Ulcerative ColitisPhase 4NCT03281304
A Study of Tofacitinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Stable Remission
A Phase 4 study testing CP-690,500 5 mg and CP-690,550 10 mg in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Pfizer at 80 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a follow up study for subjects with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in stable remission designed to evaluate flexible dosing of CP-690,550. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- CP-690,500 5 mg and CP-690,550 10 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 80 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Nov 2017to 18 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Currently enrolled in Study A3921139 receiving CP-690,550 10 mg BID for at least 2 years consecutively.
- In stable remission on CP-690,550 10 mg BID
- Agree to use highly effective contraception
- Negative pregnancy test
- Comply with visits, treatments, lab tests, diary and other study procedures
- Signed and dated informed consent document.
Who cannot join
- Subjects who were initially assigned to tofacitinib 10 mg BID at baseline of Study A3921139 whose tofacitinib dose was reduced to 5 mg BID due to safety or efficacy.
- Presence of indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis or findings suggestive of Crohn's disease
- Likely to require surgery for ulcerative colitis during study
- Expected to receive any prohibited medication
- Expected to receive live or attenuated virus vaccination during study
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the study
Show all 18Show fewer
- Evidence of colonic malignancy or any dysplasia
- Acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition that may increase risk of participation
- Investigator site staff member
- Subjects likely to be uncooperative or unable to comply with study procedures
- Participation in other studies involving investigational drugs during study
- Subjects with any of the following risk factors for pulmonary embolism at baseline as defined by EMA's PRAC:
- has heart failure;
- has inherited coagulation disorders;
- has had venous thromboembolism, either deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism;
- is taking combined hormonal contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy;
- has malignancy (association is strongest with cancers other than non-melanoma skin cancers);
- is undergoing major surgery
Trial locations and contacts
80 sites in 20 countries.
80 sites in 20 countries
United States24 sites
Bristol Hospital
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Connecticut Clinical Research Institute
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
Chevy Chase Endoscopy Center
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
MGG Group Co., Inc., Chevy Chase Clinical Research
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)- McGovern Medical School
Houston, Texas, 77030
NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Eastside Endoscopy Center
Macomb, Michigan, 48044
Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Surgicare of Mobile
Mobile, Alabama, 36606
Alabama Medical Group, P.C.
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Columbia University Medical Center Research Pharmacy/ Milstein Hospital
New York, New York, 10032
Central Connecticut Endoscopy Center
Plainville, Connecticut, 06062
Advanced Medical Research Center
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Alpine Medical Group
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
Wasatch Clinical Research, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Clinical Applications Laboratories, Inc.
San Diego, California, 92103
Cotton-O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Digestive Health
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
Troy, Michigan, 48098
Christus Trinity Mother Frances Endoscopy Center
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Tyler Research Institute, LLC
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Florida Medical Clinic, P.A.
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542
Japan14 sites
Tokyo Medical And Dental University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519
Toho University Sakura Medical Center
Chiba, 285-8741
Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital
Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka, 818-8502
Tokai University Hachioji Hospital
Hachiōji, Tokyo, 192-0032
Hiroshima University Hospital
Hiroshima, 734-8551
Kurume University Hospital
Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011
Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital
Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642
Aichi Medical University Hospital
Nagakute, Aichi-ken, 480-1195
Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital
Osaka, 545-8586
Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital
Ōtsu, Shiga, 520-2192
Hokkaido P.W.F.A.C Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0033
Showa University Hospital
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8666
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital
Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, 569-8686
Keio University Hospital
Tokyo, 160-8582
Serbia5 sites
Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Belgrade, 11000
Clinical Hospital Centre Zvezdara
Belgrade, 11000
Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Belgrade, 11000
Clinical Center Kragujevac
Kragujevac, 34000
General Hospital "Djordje Joanovic"
Zrenjanin, 23000
South Africa5 sites
Kingsbury Hospital
Claremont, CAPE TOWN, 7708
Endocare Research Centre
Paarl, Western Cape, 7646
Panorama Mediclinic
Panorama, Western Cape, 7500
Wits Clinical Research (WCR) Bara Site, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital
Soweto, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2013
Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital
Soweto, Johannesburg, 2013
Ukraine4 sites
Regional Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise "Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Hospital" Surgery Departm
Chernivtsi, 58001
Kyiv Municipal Clinical Hospital #18
Kyiv, 01030
MI Uzhgorod Regional Hospital
Uzhhorod, 88009
Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital for War Veterans, Therapeutics Dept. No. 2
Vinnytsia, 21005
Hungary3 sites
Szent Janos Korhaz és Eszak-budai Egyesitett Korhazak
Budapest, 1125
Pannonia Maganorvosi Centrum Kft.
