CrownsNCT03283709
Removable Partial Denture Abutments Restored With Monolithic Zirconia Crowns
A study testing Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns and Conventional abutment crowns in people with Crowns and Denture, run by Hiroko Nagaoka at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an all-ceramic dental crown material to restore the abutment teeth of partially-edentulous patients who need removable partial dentures (RPD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns and Conventional abutment crowns
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2017to 30 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Partially edentulous and treatment planned for an RPD
- Requires at least 1 surveyed crown on an abutment tooth
- Abutment teeth and RPD in function with opposing arch
- Abutment teeth vital at time of study enrollment
- English literacy, cognitively capable of understanding study and consent documents
- Cognitively and functionally capable of performing prosthesis and oral self-care
Who cannot join
- Any chronic or degenerative condition which impairs consent capability
- Any cognitive or motor condition which impairs ability to follow instructions or perform oral self-care
- Healthy enough to tolerate planned dental procedures without premedication
- Chronic infectious disease
- COPD
- Renal insufficiency
Show all 9Show fewer
- Autoimmune or chronic inflammatory disorders
- Unstable asthma or diabetes
- Unstable hypertension
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Kentucky College of Dentistry
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0297
About this study
Official title: Removable Partial Denture Abutments Restored With Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an all-ceramic dental crown material to restore the abutment teeth of partially-edentulous patients who need removable partial dentures (RPD). The outcomes of the treatment group (all-ceramic crowns) will be compared to a similarly-treated control group whose RPD abutment teeth are restored using conventional metal and metal-ceramic crowns. Primary outcomes of interest include crown survival, abutment tooth survival and RPD survival.The null hypothesis is that at the conclusion of the study there will be no differences in outcomes between the two groups.
All dental treatment, including dental hygiene and periodontal care, fillings, crowns and RPD fabrication will be provided by predoctoral dental students in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry student clinics. Students treating the subjects will be supervised by licensed, technique-calibrated faculty specialists. Following the completion of dental treatment, enrolled subjects will be clinically re-evaluated by investigators at 6 months, and at annual intervals thereafter for 5 years following RPD delivery.
Read the detailed description
This study will investigate the use of highly esthetic, second and third generation multi-layer zirconia crown materials to restore removable partial denture abutment teeth. All performed treatment will be the standard of care and to the usual and customary standards used in United states dental clinics for crown and RPD procedures. Treatment subjects will have RPD abutment teeth restored with either Noritake Katana STML (anterior teeth) or HTML (premolars and molars) zirconia crowns, and periodically evaluated for 60 months following RPD delivery. Outcomes will be compared to a similarly treated control group restored with metal, metal-ceramic, or a combination of metal and metal-ceramic crowns.
Following informed consent, subjects will be randomly assigned using an internet program (https://www.randomizer.org/) to either a treatment (zirconia abutment tooth crown) or control (metal or metal-ceramic abutment tooth crown) group. Using information from the oral examination, articulated diagnostic casts will be evaluated , the RPD design confirmed, and the need for a crown on one or more abutment teeth verified. Enrolled subjects will be given oral hygiene instruction at the beginning of the study. They will also be instructed to brush their teeth twice daily using an OTC fluoride dentifrice of their choice. They will also be asked to use a 0.05% NaF oral rinse for 1 minute daily.
Abutment teeth must be in function with the opposing arch and vital at the beginning of the study. Vitality will be be determined using a synthesis of history, percussion, palpation and pulp testing. Pulp tests will be conducted using cold and an EPT, and the facial, lingual and occlusal (incisal) surfaces of all abutment teeth will be tested for responsiveness. If abutment tooth vitality is confirmed, teeth requiring surveyed crowns will be prepared and restored using standardized clinical and laboratory guidelines.
