Patient-Centered CareExpCareNCT03283891
Effects on Nurses' Quality of Working Life of an Educational Intervention to Strengthen Their Humanistic Practice
A study testing Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practice in people with Patient-Centered Care, run by Institut et Haute Ecole de la Santé la Source at 10 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Haemodialysis (HD) patients constitute a vulnerable population with considerable health needs. They are often older persons with comorbid chronic conditions. Despite the substantial technical care they receive, these patients indicate that the quality of the human relationship that develops with nurses-the pivotal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Patient-Centered Care
- What is being tested?
- Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practice
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 241 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2017to 1 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Nurses:
- have at least 6 months' work experience in the department;
- consent to take part in the study. In addition, nurses who intend to leave the HD unit in the 3 months to come will be excluded
- Patients
- be at least 18 years of age and under active treatment for at least 6 months;
- understand and read French;
- able to provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Nurses:
- 1. intention to leave the HD unit in the 3 months after the beginning of the project
- Patients
- being diagnosed with dementia
- being a new HD patient
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Switzerland10 sites
Hôpital du Jura
Delémont, Canton of Jura
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG)
Geneva
Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud
Hôpital du Valais - Martigny
Martigny-Ville, Valais
Hôpital Riviera-Chablais (HRC)
Monthey, Valais
Hôpital de Morges - Ensemble hospitalier de la Côte
Morges, Canton of Vaud
Hôpital intercantonal de la Broye (HIB)
Payerne, Canton of Vaud
Hôpital du Valais - Sierre
Sierre, Valais
Hôpital du Valais - Sion
Sion, Valais
Établissements hospitaliers du Nord vaudois (eHnv)
Yverdon-les-Bains, Canton of Vaud
About this study
Official title: Effects on Nurses' Quality of Working Life and on Patients' Quality of Life of an Educational Intervention to Strengthen Humanistic Practice Among Haemodialysis Nurses in Switzerland: A Mixed Methods Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Haemodialysis (HD) patients constitute a vulnerable population with considerable health needs. They are often older persons with comorbid chronic conditions. Despite the substantial technical care they receive, these patients indicate that the quality of the human relationship that develops with nurses-the pivotal element in the care this population receives-can become therapeutic. This feature of the human relationship constitutes the cornerstone of the humanistic practice (caring practice) that all nurses should adhere to. However, according to some authors, such practice tends to fade over time. In 2012, a pilot study allowed to test an educational intervention based on Watson's Theory of Human Caring, the aim of which was to optimise nurses' humanistic practices. The intervention, first developed in Quebec and adapted in Switzerland by a committee of experts, was delivered to a group of nine HD nurses (Canton of Vaud, Switzerland) and evaluated. Preliminary results (qualitative and quantitative) showed the intervention to be highly feasible and acceptable. Moreover, in terms of preliminary outcomes, participating nurses appeared to strengthen their caring attitudes/behaviours toward HD patients post-intervention. Quantitative analyses of patients' questionnaires showed that HD patients perceived significant changes in nurses' caring attitudes/behaviours and maintained their level of quality of life (QoL) over time, which is a definite gain for this population. In light of these positive results, it is important to pursue this line of investigation in order to examine more accurately the intervention's effects on both nurses and patients. To this end, the investigators propose conducting a mixed-methods cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effects of an educational intervention to strengthen humanistic practice among nurses working in HD units in French Switzerland, on perceived quality of the nurse-patient relationship (NPR), nurses' team cohesion, nurses' quality of working life (QoWL), and HD patients' QoL. Knowledge acquired in the course of the study will contribute to strengthen nurses' humanistic practice, a key factor in HD patients' QoL.