Budapest, 1136
Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz Endoszkopos Laboratorium
Gyula, 5700
New Zealand3 sites
Christchurch Hospital (Canterbury District Health Board)
Christchurch, 8011
Southern District Health Board
Dunedin, 9016
North Shore Hospital (Waitemata District Health Board)
Takapuna, Auckland, 0620
Russia3 sites
Federal State Budgetary Institution "State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology
Moscow, 123423
LLC Novosibirskiy Gastrocenter
Novosibirsk, 630007
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Scientific Research Institute of Physiology
Novosibirsk, 630117
Slovakia3 sites
Medak s.r.o.
Bratislava, 851 01
KM Management spol. s.r.o.
Nitra, 949 01
Gastro I., s.r.o., Gastroenterologicka ambulancia
Prešov, 080 01
South Korea3 sites
Hanyang University Guri Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, 11923
Kyung Hee University Hospital
Seoul, 02447
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Canada2 sites
London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8
France2 sites
CHU Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
CHU de Bordeaux Hopital Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33600
Belgium1 site
UZ Leuven (University Hospital Leuven), Campus Gasthuisberg
Leuven, 3000
United Kingdom1 site
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Bristol, AVON, BS2 8HW
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 3B/4, MULTI-CENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY OF TOFACITINIB (CP-690,550) IN SUBJECTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN STABLE REMISSION
This study is a follow up study for subjects with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in stable remission designed to evaluate flexible dosing of CP-690,550.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- CP-690,500 5 mg, CP-690,550 10 mg
- Keywords
- ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CP-690,500 5 mgDrug
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet BID
CP-690,550 10 mgDrug
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet BID
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CP-690,550 5 mg | Experimental | CP-690,550 5 mg tablet by mouth twice a day (BID) Receives: Drug: CP-690,500 5 mg |
| CP-690,550 10 mg | Experimental | CP-690,550 10 mg BID Receives: Drug: CP-690,550 10 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Month 6
Remission as per modified mayo score was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore of 0 at Month 6. Modified mayo score consisted of 3 components: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore and endoscopic subscore: higher scores for each score = more severe disease. These scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Month 6
Secondary outcomes (24)
Time to Loss of Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score Using Kaplan-Meier Method
Time to loss of remission(flare): time from first drug administration until time of meeting loss of remission criteria based on modified mayo score. Loss of remission: meeting at least (>=)1 criteria: increase from Baseline in rectal bleeding subscore by >=1 point and increase in endoscopic subscore by >=1 point; increase from Baseline in rectal bleeding subscore by >=2 points and endoscopic subscore >0; increase in stool frequency subscore by >=2 points and increase in endoscopic subscore by >=1 point; increase in endoscopic subscore by >=2 points. Modified mayo score included 3 components: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscores: Modified mayo score included 3 components: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscores, each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores for each score=more severe disease. All scores summed up to give total modified mayo score range from 0 to 9; higher scores=more severe disease.
