Traumatic Brain InjuryNCT03280485
Validation of the Scandinavian Guidelines for Management of TBI in Adults
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Halmstad County Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are one of the most common reasons for patients to attend the emergency department (ED). 90% of patients with TBI are defined as mild TBI (mTBI). A small minority of patients with mTBI would show pathological computed tomography (CT) results and even fewer need neurosurgical… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- How many people
- 3,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 10 Sep 2017to 31 Dec 2021
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: adults with TBI
Who may be able to join
- From September 2017 we will prospectively enroll all adult patients with a GCS 9-15 that seek the ED in Halmstad, Malmo, Lund, Linkoping, Orebro (Sweden) within 24h after TBI.
Who cannot join
- We will exclude:
- patients younger than 18 years of age;
- patients without a Swedish personal identification number due to difficulties in performing the follow up phase;
- all patients that refuse to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Halland Hospital Halmstad
Halmstad, 302 64
Olga Calcagnile, MD, PhD, 035-131000, olga.calcagnile@regionhalland.se
Johan Undén, PhD, MD, 035-131000, johan.unden@regionhalland.se
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Validation of the Scandinavian Guidelines for Management of Minimal, Mild and Moderate Head Injury in Adults: a Study Protocol.
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are one of the most common reasons for patients to attend the emergency department (ED). 90% of patients with TBI are defined as mild TBI (mTBI).
A small minority of patients with mTBI would show pathological computed tomography (CT) results and even fewer need neurosurgical intervention. Nevertheless, complications would be so severe, if neurosurgical intervention is delayed, that it has become common practice to subject all patients with mTBI to CT. The high number of CT scans has an impact on health care resources but may also involve risk by subjecting patients through potentially harmful ionizing radiation.
Read more
Several independent research groups have attempted to optimize CT use in mTBI patients by forming guidelines that aim to identify patients at high risk for intracranial complications. Most guidelines have been published in the past 15 years and have been validated both prospectively internally and externally; all guidelines have been shown to be safe when implemented in clinical use with few missed complications. However the number of CT scans has not been reduced dramatically, in some cases it has even increased.
In 2013, the new Scandinavian guidelines (SNC13) were published. They are the first guidelines that use a biomarker, S100B, as a tool for managing patients with mTBI. Although S100B has a low specificity for intracranial complications, a high sensitivity makes it suitable to be implemented into clinical practice as a tool for CT reduction. Previous SNC guidelines have been compared to other prominent guidelines with impressive results. The SNC13 have been externally validated in a retrospective study from the USA that was underpowered for important outcomes. Nevertheless, SNC13 have already been partially implemented in clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, a strict multicenter validation has not been performed yet nor a systematic comparison to other available guidelines.
Our primary aim is to validate the performance of the SNC13 in predicting intracranial complications in adult patients presenting with traumatic head injury in Swedish hospitals. A secondary aim is to compare the performance of SNC 13 with 6 other clinical guidelines, with respect to important outcomes. Moreover, to explore the performances of different biomarkers in predicting intracranial complications in predefined subgroups of TBI. Finally, to evaluate the possibility of further improvement of the SNC13.
Read the detailed description
Design Investigators will perform a prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, observational study of adults presenting with traumatic head injury at the ED.
All data necessary for analysis including predictor variables and outcome data for all the seven guidelines included in the study will be registered (table 1). Patients will be managed clinically accordingly to the judgment of the responsible physician and/or local guidelines.
Study setting and population The study will be set in Halmstad, Malmö, Lund, Örebro and Linköping, Sweden. Hallands Hospital Halmstad (HS) is a level II trauma centre, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and Lund (SUS), Örebro University Hospital, Linköping University Hospital are level I trauma centers.
The coordinating site for the study will be HS where the statistical and the comparative biomarker analysis will be performed.
Inclusion criteria From September 2017 investigators will prospectively enroll all adult patients with a GCS 9-15 that seek the ED within 24h after TBI.
Exclusion criteria
- patients younger than 18 years of age;
- patients without a Swedish personal identification number due to difficulties in performing the follow up phase;
- all patients that refuse to participate.
Data registration and follow-up Details of how patients are managed, including patient characteristics, injury type, patient history, clinical examination results, current medications and CT findings will be documented in a pre-determined case-report form by the triage nurse and/or physician on call.
All patients will be asked to answer a questionnaire sent by mail 3 months after the injury. The questionnaire will be re-sent if no answer is received. If no answer is received from these attempts, patients will be contacted via telephone. The questionnaire includes questions that would identify a significant intracranial lesion, data concerning sick-days, new contacts with medical professionals and information concerning quality of life. In cases where patients can not be reached by mail or telephone, medical records and national mortality databases will be consulted for evidence of complications and/or death. The Swedish health care system allows full visibility of data for persons with a Swedish personal identification number for medical records and mortality database over the whole country. Patients who suffer significant (enough to seek medical care) intracranial complications after discharge would therefore be identified.
