Stroke RehabilitationNCT03279848
Stratification of Stroke Rehabilitation: 5-year Profiles of Functional Outcomes
An observational study of Stroke Rehabilitation, run by Tai Po Hospital.
Trial summary
Objective: To make use of admission Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) as a stratification tool to reveal profiles of functional outcomes of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke Rehabilitation
- How many people
- 2,722 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2011to 1 Jun 2016
- How long will I take part?
- 4 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with principal diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident, stroke, or hemiplegia.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with principal diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident, stroke, or hemiplegia and has received and completed stroke rehabilitation program in a hospital in Hong Kong between the periods of 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2015.
Who cannot join
- Patients with principal diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident, stroke, or hemiplegia and has received but cannot completed stroke rehabilitation program in a hospital in Hong Kong between the periods of 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2015.
About this study
Objective: To make use of admission Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) as a stratification tool to reveal profiles of functional outcomes of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.
Design: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation centre. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited.
Read the detailed description
Objective: To make use of admission Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) as a stratification tool to reveal profiles of functional outcomes of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.
Design: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation centre. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited. The patients were divided into seven groups according to their admission Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC). The between-group difference in length of stay (LOS), functional outcomes at admission and discharge including Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) as well as MRMI gain, MRMI efficiency, MBI gain and MBI efficiency were analyzed.
- Conditions
- Stroke Rehabilitation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Other
Also called Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke rehabilitation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI)
MRMI was used to assess subjects' mobility in this study. The MRMI is highly reliable between raters (ICC= 0.98) and has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93) to early stage patients with stroke. The MRMI consists of eight test items, including turning over, changing from lying to sitting, maintaining sitting balance, going from sitting to standing, standing, transferring, walking indoors, and climbing stairs. The score of MRMI range from 0 to 40. One main characteristic of the MRMI is that participants are scored by observation of their performance on the items directly. Change in MRMI i.e. MRMI gain is the difference between pre-discharge MRMI and admission MRMI.
Measured: baseline and 1 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in Modified Barthel Index (MBI) Gain
MBI was used to assess subjects' basic activities of daily living (ADL) in this study. MBI measures the subject's performance on ten functional items including self-care, continence, and locomotion. The values assigned to each item are based on the amount of physical assistance required to perform the task and added to give a total score ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = fully dependent, 100 = fully independent) with higher score indicating higher levels of physical function. There are no subtotal score because there are no sub-scales. The internal consistency reliability coefficient for MBI is 0.90. Change in MBI i.e. MBI gain is the difference between pre- discharge MBI and admission MBI.
Measured: baseline and 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2011
- Primary completion31 Dec 2015
- Study completion1 Jun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stroke RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 2,722 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 4 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tai Po Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bryan Ping Ho CHUNG, Tai Po Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03279848
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016.283
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stratification of Stroke Rehabilitation: 5-year Profiles of Functional Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03279848
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016.283
- Conditions
- Stroke Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,722 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tai Po HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: To make use of admission Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) as a stratification tool to reveal profiles of functional outcomes of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.
Design: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation centre. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited.
Detailed description
Objective: To make use of admission Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) as a stratification tool to reveal profiles of functional outcomes of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.
Design: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation centre. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited. The patients were divided into seven groups according to their admission Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC). The between-group difference in length of stay (LOS), functional outcomes at admission and discharge including Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) as well as MRMI gain, MRMI efficiency, MBI gain and MBI efficiency were analyzed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Target follow-up
- 4 Weeks
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with principal diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident, stroke, or hemiplegia.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with principal diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident, stroke, or hemiplegia and has received and completed stroke rehabilitation program in a hospital in Hong Kong between the periods of 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2015.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with principal diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident, stroke, or hemiplegia and has received but cannot completed stroke rehabilitation program in a hospital in Hong Kong between the periods of 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2015.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Also: Stroke RehabilitationStroke rehabilitation | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Change in Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI)
Time frame: baseline and 1 month
MRMI was used to assess subjects' mobility in this study. The MRMI is highly reliable between raters (ICC= 0.98) and has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93) to early stage patients with stroke. The MRMI consists of eight test items, including turning over, changing from lying to sitting, maintaining sitting balance, going from sitting to standing, standing, transferring, walking indoors, and climbing stairs. The score of MRMI range from 0 to 40. One main characteristic of the MRMI is that participants are scored by observation of their performance on the items directly. Change in MRMI i.e. MRMI gain is the difference between pre-discharge MRMI and admission MRMI.
1 secondary outcome
Change in Modified Barthel Index (MBI) Gain
Time frame: baseline and 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2017.
Related trials for Stroke Rehabilitation
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Paired VNS
Stroke, Ischemic
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Recruiting
Cervical tsDCS on Stroke Patients
Functional Recovery, Motor Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality Training Dose for Arm Recovery After Stroke: Clinical and Blood Biomarker Responses
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke Rehabilitation, run by Tai Po Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI) (time frame: baseline and 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2017.