Measured: Up to Month 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Remission as per modified partial mayo score was defined as stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding sub score of 0 at the specified time points. Modified partial mayo scores consisted of 2 components: stool frequency and rectal bleeding: each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores for each score = more severe disease. These scores were summed up to give a total modified partial mayo score range of 0 to 6; where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Remission as per total mayo score was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and physician global assessment (PGA), each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Remission as per partial mayo score was defined as partial mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Partial mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC without endoscopy. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total partial mayo score range from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42
Remission as per modified mayo score was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Modified mayo score consisted of 3 components: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore and endoscopic subscore: higher scores for each score = more severe disease. These scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Months 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Modified Mayo Score at Month 6
Modified mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Modified mayo scores consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscore, each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These individual scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42
Modified mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Modified mayo scores consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscore, each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These individual scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Months 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3 and 6
Modified partial mayo scores consisted of 2 subscores: stool frequency and rectal bleeding with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total Modified partial mayo score ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 6 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Modified partial mayo scores consisted of 2 subscores: stool frequency and rectal bleeding with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total modified partial mayo score range from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 6 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Month 6
Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each sub score graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42
Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each sub score graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Months 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3 and 6
Partial mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC without endoscopy. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total partial mayo score range from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6
Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Partial mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC without endoscopy. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA with each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a total partial mayo score ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Mucosal healing in participants was defined as the mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Mayo Score at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30 percent, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each sub score graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. PGA included 3 criteria: participant's recollection of abdominal discomfort, general sense of wellbeing and other observations such as physical findings and performance status. Individual subscores were summed up to give a mayo score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Measured: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin (in micrograms per gram [mcg/g]) was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Level at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Change From baseline in hs-CRP level (in milligrams per liter [mg/L]) is reported.
Measured: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events (irrespective of frequency threshold used to report other AEs in safety section).
Measured: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Serious Infections
Serious infections were defined as any infections (viral, bacterial, and fungal) requiring parenteral antimicrobial therapy, hospitalization for treatment, or meeting other criteria that require the infection to be classified as serious adverse event. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events.
Measured: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Abnormality criteria: Hematology: hemoglobin(Hg): <0.8* lower limit of normal (LLN); hematocrit: <0.8*LLN; lymphocytes: <0.8* LLN; lymphocytes/leukocytes: <0.8*LLN; erythrocytes: <0.8*LLN; erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume: <0.9*LLN; erythrocytes mean corpuscular Hg: <0.9*LLN; reticulocytes, reticulocytes/erythrocytes:>1.5* upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes: >1.2*ULN; basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes: >1.2*ULN; leukocyte esterase: >=1; Clinical chemistry: bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN, bilirubin: >1.5*ULN; indirect bilirubin: >1.5* ULN; aspartate aminotransferase(AT): >3.0*ULN; alanine AT: >3.0*ULN; gamma glutamyl transferase: >3.0* ULN; creatine kinase: >2.0*ULN; potassium: >1.1*ULN; blood urea nitrogen: >1.3*ULN; creatinine: >1.3*ULN; urate: >1.2*ULN; cholesterol: >1.3*ULN; HDL-cholesterol: <0.8* LLN; LDL-cholesterol: >1.2*ULN; triglycerides: >1.3*ULN; glucose: >1.5*ULN; and urine Hg >=1.
Measured: Baseline up to 27 months
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation
Laboratory abnormalities leading to study treatment discontinuation: 2 sequential neutrophil counts <750 neutrophils per cubic millimeter (mm^3); 2 sequential lymphocyte counts <500 lymphocytes/mm^3; 2 sequential hemoglobin <8.0 grams per deciliter; 2 sequential platelet counts <75000 platelets/mm^3; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations >=3*ULN with at least one total bilirubin value >=2*ULN; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations >=3*ULN accompanied by signs or symptoms consistent with hepatic injury; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations >=5*ULN; 2 sequential increases in creatinine >50% and >0.5 milligrams per deciliter over A3921139 baseline; 2 sequential CK elevations >10*ULN unless the causality is known not to be medically serious (eg, exercise induced).