Details on study period are specified on figure 1 with an algorithm for patient eligibility and data analysis.
Data will be registered in an Excel® file. Descriptive statistics will be analysed using IBM SPSS® Statistics Version 20 software.
S100B analysis A 5ml blood sample is drawn from patient's cubital vein in the ED. Samples are analysed with the fully automated Elecsys® S100 (Roche AB) at the Clinical Chemistry Department of HS, SUS, Örebro University Hospital and Linköping University Hospital, Sweden. Cut-off level for normal levels of S100B according to the SNC guidelines is less than 0.10μg/L and a window of sampling of within 6 hours from the time of the injury.
From all patients seeking care within 24h form injury with medium and low risk TBI, according to SNC13 (including multitrauma patients), a 5ml blood sample will be drawn, centrifuged and frozen at -70 degrees Celsius. Samplings will be coded and registered for analysis of GFAP, SBP-50 and TAU.
CT examinations CT scans are always analysed by a board certified radiologist.
Sample size The Scandinavian guidelines will recommend discharge (i.e. neither CT nor admission) in approximately 50% of patients and a prevalence of our primary outcome of 5% (from our own observations and from data derived from a pre-selected cohort) . Allowing for one missed case, a sensitivity of >99% with a lower 95% confidence interval, a sample size of 2490 patients is required to detect traumatic intracranial complications according to the SNC13. Allowing for a 10% lost to follow-up, the desired sample size is 2767 patients.
Interim analysis After 1000 patients, the prevalence for the primary outcome will be measured in order to be able to reevaluate sample size.
Ethics Ethical approval was granted from the Regional Ethical Review Board of Lund (approval number 2012/574).
Informed verbal consent will be obtained and registered by nurses responsible for triage at ED.
Patients' data and social security number will be stored and handled accordingly to Swedish Personal Data Act, (PUL 1998: 204).
Written consent will be obtained from all patients from whom the extra blood sampling for biomarker analysis will be requested. Sampling will be coded and patients will be able at any time to refuse to be part of the study.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- no intervention
- Keywords
- TBI, management, S100B, biomarkers, mild head injury, intracranial complication
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
no interventionOther
no intervention validation of guidelines via database
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neurosurgery
Need for any neurosurgical proceedure or intervention within 1 week of injury
Measured: 4 years
Intracranial complication
composite variable of death as consequence of the TBI, need for neurosurgical intervention or marked abnormality on CT
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
serious CT findings
contusions larger than 5mm in diameter, subarachnoid bleeding thicker than 1mm, subdural hematoma thicker than 4mm, pneumocephaly that will need intervention, depressed skull fracture through the inner table.
Measured: 4 years
CT findings
Any pathological traumatic CT finding
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2017
- Study start10 Sep 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 3,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Halmstad County Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Olga Calcagnile, Halmstad County Hospital
- Investigators
- Olga Calcagnile, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Halland Hospital Halmstad
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03280485
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- no number
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Validation of the Scandinavian Guidelines for Management of Minimal, Mild and Moderate Head Injury in Adults: a Study Protocol.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03280485
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- no number
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Keywords
- TBI, management, S100B, biomarkers, mild head injury, intracranial complication
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 3,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Halmstad County HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are one of the most common reasons for patients to attend the emergency department (ED). 90% of patients with TBI are defined as mild TBI (mTBI).
A small minority of patients with mTBI would show pathological computed tomography (CT) results and even fewer need neurosurgical intervention. Nevertheless, complications would be so severe, if neurosurgical intervention is delayed, that it has become common practice to subject all patients with mTBI to CT. The high number of CT scans has an impact on health care resources but may also involve risk by subjecting patients through potentially harmful ionizing radiation.
Several independent research groups have attempted to optimize CT use in mTBI patients by forming guidelines that aim to identify patients at high risk for intracranial complications. Most guidelines have been published in the past 15 years and have been validated both prospectively internally and externally; all guidelines have been shown to be safe when implemented in clinical use with few missed complications. However the number of CT scans has not been reduced dramatically, in some cases it has even increased.
In 2013, the new Scandinavian guidelines (SNC13) were published. They are the first guidelines that use a biomarker, S100B, as a tool for managing patients with mTBI. Although S100B has a low specificity for intracranial complications, a high sensitivity makes it suitable to be implemented into clinical practice as a tool for CT reduction. Previous SNC guidelines have been compared to other prominent guidelines with impressive results. The SNC13 have been externally validated in a retrospective study from the USA that was underpowered for important outcomes. Nevertheless, SNC13 have already been partially implemented in clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, a strict multicenter validation has not been performed yet nor a systematic comparison to other available guidelines.
Our primary aim is to validate the performance of the SNC13 in predicting intracranial complications in adult patients presenting with traumatic head injury in Swedish hospitals. A secondary aim is to compare the performance of SNC 13 with 6 other clinical guidelines, with respect to important outcomes. Moreover, to explore the performances of different biomarkers in predicting intracranial complications in predefined subgroups of TBI. Finally, to evaluate the possibility of further improvement of the SNC13.
