Hip FracturesPhase 4NCT03289858
Randomized Controlled Trial for Exparel Hip Fracture
A Phase 4 study testing Exparel and Sodium Chloride in people with Hip Fractures, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized study looking at the effect that a long-acting local anesthetic has on pain control in patients having surgery for hip fractures. The investigators are conducting the study to see if that reduces the amount of pain medicine needed after surgery, and if it reduces other medical… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Fractures
- What is being tested?
- Exparel and Sodium Chloride
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2017to 22 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 55 or older
- Sustaining either an OTA/AO type 31A or 31B fracture undergoing ORIF or hemiarthroplasty
- Able to consent
- Isolated injury
Who cannot join
- OTA/AO 31B1 (Impacted/slightly displaced)
- Baseline dementia or cognitive deficit
- Inability to consent
- Chronic Opioid use
- End stage liver disease with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) greater than 20.
- End stage renal disease as defined by patients requiring hemodialysis at least twice weekly
Show all 9Show fewer
- Polytrauma, defined as: concurrent upper or lower extremity fracture, pelvis fracture, spine fracture, rib fractures, or facial fractures, Blunt chest or abdominal trauma resulting in diagnosed organ injury, Head trauma resulting in intracranial bleed or diagnosed concussion
- Allergy to amide-type local anesthetics
- Prisoners (unlikely to be accessible for follow-up)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
UMass Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: Does the Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine Decrease Narcotic Requirements in Geriatric Hip Fractures? A Randomized, Double Blinded Control Trial
This is a prospective, randomized study looking at the effect that a long-acting local anesthetic has on pain control in patients having surgery for hip fractures. The investigators are conducting the study to see if that reduces the amount of pain medicine needed after surgery, and if it reduces other medical complications after surgery.
Read the detailed description
Osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip are common in the geriatric population, are increasing in frequency, and represent a growing social and economic burden. Pain control after surgical treatment is an area of growing interest, as improvement in post-injury pain is often an important indication for surgical treatment of hip fractures.
Typically a mainstay of post-operative pain control, the use of opiates has come under increasing scrutiny, as it has been shown to be associated with delirium, respiratory depression, and even may even lead to addiction or abuse in the medically frail geriatric population. These concerns have led to efforts to minimize the use of post-operative opiates in hip fracture patients. In that context, a treatment that could reduce the necessity of post-op narcotics while still improving pain control would be potentially valuable.
There has been growing interest in the use of long-acting local anesthetics for improving pain control in orthopaedics, particularly in the elective total joint arthroplasty population. Studies have shown that arthroplasty patients receiving long-acting local anesthetics have decreased opiate requirements, reduced length of stay, and lower costs. Although well-demonstrated in the elective arthroplasty population, the effects of long-acting local anesthetics have yet to be demonstrated in the hip fracture population. Given that these fractures frequently occur in medically frail patients with multiple comorbidities, in whom post-operative confusion and delirium are relatively common, there is the potential for treatments that decrease opiate requirements to demonstrate substantial medical and economic benefits.
Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) and long-acting local anesthetics have been used extensively in hip replacement surgery and have not been shown to be associated with any increased risks. In the case of patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with arthroplasty, the surgical techniques are identical to those being used in this study. Exparel has also been used in trauma surgery as well as foot and ankle surgery without any increased described risks, although its use explicitly in hip fractures has not been published. However, the PI has trained in other medical centers where Exparel is routinely used in hip fracture patients without any identified increased risks or complications, but there is a paucity of data on this subject, which is the rationale for this study.
The investigators hypothesize that in patients with osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip, patients receiving intraoperative long-acting local anesthetics will have decreased pain and decreased post-operative opiate requirements, leading to less delirium and decreased hospital resource utilization during their index hospitalization.
The goal is to conduct a multi-center prospective randomized control trial to determine if liposomal bupivacaine is superior to standard of care by addressing the below separate but related aims:
- Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce narcotic requirements and pain post operatively after hip fracture treatment. Excess narcotic use in the elderly population is associated with a host of complications often magnified by polypharmacy, including in hospital delirium, increased length of stay, nausea, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression and others. Decreasing narcotic usage in this group of patients following hip fracture can possibly reduce such complications. Patients will receive standard of care medical treatment and be randomized to intra-operative Exparel vs. placebo injections. Opioid requirements, complications, pain score, and length of stay will be assessed in the post-operative period. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total morphine requirements and pain scores will be decreased in this group following the administration of exparel in the geriatric hip fracture fracture population.
- Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce delirium in post-operative hip fracture patients. In hospital delirium in elderly patients is associated with poor outcomes, including prolonged length of stay, poor participation in rehabilitation, and falls. Use of a locally administered liposomal bupivacaine could decrease the need for additional medications for pain control in addition to decreased mental stress for patients in this unfamiliar situation, thus resulting in decreased episodes of delirium. The investigators will assess delirium utilizing Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) scores in the post-operative period at regularly scheduled intervals and compare average scores between the treatment / standard of care group. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total episodes of delirium will be decreased in the liposomal bupivacaine group.
