AzTrials
AzTrials

Indication for Peripheral Intravenous CatheterizationMODUS IINCT03288766

SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System

An observational study of Indication for Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization and Atrial Flutter, run by C. R. Bard at 8 sites in 2 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study to assess clinical performance of the SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) with MODUS II software for confirming correct tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in adult subjects with altered cardiac rhythm. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
What is being tested?
PICC placement with SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond TCS with MODUS II software
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
232 participants
Where
8 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
19 Apr 2018to 15 Jun 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects will be adult males or females ≥ 21 years of age with identifiable alterations of cardiac rhythm. For this study, altered cardiac rhythm is defined as any condition that does not have a P-wave on ECG.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, ≥ 21 years of age with altered cardiac rhythm (no recognizable P-wave on standard ECG) with diagnosis of specific arrhythmia type or identification of pacemaker driven rhythms as defined below:
  • Atrial fibrillation with history of diagnosis per 12-lead ECG in medical record or diagnosed via bedside telemetry by study team RN at assessment, or
  • All other arrhythmias (including but not limited to atrial flutter, PAC, PVC, PJC, tachycardia, AV Block, BB Block) with history of diagnosis per 12-lead ECG in medical record or diagnosed via bedside telemetry by cardiac unit RN at assessment, or retrospectively by site cardiologist, or
  • Pacemaker driven rhythm with temporary or permanent pacemaker device in place;
  • Subject requires PICC placement as part of standard of care;
  • Subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) has signed an Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Who cannot join

  • Subject has a contraindication to PICC placement as listed in the Instructions for Use (IFU) to include:
  • The presence of bacteremia or septicemia (known or suspected),
  • The patient's body size is insufficient to accommodate the size of the implanted device,
  • The patient is known or is suspected to be allergic to materials contained in the device,
  • Past irradiation of prospective insertion site,
  • Previous episodes of venous thrombosis or vascular surgical procedures at the prospective placement site,
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Local tissue factors will prevent proper device stabilization and/or access;
  • Subjects who previously had a PICC in place and require a PICC exchange;
  • Subject has presence of active resting tremor (i.e. Parkinson's, Multiple Sclerosis, etc.) deemed by Investigator to have potential impact on procedure accuracy;
  • Subjects who are pregnant or think they may be pregnant.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 2 countries.

8 sites in 2 countries

United States6 sites
  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Moses Cone Hospital

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401

  • Vidant Medical Center

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27834

  • Summerlin Hospital and Medical Center

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144

  • J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505

  • Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

Other trials in United States

Australia2 sites
  • Sunshine Coast University Hospital

    Birtinya, Queensland, 4575

  • Fiona Stanley Hospital

    Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: A Single-Arm Prospective, Multi-Centered Study to Assess the SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System

This study is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study to assess clinical performance of the SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) with MODUS II software for confirming correct tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in adult subjects with altered cardiac rhythm.

Read the detailed description

This study is intended to confirm the accuracy of the SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond TCS with the addition of MODUS II (SLM2) software to eliminate the need for post-procedural chest x-ray (CXR) in adult subjects with cardiac abnormalities that alter presentation of the P-wave. Atrial fibrillation will be the primary target while data on pacemaker driven rhythms and other arrhythmia types will also be collected to explore overall performance.

Being tested
PICC placement with SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond TCS with MODUS II software
Medical subject headings
Atrial Flutter, Atrial Premature Complexes, Ventricular Premature Complexes, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Block, Bundle-Branch Block

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PICC placement with SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond TCS with MODUS II softwareProcedure or surgery

    The SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) is an FDA-cleared fully-integrated magnetic tracking and ECG-based PICC tip confirmation technology, indicated for use as an alternative to chest x-ray and fluoroscopy for PICC tip placement confirmation in adult patients without any alterations of cardiac rhythms that change the normal presentation of the P-wave. A software package, MODUS II, has been developed to accurately analyze the entire ECG complex and identify the correct placement of the PICC tip based on a patient's individual ECG, in the absence of an easily identifiable P-wave. This software system is designed to provide visual and/or audio cues to notify the PICC placer of the location of the PICC tip relative to the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) of the patient.

Study groups in NCT03288766
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PICC Placement with Study DevicePICC Placement with SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond TCS with MODUS II software
Receives: Procedure: PICC placement with SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond TCS with MODUS II software

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of successful PICC tip placement within the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) or in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) using SLM2

    Tip positioning is determined at bedside by the software via the Green Diamond Indicator (GDI+) and confirmed by CXR. PICC tip placement will be considered successful if it is determined to be in the lower 1/3 of the SVC or in the CAJ by an independent, blinded radiologist judging position retrospectively against pre-specified anatomical criteria.

    Measured: The PICC insertion procedure is 60-90 mins in duration

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Rate of successful PICC tip placement within the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) or in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) using SLM2 in the absence of a GDI

    It is expected there will be some cases where the MODUS II software may fail to present a Green Diamond Indicator (GDI-). In the absence of a GDI, tip positioning is determined at bedside using magnetic tracking and external measurement per hospital protocol, with CXR required for tip confirmation. PICC tip placement will be considered successful if it is determined to be in the lower 1/3 of the SVC or in the CAJ by an independent, blinded radiologist judging position retrospectively against pre-specified anatomical criteria.

    Measured: The PICC insertion procedure is 60-90 mins in duration

  2. Percent agreement between the site readings of the CXR (standard of care) versus those completed by an independent, blinded radiologist

    An independent, blinded radiologist will judge PICC tip position retrospectively against pre-specified anatomical criteria compared with findings of the SLM2.

    Measured: The PICC insertion procedure is 60-90 mins in duration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2017
  2. Study start19 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2021

Why it stopped: Low enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
232 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03288766
Sponsor's protocol ID
BAS-14-003
Acronym
MODUS II
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
18 Sep 2017
Last updated
20 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Indication for Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization and Atrial Flutter, run by C. R. Bard at 8 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Low enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of successful PICC tip placement within the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) or in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) using SLM2 (time frame: The PICC insertion procedure is 60-90 mins in duration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in