Diabetic FootNCT03280524
Reflexology and Quality of Life
A study testing reflexology and self-care guidelines with feet in people with Diabetic Foot, run by Universidade do Vale do Sapucai at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with 60 type 2 diabetes patients divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Foot
- What is being tested?
- reflexology and self-care guidelines with feet
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil.
Who cannot join
- presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Reflexology and Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients
This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with 60 type 2 diabetes patients divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of reflexology on the quality of life and functional capacity of patients at risk for diabetic neuropathy. This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with type 2 diabetes patients. The eligibility criteria are 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. As exclusion criteria, it will be considered the presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology. For the calculation of the sample size, a pilot test will be conducted with 8 diabetic patients. It will be used the statistical software Biostat® 5.3. The sample found was of 60 patients who were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline. For the evaluations, it will be applied the instrument for quality of life (SF-36) and for functional capacity, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. This research will follow the standards set by resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, for research with human beings and will be conducted in accordance with the ethical recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot
- Being tested
- reflexology, self-care guidelines with feet
- Keywords
- Reflexology,diabetes, quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Foot, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
reflexologyOther
Also called massage
self-care guidelines with feetOther
Also called education
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Control Group will receive self-care guidelines with feet Receives: Other: self-care guidelines with feet |
| Treatment Group | Experimental | Treatment will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology Receives: Other: reflexology; Other: self-care guidelines with feet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Life Questionnaire SF-36
measure of quality of life
Measured: An average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2017
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionMar 2017
- Study completionMay 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic FootStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The patients will be taken to a room reserved for the procedure. First, the patients answer the research instruments and then they will be asked to lie supine on a stretcher. The feet of the patients will be cleaned with water (37ºC) and mild soap and then will be dry with paper towels. The next phase consists in the application of foot massage, that will follow the Lourenço's Protocol (2012), which consists of 14 steps of relaxation massage. Each step will have duration of 1 minute, 3 procedures by week, by 4 consecutive weeks. The research instruments, SF-36 and Stanford Health Assessment Questionnarie will be applied before the first and after the last procedure.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Beatriz Bertolaccini Martínez, Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
- Investigators
- Beatriz Ms Martínez, doctor, Principal investigator, Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03280524
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAAE: 30795814.8.0000.5102
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aguiar CC, Vieira AP, Carvalho AF, Montenegro-Junior RM. [Assessment instruments for a Health-Related Quality of Life in diabetes mellitus]. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008 Aug;52(6):931-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302008000600004. Portuguese.
PubMed 18820804Kaul K, Tarr JM, Ahmad SI, Kohner EM, Chibber R. Introduction to diabetes mellitus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;771:1-11. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5441-0_1.
PubMed 23393665Tiran D, Chummun H. The physiological basis of reflexology and its use as a potential diagnostic tool. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 Feb;11(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ctnm.2004.07.007.
PubMed 15984227Armstrong AR, Thiebaut SP, Brown LJ, Nepal B. Australian adults use complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of chronic illness: a national study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Aug;35(4):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00745.x.
PubMed 21806735Wang MY, Tsai PS, Lee PH, Chang WY, Yang CM. The efficacy of reflexology: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jun;62(5):512-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04606.x.
PubMed 18489444Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PubMed 1593914Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
PubMed 5349366
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reflexology and Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03280524
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAAE: 30795814.8.0000.5102
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot
- Keywords
- Reflexology,diabetes, quality of life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade do Vale do SapucaiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with 60 type 2 diabetes patients divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of reflexology on the quality of life and functional capacity of patients at risk for diabetic neuropathy. This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with type 2 diabetes patients. The eligibility criteria are 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. As exclusion criteria, it will be considered the presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology. For the calculation of the sample size, a pilot test will be conducted with 8 diabetic patients. It will be used the statistical software Biostat® 5.3. The sample found was of 60 patients who were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline. For the evaluations, it will be applied the instrument for quality of life (SF-36) and for functional capacity, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. This research will follow the standards set by resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, for research with human beings and will be conducted in accordance with the ethical recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The patients will be taken to a room reserved for the procedure. First, the patients answer the research instruments and then they will be asked to lie supine on a stretcher. The feet of the patients will be cleaned with water (37ºC) and mild soap and then will be dry with paper towels. The next phase consists in the application of foot massage, that will follow the Lourenço's Protocol (2012), which consists of 14 steps of relaxation massage. Each step will have duration of 1 minute, 3 procedures by week, by 4 consecutive weeks. The research instruments, SF-36 and Stanford Health Assessment Questionnarie will be applied before the first and after the last procedure.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Other: self-care guidelines with feetControl Group will receive self-care guidelines with feet |
| Treatment Group | Experimental | Other: reflexology, Other: self-care guidelines with feetTreatment will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| reflexologyAlso: massage | Other | Treatment Group |
| self-care guidelines with feetAlso: education | Other | Control Group, Treatment Group |
Primary outcome
Quality of Life Questionnaire SF-36
Time frame: An average of 1 year
measure of quality of life
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2018.
- Background: PubMed 18820804Aguiar CC, Vieira AP, Carvalho AF, Montenegro-Junior RM. [Assessment instruments for a Health-Related Quality of Life in diabetes mellitus]. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008 Aug;52(6):931-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302008000600004. Portuguese.
- Background: PubMed 23393665Kaul K, Tarr JM, Ahmad SI, Kohner EM, Chibber R. Introduction to diabetes mellitus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;771:1-11. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5441-0_1.
- Background: PubMed 15984227Tiran D, Chummun H. The physiological basis of reflexology and its use as a potential diagnostic tool. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 Feb;11(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ctnm.2004.07.007.
- Background: PubMed 21806735Armstrong AR, Thiebaut SP, Brown LJ, Nepal B. Australian adults use complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of chronic illness: a national study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Aug;35(4):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00745.x.
- Background: PubMed 18489444Wang MY, Tsai PS, Lee PH, Chang WY, Yang CM. The efficacy of reflexology: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jun;62(5):512-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04606.x.
- Background: PubMed 1593914Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
- Background: PubMed 5349366Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Foot
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy Evaluation of Turmeric-Derived Nanoparticle Hydrogel for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Wounds
Diabete Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Better Care Closer to Home: Enhancing Primary and Community Care
Diabetic Foot Disease, Recurrence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Beatriz Ms Martínez, doctor principal investigator
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing reflexology and self-care guidelines with feet in people with Diabetic Foot, run by Universidade do Vale do Sapucai at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Life Questionnaire SF-36 (time frame: An average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03280524, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2018.