AzTrials
AzTrials

AMLPhase 2/3HAMLETNCT03275636

Haploidentical Donor vs mMUD in Hematological Malignancies

A Phase 2/3 study testing Peripheral blood stem cells in people with AML and ALL, run by DKMS gemeinnützige GmbH at 9 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this trial is to compare the outcome after partially matched (single mismatch) unrelated donor transplantation with haploidentical transplantation in a randomized controlled setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
AML, ALL, MDS
What is being tested?
Peripheral blood stem cells
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
9 sitesGermany
Study dates
1 Jan 2018to 13 Apr 2024
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible diagnoses are listed below:
  • AML with adverse risk genetic abnormalities (according to the ELN guidelines)1. AML with intermediate genetic abnormalities (according to ELN guidelines) either in first complete remission, after relapse, or by chemotherapy-refractory disease.
  • AML with favourable genetic abnormalities (according to ELN guidelines) after relapse or by chemotherapy-refractory disease, except APL.
  • AML with undefined genetic risk classification after relapse or with chemotherapy-refractory disease.
  • AML arising from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or a myeloproliferative neoplasia, except if favourable genetic abnormalities (according to ELN guidelines) are present.
  • Therapy-related myeloid neoplasia except if favorable genetic abnormalities (according to ELN guidelines) are present.
Show all 21Show fewer
  • MDS with high risk or very high risk disease (according to the IPSS-R score)2.
  • First CR of high-risk ALL, defined by one or more of these:
  • Early or mature T-ALL (CD1a negative).
  • Pro B-ALL with t(4v;11); KMT2A-rearrangements.
  • Presence of BCR-ABL and/or t(9;22).
  • Persistence of minimal residual disease after the second induction course. ALL with or without complete remission after salvage therapy following poor response to induction therapy.
  • ALL after haematological or molecular relapse.
  • Fit for transplant according to physician judgement.
  • No history of cardiac disease and absence of active symptoms, otherwise, documented left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%.
  • No history of chronic pulmonary disease and absence of dyspnea. Otherwise, documented diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥40% or FEV1/FVC ≥ 50% despite appropriate treatment
  • Availability of ≥1 unrelated donor with a single allele or antigen mismatch at HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1 and no concurrent DQB1 mismatch (9/10) shown by confirmatory typing.
  • Availability of at least one haploidentical donor meeting the following criteria:
  • Donor is a biologic parent / child of the patient, or haploidentity has been confirmed for patient's relatives by HLA-Typing.
  • The donor has expressed his/her will to donate and has no contraindications against a stem cell donation by medical history.
  • Donor age is ≥18 years and ≤75 years.

Who cannot join

  • Relapse or graft failure after a first allogeneic transplantation.
  • Thymic ALL in first complete remission.
  • Severe organ dysfunction defined by either of the following three criteria:
  • Patients who receive supplementary continuous oxygen. Serum bilirubin >1.5 x ULN (if not considered Gilbert-Syndrome) or ASAT/ALAT >5 x ULN.
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 40 mL/min
  • Uncontrolled infection at the time of enrollment.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  • An HLA-identical sibling donor or 8/8 (HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1) matched unrelated donor is available and suitable to donate prior to randomization.
  • Men unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception methods from enrollment to minimum of six months after the last dose of chemotherapy.
  • Women of childbearing potential except those who fulfill the following criteria: Post-menopausal or post-operative or continuous and correct application of a contraception method with a Pearl Index <1% or sexual abstinence or vasectomy of the sexual partner.
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country.

9 sites in 1 country

Germany9 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn

    Bonn, 53105

  • Universitätsklinikum Dresden

    Dresden

  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, 60595

  • Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)

    Halle, 06120

  • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Universitätsklinikum Münster

    Münster, 48149

  • Klinikum Nürnberg Nord

    Nuremberg, 90419

  • Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus

    Stuttgart, 70376

  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outcome After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation From a Partially Matched Unrelated Versus Haploidentical Donor

The goal of this trial is to compare the outcome after partially matched (single mismatch) unrelated donor transplantation with haploidentical transplantation in a randomized controlled setting.

Read the detailed description

For patients with an indication for allogeneic HCT, the search for a stem cell donor is a challenge. 20% of patients who need an allograft have an HLA-identical sibling available, and for approximately 70% of the remaining patients, a suitable, HLA-well-matched (10/10), unrelated volunteer can be found. For the remaining patients, partially matched (single mismatch) unrelated donors or haploidentical donors are alternative options.

Recently published retrospective single center and registry studies suggest comparable outcomes for HCT from unrelated donors matched at HLA -A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 and haploidentical donors. The number of haploidentical HCT evaluated in these studies was still relatively small and a selection bias for the retrospective comparisons cannot be excluded.

The goal of this trial is to evaluate overall survival of patients with high-risk AML, ALL or MDS after partially matched unrelated or haploidentical donor transplantation..

Conditions
AML, ALL, MDS
Being tested
Peripheral blood stem cells
Keywords
Haploidentical, mismatched unrelated donor, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, donor comparison

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peripheral blood stem cellsBiological

    Also called PBSC

    Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with PBSC

Study groups in NCT03275636
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Haploidentical donorExperimentalPeripheral blood stem cells from Haploidentical donor
Receives: Biological: Peripheral blood stem cells
partially matched unrelated donorActive comparatorPeripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donor with a single allele or antigen mismatch at HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1 and no concurrent DQB1 mismatch (9/10) shown by confirmatory typing
Receives: Biological: Peripheral blood stem cells

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival

    Overall survival calculated from the time of randomization will be the primary endpoint of this trial. Death from any reason will be considered as event.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Engraftment rate

    Engraftment

    Measured: day 56

  2. Immune-reconstitution rate

    Immune-reconstitution rate

    Measured: day56

  3. Infections

    Severe infections rate

    Measured: 2 months after HCT

  4. Event Free Survival

    Event Free Survival

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Graft vs Host Disease

    Graft vs Host Disease rate

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Graft vs Host Disease-free survival

    Graft vs Host Disease-free survival rate

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2017
  2. Study start1 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion13 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion13 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03275636
Sponsor's protocol ID
DKMS-16-01
Other IDs
2015-005399-12, 2015
Acronym
HAMLET
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
4 Sep 2017
Last updated
7 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Peripheral blood stem cells in people with AML and ALL, run by DKMS gemeinnützige GmbH at 9 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 21 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in