- Conditions
- Patient-Centered Care
- Being tested
- Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practice
- Keywords
- Educational intervention, Watson's theory of human caring, Quality of working life of haemodialysis nurses, Quality of life of haemodialysis patients
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practiceOther
Four educational sessions:
- Acquisition of core concepts of caring practice (I)
- Acquisition of core concepts of caring practice (II)
- Search for meaning: Influencing hope in persons through humanistic practice
- Enacting different caring attitudes and behaviours in an intermediary simulation exercise with actor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| educational intervention | Experimental | Various pedagogical activities to mobilise Watson's ten Carative Factors Receives: Other: Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practice |
| control | No intervention | No intervention during the different times of measurement. Educational intervention will be delivered after the last measure. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nurse-patient relationship (NPR)
NPR will be measured with the French version (EIIP-70) of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale (CNPI-70). This tool comprises 70 items across 10 dimensions that capture each of Watson's 10 CF. It allows nurses to selfevaluate their frequency of caring attitudes/behaviours. More specifically, the EIIP-70 covers the following dimensions: humanism (6 items), hope (7 items), sensitivity (6 items), relationship (7 items), emotions (6 items), problem solving (6 items), teaching (11 items), assistance (10 items) and existential factors (6 items). Respondents must choose from five responses ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). This tool was validated on 377 nursing students and demonstrates good psychometric properties (Cronbach's alphas for the ten sub-dimensions range from .73 to .91).
Measured: 30 months
Nurses' team cohesion
Team cohesion will be measured with the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), which was subsequently adapted for work teams. Like the original, the French version contains 18 items and encompasses the four dimensions of team cohesion, namely, respondent's social-related attraction to the group (5 items, 1 of which is reverse scored), respondent's task-related attraction to the group (4 items, 2 of which are reverse scored), social-related group integration as perceived by respondent (4 items, 2 of which are reverse scored), and task-related group integration as perceived by respondent (5 items, 1 of which is reverse scored). The response scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The questionnaire was tested on a sample of nurses from another healthcare institution. No major comprehension difficulties emerged. Cronbach's alphas for the different dimensions run from 0.71 to 0.81.
Measured: 30 months
Nurses' quality of working life (QoWL) - nurses
Quality of working life (QoWL) will be measured with a scale developed by Elizur and Shye (70), translated and validated in French. The scale is composed of 16 items exploring different dimensions of QoWL : psychological (items 1-4), physical (items 5-8), social (items 9-12) and cultural (items 13-16). Respondents must choose from six answers on a Likert scale ranging from "a very large part" to "very little".
Measured: 30 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Hemodyalisis patients' quality of life (QoL)
Quality of life (QoL) of HD patients will be explored with a French version of the WHOQOL-BREF. This scale is a generic instrument that serves to explore perceived QoL and the impact of health problems on QoL. It comprises 26 items exploring four dimensions: physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items), and environment (8 items). It also contains two items measuring overall QoL, which is an added advantage of this instrument. Respondents must choose from five responses on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 5 (completely). The WHOQOLBREF yields an overall "QoL profile" score on a scale of 0 to 100, as well as scores for each dimension. A high score indicates a high perceived QoL. The French version translated and validated, and has shown perfectly satisfactory psychometric properties, and good acceptability by the population with a non-response rate below 5%.
Measured: 30 months
Nurse-patient relationship (NPR) - patients
NPR will be explored with the French version (EIIP-70) (66) of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale (CNPI-70) (for a description of dimensions, see Nurse section). Only the person addressed has been changed in order to adapt the items to the patient's viewpoint. The scale has been validated on a French population of patients living with HIV and presents perfectly satisfactory psychometric properties (Cronbach's alphas from 0.75 to 0.85). The scale allows HD patients to assess nurses' caring attitudes and behaviours.
Measured: 30 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Sep 2017
- Primary completion24 Jul 2018
- Study completion1 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Patient-Centered CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Mixed methods cluster randomised controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 241 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut et Haute Ecole de la Santé la Source
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universite du Quebec en Outaouais, Université de Sherbrooke, School of Management and Engineering Vaud, Université de Montréal, University of Lausanne Hospitals, Swiss National Science Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philippe Delmas, Institut et Haute Ecole de la Santé la Source
- Investigators
- Philippe Delmas, PhD, Principal investigator, Haute Ecole de la Santé La Source
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03283891
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FNS 10001C_172588
- Acronym
- ExpCare
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Antonini M, Bellier-Teichmann T, O'reilly L, Cara C, Brousseau S, Weidmann J, Roulet-Schwab D, Ledoux I, Konishi M, Pasquier J, Delmas P. Effects of an educational intervention to strengthen humanistic practice on haemodialysis nurses' caring attitudes and behaviours and quality of working life: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00729-6.