Abutment teeth restored with metal and zirconia crowns will be prepared and restored using the following clinical and laboratory guidelines. The margin will be a circumferential chamfer prepared to a depth of 0.5 mm with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin where possible. Axial surfaces will be prepared with a total occlusal convergence of >6° but not to exceed 20°. Incisal and facial surfaces will be reduced 0.7-1.0 mm. Functional surfaces will be reduced to 1.0 mm of opposing tooth clearance with the exception of under rest seats, where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. At completion, the prepared tooth should have a height to base ratio of 0.4. If inadequate retention and resistance form is identified following preparation of axial walls, supplementary grooves will be added, the number and location of which are at the discretion of the investigator. Final impressions will be made using PVS in a custom tray (Extrude) and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following fabrication, the working cast will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) sectioned, trimmed and scanned (3Shape D2000 laboratory scanner or equivalent). The crown(s) will be waxed to full contour. Rest seats, undercuts and guide planes will then be developed in wax. Once the waxup has been surveyed and finalized, it will be secured to the scanning platform and a new scan performed with the waxup in place. The data file with the die scan will be merged with the file that contains the waxup. The merged file will then be transmitted to a designated production facility where the zirconia crown(s) will be milled. Canines will be milled using Noritake Katana STML zirconia and premolars and molars will be milled using Noritake Katana HTML zirconia. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns will be prepared and restored using a standard protocol utilizing the following guidelines. Posterior crowns will have metal occlusal surfaces with the porcelain-metal junction on the occlusal surface at half the distance between the central groove and the buccal cusp tip. Mesial, distal and lingual surfaces will be in metal, and the crown will have a disappearing metal margin on the facial surface. The facial preparation from mesiofacial to distofacial line angles will be a heavy chamfer or modified shoulder 1.0-1.2 mm in depth with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Mesial, distal and lingual chamfer margins will be prepared to a horizontal depth of 0.5 mm. Facial margin height will be at or slightly apical to the free gingival margin. Mesial, distal and lingual margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin if possible. Functional surfaces will be prepared with opposing tooth clearance of 1.5 mm with the exception of under rest seats where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. Nonfunctional cusp reduction will be 1.0 mm. Final impressions will be made using PVS (Extrude) in a custom tray and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following working cast fabrication it will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) prepared for conventional laboratory crown fabrication. Conventional (all-metal and PFM) surveyed crowns will be fabricated using noble and high-noble casting alloys and PFM crowns will use feldspathic porcelain as a veneering ceramic. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Qualifying RPD designs may be Kennedy class I-IV with up to two modification spaces, and will be designed using a standardized protocol. Maxillary major connectors may consist of a complete palatal plate, modified palatal plate, anterior-posterior palatal strap or palatal strap. Mandibular major connectors will consist of either a lingual plate or a lingual bar. Frameworks will be fabricated from nickel-chrome alloy (Ticonium), the denture bases acrylic resin (Lucitone 199), and artificial teeth will be DENTSPLY Trubyte IPN Portrait. To meet the definition of an RPD abutment tooth it must host a direct retainer consisting of an occlusal or cingulum rest, a proximal plate and a retentive clasp. Reciprocation must be provided in the form of a plate, reciprocating clasp or minor connector and rest. The plan for occlusion will be based upon the number and distribution of remaining natural teeth. If an arch opposing the RPD is edentulous and restored by a removable complete denture, then natural and artificial teeth will be arranged in bilateral balance. If anterior guidance is present on natural teeth in both arches it will be preserved so that artificial RPD teeth contact opposing teeth in maximum intercuspation only.
Clinical assessments, procedures and annual examinations will be performed in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry second, third, and fourth floor student clinics. Clinical procedures will be performed by third and fourth year dental students, and clinical supervision for these procedures will be provided by licensed, calibrated investigators.
- Being tested
- Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns, Conventional abutment crowns
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crownsDevice
Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from monolithic multi-layered zirconia
Conventional abutment crownsDevice
Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from noble or high noble metals, veneered with feldspathic porcelain
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Full-contour monolithic Zirconia crowns | Experimental | If participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from multi-layered monolithic zirconia Receives: Device: Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns |
| Conventional abutment crowns | Other | If participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from type III gold or high-noble metal veneered with feldspathic porcelain Receives: Device: Conventional abutment crowns |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Need to Replace Crown on RPD Abutment Tooth
This is a collective measure reporting need to replace an abutment tooth crown for any reason. This includes repeated adhesive failure at crown interface due to inadequate retention/resistance form in the abutment tooth preparation, catastrophic fracture of monolithic or veneering crown ceramic necessitating crown replacement, primary or secondary caries involving crowned abutment tooth necessitating crown replacement
Measured: 60 months
RPD Abutment Tooth Loss
Loss of any RPD abutment tooth for any reason whether crowned or otherwise.
Measured: 60 months
RPD Failure
Any technical or biologic complication resulting in loss of service of RPD. This includes loss of RPD as well as dissatisfaction and nonacceptance
Measured: 60 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Tooth Loss
Loss of any nonabutment tooth in either arch for any reason
Measured: 60 months
Caries
Dental caries involving any tooth in either arch
Measured: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Change in clinical attachment level involving any tooth in either arch compared to baseline presentation.
Measured: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Increase or decrease in mobility involving any tooth in either arch compared to baseline presentation.
Measured: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Onset of fremitus involving any tooth in either arch relative to baseline presentation.
Measured: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Change in furcation classification involving any molar in either arch relative to baseline presentation..
