Brain MetastasasesPhase 2ERASERNCT03288272
Evaluation of Repeated Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Multiple Brain Metastases.
A Phase 2 study testing Whole Brain Radiotherapy in people with Brain Metastasases, run by Stephanie Combs at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) has been established as the treatment standard in patients with multiple cerebral metastases from solid tumors. However, intracerebral recurrence is possible and a repeated WBRT may be indicated to improve intracerebral tumor control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Metastasases
- What is being tested?
- Whole Brain Radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- histologically confirmed malignancy
- previous WBRT
- MR-imaging confirmed cerebral metastases (>1)
- age ≥ 18 years of age
- Karnofsky Performance Score ³60
- For women with childbearing potential, (and men) adequate contraception.
- Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
- Written informed consent (must be available before enrolment in the trial)
Who cannot join
- refusal of the patients to take part in the study
- Patients who have not yet recovered from acute high-grade toxicities of prior therapies
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Participation in another clinical study or observation period of competing trials, respectively
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar
Munich, 81675
Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr., +49-89-4140- ext. 4501, stephanie.combs@tum.de
Carmen Kessel, MA, +49-89-4140- ext. 4501, carmen.kessel@tum.de
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Repeated Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Multiple Brain Metastases - the Randomized Trial ERASER.
Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) has been established as the treatment standard in patients with multiple cerebral metastases from solid tumors. However, intracerebral recurrence is possible and a repeated WBRT may be indicated to improve intracerebral tumor control. Each institutsion offers different dosing regimens, which have all been published to be safe and effective. Some favor best supportive care only.
The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.
Read the detailed description
According to Nussbaum et al., 24-45% of cancer patients develop cerebral metastases during the course of the disease. Brain metastases are generally associated with a poor prognosis and high morbidity. Published median survival rates after WBRT are between 2 and 7 months. Standard of care in multiple BM is WBRT delivered as 30 Gy in 10 fractions, leading to modest palliation with a median survival of 3 to 5 months. Prognostic factors include the RPA-classification, performance status, response to steroids and evidence of systemic disease.
Unfortunately, intracerebral recurrence happens. For example, in the cohort of Meyners et al.(2010) on WBRT in relatively radioresistant tumors, median time to recurrence was 4.5months and the local control rates at 6 and 12 months post radiationem were 37% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, the treatment of intracerebral recurrence after previous WBRT is challenging. In case of </= 3 recurrent BM, surgery or radiosurgery (RS) are options. One other option, especially in case of >3 recurrent BM is repeated WBRT. In this setting, one of the first reports on repeated WBRT was published by Cooper et al. in 1990. The authors reported on repeated WBRT (n=52) consisting of 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Response to reirradiation was seen in 42% of the patients. Furthermore, the patients improved by at least one level in their neurologic function status. Survival after second therapy averaged 5 months. In the report by Wong et al. (1996) median dose of retreatment (n=86) was 20 Gy. Resolution of symptoms was achieved in 27% of patients, partial improvement in 43% and no improvement or worsening of symptoms was seen in 29% of patients. The majority of patients had no significant toxicity secondary to re-irradiation. Five patients had radiographic abnormalities of their brain consistent with radiation-related changes. One patient had symptoms of dementia that was thought to be caused by radiotherapy. Sadikov et al. (2007) reported on 72 patients who underwent repeated WBRT for recurrent or progressive BM. The median survival after re-irradiation was 4.1 months. One patient was reported as having memory impairment and pituitary insufficiency after 5 months of progression-free survival.
In the report by Mayer et al. on re-irradiation tolerance of the human brain -in this analysis focused on recurrent glioma-, the authors concluded that radiation-induced brain tissue necrosis is found to occur at normalized tolerance doses of cumulative > 100 Gy.
The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.
In the present trial, the primary endpoint toxicity as well as the secondary endpoints QoL, loco-regional progression-free survival, overall survival and imaging response in patients previously treated with WBRT requiring repeated WBRT for intracerebral tumor progression will be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Brain Metastasases
- Being tested
- Whole Brain Radiotherapy, Best Supportive Care
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Whole Brain RadiotherapyRadiation
Radiotherapy of the whole brain
Best Supportive CareOther
Best Supportive Care including nutrition, pain medication, steroids as needed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy | Active comparator | Arm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy Receives: Radiation: Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
| Arm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy | Active comparator | Arm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 30 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy Receives: Radiation: Whole Brain Radiotherapy |
| Arm 3 - Best Supportive Care | Active comparator | Symptomatic treatment includes steroids, pain medication, nutritional support etc. Receives: Other: Best Supportive Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Toxicity
The primary endpoint is toxicity according to CTCAE after whole brain radiotherapy.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
loco-regional progression-free survival
follow-up and local control of brain metastases as well as loco-regional control
Measured: 6 months
Quality of Life (QOL)
QOL
Measured: 6 months
Survival
survival after radiotherapy
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2017
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionMay 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain MetastasasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomization Best Supportive Care, Two Radiotherapy Dosing Regimens
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stephanie Combs
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Stephanie Combs, Technical University of Munich
- Investigators
- Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Professor and Department Chair
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03288272
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ERASER
- Acronym
- ERASER
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 15 May 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Scharp M, Hauswald H, Bischof M, Debus J, Combs SE. Re-irradiation in the treatment of patients with cerebral metastases of solid tumors: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 3;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-4.
