into NOD-SCID mice.
Together with the aforementioned data on immune infiltration, these data provide the rationale for a therapeutic PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade in ovarian cancer.
In ovarian carcinoma patients, the anti-PD1 compound nivolumab has been reported to achieve 3 objectives responses out of 13 (23%) heavily pre-treated patients. Response was prolonged over 1 year in 2 out of the 3 responders. Similarly, the anti-PD1 pembrozilumab achieved 3 confirmed responses (11.5% [(95% CI, 2.4-30.2]) in 26 patients treated in a phase IB study and 3 additional patients had a tumor reduction of at least 30%. Most common AEs were fatigue (42.3%), anemia (30.8%), and decreased appetite (30.8%). Drug-related AEs occurred in 69.2% of pts (grade ≥ 3, 1/26 pts).
The anti-PD-L1 avelumab has reported a 10.7% objective response and a 44% stabilization rate in 75 patients with ovarian cancer in relapse. In this study, con-firmed or unconfirmed responses (n=11) tend to be more frequently observed in patients with low burden of tumor, limited number of prior lines of chemotherapy and in the setting of platinum-sensitivity. Toxicity was minimal. Considering all grades, fatigue was observed in 16% of the patients, chills in 12%, nausea in 10.7%, diarrhea in 10.7%, rash in 8% and hypothyroidism in 5.3%.
Rationale for combining pembrolizumab and standard chemotherapy Kryczek et al compared the PD-1 expression level at the surface of intra-tumoral CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs among many cancer types. Interestingly, the higher level of PD-1 expression (around 20%) was found on Tregs of ovarian cancers whereas it was much lower (<10%) in other cancer types (Colon cancer, Hepatic cancer, Melanoma, Pancreatic carcinoma, Renal cell carcinoma). PD-L1 expression has also been detected in ovarian cancer tissue analysis by Immunohistochemistry staining and its level of expression has been correlated to a bad outcome of patients (59). Together with the aforementioned data on immune infiltration, these results provide rationale for a therapeutic PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade in ovarian cancer. In the published trials on such compounds, addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy or using alone has been shown to improve the response rates with a median time to response at 8 weeks (60,61).
Rationale for combining pembrolizumab and bevacizumab There are several data suggesting that pembrolizumab and bevacizumab may be synergistic. Enhanced tumor angiogenesis is commonly associated with absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients. There is evidence in OC that tumor expression of VEGF is negatively correlated to the density of CD3+TILs and this phenotype is associated with early recurrence, consistent with prior studies showing a correlation of VEGF to early recurrence and short survival. Furthermore, in ascites, high levels of VEGF correlate to low numbers of NK T-like CD3+CD56+ cells.
This randomized phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combina-tion with the standard neo adjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS and the safety of this strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We assume that its administration in the neo adjuvant setting combination with standard of care (4 cycles of standard chemotherapy) would improve the response rate and consequently will help to achieve optimal debulking rate at IDS.
After surgery, patients will continue to be treated with standard of care (chemotherapy for 2 to 5 cycles plus or less bevacizumab) or the same combination plus pembrolizumab (keytruda).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- open-label, multicentric
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - BevacizumabArm B (n=60): 4 neo-adjuvant cycles of standard 3 weekly Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²) Arm B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) The total number of cycles of chemotherapy will be 6 cycles from the start of the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Three additional cycles are allowed if required (maximum 9 cycles in total). The planning of administration or not of bevacizumab will be defined before the randomization and could not be modified (stratification factor). After chemotherapy: * In the Arm A \& B, for patients receiving bevacizumab (as standard therapy) (15 mg/kg Q3W), this will be continue until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy. * In the arm B, patient will receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy. |
| Chemotherapy alone | Active comparator | Drug: Chemotherapy - BevacizumabArm A (n=30): 4 neo-adjuvant cycles of standard 3 weekly carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²) Arm A: carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), q3 weeks +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) The total number of cycles of chemotherapy will be 6 cycles from the start of the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Three additional cycles are allowed if required (maximum 9 cycles in total). The planning of administration or not of bevacizumab will be defined before the randomization and could not be modified (stratification factor). After chemotherapy: - In the Arm A \& B, for patients receiving bevacizumab (as standard therapy) (15 mg/kg Q3W), this will be continue until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Be willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial.
- Woman ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old on day of signing informed consent
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma or fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peri-toneal carcinoma with the exception of mucinous histology. Histology should be obtained by laparoscopy (or by laparotomy).