Measured: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Change in overall score for bleeding index compared to baseline presentation.
Measured: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Change in overall score for plaque index compared to baseline presentation.
Measured: 60 months
Abutment Tooth Vitality
Loss of vitality of any abutment tooth, crowned or otherwise
Measured: 60 months
Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life
Change in patient satisfaction and quality of life, measured using the OHIP-14 questionnaire
Measured: 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Dec 2017
- Primary completion30 Nov 2019
- Study completion30 Nov 2019
Why it stopped: Study terminated because PI left the institution.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (37)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CrownsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes for partial edentulism using two restorative materials. A convenience sample of study participants will be randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hiroko Nagaoka
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Hiroko Nagaoka, University of Kentucky
- Investigators
- Vaughan Hoefler, DDS, MBA, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03283709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-0511-F1V
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is not a plan to make IPD available
Publications
Douglass CW, Watson AJ. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121204.
PubMed 11807477Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
PubMed 28343666Abt E, Carr AB, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003814.pub2.
PubMed 22336794Benso B, Kovalik AC, Jorge JH, Campanha NH. Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1351-5. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.777780. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
PubMed 23834529Ettinger RL, Goettsche ZS, Qian F. The Extent and Scope of Prosthodontic Practice in Iowa. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):113-121. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12588. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
PubMed 28273692Rehmann P, Orbach K, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):147-50. doi: 10.11607/ijp.2959.
PubMed 23476909De Kok IJ, Cooper LF, Guckes AD, McGraw K, Wright RF, Barrero CJ, Bak SY, Stoner LO. Factors Influencing Removable Partial Denture Patient-Reported Outcomes of Quality of Life and Satisfaction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan;26(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12526. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
PubMed 27598416Murai S, Matsuda K, Ikebe K, Enoki K, Hatta K, Fujiwara K, Maeda Y. A field survey of the partially edentate elderly: Investigation of factors related to the usage rate of removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):828-32. doi: 10.1111/joor.12318. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
PubMed 26059645Koyama S, Sasaki K, Yokoyama M, Sasaki T, Hanawa S. Evaluation of factors affecting the continuing use and patient satisfaction with Removable Partial Dentures over 5 years. J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.007. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
PubMed 20083450Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015.
PubMed 15583562Donovan TE. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:14S-18S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0360.
PubMed 18768904Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:4S-7S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359. No abstract available.
PubMed 18768902Spear F, Holloway J. Which all-ceramic system is optimal for anterior esthetics? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:19S-24S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0358.
PubMed 18768905Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):603-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
PubMed 25842099Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):33-43. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3647.
PubMed 24392475
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Removable Partial Denture Abutments Restored With Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03283709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17-0511-F1V
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study terminated because PI left the institution.
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hiroko NagaokaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an all-ceramic dental crown material to restore the abutment teeth of partially-edentulous patients who need removable partial dentures (RPD). The outcomes of the treatment group (all-ceramic crowns) will be compared to a similarly-treated control group whose RPD abutment teeth are restored using conventional metal and metal-ceramic crowns. Primary outcomes of interest include crown survival, abutment tooth survival and RPD survival.The null hypothesis is that at the conclusion of the study there will be no differences in outcomes between the two groups.
All dental treatment, including dental hygiene and periodontal care, fillings, crowns and RPD fabrication will be provided by predoctoral dental students in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry student clinics. Students treating the subjects will be supervised by licensed, technique-calibrated faculty specialists. Following the completion of dental treatment, enrolled subjects will be clinically re-evaluated by investigators at 6 months, and at annual intervals thereafter for 5 years following RPD delivery.
Detailed description
This study will investigate the use of highly esthetic, second and third generation multi-layer zirconia crown materials to restore removable partial denture abutment teeth. All performed treatment will be the standard of care and to the usual and customary standards used in United states dental clinics for crown and RPD procedures. Treatment subjects will have RPD abutment teeth restored with either Noritake Katana STML (anterior teeth) or HTML (premolars and molars) zirconia crowns, and periodically evaluated for 60 months following RPD delivery. Outcomes will be compared to a similarly treated control group restored with metal, metal-ceramic, or a combination of metal and metal-ceramic crowns.
Following informed consent, subjects will be randomly assigned using an internet program (https://www.randomizer.org/) to either a treatment (zirconia abutment tooth crown) or control (metal or metal-ceramic abutment tooth crown) group. Using information from the oral examination, articulated diagnostic casts will be evaluated , the RPD design confirmed, and the need for a crown on one or more abutment teeth verified. Enrolled subjects will be given oral hygiene instruction at the beginning of the study. They will also be instructed to brush their teeth twice daily using an OTC fluoride dentifrice of their choice. They will also be asked to use a 0.05% NaF oral rinse for 1 minute daily.
