AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisPhase 4NCT03281304

A Study of Tofacitinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Stable Remission

A Phase 4 study testing CP-690,500 5 mg and CP-690,550 10 mg in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Pfizer at 80 sites in 20 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a follow up study for subjects with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in stable remission designed to evaluate flexible dosing of CP-690,550. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ulcerative Colitis
What is being tested?
CP-690,500 5 mg and CP-690,550 10 mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
80 sitesin 20 countries
Study dates
16 Nov 2017to 18 Mar 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Currently enrolled in Study A3921139 receiving CP-690,550 10 mg BID for at least 2 years consecutively.
  • In stable remission on CP-690,550 10 mg BID
  • Agree to use highly effective contraception
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Comply with visits, treatments, lab tests, diary and other study procedures
  • Signed and dated informed consent document.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who were initially assigned to tofacitinib 10 mg BID at baseline of Study A3921139 whose tofacitinib dose was reduced to 5 mg BID due to safety or efficacy.
  • Presence of indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis or findings suggestive of Crohn's disease
  • Likely to require surgery for ulcerative colitis during study
  • Expected to receive any prohibited medication
  • Expected to receive live or attenuated virus vaccination during study
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the study
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Evidence of colonic malignancy or any dysplasia
  • Acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition that may increase risk of participation
  • Investigator site staff member
  • Subjects likely to be uncooperative or unable to comply with study procedures
  • Participation in other studies involving investigational drugs during study
  • Subjects with any of the following risk factors for pulmonary embolism at baseline as defined by EMA's PRAC:
  • has heart failure;
  • has inherited coagulation disorders;
  • has had venous thromboembolism, either deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism;
  • is taking combined hormonal contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy;
  • has malignancy (association is strongest with cancers other than non-melanoma skin cancers);
  • is undergoing major surgery

Trial locations and contacts

80 sites in 20 countries.

80 sites in 20 countries

United States24 sites
  • Bristol Hospital

    Bristol, Connecticut, 06010

  • Connecticut Clinical Research Institute

    Bristol, Connecticut, 06010

  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

    Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047

  • Chevy Chase Endoscopy Center

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • MGG Group Co., Inc., Chevy Chase Clinical Research

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • Memorial Hermann Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)- McGovern Medical School

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates

    Lake Success, New York, 11042

  • Eastside Endoscopy Center

    Macomb, Michigan, 48044

  • Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC

    Mentor, Ohio, 44060

  • Surgicare of Mobile

    Mobile, Alabama, 36606

  • Alabama Medical Group, P.C.

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Columbia University Medical Center Research Pharmacy/ Milstein Hospital

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Central Connecticut Endoscopy Center

    Plainville, Connecticut, 06062

  • Advanced Medical Research Center

    Port Orange, Florida, 32127

  • Alpine Medical Group

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102

  • Wasatch Clinical Research, LLC

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107

  • Clinical Applications Laboratories, Inc.

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Cotton-O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Digestive Health

    Topeka, Kansas, 66606

  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

    Troy, Michigan, 48098

  • Christus Trinity Mother Frances Endoscopy Center

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • Tyler Research Institute, LLC

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • Florida Medical Clinic, P.A.

    Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542

Other trials in United States

Japan14 sites
  • Tokyo Medical And Dental University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine

    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519

  • Toho University Sakura Medical Center

    Chiba, 285-8741

  • Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital

    Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka, 818-8502

  • Tokai University Hachioji Hospital

    Hachiōji, Tokyo, 192-0032

  • Hiroshima University Hospital

    Hiroshima, 734-8551

  • Kurume University Hospital

    Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011

  • Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital

    Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642

  • Aichi Medical University Hospital

    Nagakute, Aichi-ken, 480-1195

  • Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital

    Osaka, 545-8586

  • Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital

    Ōtsu, Shiga, 520-2192

  • Hokkaido P.W.F.A.C Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0033

  • Showa University Hospital

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8666

  • Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital

    Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, 569-8686

  • Keio University Hospital

    Tokyo, 160-8582

Other trials in Japan

Serbia5 sites
  • Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Clinical Hospital Centre Zvezdara

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Clinical Center Kragujevac

    Kragujevac, 34000

  • General Hospital "Djordje Joanovic"

    Zrenjanin, 23000

Other trials in Serbia

South Africa5 sites
  • Kingsbury Hospital

    Claremont, CAPE TOWN, 7708

  • Endocare Research Centre

    Paarl, Western Cape, 7646

  • Panorama Mediclinic

    Panorama, Western Cape, 7500

  • Wits Clinical Research (WCR) Bara Site, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital

    Soweto, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2013

  • Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital

    Soweto, Johannesburg, 2013

Other trials in South Africa

Ukraine4 sites
  • Regional Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise "Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Hospital" Surgery Departm

    Chernivtsi, 58001

  • Kyiv Municipal Clinical Hospital #18

    Kyiv, 01030

  • MI Uzhgorod Regional Hospital

    Uzhhorod, 88009

  • Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital for War Veterans, Therapeutics Dept. No. 2

    Vinnytsia, 21005

Other trials in Ukraine

Hungary3 sites
  • Szent Janos Korhaz és Eszak-budai Egyesitett Korhazak

    Budapest, 1125

  • Pannonia Maganorvosi Centrum Kft.

    Budapest, 1136

  • Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz Endoszkopos Laboratorium

    Gyula, 5700

Other trials in Hungary

New Zealand3 sites
  • Christchurch Hospital (Canterbury District Health Board)

    Christchurch, 8011

  • Southern District Health Board

    Dunedin, 9016

  • North Shore Hospital (Waitemata District Health Board)

    Takapuna, Auckland, 0620

Other trials in New Zealand

Russia3 sites
  • Federal State Budgetary Institution "State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology

    Moscow, 123423

  • LLC Novosibirskiy Gastrocenter

    Novosibirsk, 630007

  • Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Scientific Research Institute of Physiology

    Novosibirsk, 630117

Other trials in Russia

Slovakia3 sites
  • Medak s.r.o.

    Bratislava, 851 01

  • KM Management spol. s.r.o.

    Nitra, 949 01

  • Gastro I., s.r.o., Gastroenterologicka ambulancia

    Prešov, 080 01

Other trials in Slovakia

South Korea3 sites
  • Hanyang University Guri Hospital

    Gyeonggi-do, 11923

  • Kyung Hee University Hospital

    Seoul, 02447

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul, 03722

Other trials in South Korea

Canada2 sites
  • London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • Royal University Hospital

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8

Other trials in Canada

France2 sites
  • CHU Hotel Dieu

    Nantes, 44093

  • CHU de Bordeaux Hopital Haut Leveque

    Pessac, 33600

Other trials in France

Poland2 sites
  • Endoskopia Sp. z o.o.

    Sopot, 81-756

  • Lexmedica

    Wroclaw, 53-114

Other trials in Poland

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Leuven (University Hospital Leuven), Campus Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Czechia1 site
  • Nemocnice Strakonice a.s.

    Strakonice, 386 01

Other trials in Czechia

Germany1 site
  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

    Kiel, 24105

Other trials in Germany

Italy1 site
  • Università "Magna Graecia" di Catanzaro

    Catanzaro, CZ, 88100

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands1 site
  • Academic Medical Centre

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom1 site
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

    Bristol, AVON, BS2 8HW

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 3B/4, MULTI-CENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY OF TOFACITINIB (CP-690,550) IN SUBJECTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN STABLE REMISSION

This study is a follow up study for subjects with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in stable remission designed to evaluate flexible dosing of CP-690,550.

Being tested
CP-690,500 5 mg, CP-690,550 10 mg
Keywords
ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CP-690,500 5 mgDrug

    CP-690,550 5 mg tablet BID

  • CP-690,550 10 mgDrug

    CP-690,550 10 mg tablet BID

Study groups in NCT03281304
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CP-690,550 5 mgExperimentalCP-690,550 5 mg tablet by mouth twice a day (BID)
Receives: Drug: CP-690,500 5 mg
CP-690,550 10 mgExperimentalCP-690,550 10 mg BID
Receives: Drug: CP-690,550 10 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Month 6

    Remission as per modified mayo score was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore of 0 at Month 6. Modified mayo score consisted of 3 components: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore and endoscopic subscore: higher scores for each score = more severe disease. These scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Month 6

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Time to Loss of Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score Using Kaplan-Meier Method

    Time to loss of remission(flare): time from first drug administration until time of meeting loss of remission criteria based on modified mayo score. Loss of remission: meeting at least (>=)1 criteria: increase from Baseline in rectal bleeding subscore by >=1 point and increase in endoscopic subscore by >=1 point; increase from Baseline in rectal bleeding subscore by >=2 points and endoscopic subscore >0; increase in stool frequency subscore by >=2 points and increase in endoscopic subscore by >=1 point; increase in endoscopic subscore by >=2 points. Modified mayo score included 3 components: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscores: Modified mayo score included 3 components: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscores, each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores for each score=more severe disease. All scores summed up to give total modified mayo score range from 0 to 9; higher scores=more severe disease.