- High grade serous or endometrioid (see appendix 1 bis)
- Advanced FIGO stage IIIC to IV patient not able to receive primary debulking surgery for which neo adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended (primary debulking surgery has been denied after an evaluation through laparoscopy or laparotomy). Patients with extra abdominal metastasis (FIGO 2014 Stage IV) can be included in case of completely resectable metastasis.
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Histological diagnosis of malignant tumor of non-epithelial origin (e.g. germ cell tumor, sex cord-stromal tumor) of the ovary, the fallopian tube or peritoneum or borderline tumor of the ovary (tumor of low malignant potential).
- Patients with extra abdominal metastasis (FIGO 2014 Stage IV) not completely resectable, as e.g. multiple parenchymal lung metastases (preferably histologically proven), non resectable lymph node metastases, brain me-tastases.
- Prior systemic therapy for ovarian cancer (e.g. chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, oral targeted therapy, hormonal therapy),
- Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or prior radiotherapy to an extra-abdominal target volume that would bear the risk of increased toxicity of chemotherapy,
- Serious illness or concomitant non-oncological disease such as neurologic, psychiatric or infectious disease, active ulcers (gastrointestinal tract, skin) or a laboratory abnormality that may Increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration and in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the study,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - BevacizumabPembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) | Drug | Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy |
| Chemotherapy - BevacizumabCarboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) | Drug | Chemotherapy alone |
Primary outcome
Primary objective
Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Efficacy: Complete Resection Rate (CC0) after interval debulking surgery
11 secondary outcomes
Secondary objective
Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Secondary objective
Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Secondary objective
Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.
Secondary objective
Time frame: Average of 3 months after the first neo-adjuvant cycle.
Secondary objective
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of treatment.
Secondary objective
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date event, assessed up to 5 years.
Secondary objective
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date event, assessed up to 5 years.
Secondary objective
Time frame: From the date of randomization to death, assessed up to 5 years.
Secondary objective
Time frame: 30 days after last treatment intake.
Secondary objective
Time frame: 30 days after the interval debulking surgery.
Secondary objective
Time frame: 30 days after the interval debulking surgery.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40378056Collet L, Ardin M, Venet D, Berthet J, Ghamry-Barrin S, Treilleux I, Noel JC, Leheurteur M, Meunier J, Bengrine Lefevre L, Martinez M, Priou F, Selle F, Just PA, Bataillon G, Rothe F, Sotiriou C, Caux C, Dubois B, Ray-Coquard I, Le Saux O. Unraveling the Tumor Microenvironment and PD-L1 Expression across Tissue Types in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in the NeoPembrOV/GINECO Phase II Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 1;31(15):3317-3331. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2712.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39013886Le Saux O, Ardin M, Berthet J, Barrin S, Bourhis M, Cinier J, Lounici Y, Treilleux I, Just PA, Bataillon G, Savoye AM, Mouret-Reynier MA, Coquan E, Derbel O, Jeay L, Bouizaguen S, Labidi-Galy I, Tabone-Eglinger S, Ferrari A, Thomas E, Menetrier-Caux C, Tartour E, Galy-Fauroux I, Stern MH, Terme M, Caux C, Dubois B, Ray-Coquard I. Immunomic longitudinal profiling of the NeoPembrOv trial identifies drivers of immunoresistance in high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 16;15(1):5932. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47000-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39013870Ray-Coquard IL, Savoye AM, Schiffler C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Derbel O, Kalbacher E, LeHeurteur M, Martinez A, Cornila C, Martinez M, Bengrine Lefevre L, Priou F, Cloarec N, Venat L, Selle F, Berton D, Collard O, Coquan E, Le Saux O, Treilleux I, Gouerant S, Angelergues A, Joly F, Tredan O. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab in advanced high-grade serous carcinoma: the randomized phase II NeoPembrOV clinical trial. Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 16;15(1):5931. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46999-x.
- Acces to detailled resultsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer Stage IV
RecruitingPhase 2
Immunotherapy Using Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes for Patients With Metastatic Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Measuring the Effects of Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Cancer and DNA Repair Variations
Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Active, not recruiting
e-Health Intervention (Day-by-Day) for the Management of Fear of Progression in Women With Stage III or IV Gynecologic Cancer: A Pilot Study
Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm, Stage III Cervical Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingPhase 3
Mo-Rez in First- Line (1L) Maintenance Treatment of Non-Homologous Recombination Deficient Ovarian Cancer (Non-HRd OC) [BEHOLD-Ovarian03]
Ovarian Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Isabelle RAY-COQUARD, MD, PhD principal investigator
isabelle.ray-coquard@lyon.unicancer.fr
22 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab in people with Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, run by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP at 22 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 29 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary objective (time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03275506, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2025.