Chronic Low Back PainPhase 3FACT CLBP 1NCT03285646
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
A Phase 3 study testing Fasinumab in people with Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 56 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab in relieving Chronic low back pain (CLBP) as compared to placebo in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip when treated for up to 16 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low Back Pain, Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Fasinumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 56 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Oct 2017to 2 May 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of non-radicular moderate-to-severe CLBP for ≥3 months (prior to screening visit)
- Clinical diagnosis of OA in at least 1 hip or knee joint based on the American College of Rheumatology Criteria with radiographic evidence of OA (K-L ≥2) at screening
- History of inadequate relief of CLBP from non-pharmacologic therapy
- Willing to undergo joint replacement (JR) surgery, if necessary
- History of regular analgesic medication use
- History of inadequate pain relief or intolerance to analgesics used for chronic LBP
Who cannot join
- Patient is not a candidate for MRI
- History of major trauma or back surgery in the past 6 months prior to the screening visit
- History or presence of pyriformis syndrome
- Evidence on baseline lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging of potentially confounding conditions
- History or evidence on joint imaging of conditions that may confound joint safety evaluation
- Evidence or symptoms consistent with autonomic dysfunction (e.g., orthostatic hypotension and/or autonomic symptoms) as defined in the protocol
Show all 9Show fewer
- Recent use of longer acting pain medications
- Other medical conditions that may interfere with participation or accurate assessments during the trial
- Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria apply.
Trial locations and contacts
56 sites in 1 country.
56 sites in 1 country
United States56 sites
Regeneron Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Regeneron Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92801
Regeneron Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92805
Regeneron Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30189
Regeneron Research Site
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
Regeneron Research Site
Beavercreek, Ohio, 45431
Regeneron Research Site
Berlin, New Jersey, 08009
Regeneron Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Regeneron Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
Regeneron Research Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Regeneron Research Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Regeneron Research Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Regeneron Research Site
Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017
Regeneron Research Site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58105
Regeneron Research Site
Hartsdale, New York, 10530
Regeneron Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Regeneron Research Site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Regeneron Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77058
Regeneron Research Site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Regeneron Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Regeneron Research Site
Katy, Texas, 77498
Regeneron Research Site
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53144
Regeneron Research Site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Regeneron Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144
Regeneron Research Site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
Regeneron Research Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Regeneron Research Site #1
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Regeneron Research Site #2
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Regeneron Research Site #1
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Regeneron Research Site #2
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Regeneron Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33155
Regeneron Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Regeneron Research Site
New York, New York, 10036
Regeneron Research Site
Newnan, Georgia, 30265
Regeneron Research Site
North Hollywood, California, 91606
Regeneron Research Site
Ocoee, Florida, 34761
Regeneron Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Regeneron Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32801
Regeneron Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Regeneron Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053
Regeneron Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75075
Regeneron Research Site
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Regeneron Research Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Regeneron Research Site
San Diego, California, 92103
Regeneron Research Site
San Marcos, California, 92078
Regeneron Research Site
Santa Ana, California, 92703
Regeneron Research Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34232
Regeneron Research Site
Spring Valley, California, 91978
Regeneron Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Regeneron Research Site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Regeneron Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Regeneron Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Regeneron Research Site
Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383
Regeneron Research Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Regeneron Research Site
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265
Regeneron Research Site
Whittier, California, 90602
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab in relieving Chronic low back pain (CLBP) as compared to placebo in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip when treated for up to 16 weeks. The secondary objectives of the study are: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To characterize the concentrations of fasinumab in serum over time when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab when treated for up to 16 weeks in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain, Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Fasinumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Knee, Hip
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FasinumabDrug
Also called REGN475
Subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W)
PlaceboDrug
Subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fasinumab | Experimental | Subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W) Receives: Drug: Fasinumab |
| Placebo | Experimental | SC every 4 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Measured: Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score
The RMDQ is a self-administered, health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores are indicative of better function.
Measured: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score
The PGA of LBP is a participant assessed 5 point Likert scale of LBP ranging from 1-5 where 1 = very well; 2 = well; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor.
Measured: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in Average Daily LBPI NRS Score
Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Score
The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire for participants to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function. With a recall period of 24 hours, the questionnaire contains the front and back body diagrams, the 4 pain severity items and 7 pain interference items rated on 0-10 scale; total interference score ranges from 0-10 (0, does not interfere; 10 completely interferes), and the question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The BPI pain interference is typically scored as the mean of the 7 interference items.
Measured: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
Destructive arthropathy (DA) is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as those that are not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period.
Measured: Up to Week 16
Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events
Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Number of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation
Any peripheral sensory AE (eg, paraesthesia and hypoaesthesia) that required a neurology consultation.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events
All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug
An end of study phone contact was conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug (week 12) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.
Measured: Up to Week 64
Number of Participants With at Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay
Samples for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) evaluation were collected at baseline and at subsequent study visits. ADA variables include ADA status (+ or -) and titer as follows: Total participants negative in the ADA assay at all time points analyzed. Pre-existing immunoreactivity - positive response at baseline with all post-dose results negative, or a positive response at baseline with all post-dose responses less than 9-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment emergent - post-dose positive result when baseline results were negative. Persistent - A positive result detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period, with no negative results in-between. Indeterminate - A positive result at the last collection time point analyzed only. Transient - Not persistent or indeterminate regardless of any missing samples. Treatment boosted - any post-dose positive result at least 9-fold over the baseline level when baseline is positive.
Measured: 16 Weeks
Serum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab Over Time
Summary of mean concentration of functional fasinumab are presented by nominal time point.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2017
- Study start30 Oct 2017
- Primary completion5 May 2018
- Study completion2 May 2019
Why it stopped: Due to implementation of an urgent safety measure, enrollment and dosing in R475-PN-1612 was stopped; enrolled participants entered the 20-week safety follow-up
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03285646
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R475-PN-1612
- Other IDs
- 2017-001943-12, 2017
- Acronym
- FACT CLBP 1
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03285646
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FACT CLBP 1 / R475-PN-1612
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain, Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Knee, Hip
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Due to implementation of an urgent safety measure, enrollment and dosing in R475-PN-1612 was stopped; enrolled participants entered the 20-week safety follow-up
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
- Study start
- 30 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab in relieving Chronic low back pain (CLBP) as compared to placebo in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip when treated for up to 16 weeks. The secondary objectives of the study are: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To characterize the concentrations of fasinumab in serum over time when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab when treated for up to 16 weeks in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fasinumab | Experimental | Drug: FasinumabSubcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W) |
| Placebo | Experimental | Drug: PlaceboSC every 4 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of non-radicular moderate-to-severe CLBP for ≥3 months (prior to screening visit)
- Clinical diagnosis of OA in at least 1 hip or knee joint based on the American College of Rheumatology Criteria with radiographic evidence of OA (K-L ≥2) at screening
- History of inadequate relief of CLBP from non-pharmacologic therapy
- Willing to undergo joint replacement (JR) surgery, if necessary
- History of regular analgesic medication use
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patient is not a candidate for MRI
- History of major trauma or back surgery in the past 6 months prior to the screening visit
- History or presence of pyriformis syndrome
- Evidence on baseline lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging of potentially confounding conditions
- History or evidence on joint imaging of conditions that may confound joint safety evaluation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FasinumabAlso: REGN475Subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W) | Drug | Fasinumab |
| PlaceboSubcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W) | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
13 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in Average Daily LBPI NRS Score
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Score
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Number of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug
Time frame: Up to Week 64
Number of Participants With at Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay
Time frame: 16 Weeks
Serum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
56 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fasinumab in people with Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 56 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 56 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2021.