AzTrials
AzTrials

CrownsNCT03283709

Removable Partial Denture Abutments Restored With Monolithic Zirconia Crowns

A study testing Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns and Conventional abutment crowns in people with Crowns and Denture, run by Hiroko Nagaoka at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an all-ceramic dental crown material to restore the abutment teeth of partially-edentulous patients who need removable partial dentures (RPD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Crowns, Denture
What is being tested?
Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns and Conventional abutment crowns
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2017to 30 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Partially edentulous and treatment planned for an RPD
  • Requires at least 1 surveyed crown on an abutment tooth
  • Abutment teeth and RPD in function with opposing arch
  • Abutment teeth vital at time of study enrollment
  • English literacy, cognitively capable of understanding study and consent documents
  • Cognitively and functionally capable of performing prosthesis and oral self-care

Who cannot join

  • Any chronic or degenerative condition which impairs consent capability
  • Any cognitive or motor condition which impairs ability to follow instructions or perform oral self-care
  • Healthy enough to tolerate planned dental procedures without premedication
  • Chronic infectious disease
  • COPD
  • Renal insufficiency
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Autoimmune or chronic inflammatory disorders
  • Unstable asthma or diabetes
  • Unstable hypertension

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Kentucky College of Dentistry

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0297

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Removable Partial Denture Abutments Restored With Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an all-ceramic dental crown material to restore the abutment teeth of partially-edentulous patients who need removable partial dentures (RPD). The outcomes of the treatment group (all-ceramic crowns) will be compared to a similarly-treated control group whose RPD abutment teeth are restored using conventional metal and metal-ceramic crowns. Primary outcomes of interest include crown survival, abutment tooth survival and RPD survival.The null hypothesis is that at the conclusion of the study there will be no differences in outcomes between the two groups.

All dental treatment, including dental hygiene and periodontal care, fillings, crowns and RPD fabrication will be provided by predoctoral dental students in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry student clinics. Students treating the subjects will be supervised by licensed, technique-calibrated faculty specialists. Following the completion of dental treatment, enrolled subjects will be clinically re-evaluated by investigators at 6 months, and at annual intervals thereafter for 5 years following RPD delivery.

Read the detailed description

This study will investigate the use of highly esthetic, second and third generation multi-layer zirconia crown materials to restore removable partial denture abutment teeth. All performed treatment will be the standard of care and to the usual and customary standards used in United states dental clinics for crown and RPD procedures. Treatment subjects will have RPD abutment teeth restored with either Noritake Katana STML (anterior teeth) or HTML (premolars and molars) zirconia crowns, and periodically evaluated for 60 months following RPD delivery. Outcomes will be compared to a similarly treated control group restored with metal, metal-ceramic, or a combination of metal and metal-ceramic crowns.

Following informed consent, subjects will be randomly assigned using an internet program (https://www.randomizer.org/) to either a treatment (zirconia abutment tooth crown) or control (metal or metal-ceramic abutment tooth crown) group. Using information from the oral examination, articulated diagnostic casts will be evaluated , the RPD design confirmed, and the need for a crown on one or more abutment teeth verified. Enrolled subjects will be given oral hygiene instruction at the beginning of the study. They will also be instructed to brush their teeth twice daily using an OTC fluoride dentifrice of their choice. They will also be asked to use a 0.05% NaF oral rinse for 1 minute daily.

Abutment teeth must be in function with the opposing arch and vital at the beginning of the study. Vitality will be be determined using a synthesis of history, percussion, palpation and pulp testing. Pulp tests will be conducted using cold and an EPT, and the facial, lingual and occlusal (incisal) surfaces of all abutment teeth will be tested for responsiveness. If abutment tooth vitality is confirmed, teeth requiring surveyed crowns will be prepared and restored using standardized clinical and laboratory guidelines.