Abutment teeth must be in function with the opposing arch and vital at the beginning of the study. Vitality will be be determined using a synthesis of history, percussion, palpation and pulp testing. Pulp tests will be conducted using cold and an EPT, and the facial, lingual and occlusal (incisal) surfaces of all abutment teeth will be tested for responsiveness. If abutment tooth vitality is confirmed, teeth requiring surveyed crowns will be prepared and restored using standardized clinical and laboratory guidelines.
Abutment teeth restored with metal and zirconia crowns will be prepared and restored using the following clinical and laboratory guidelines. The margin will be a circumferential chamfer prepared to a depth of 0.5 mm with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin where possible. Axial surfaces will be prepared with a total occlusal convergence of >6° but not to exceed 20°. Incisal and facial surfaces will be reduced 0.7-1.0 mm. Functional surfaces will be reduced to 1.0 mm of opposing tooth clearance with the exception of under rest seats, where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. At completion, the prepared tooth should have a height to base ratio of 0.4. If inadequate retention and resistance form is identified following preparation of axial walls, supplementary grooves will be added, the number and location of which are at the discretion of the investigator. Final impressions will be made using PVS in a custom tray (Extrude) and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following fabrication, the working cast will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) sectioned, trimmed and scanned (3Shape D2000 laboratory scanner or equivalent). The crown(s) will be waxed to full contour. Rest seats, undercuts and guide planes will then be developed in wax. Once the waxup has been surveyed and finalized, it will be secured to the scanning platform and a new scan performed with the waxup in place. The data file with the die scan will be merged with the file that contains the waxup. The merged file will then be transmitted to a designated production facility where the zirconia crown(s) will be milled. Canines will be milled using Noritake Katana STML zirconia and premolars and molars will be milled using Noritake Katana HTML zirconia. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns will be prepared and restored using a standard protocol utilizing the following guidelines. Posterior crowns will have metal occlusal surfaces with the porcelain-metal junction on the occlusal surface at half the distance between the central groove and the buccal cusp tip. Mesial, distal and lingual surfaces will be in metal, and the crown will have a disappearing metal margin on the facial surface. The facial preparation from mesiofacial to distofacial line angles will be a heavy chamfer or modified shoulder 1.0-1.2 mm in depth with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Mesial, distal and lingual chamfer margins will be prepared to a horizontal depth of 0.5 mm. Facial margin height will be at or slightly apical to the free gingival margin. Mesial, distal and lingual margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin if possible. Functional surfaces will be prepared with opposing tooth clearance of 1.5 mm with the exception of under rest seats where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. Nonfunctional cusp reduction will be 1.0 mm. Final impressions will be made using PVS (Extrude) in a custom tray and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following working cast fabrication it will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) prepared for conventional laboratory crown fabrication. Conventional (all-metal and PFM) surveyed crowns will be fabricated using noble and high-noble casting alloys and PFM crowns will use feldspathic porcelain as a veneering ceramic. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Qualifying RPD designs may be Kennedy class I-IV with up to two modification spaces, and will be designed using a standardized protocol. Maxillary major connectors may consist of a complete palatal plate, modified palatal plate, anterior-posterior palatal strap or palatal strap. Mandibular major connectors will consist of either a lingual plate or a lingual bar. Frameworks will be fabricated from nickel-chrome alloy (Ticonium), the denture bases acrylic resin (Lucitone 199), and artificial teeth will be DENTSPLY Trubyte IPN Portrait. To meet the definition of an RPD abutment tooth it must host a direct retainer consisting of an occlusal or cingulum rest, a proximal plate and a retentive clasp. Reciprocation must be provided in the form of a plate, reciprocating clasp or minor connector and rest. The plan for occlusion will be based upon the number and distribution of remaining natural teeth. If an arch opposing the RPD is edentulous and restored by a removable complete denture, then natural and artificial teeth will be arranged in bilateral balance. If anterior guidance is present on natural teeth in both arches it will be preserved so that artificial RPD teeth contact opposing teeth in maximum intercuspation only.