PubMed 34930206Delmas P, O'Reilly L, Cara C, Brousseau S, Weidmann J, Roulet-Schwab D, Ledoux I, Pasquier J, Antonini M, Bellier-Teichmann T. Effects on nurses' quality of working life and on patients' quality of life of an educational intervention to strengthen humanistic practice among hemodialysis nurses in Switzerland: a protocol for a mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2018 Nov 21;17:47. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0320-0. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30479561
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects on Nurses' Quality of Working Life and on Patients' Quality of Life of an Educational Intervention to Strengthen Humanistic Practice Among Haemodialysis Nurses in Switzerland: A Mixed Methods Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03283891
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ExpCare / FNS 10001C_172588
- Conditions
- Patient-Centered Care
- Keywords
- Educational intervention, Watson's theory of human caring, Quality of working life of haemodialysis nurses, Quality of life of haemodialysis patients
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 241 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut et Haute Ecole de la Santé la SourceUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universite du Quebec en Outaouais, Université de Sherbrooke, School of Management and Engineering Vaud, Université de Montréal, University of Lausanne Hospitals, Swiss National Science Foundation
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Haemodialysis (HD) patients constitute a vulnerable population with considerable health needs. They are often older persons with comorbid chronic conditions. Despite the substantial technical care they receive, these patients indicate that the quality of the human relationship that develops with nurses-the pivotal element in the care this population receives-can become therapeutic. This feature of the human relationship constitutes the cornerstone of the humanistic practice (caring practice) that all nurses should adhere to. However, according to some authors, such practice tends to fade over time. In 2012, a pilot study allowed to test an educational intervention based on Watson's Theory of Human Caring, the aim of which was to optimise nurses' humanistic practices. The intervention, first developed in Quebec and adapted in Switzerland by a committee of experts, was delivered to a group of nine HD nurses (Canton of Vaud, Switzerland) and evaluated. Preliminary results (qualitative and quantitative) showed the intervention to be highly feasible and acceptable. Moreover, in terms of preliminary outcomes, participating nurses appeared to strengthen their caring attitudes/behaviours toward HD patients post-intervention. Quantitative analyses of patients' questionnaires showed that HD patients perceived significant changes in nurses' caring attitudes/behaviours and maintained their level of quality of life (QoL) over time, which is a definite gain for this population. In light of these positive results, it is important to pursue this line of investigation in order to examine more accurately the intervention's effects on both nurses and patients. To this end, the investigators propose conducting a mixed-methods cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effects of an educational intervention to strengthen humanistic practice among nurses working in HD units in French Switzerland, on perceived quality of the nurse-patient relationship (NPR), nurses' team cohesion, nurses' quality of working life (QoWL), and HD patients' QoL. Knowledge acquired in the course of the study will contribute to strengthen nurses' humanistic practice, a key factor in HD patients' QoL.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Mixed methods cluster randomised controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| educational intervention | Experimental | Other: Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practiceVarious pedagogical activities to mobilise Watson's ten Carative Factors |
| control | No intervention | –No intervention during the different times of measurement. Educational intervention will be delivered after the last measure. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Nurses:
- Patients
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Nurses:
- 1. intention to leave the HD unit in the 3 months after the beginning of the project
- Patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practiceFour educational sessions: * Acquisition of core concepts of caring practice (I) * Acquisition of core concepts of caring practice (II) * Search for meaning: Influencing hope in persons through humanistic practice * Enacting different caring attitudes and behaviours in an intermediary simulation exercise with actor | Other | educational intervention |
Primary outcome
Nurse-patient relationship (NPR)
Time frame: 30 months
NPR will be measured with the French version (EIIP-70) of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale (CNPI-70). This tool comprises 70 items across 10 dimensions that capture each of Watson's 10 CF. It allows nurses to selfevaluate their frequency of caring attitudes/behaviours. More specifically, the EIIP-70 covers the following dimensions: humanism (6 items), hope (7 items), sensitivity (6 items), relationship (7 items), emotions (6 items), problem solving (6 items), teaching (11 items), assistance (10 items) and existential factors (6 items). Respondents must choose from five responses ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). This tool was validated on 377 nursing students and demonstrates good psychometric properties (Cronbach's alphas for the ten sub-dimensions range from .73 to .91).