    Measured: Up to Month 42

  2. Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

    Remission as per modified partial mayo score was defined as stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding sub score of 0 at the specified time points. Modified partial mayo scores consisted of 2 components: stool frequency and rectal bleeding: each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores for each score = more severe disease. These scores were summed up to give a total modified partial mayo score range of 0 to 6; where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

  3. Number of Participants With Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42

    Remission as per total mayo score was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and physician global assessment (PGA), each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42

  4. Number of Participants With Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

    Remission as per partial mayo score was defined as partial mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Partial mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC without endoscopy. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total partial mayo score range from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

  5. Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42

    Remission as per modified mayo score was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Modified mayo score consisted of 3 components: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore and endoscopic subscore: higher scores for each score = more severe disease. These scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Months 18, 30 and 42

  6. Change From Baseline in Modified Mayo Score at Month 6

    Modified mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Modified mayo scores consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscore, each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These individual scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6

  7. Change From Baseline in Modified Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42

    Modified mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Modified mayo scores consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscore, each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These individual scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 18, 30 and 42

  8. Change From Baseline in Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3 and 6

    Modified partial mayo scores consisted of 2 subscores: stool frequency and rectal bleeding with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total Modified partial mayo score ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 6 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6

  9. Change From Baseline in Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

    Modified partial mayo scores consisted of 2 subscores: stool frequency and rectal bleeding with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total modified partial mayo score range from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 6 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

  10. Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Month 6

    Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each sub score graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6

  11. Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42

    Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each sub score graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 18, 30 and 42

  12. Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3 and 6

    Partial mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC without endoscopy. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total partial mayo score range from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6

  13. Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

    Partial mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC without endoscopy. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total partial mayo score ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

  14. Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42

    Mucosal healing in participants was defined as the mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42

  15. Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Mayo Score at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42

    Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30 percent, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each sub score graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42

  16. Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

    Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin (in micrograms per gram [mcg/g]) was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

  17. Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Level at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

    Change From baseline in hs-CRP level (in milligrams per liter [mg/L]) is reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42

  18. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events (irrespective of frequency threshold used to report other AEs in safety section).

    Measured: Baseline up to 43 months

  19. Number of Participants With Serious Infections

    Serious infections were defined as any infections (viral, bacterial, and fungal) requiring parenteral antimicrobial therapy, hospitalization for treatment, or meeting other criteria that require the infection to be classified as serious adverse event. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events.

    Measured: Baseline up to 43 months

  20. Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities

    Abnormality criteria: Hematology: hemoglobin(Hg): <0.8* lower limit of normal (LLN); hematocrit: <0.8*LLN; lymphocytes: <0.8* LLN; lymphocytes/leukocytes: <0.8*LLN; erythrocytes: <0.8*LLN; erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume: <0.9*LLN; erythrocytes mean corpuscular Hg: <0.9*LLN; reticulocytes, reticulocytes/erythrocytes:>1.5* upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes: >1.2*ULN; basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes: >1.2*ULN; leukocyte esterase: >=1; Clinical chemistry: bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN, bilirubin: >1.5*ULN; indirect bilirubin: >1.5* ULN; aspartate aminotransferase(AT): >3.0*ULN; alanine AT: >3.0*ULN; gamma glutamyl transferase: >3.0* ULN; creatine kinase: >2.0*ULN; potassium: >1.1*ULN; blood urea nitrogen: >1.3*ULN; creatinine: >1.3*ULN; urate: >1.2*ULN; cholesterol: >1.3*ULN; HDL-cholesterol: <0.8* LLN; LDL-cholesterol: >1.2*ULN; triglycerides: >1.3*ULN; glucose: >1.5*ULN; and urine Hg >=1.

    Measured: Baseline up to 27 months

  21. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation

    Laboratory abnormalities leading to study treatment discontinuation: 2 sequential neutrophil counts <750 neutrophils per cubic millimeter (mm^3); 2 sequential lymphocyte counts <500 lymphocytes/mm^3; 2 sequential hemoglobin <8.0 grams per deciliter; 2 sequential platelet counts <75000 platelets/mm^3; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations >=3*ULN with at least one total bilirubin value >=2*ULN; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations >=3*ULN accompanied by signs or symptoms consistent with hepatic injury; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations >=5*ULN; 2 sequential increases in creatinine >50% and >0.5 milligrams per deciliter over A3921139 baseline; 2 sequential CK elevations >10*ULN unless the causality is known not to be medically serious (eg, exercise induced).