Clinical assessments, procedures and annual examinations will be performed in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry second, third, and fourth floor student clinics. Clinical procedures will be performed by third and fourth year dental students, and clinical supervision for these procedures will be provided by licensed, calibrated investigators.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes for partial edentulism using two restorative materials. A convenience sample of study participants will be randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Full-contour monolithic Zirconia crowns | Experimental | Device: Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crownsIf participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from multi-layered monolithic zirconia |
| Conventional abutment crowns | Other | Device: Conventional abutment crownsIf participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from type III gold or high-noble metal veneered with feldspathic porcelain |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Partially edentulous and treatment planned for an RPD
- Requires at least 1 surveyed crown on an abutment tooth
- Abutment teeth and RPD in function with opposing arch
- Abutment teeth vital at time of study enrollment
- English literacy, cognitively capable of understanding study and consent documents
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Any chronic or degenerative condition which impairs consent capability
- Any cognitive or motor condition which impairs ability to follow instructions or perform oral self-care
- Healthy enough to tolerate planned dental procedures without premedication
- Chronic infectious disease
- COPD
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crownsSubjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from monolithic multi-layered zirconia | Device | Full-contour monolithic Zirconia crowns |
| Conventional abutment crownsSubjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from noble or high noble metals, veneered with feldspathic porcelain | Device | Conventional abutment crowns |
Primary outcome
Need to Replace Crown on RPD Abutment Tooth
Time frame: 60 months
This is a collective measure reporting need to replace an abutment tooth crown for any reason. This includes repeated adhesive failure at crown interface due to inadequate retention/resistance form in the abutment tooth preparation, catastrophic fracture of monolithic or veneering crown ceramic necessitating crown replacement, primary or secondary caries involving crowned abutment tooth necessitating crown replacement
RPD Abutment Tooth Loss
Time frame: 60 months
Loss of any RPD abutment tooth for any reason whether crowned or otherwise.
RPD Failure
Time frame: 60 months
Any technical or biologic complication resulting in loss of service of RPD. This includes loss of RPD as well as dissatisfaction and nonacceptance
10 secondary outcomes
Tooth Loss
Time frame: 60 months
Caries
Time frame: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Time frame: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Time frame: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Time frame: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Time frame: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Time frame: 60 months
Periodontal Disease
Time frame: 60 months
Abutment Tooth Vitality
Time frame: 60 months
Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life
Time frame: 60 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 11807477Douglass CW, Watson AJ. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121204.
- Background: PubMed 28343666Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
- Background: PubMed 22336794Abt E, Carr AB, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003814.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 23834529Benso B, Kovalik AC, Jorge JH, Campanha NH. Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1351-5. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.777780. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
- Background: PubMed 28273692Ettinger RL, Goettsche ZS, Qian F. The Extent and Scope of Prosthodontic Practice in Iowa. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):113-121. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12588. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 23476909Rehmann P, Orbach K, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):147-50. doi: 10.11607/ijp.2959.
- Background: PubMed 27598416De Kok IJ, Cooper LF, Guckes AD, McGraw K, Wright RF, Barrero CJ, Bak SY, Stoner LO. Factors Influencing Removable Partial Denture Patient-Reported Outcomes of Quality of Life and Satisfaction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan;26(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12526. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
- Background: PubMed 26059645Murai S, Matsuda K, Ikebe K, Enoki K, Hatta K, Fujiwara K, Maeda Y. A field survey of the partially edentate elderly: Investigation of factors related to the usage rate of removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):828-32. doi: 10.1111/joor.12318. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
- Background: PubMed 20083450Koyama S, Sasaki K, Yokoyama M, Sasaki T, Hanawa S. Evaluation of factors affecting the continuing use and patient satisfaction with Removable Partial Dentures over 5 years. J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.007. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
- Background: PubMed 15583562Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015.
- Background: PubMed 18768904Donovan TE. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:14S-18S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0360.
- Background: PubMed 18768902Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:4S-7S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is not a plan to make IPD available
Related trials for Crowns
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Influence of Prosthetic Characteristics of Implant-Supported Crowns on Peri-implant Health and Osseointegration: A Comparison Between Digital and Conventional Workflows.
Implant-supported Single Crowns, Osseointegration
Not yet recruiting
Accuracy of Stackable Double Periodontal Guide in Esthetic Crown Lengthening
Gummy Smile of Altered Passive Eruption Type 1B
Recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns in Restoring Primary Anterior Teeth
Clinical, Primary Teeth
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Performance of All-ceramic Posterior Crowns. A Randomized, Prospective Clinical.
Dental Prosthesis Failure
Not yet recruiting
Immediate vs Conventional Loading With Different Crown Materials on Immediately Placed Single Implants
Partial Edentulism, Dental Implant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vaughan Hoefler, DDS, MBA principal investigator
University of Kentucky
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns and Conventional abutment crowns in people with Crowns and Denture, run by Hiroko Nagaoka at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Need to Replace Crown on RPD Abutment Tooth (time frame: 60 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03283709, which also lists 37 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2020.