AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal DisordersNCT03277053

A Mobile Device App to Improve Adherence to an Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery

A study testing Mobile application in people with Colorectal Disorders, run by Dr. Liane S. Feldman at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomized control trial on patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection in an Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP). The intervention is delivered via an electronic application containing guidelines, information, and tailored feedback. The hypothesis is that the application will improve adherence to the ERP. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Disorders
What is being tested?
Mobile application
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
104 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
24 Aug 2016to 1 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • elective laparoscopic colorectal resection.
  • Proficient in english or french

Who cannot join

  • intellectual disabilities
  • major simultaneous procedures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Montreal general Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, h3g1a4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Mobile Device App to Improve Adherence to an Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

A randomized control trial on patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection in an Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP). The intervention is delivered via an electronic application containing guidelines, information, and tailored feedback. The hypothesis is that the application will improve adherence to the ERP.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERP) in colorectal surgery reduce postoperative morbidity and shorten length of hospital stay with no increase in readmission rates. However, poor adherence to ERP elements remains a challenge. Recent studies suggest that the use of mobile device applications has the potential to improve patient compliance with treatment guidelines. We recently developed and pilot tested a mobile app to support an ERP for colorectal surgery which collects patient-reported recovery information and engages patients as stakeholders in their recovery process. The overall aim of this study is to estimate the extent to which the use of this mobile device app impacts adherence to postoperative ERP elements in comparison to standard preoperative education.

Methods. The proposal is for a two-group, assessor-blind, randomized trial including adult patients with colorectal diseases planned for surgical resection.

Participants will be randomly assigned into one of two groups:

  1. usual perioperative education and audit, or
  2. a mobile device application for postoperative education and self-audit.

The intervention will be delivered through a tablet present at the bedside with an application which links education, recovery planning, and daily self-assessment to a plan of care. It educates patients about daily recovery milestones and track their adherence. The primary outcome will be patient adherence to postoperative enhanced recovery elements. Other targeted outcomes include self-reported recovery, satisfaction and patient activation. According to an a priori power analysis, a sample of 104 patients (52 per group) is targeted for this trial.

Significance: This study will contribute evidence regarding the use of mobile device technology for education and the direct involvement of patients as stakeholders in postoperative recovery.

The study findings have the potential to increase patient engagement in the care pathway, which has the potential to increase compliance to pathway elements and improve postoperative outcomes.

Being tested
Mobile application, Control.
Keywords
colorectal, laparoscopic, application, ERP, adherence, mobile

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mobile applicationDevice

    A mobile application designed specifically for colorectal patients treated within an enhanced recovery pathway. Contains information, guidelines, questionnaires and feedback

  • Control.Other

    Patient receive an ipad with no application.

Study groups in NCT03277053
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
controlSham comparatorPatients receive an ipad with no app.
Receives: Other: Control.
Mobile application no stomaExperimentalPatients who did not receive a stoma receive an ipad containing the app and are instructed how to use it.
Receives: Device: Mobile application
Mobile application stomaExperimentalPatients who receive a stoma receive an ipad containing the app and are instructed how to use it.
Receives: Device: Mobile application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Completion of 5 patient-dependent pathway interventions that involve patient participation on the initial 48 hrs after surgery.

    Questionnaire including 5 pathway interventions that involve patient participation during the first 48 hours after surgery (mobilization, gum chewing, consumption of oral liquids, breathing exercises, nutritional supplement).

    Measured: postoperative day 2

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Length of stay

    Number of days spent in the hospital after surgery

    Measured: one month

  2. Complications

    Comprehensive complication index (CCI)

    Measured: one month

  3. Successful Recovery

    Discharge by postoperative day 4 with no complications.

    Measured: postoperative day 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2017
  2. Study start24 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
104 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03277053
Sponsor's protocol ID
McgillGensurgAPPRCT
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
11 Jul 2017
Last updated
26 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mobile application in people with Colorectal Disorders, run by Dr. Liane S. Feldman at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Completion of 5 patient-dependent pathway interventions that involve patient participation on the initial 48 hrs after surgery. (time frame: postoperative day 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in