Change; Personality, Due to General Medical ConditionFEMEMNCT03285828
Motivational Interviewing Training for Medical Students: a Pilot Pre-post Study
A study testing motivationnal interviewing training in people with Change; Personality, Due to General Medical Condition, run by Bicetre Hospital.
Trial summary
Objective is to evaluate the impact of a basic training programme in motivational interviewing (MI) for medical students, by comparing the ability of students to promote behavioural changes through relationship skills and to conduct a motivational interview before and after training. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Change; Personality, Due to General Medical Condition
- What is being tested?
- motivationnal interviewing training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 4 Apr 2016to 30 Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Students in clinical internships (fourth or fifth year of medical courses) in the Immunology-Infection-Inflammation-Endocrinology Division of Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris.
- signed consent
Who cannot join
- participation refused
- prior training in motivational interviewing
About this study
Official title: Optimising the Relationship Between Medical Students and Patients Through a Motivational Interviewing Training Programme: a Pilot Pre-post Study
Objective is to evaluate the impact of a basic training programme in motivational interviewing (MI) for medical students, by comparing the ability of students to promote behavioural changes through relationship skills and to conduct a motivational interview before and after training.
Read the detailed description
Design: A pilot pre-post study in 20 students by comparing students' performance before and after MI training session.
Setting: Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France.
Interventions: Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic MI training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training.
Main outcome measures: Global scores by two independent raters who used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 code, perception of student's empathy by the caregivers (CARE questionnaire), self-efficacy of students to engage in a patient-centred relationship (SEPCQ score), and student's satisfaction with the odds of achieving the target goal.
- Being tested
- motivationnal interviewing training
- Keywords
- medical education, motivational interviewing, medical empathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
motivationnal interviewing trainingBehavioural
The students received three four-hour sessions of basic motivationnal interviewing training :
- Viewing and commenting on video clips illustrating motivational and non-motivational doctor-patient interactions.
- Lectures and the distribution of memory aids.
- Practical exercises: making "reflections", asking open questions; exploring ambivalence; dealing with resistance; expressing empathy, summarising.
- Role-playing, based on several situations, each involving two students. The investigators deliberately chose a non-medical situation (conflict between a mother and a student asking her for pocket money to go out for fun, the day before a university examination) for the first situation. All the other situations concerned changes to healthier behaviour in a medical setting, but with a goal different from that used for the first or the second simulated interview before motivationnal interviewing training.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| First group | Other | Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training. Receives: Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing training |
| Second group | Other | Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training. Receives: Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
GLOBAL MITI scores (MITI = Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity version 3.1.1)
Global scores by two independent raters who used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 code
Measured: 15 mn
perception of student's empathy by the caregivers
CARE questionnaire (CARE = The Consultation And Relational Empathy questionnaire)
Measured: 15 mn
self-efficacy of students to engage in a patient-centred relationship
SEPCQ score (SEPCQ = The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness score)
Measured: 15 mn
student's satisfaction with the odds of achieving the target goal.
specific questionnary (Analog scale of satisfaction from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very statisfied))
Measured: 15 mn
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2017
- Study start4 Apr 2016
- Primary completion30 Jun 2016
- Study completion30 Jun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Change; Personality, Due to General Medical ConditionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A pilot pre-post study investigating the effects of a training programme, by comparing performance before and after its implementation
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bicetre Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- INSERM SC10-US19, University of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, DR ANTOINE CHERET, Bicetre Hospital
- Investigators
- ANTOINE CHERET, Principal investigator, Bicetre Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03285828
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FEMEM
- Acronym
- FEMEM
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rollnick S, Butler CC, Kinnersley P, Gregory J, Mash B. Motivational interviewing. BMJ. 2010 Apr 27;340:c1900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1900. No abstract available.
PubMed 20423957
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimising the Relationship Between Medical Students and Patients Through a Motivational Interviewing Training Programme: a Pilot Pre-post Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03285828
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FEMEM / FEMEM
- Keywords
- medical education, motivational interviewing, medical empathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bicetre HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- INSERM SC10-US19, University of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes
- Study start
- 4 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective is to evaluate the impact of a basic training programme in motivational interviewing (MI) for medical students, by comparing the ability of students to promote behavioural changes through relationship skills and to conduct a motivational interview before and after training.
Detailed description
Design: A pilot pre-post study in 20 students by comparing students' performance before and after MI training session.
Setting: Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France.
Interventions: Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic MI training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training.
Main outcome measures: Global scores by two independent raters who used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 code, perception of student's empathy by the caregivers (CARE questionnaire), self-efficacy of students to engage in a patient-centred relationship (SEPCQ score), and student's satisfaction with the odds of achieving the target goal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A pilot pre-post study investigating the effects of a training programme, by comparing performance before and after its implementation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| First group | Other | Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing trainingStudents received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training. |
| Second group | Other | Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing trainingStudents received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Students in clinical internships (fourth or fifth year of medical courses) in the Immunology-Infection-Inflammation-Endocrinology Division of Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris.
- signed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- participation refused
- prior training in motivational interviewing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| motivationnal interviewing trainingThe students received three four-hour sessions of basic motivationnal interviewing training : 1. Viewing and commenting on video clips illustrating motivational and non-motivational doctor-patient interactions. 2. Lectures and the distribution of memory aids. 3. Practical exercises: making "reflections", asking open questions; exploring ambivalence; dealing with resistance; expressing empathy, summarising. 4. Role-playing, based on several situations, each involving two students. The investigators deliberately chose a non-medical situation (conflict between a mother and a student asking her for pocket money to go out for fun, the day before a university examination) for the first situation. All the other situations concerned changes to healthier behaviour in a medical setting, but with a goal different from that used for the first or the second simulated interview before motivationnal interviewing training. | Behavioural | First group, Second group |
Primary outcome
GLOBAL MITI scores (MITI = Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity version 3.1.1)
Time frame: 15 mn
Global scores by two independent raters who used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 code
perception of student's empathy by the caregivers
Time frame: 15 mn
CARE questionnaire (CARE = The Consultation And Relational Empathy questionnaire)
self-efficacy of students to engage in a patient-centred relationship
Time frame: 15 mn
SEPCQ score (SEPCQ = The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness score)
student's satisfaction with the odds of achieving the target goal.
Time frame: 15 mn
specific questionnary (Analog scale of satisfaction from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very statisfied))
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2017.
- Background: PubMed 20423957Rollnick S, Butler CC, Kinnersley P, Gregory J, Mash B. Motivational interviewing. BMJ. 2010 Apr 27;340:c1900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1900. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ANTOINE CHERET principal investigator
Bicetre Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing motivationnal interviewing training in people with Change; Personality, Due to General Medical Condition, run by Bicetre Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
GLOBAL MITI scores (MITI = Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity version 3.1.1) (time frame: 15 mn). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03285828, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.