PubMed 24387239
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Repeated Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Multiple Brain Metastases - the Randomized Trial ERASER.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03288272
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ERASER / ERASER
- Conditions
- Brain Metastasases
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Stephanie CombsUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016
- Primary completion
- May 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) has been established as the treatment standard in patients with multiple cerebral metastases from solid tumors. However, intracerebral recurrence is possible and a repeated WBRT may be indicated to improve intracerebral tumor control. Each institutsion offers different dosing regimens, which have all been published to be safe and effective. Some favor best supportive care only.
The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.
Detailed description
According to Nussbaum et al., 24-45% of cancer patients develop cerebral metastases during the course of the disease. Brain metastases are generally associated with a poor prognosis and high morbidity. Published median survival rates after WBRT are between 2 and 7 months. Standard of care in multiple BM is WBRT delivered as 30 Gy in 10 fractions, leading to modest palliation with a median survival of 3 to 5 months. Prognostic factors include the RPA-classification, performance status, response to steroids and evidence of systemic disease.
Unfortunately, intracerebral recurrence happens. For example, in the cohort of Meyners et al.(2010) on WBRT in relatively radioresistant tumors, median time to recurrence was 4.5months and the local control rates at 6 and 12 months post radiationem were 37% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, the treatment of intracerebral recurrence after previous WBRT is challenging. In case of </= 3 recurrent BM, surgery or radiosurgery (RS) are options. One other option, especially in case of >3 recurrent BM is repeated WBRT. In this setting, one of the first reports on repeated WBRT was published by Cooper et al. in 1990. The authors reported on repeated WBRT (n=52) consisting of 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Response to reirradiation was seen in 42% of the patients. Furthermore, the patients improved by at least one level in their neurologic function status. Survival after second therapy averaged 5 months. In the report by Wong et al. (1996) median dose of retreatment (n=86) was 20 Gy. Resolution of symptoms was achieved in 27% of patients, partial improvement in 43% and no improvement or worsening of symptoms was seen in 29% of patients. The majority of patients had no significant toxicity secondary to re-irradiation. Five patients had radiographic abnormalities of their brain consistent with radiation-related changes. One patient had symptoms of dementia that was thought to be caused by radiotherapy. Sadikov et al. (2007) reported on 72 patients who underwent repeated WBRT for recurrent or progressive BM. The median survival after re-irradiation was 4.1 months. One patient was reported as having memory impairment and pituitary insufficiency after 5 months of progression-free survival.
In the report by Mayer et al. on re-irradiation tolerance of the human brain -in this analysis focused on recurrent glioma-, the authors concluded that radiation-induced brain tissue necrosis is found to occur at normalized tolerance doses of cumulative > 100 Gy.
The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.
In the present trial, the primary endpoint toxicity as well as the secondary endpoints QoL, loco-regional progression-free survival, overall survival and imaging response in patients previously treated with WBRT requiring repeated WBRT for intracerebral tumor progression will be evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Randomization Best Supportive Care, Two Radiotherapy Dosing Regimens
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy | Active comparator | Radiation: Whole Brain RadiotherapyArm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy |
| Arm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy | Active comparator | Radiation: Whole Brain RadiotherapyArm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 30 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy |
| Arm 3 - Best Supportive Care | Active comparator | Other: Best Supportive CareSymptomatic treatment includes steroids, pain medication, nutritional support etc. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- histologically confirmed malignancy
- previous WBRT
- MR-imaging confirmed cerebral metastases (>1)
- age ≥ 18 years of age
- Karnofsky Performance Score ³60
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- refusal of the patients to take part in the study
- Patients who have not yet recovered from acute high-grade toxicities of prior therapies
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Participation in another clinical study or observation period of competing trials, respectively
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Whole Brain RadiotherapyRadiotherapy of the whole brain | Radiation | Arm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy, Arm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy |
| Best Supportive CareBest Supportive Care including nutrition, pain medication, steroids as needed | Other | Arm 3 - Best Supportive Care |
Primary outcome
Toxicity
Time frame: 3 months
The primary endpoint is toxicity according to CTCAE after whole brain radiotherapy.
3 secondary outcomes
loco-regional progression-free survival
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time frame: 6 months
Survival
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 24387239Scharp M, Hauswald H, Bischof M, Debus J, Combs SE. Re-irradiation in the treatment of patients with cerebral metastases of solid tumors: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 3;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Brain Metastasases
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase Ib Study of AlpeliSib With PEmbroLizumab in Patients With mEtastatic Breast caNcer or melanomA (SELENA)
Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Radiotherapy Combined With Cisplatin/Carboplatin, Adebrelimab and Bevacizumab in the Treatment of TNBC-BM.
TNBC, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Brain Metastasases
Recruiting
A Study of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) in People With Brain Cancer Having Tumor Resection Surgery
Brain Metastasases
Recruiting
Exploring the Feasibility of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and Blood Plasma Liquid Biopsy in Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumours and Primary Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumours: A Pilot Study
Solid Tumor Malignancies, Brain Metastasases
RecruitingObservational study
Connectome-guided Onco-functional Resection With Tractography-Extended Neuronavigation in Brain Tumor Surgery
Brain (Nervous System) Cancers, Glioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Professor and Department Chair
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Whole Brain Radiotherapy in people with Brain Metastasases, run by Stephanie Combs at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr. (+49-89-4140- ext. 4501, stephanie.combs@tum.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Toxicity (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03288272, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2017.