Abutment teeth restored with metal and zirconia crowns will be prepared and restored using the following clinical and laboratory guidelines. The margin will be a circumferential chamfer prepared to a depth of 0.5 mm with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin where possible. Axial surfaces will be prepared with a total occlusal convergence of >6° but not to exceed 20°. Incisal and facial surfaces will be reduced 0.7-1.0 mm. Functional surfaces will be reduced to 1.0 mm of opposing tooth clearance with the exception of under rest seats, where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. At completion, the prepared tooth should have a height to base ratio of 0.4. If inadequate retention and resistance form is identified following preparation of axial walls, supplementary grooves will be added, the number and location of which are at the discretion of the investigator. Final impressions will be made using PVS in a custom tray (Extrude) and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following fabrication, the working cast will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) sectioned, trimmed and scanned (3Shape D2000 laboratory scanner or equivalent). The crown(s) will be waxed to full contour. Rest seats, undercuts and guide planes will then be developed in wax. Once the waxup has been surveyed and finalized, it will be secured to the scanning platform and a new scan performed with the waxup in place. The data file with the die scan will be merged with the file that contains the waxup. The merged file will then be transmitted to a designated production facility where the zirconia crown(s) will be milled. Canines will be milled using Noritake Katana STML zirconia and premolars and molars will be milled using Noritake Katana HTML zirconia. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).

Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns will be prepared and restored using a standard protocol utilizing the following guidelines. Posterior crowns will have metal occlusal surfaces with the porcelain-metal junction on the occlusal surface at half the distance between the central groove and the buccal cusp tip. Mesial, distal and lingual surfaces will be in metal, and the crown will have a disappearing metal margin on the facial surface. The facial preparation from mesiofacial to distofacial line angles will be a heavy chamfer or modified shoulder 1.0-1.2 mm in depth with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Mesial, distal and lingual chamfer margins will be prepared to a horizontal depth of 0.5 mm. Facial margin height will be at or slightly apical to the free gingival margin. Mesial, distal and lingual margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin if possible. Functional surfaces will be prepared with opposing tooth clearance of 1.5 mm with the exception of under rest seats where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. Nonfunctional cusp reduction will be 1.0 mm. Final impressions will be made using PVS (Extrude) in a custom tray and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following working cast fabrication it will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) prepared for conventional laboratory crown fabrication. Conventional (all-metal and PFM) surveyed crowns will be fabricated using noble and high-noble casting alloys and PFM crowns will use feldspathic porcelain as a veneering ceramic. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).

Qualifying RPD designs may be Kennedy class I-IV with up to two modification spaces, and will be designed using a standardized protocol. Maxillary major connectors may consist of a complete palatal plate, modified palatal plate, anterior-posterior palatal strap or palatal strap. Mandibular major connectors will consist of either a lingual plate or a lingual bar. Frameworks will be fabricated from nickel-chrome alloy (Ticonium), the denture bases acrylic resin (Lucitone 199), and artificial teeth will be DENTSPLY Trubyte IPN Portrait. To meet the definition of an RPD abutment tooth it must host a direct retainer consisting of an occlusal or cingulum rest, a proximal plate and a retentive clasp. Reciprocation must be provided in the form of a plate, reciprocating clasp or minor connector and rest. The plan for occlusion will be based upon the number and distribution of remaining natural teeth. If an arch opposing the RPD is edentulous and restored by a removable complete denture, then natural and artificial teeth will be arranged in bilateral balance. If anterior guidance is present on natural teeth in both arches it will be preserved so that artificial RPD teeth contact opposing teeth in maximum intercuspation only.

Clinical assessments, procedures and annual examinations will be performed in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry second, third, and fourth floor student clinics. Clinical procedures will be performed by third and fourth year dental students, and clinical supervision for these procedures will be provided by licensed, calibrated investigators.

Conditions
Crowns, Denture
Being tested
Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns, Conventional abutment crowns

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crownsDevice

    Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from monolithic multi-layered zirconia

  • Conventional abutment crownsDevice

    Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from noble or high noble metals, veneered with feldspathic porcelain

Study groups in NCT03283709
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Full-contour monolithic Zirconia crownsExperimentalIf participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from multi-layered monolithic zirconia
Receives: Device: Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns
Conventional abutment crownsOtherIf participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from type III gold or high-noble metal veneered with feldspathic porcelain
Receives: Device: Conventional abutment crowns

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Need to Replace Crown on RPD Abutment Tooth

    This is a collective measure reporting need to replace an abutment tooth crown for any reason. This includes repeated adhesive failure at crown interface due to inadequate retention/resistance form in the abutment tooth preparation, catastrophic fracture of monolithic or veneering crown ceramic necessitating crown replacement, primary or secondary caries involving crowned abutment tooth necessitating crown replacement

    Measured: 60 months

  2. RPD Abutment Tooth Loss

    Loss of any RPD abutment tooth for any reason whether crowned or otherwise.