Measured: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital signs abnormality criteria included: 1) a) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of (less than) <50 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), b) change greater than equal to (>=) 20 mmHg increase, c) change >=20 mmHg decrease; 2) a) systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <90 mmHg, b) change >=30 mmHg increase, c) change >=30 mmHg decrease; 3) a) pulse rate value of <40 beats per minute (bpm), b) pulse rate >120 bpm. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examinations Abnormalities
Physical examination included assessment of the weight, general appearance, eyes, mouth, lungs, heart, abdomen, musculoskeletal, extremities, skin and lymph nodes. Clinical significance was assessed by the Investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Opportunistic Infections, All Malignancy, Gastrointestinal Perforation and Cardiovascular Events Adjudicated by Adjudication Committee
Number of participants with adjudicated opportunistic infections including herpes zoster (non-adjacent or >2 adjacent dermatomes); all malignancies including non-melanoma skin cancer; gastrointestinal perforation and cardiovascular events including pulmonary embolism and cerebrovascular accident, adjudicated by adjudication committee were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to 43 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2017
- Study start16 Nov 2017
- Primary completion14 Feb 2020
- Study completion18 Mar 2022
Why it stopped: The study terminated early due to business reasons, with the study already meeting its primary objective. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety and/or efficacy concerns.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03281304
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921288
- Other IDs
- RIVETING STUDY, 2017-002274-39, 2017
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Rubin DT, Panes J, Torres J, Kobayashi T, Su C, Lawendy N, Modesto I, Segovia M, Gardiner S, Wang W, Vermeire S. Outcomes of tofacitinib dose reduction in patients with ulcerative colitis in stable remission: a long-term follow-up of the randomized RIVETING trial. Crohns Colitis 360. 2026 Aug 6;8(3):otag093. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otag093. eCollection 2026 Jul.
PubMed 42669025Torres J, D'Haens GR, Regueiro M, Santana G, Panes J, Vermeire S, Gardiner S, Kulisek N, Modesto I, Su C, Lawendy N, Mundayat R, Paulissen J, Dubinsky MC. Potential predictors of efficacy outcomes following tofacitinib dose reduction in patients with ulcerative colitis in stable remission: a post hoc analysis of outcomes from the RIVETING study. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 27;18:17562848251318849. doi: 10.1177/17562848251318849. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40028509Panes J, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Ng SC, Lawendy N, Kulisek N, Guo X, Wu J, Vranic I, Panaccione R, Vermeire S. Analysis of tofacitinib safety in ulcerative colitis from the completed global clinical developmental program up to 9.2 years of drug exposure. United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Jul;12(6):793-801. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12584. Epub 2024 May 22.
PubMed 38778549Rubin DT, Torres J, Regueiro M, Reinisch W, Prideaux L, Kotze PG, Tan FH, Gardiner S, Mundayat R, Cadatal MJ, Ng SC. Association Between Smoking Status and the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Crohns Colitis 360. 2024 Jan 20;6(1):otae004. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otae004. eCollection 2024 Jan.
PubMed 38425446Sandborn WJ, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Panaccione R, Ng SC, Lawendy N, Kulisek N, Modesto I, Guo X, Mundayat R, Su C, Vranic I, Panes J. Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: An Integrated Summary of up to 7.8 Years of Safety Data from the Global Clinical Programme. J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Apr 3;17(3):338-351. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac141.
PubMed 36124702Winthrop KL, Vermeire S, Long MD, Panes J, Ng SC, Kulisek N, Mundayat R, Lawendy N, Vranic I, Modesto I, Su C, Melmed GY. Long-term Risk of Herpes Zoster Infection in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jan 5;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac063.
PubMed 35648151
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 3B/4, MULTI-CENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY OF TOFACITINIB (CP-690,550) IN SUBJECTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN STABLE REMISSION
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03281304
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921288
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Keywords
- ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study terminated early due to business reasons, with the study already meeting its primary objective. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety and/or efficacy concerns.
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Apr 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a follow up study for subjects with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in stable remission designed to evaluate flexible dosing of CP-690,550.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CP-690,550 5 mg | Experimental | Drug: CP-690,500 5 mgCP-690,550 5 mg tablet by mouth twice a day (BID) |
| CP-690,550 10 mg | Experimental | Drug: CP-690,550 10 mgCP-690,550 10 mg BID |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Currently enrolled in Study A3921139 receiving CP-690,550 10 mg BID for at least 2 years consecutively.
- In stable remission on CP-690,550 10 mg BID
- Agree to use highly effective contraception
- Negative pregnancy test
- Comply with visits, treatments, lab tests, diary and other study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Subjects who were initially assigned to tofacitinib 10 mg BID at baseline of Study A3921139 whose tofacitinib dose was reduced to 5 mg BID due to safety or efficacy.
