Labor ComplicationlabourRecordNCT03276117
Wide Use of Paperless Partograph in Evaluation of Labour
An observational study of Labor Complication and Labor Pain, run by Assiut University at 6 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
Paperless partograph wide using in labour room as simple tool in evaluation of labour Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Labor Complication, Labor Pain
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- 2 Feb 2017to 26 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 35 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: the collected data wail be analyzed using the statistical package for social science (version 10.0 for windows,SPSS.
Who may be able to join
- Spontaneous labour
- cephalic presentation
- pregnant 37 weeks up to full term
Who cannot join
- mail_presentation
- induced labour
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Egypt6 sites
Faculity of Medicine ,in Assiut,Egypt
Asyut, 71723
Faculity of Medicine Assiut University
Asyut, 71723
Faculity of Medicine in Assiut,Egypt
Asyut, 71723
Faculity of Medicine,in Assiut ,Egypt
Asyut, 71723
Faculity of Medicine,in Assiut,Egypt
Asyut, 71723
Faculity of Medicine
Asyut, 71723
About this study
Official title: Wide Using of Paperless Partograph in Evaluation of Labour
Paperless partograph wide using in labour room as simple tool in evaluation of labour
Read the detailed description
Both world health organization ( WHO) PARTOGRAPH and modified world heath organization (WHO)PARTOGRAPH are too long labour tools in evaluation of labour so we need simple tool in evaluation of labour
- Conditions
- Labor Complication, Labor Pain
- Keywords
- pregnancy.obstructed labour
- Medical subject headings
- Obstetric Labor Complications, Labor Pain
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progress of labour
Cervical dilated 1 cm each hour
Measured: up to 2 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
New born
Apgar scor at 1 minute and Apgar scor at 5 minutes
Measured: up to 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2017
- Study start2 Feb 2017
- Primary completion21 Aug 2017
- Study completion26 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Labor ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, ayman darder, Assiut University
- Investigators
- mohamed khalaph, professor, Study chair, assiut universty faculity of medicineahmad abass, professor, Principal investigator, assiut university faclity of meficibe
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03276117
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- paperless partograph
- Acronym
- labourRecord
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching. BMJ. 1993 Jul 3;307(6895):66. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6895.66-a. No abstract available.
PubMed 8343701Chang AA, Heskett KM, Davidson TM. Searching the literature using medical subject headings versus text word with PubMed. Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):336-40. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000195371.72887.a2.
PubMed 16467730Fatehi F, Gray LC, Wootton R. How to improve your PubMed/MEDLINE searches: 3. advanced searching, MeSH and My NCBI. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Mar;20(2):102-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13519036.
PubMed 24614997
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Wide Using of Paperless Partograph in Evaluation of Labour
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03276117
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- labourRecord / paperless partograph
- Conditions
- Labor Complication, Labor Pain
- Keywords
- pregnancy.obstructed labour
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Paperless partograph wide using in labour room as simple tool in evaluation of labour
Detailed description
Both world health organization ( WHO) PARTOGRAPH and modified world heath organization (WHO)PARTOGRAPH are too long labour tools in evaluation of labour so we need simple tool in evaluation of labour
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- the collected data wail be analyzed using the statistical package for social science (version 10.0 for windows,SPSS.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Spontaneous labour
- cephalic presentation
- pregnant 37 weeks up to full term
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- mail_presentation
- induced labour
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Progress of labour
Time frame: up to 2 month
Cervical dilated 1 cm each hour
1 secondary outcome
New born
Time frame: up to 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 8343701Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching. BMJ. 1993 Jul 3;307(6895):66. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6895.66-a. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 16467730Chang AA, Heskett KM, Davidson TM. Searching the literature using medical subject headings versus text word with PubMed. Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):336-40. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000195371.72887.a2.
- Results publication: PubMed 24614997Fatehi F, Gray LC, Wootton R. How to improve your PubMed/MEDLINE searches: 3. advanced searching, MeSH and My NCBI. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Mar;20(2):102-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13519036.
- all the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the world without legal barriersLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Labor Complication
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Recruiting
Study of the Influence of Intraperitoneal Insufflation of CO2 by Laparoscopy on the Short-term Evolution of Premature Infants With Ulcerative Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Preterm Birth, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
RecruitingObservational study
Multidimensional Dynamic Early Warning System for Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Multicenter Clinical Study
NEC - Necrotizing Enterocolitis
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study Called FINEROD to Learn More About the Use of the Treatment Finerenone Including How Safe it is and How Well it Works Under Real-world Conditions
Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
mohamed khalaph, professor study chair
assiut universty faculity of medicine
ahmad abass, professor principal investigator
assiut university faclity of meficibe
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Labor Complication and Labor Pain, run by Assiut University at 6 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progress of labour (time frame: up to 2 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03276117, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2017.