Nurses' team cohesion
Time frame: 30 months
Team cohesion will be measured with the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), which was subsequently adapted for work teams. Like the original, the French version contains 18 items and encompasses the four dimensions of team cohesion, namely, respondent's social-related attraction to the group (5 items, 1 of which is reverse scored), respondent's task-related attraction to the group (4 items, 2 of which are reverse scored), social-related group integration as perceived by respondent (4 items, 2 of which are reverse scored), and task-related group integration as perceived by respondent (5 items, 1 of which is reverse scored). The response scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The questionnaire was tested on a sample of nurses from another healthcare institution. No major comprehension difficulties emerged. Cronbach's alphas for the different dimensions run from 0.71 to 0.81.
Nurses' quality of working life (QoWL) - nurses
Time frame: 30 months
Quality of working life (QoWL) will be measured with a scale developed by Elizur and Shye (70), translated and validated in French. The scale is composed of 16 items exploring different dimensions of QoWL : psychological (items 1-4), physical (items 5-8), social (items 9-12) and cultural (items 13-16). Respondents must choose from six answers on a Likert scale ranging from "a very large part" to "very little".
2 secondary outcomes
Hemodyalisis patients' quality of life (QoL)
Time frame: 30 months
Nurse-patient relationship (NPR) - patients
Time frame: 30 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34930206Antonini M, Bellier-Teichmann T, O'reilly L, Cara C, Brousseau S, Weidmann J, Roulet-Schwab D, Ledoux I, Konishi M, Pasquier J, Delmas P. Effects of an educational intervention to strengthen humanistic practice on haemodialysis nurses' caring attitudes and behaviours and quality of working life: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00729-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30479561Delmas P, O'Reilly L, Cara C, Brousseau S, Weidmann J, Roulet-Schwab D, Ledoux I, Pasquier J, Antonini M, Bellier-Teichmann T. Effects on nurses' quality of working life and on patients' quality of life of an educational intervention to strengthen humanistic practice among hemodialysis nurses in Switzerland: a protocol for a mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2018 Nov 21;17:47. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0320-0. eCollection 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Patient-Centered Care
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Pharmacotherapy Optimization in Polymedicated Lebanese Older Adults in Primary Health Care Centers
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Polypharmacy (People Under Treatment With 5 or More Drugs)
Recruiting
Technology-Based Intervention Pilot Testing
Dementia, Elder Abuse
Enrolling by invitation
ProFoUND PCC= A Program For a Userbased Nursing Development in Person-Centered Care, is a Project That Aims to Develop, Test and Evaluate Effects of a Co-created Intervention to Increase Person-centred Care in Residential Care Settings for Older People.
To Develop, Test, Implement and Evaluate a Model for Person-centred Care for Older People at Two Academic Residential Care Facilities
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Not yet recruiting
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Through Education and Stool-Based Testing Outreach
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening, CRC Screening
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe Delmas, PhD principal investigator
Haute Ecole de la Santé La Source
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educational intervention - humanistic nursing practice in people with Patient-Centered Care, run by Institut et Haute Ecole de la Santé la Source at 10 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nurse-patient relationship (NPR) (time frame: 30 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03283891, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2021.