Detailed description
Design Investigators will perform a prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, observational study of adults presenting with traumatic head injury at the ED.
All data necessary for analysis including predictor variables and outcome data for all the seven guidelines included in the study will be registered (table 1). Patients will be managed clinically accordingly to the judgment of the responsible physician and/or local guidelines.
Study setting and population The study will be set in Halmstad, Malmö, Lund, Örebro and Linköping, Sweden. Hallands Hospital Halmstad (HS) is a level II trauma centre, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and Lund (SUS), Örebro University Hospital, Linköping University Hospital are level I trauma centers.
The coordinating site for the study will be HS where the statistical and the comparative biomarker analysis will be performed.
Inclusion criteria From September 2017 investigators will prospectively enroll all adult patients with a GCS 9-15 that seek the ED within 24h after TBI.
Exclusion criteria
- patients younger than 18 years of age;
- patients without a Swedish personal identification number due to difficulties in performing the follow up phase;
- all patients that refuse to participate.
Data registration and follow-up Details of how patients are managed, including patient characteristics, injury type, patient history, clinical examination results, current medications and CT findings will be documented in a pre-determined case-report form by the triage nurse and/or physician on call.
All patients will be asked to answer a questionnaire sent by mail 3 months after the injury. The questionnaire will be re-sent if no answer is received. If no answer is received from these attempts, patients will be contacted via telephone. The questionnaire includes questions that would identify a significant intracranial lesion, data concerning sick-days, new contacts with medical professionals and information concerning quality of life. In cases where patients can not be reached by mail or telephone, medical records and national mortality databases will be consulted for evidence of complications and/or death. The Swedish health care system allows full visibility of data for persons with a Swedish personal identification number for medical records and mortality database over the whole country. Patients who suffer significant (enough to seek medical care) intracranial complications after discharge would therefore be identified.
Details on study period are specified on figure 1 with an algorithm for patient eligibility and data analysis.
Data will be registered in an Excel® file. Descriptive statistics will be analysed using IBM SPSS® Statistics Version 20 software.
S100B analysis A 5ml blood sample is drawn from patient's cubital vein in the ED. Samples are analysed with the fully automated Elecsys® S100 (Roche AB) at the Clinical Chemistry Department of HS, SUS, Örebro University Hospital and Linköping University Hospital, Sweden. Cut-off level for normal levels of S100B according to the SNC guidelines is less than 0.10μg/L and a window of sampling of within 6 hours from the time of the injury.
From all patients seeking care within 24h form injury with medium and low risk TBI, according to SNC13 (including multitrauma patients), a 5ml blood sample will be drawn, centrifuged and frozen at -70 degrees Celsius. Samplings will be coded and registered for analysis of GFAP, SBP-50 and TAU.
CT examinations CT scans are always analysed by a board certified radiologist.
Sample size The Scandinavian guidelines will recommend discharge (i.e. neither CT nor admission) in approximately 50% of patients and a prevalence of our primary outcome of 5% (from our own observations and from data derived from a pre-selected cohort) . Allowing for one missed case, a sensitivity of >99% with a lower 95% confidence interval, a sample size of 2490 patients is required to detect traumatic intracranial complications according to the SNC13. Allowing for a 10% lost to follow-up, the desired sample size is 2767 patients.
Interim analysis After 1000 patients, the prevalence for the primary outcome will be measured in order to be able to reevaluate sample size.
Ethics Ethical approval was granted from the Regional Ethical Review Board of Lund (approval number 2012/574).
Informed verbal consent will be obtained and registered by nurses responsible for triage at ED.
Patients' data and social security number will be stored and handled accordingly to Swedish Personal Data Act, (PUL 1998: 204).
Written consent will be obtained from all patients from whom the extra blood sampling for biomarker analysis will be requested. Sampling will be coded and patients will be able at any time to refuse to be part of the study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- adults with TBI
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- From September 2017 we will prospectively enroll all adult patients with a GCS 9-15 that seek the ED in Halmstad, Malmo, Lund, Linkoping, Orebro (Sweden) within 24h after TBI.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients younger than 18 years of age;
- patients without a Swedish personal identification number due to difficulties in performing the follow up phase;
- all patients that refuse to participate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| no interventionno intervention validation of guidelines via database | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Neurosurgery
Time frame: 4 years
Need for any neurosurgical proceedure or intervention within 1 week of injury
Intracranial complication
Time frame: 4 years
composite variable of death as consequence of the TBI, need for neurosurgical intervention or marked abnormality on CT
2 secondary outcomes
serious CT findings
Time frame: 4 years
CT findings
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olga Calcagnile, MD, PhD principal investigator
Halland Hospital Halmstad
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Halmstad County Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Olga Calcagnile, MD, PhD (004635131000, olga.calcagnile@regionhalland.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neurosurgery (time frame: 4 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2017.