    Measured: Baseline up to 43 months

  22. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities

    Vital signs abnormality criteria included: 1) a) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of (less than) <50 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), b) change greater than equal to (>=) 20 mmHg increase, c) change >=20 mmHg decrease; 2) a) systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <90 mmHg, b) change >=30 mmHg increase, c) change >=30 mmHg decrease; 3) a) pulse rate value of <40 beats per minute (bpm), b) pulse rate >120 bpm. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to 43 months

  23. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examinations Abnormalities

    Physical examination included assessment of the weight, general appearance, eyes, mouth, lungs, heart, abdomen, musculoskeletal, extremities, skin and lymph nodes. Clinical significance was assessed by the Investigator.

    Measured: Baseline up to 43 months

  24. Number of Participants With Opportunistic Infections, All Malignancy, Gastrointestinal Perforation and Cardiovascular Events Adjudicated by Adjudication Committee

    Number of participants with adjudicated opportunistic infections including herpes zoster (non-adjacent or >2 adjacent dermatomes); all malignancies including non-melanoma skin cancer; gastrointestinal perforation and cardiovascular events including pulmonary embolism and cerebrovascular accident, adjudicated by adjudication committee were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to 43 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Sep 2017
  2. Study start16 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion14 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion18 Mar 2022

Why it stopped: The study terminated early due to business reasons, with the study already meeting its primary objective. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety and/or efficacy concerns.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
140 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03281304
Sponsor's protocol ID
A3921288
Other IDs
RIVETING STUDY, 2017-002274-39, 2017
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
11 Sep 2017
Last updated
21 Mar 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Rubin DT, Panes J, Torres J, Kobayashi T, Su C, Lawendy N, Modesto I, Segovia M, Gardiner S, Wang W, Vermeire S. Outcomes of tofacitinib dose reduction in patients with ulcerative colitis in stable remission: a long-term follow-up of the randomized RIVETING trial. Crohns Colitis 360. 2026 Aug 6;8(3):otag093. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otag093. eCollection 2026 Jul.

    PubMed 42669025
  • Torres J, D'Haens GR, Regueiro M, Santana G, Panes J, Vermeire S, Gardiner S, Kulisek N, Modesto I, Su C, Lawendy N, Mundayat R, Paulissen J, Dubinsky MC. Potential predictors of efficacy outcomes following tofacitinib dose reduction in patients with ulcerative colitis in stable remission: a post hoc analysis of outcomes from the RIVETING study. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 27;18:17562848251318849. doi: 10.1177/17562848251318849. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 40028509
  • Panes J, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Ng SC, Lawendy N, Kulisek N, Guo X, Wu J, Vranic I, Panaccione R, Vermeire S. Analysis of tofacitinib safety in ulcerative colitis from the completed global clinical developmental program up to 9.2 years of drug exposure. United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Jul;12(6):793-801. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12584. Epub 2024 May 22.

    PubMed 38778549
  • Rubin DT, Torres J, Regueiro M, Reinisch W, Prideaux L, Kotze PG, Tan FH, Gardiner S, Mundayat R, Cadatal MJ, Ng SC. Association Between Smoking Status and the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Crohns Colitis 360. 2024 Jan 20;6(1):otae004. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otae004. eCollection 2024 Jan.

    PubMed 38425446
  • Sandborn WJ, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Panaccione R, Ng SC, Lawendy N, Kulisek N, Modesto I, Guo X, Mundayat R, Su C, Vranic I, Panes J. Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: An Integrated Summary of up to 7.8 Years of Safety Data from the Global Clinical Programme. J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Apr 3;17(3):338-351. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac141.

    PubMed 36124702
  • Winthrop KL, Vermeire S, Long MD, Panes J, Ng SC, Kulisek N, Mundayat R, Lawendy N, Vranic I, Modesto I, Su C, Melmed GY. Long-term Risk of Herpes Zoster Infection in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jan 5;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac063.

    PubMed 35648151

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing CP-690,500 5 mg and CP-690,550 10 mg in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Pfizer at 80 sites in 20 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 80 sites in United States, Japan, Serbia, South Africa, Ukraine and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Month 6 (time frame: Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03281304, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in