    Measured: 60 months

  3. RPD Failure

    Any technical or biologic complication resulting in loss of service of RPD. This includes loss of RPD as well as dissatisfaction and nonacceptance

    Measured: 60 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Tooth Loss

    Loss of any nonabutment tooth in either arch for any reason

    Measured: 60 months

  2. Caries

    Dental caries involving any tooth in either arch

    Measured: 60 months

  3. Periodontal Disease

    Change in clinical attachment level involving any tooth in either arch compared to baseline presentation.

    Measured: 60 months

  4. Periodontal Disease

    Increase or decrease in mobility involving any tooth in either arch compared to baseline presentation.

    Measured: 60 months

  5. Periodontal Disease

    Onset of fremitus involving any tooth in either arch relative to baseline presentation.

    Measured: 60 months

  6. Periodontal Disease

    Change in furcation classification involving any molar in either arch relative to baseline presentation..

    Measured: 60 months

  7. Periodontal Disease

    Change in overall score for bleeding index compared to baseline presentation.

    Measured: 60 months

  8. Periodontal Disease

    Change in overall score for plaque index compared to baseline presentation.

    Measured: 60 months

  9. Abutment Tooth Vitality

    Loss of vitality of any abutment tooth, crowned or otherwise

    Measured: 60 months

  10. Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life

    Change in patient satisfaction and quality of life, measured using the OHIP-14 questionnaire

    Measured: 60 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2017
  2. Study start1 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2019

Why it stopped: Study terminated because PI left the institution.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes for partial edentulism using two restorative materials. A convenience sample of study participants will be randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03283709
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-0511-F1V
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
11 Sep 2017
Last updated
13 Mar 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: There is not a plan to make IPD available

Publications

  • Douglass CW, Watson AJ. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121204.

    PubMed 11807477
  • Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

    PubMed 28343666
  • Abt E, Carr AB, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003814.pub2.

    PubMed 22336794
  • Benso B, Kovalik AC, Jorge JH, Campanha NH. Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1351-5. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.777780. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

    PubMed 23834529
  • Ettinger RL, Goettsche ZS, Qian F. The Extent and Scope of Prosthodontic Practice in Iowa. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):113-121. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12588. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

    PubMed 28273692
  • Rehmann P, Orbach K, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):147-50. doi: 10.11607/ijp.2959.

    PubMed 23476909
  • De Kok IJ, Cooper LF, Guckes AD, McGraw K, Wright RF, Barrero CJ, Bak SY, Stoner LO. Factors Influencing Removable Partial Denture Patient-Reported Outcomes of Quality of Life and Satisfaction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan;26(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12526. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

    PubMed 27598416
  • Murai S, Matsuda K, Ikebe K, Enoki K, Hatta K, Fujiwara K, Maeda Y. A field survey of the partially edentate elderly: Investigation of factors related to the usage rate of removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):828-32. doi: 10.1111/joor.12318. Epub 2015 Jun 7.

    PubMed 26059645
  • Koyama S, Sasaki K, Yokoyama M, Sasaki T, Hanawa S. Evaluation of factors affecting the continuing use and patient satisfaction with Removable Partial Dentures over 5 years. J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.007. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

    PubMed 20083450
  • Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015.

    PubMed 15583562
  • Donovan TE. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:14S-18S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0360.

    PubMed 18768904
  • Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:4S-7S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18768902
  • Spear F, Holloway J. Which all-ceramic system is optimal for anterior esthetics? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:19S-24S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0358.

    PubMed 18768905
  • Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):603-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

    PubMed 25842099
  • Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):33-43. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3647.

    PubMed 24392475

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns and Conventional abutment crowns in people with Crowns and Denture, run by Hiroko Nagaoka at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Need to Replace Crown on RPD Abutment Tooth (time frame: 60 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03283709, which also lists 37 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in