- Presence of indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis or findings suggestive of Crohn's disease
- Likely to require surgery for ulcerative colitis during study
- Expected to receive any prohibited medication
- Expected to receive live or attenuated virus vaccination during study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CP-690,500 5 mgCP-690,550 5 mg tablet BID | Drug | CP-690,550 5 mg |
| CP-690,550 10 mgCP-690,550 10 mg tablet BID | Drug | CP-690,550 10 mg |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Remission as per modified mayo score was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, and rectal bleeding subscore of 0 at Month 6. Modified mayo score consisted of 3 components: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore and endoscopic subscore: higher scores for each score = more severe disease. These scores were summed up to give a total modified mayo score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease.
24 secondary outcomes
Time to Loss of Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score Using Kaplan-Meier Method
Time frame: Up to Month 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Time frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Time frame: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Time frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42
Time frame: Months 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Modified Mayo Score at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42
Time frame: Baseline, Months 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3 and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Partial Mayo Score at Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Time frame: Baseline, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Months 18, 30 and 42
Time frame: Baseline, Months 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Months 1, 3 and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6
Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Time frame: Baseline, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Time frame: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Mayo Score at Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Time frame: Months 6, 18, 30 and 42
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Level at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39 and 42
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Serious Infections
Time frame: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to 27 months
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation
Time frame: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examinations Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to 43 months
Number of Participants With Opportunistic Infections, All Malignancy, Gastrointestinal Perforation and Cardiovascular Events Adjudicated by Adjudication Committee
Time frame: Baseline up to 43 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42669025Rubin DT, Panes J, Torres J, Kobayashi T, Su C, Lawendy N, Modesto I, Segovia M, Gardiner S, Wang W, Vermeire S. Outcomes of tofacitinib dose reduction in patients with ulcerative colitis in stable remission: a long-term follow-up of the randomized RIVETING trial. Crohns Colitis 360. 2026 Aug 6;8(3):otag093. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otag093. eCollection 2026 Jul.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40028509Torres J, D'Haens GR, Regueiro M, Santana G, Panes J, Vermeire S, Gardiner S, Kulisek N, Modesto I, Su C, Lawendy N, Mundayat R, Paulissen J, Dubinsky MC. Potential predictors of efficacy outcomes following tofacitinib dose reduction in patients with ulcerative colitis in stable remission: a post hoc analysis of outcomes from the RIVETING study. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 27;18:17562848251318849. doi: 10.1177/17562848251318849. eCollection 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38778549Panes J, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Ng SC, Lawendy N, Kulisek N, Guo X, Wu J, Vranic I, Panaccione R, Vermeire S. Analysis of tofacitinib safety in ulcerative colitis from the completed global clinical developmental program up to 9.2 years of drug exposure. United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Jul;12(6):793-801. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12584. Epub 2024 May 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38425446Rubin DT, Torres J, Regueiro M, Reinisch W, Prideaux L, Kotze PG, Tan FH, Gardiner S, Mundayat R, Cadatal MJ, Ng SC. Association Between Smoking Status and the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Crohns Colitis 360. 2024 Jan 20;6(1):otae004. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otae004. eCollection 2024 Jan.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36124702Sandborn WJ, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Panaccione R, Ng SC, Lawendy N, Kulisek N, Modesto I, Guo X, Mundayat R, Su C, Vranic I, Panes J. Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: An Integrated Summary of up to 7.8 Years of Safety Data from the Global Clinical Programme. J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Apr 3;17(3):338-351. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac141.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35648151Winthrop KL, Vermeire S, Long MD, Panes J, Ng SC, Kulisek N, Mundayat R, Lawendy N, Vranic I, Modesto I, Su C, Melmed GY. Long-term Risk of Herpes Zoster Infection in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jan 5;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac063.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
80 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing CP-690,500 5 mg and CP-690,550 10 mg in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Pfizer at 80 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 80 sites in United States, Japan, Serbia, South Africa, Ukraine and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Modified Mayo Score at Month 6 (time frame: Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03281304, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2023.