- Determine if Exparel is cost-effective in hip fracture patients. The costs associated with increased narcotic usage, prolonged stay, resources, and complications can be significant. The use of liposomal bupivacaine may lead to decreased resource utilization to care for hip fractures. The investigators will conduct an economic analysis evaluating total inpatient hospitalization costs including costs associated with length of stay, medication requirements, and resources associated with consultations and diagnostic evaluations. These costs will be compared against the cost of Exparel administration to evaluate the net cost effect of the intervention. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the net cost of inpatient care will be decreased when compared to standard of care.
- Conditions
- Hip Fractures
- Being tested
- Exparel, Sodium Chloride
- Medical subject headings
- Hip Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExparelDrug
Also called Liposomal Bupivacaine
Subcutaneous injection at conclusion of surgical fixation of hip fracture
Sodium ChlorideDrug
Also called Saline
Saline Injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exparel (Liposomal Bupivacaine) | Experimental | Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) is FDA approved, with a labeled indication of "single-dose infiltration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia." Receives: Drug: Exparel |
| Saline Control | Placebo comparator | Saline Solution (Sodium Chloride) Receives: Drug: Sodium Chloride |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Opiate Requirements
Morphine meq given
Measured: 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Sep 2017
- Primary completion1 Jan 2019
- Study completion22 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (33)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hip FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Orthopaedic Trauma Association, University of Kentucky
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eric Swart, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Investigators
- Eric Swart, MD, Principal investigator, UMass Memorial HealthPaul Matuszewski, MD, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03289858
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H00013594
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1573-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1462.
PubMed 19826027Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113.
PubMed 17144789Sanzone AG. Current Challenges in Pain Management in Hip Fracture Patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30 Suppl 1:S1-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000562.
PubMed 27101319Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip Fractures: I. Overview and Evaluation and Treatment of Femoral-Neck Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994 May;2(3):141-149. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199405000-00002.
PubMed 10709002Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip Fractures: II. Evaluation and Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994 May;2(3):150-156. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199405000-00003.
PubMed 10709003Chau DL, Walker V, Pai L, Cho LM. Opiates and elderly: use and side effects. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(2):273-8. doi: 10.2147/cia.s1847.
PubMed 18686750Lonner JH, Scuderi GR, Lieberman JR. Potential utility of liposome bupivacaine in orthopedic surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Mar;44(3):111-7.
PubMed 25750943Berend ME, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr. Advances in pain management: game changers in knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):7-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34514.
PubMed 25381400Ma J, Zhang W, Yao S. Liposomal bupivacaine infiltration versus femoral nerve block for pain control in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PubMed 27742564Cherian JJ, Muzaffar A, Barrington JW, Elmallah RD, Chughtai M, Mistry JB, Mont MA. Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Better Postoperative Analgesic Outcome and Economic Benefits. J Knee Surg. 2016 Jul;29(5):e2. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584270. Epub 2016 Jun 10. No abstract available.
PubMed 27285179Chughtai M, Cherian JJ, Mistry JB, Elmallah RD, Bennett A, Mont MA. Liposomal Bupivacaine Suspension Can Reduce Lengths of Stay and Improve Discharge Status of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2016 Apr;29(3):224-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571431. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
PubMed 26838971Surdam JW, Licini DJ, Baynes NT, Arce BR. The use of exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) to manage postoperative pain in unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PubMed 25282071Zuckerman JD. Hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 6;334(23):1519-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606063342307. No abstract available.
PubMed 8618608Menzies IB, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, Friedman SM. The impact of comorbidity on perioperative outcomes of hip fractures in a geriatric fracture model. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Sep;3(3):129-34. doi: 10.1177/2151458512463392.
PubMed 23569706Zywiel MG, Hurley RT, Perruccio AV, Hancock-Howard RL, Coyte PC, Rampersaud YR. Health economic implications of perioperative delirium in older patients after surgery for a fragility hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 20;97(10):829-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00724.
PubMed 25995494
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does the Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine Decrease Narcotic Requirements in Geriatric Hip Fractures? A Randomized, Double Blinded Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03289858
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H00013594
- Conditions
- Hip Fractures
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, WorcesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Orthopaedic Trauma Association, University of Kentucky
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Feb 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized study looking at the effect that a long-acting local anesthetic has on pain control in patients having surgery for hip fractures. The investigators are conducting the study to see if that reduces the amount of pain medicine needed after surgery, and if it reduces other medical complications after surgery.
Detailed description
Osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip are common in the geriatric population, are increasing in frequency, and represent a growing social and economic burden. Pain control after surgical treatment is an area of growing interest, as improvement in post-injury pain is often an important indication for surgical treatment of hip fractures.
Typically a mainstay of post-operative pain control, the use of opiates has come under increasing scrutiny, as it has been shown to be associated with delirium, respiratory depression, and even may even lead to addiction or abuse in the medically frail geriatric population. These concerns have led to efforts to minimize the use of post-operative opiates in hip fracture patients. In that context, a treatment that could reduce the necessity of post-op narcotics while still improving pain control would be potentially valuable.
There has been growing interest in the use of long-acting local anesthetics for improving pain control in orthopaedics, particularly in the elective total joint arthroplasty population. Studies have shown that arthroplasty patients receiving long-acting local anesthetics have decreased opiate requirements, reduced length of stay, and lower costs. Although well-demonstrated in the elective arthroplasty population, the effects of long-acting local anesthetics have yet to be demonstrated in the hip fracture population. Given that these fractures frequently occur in medically frail patients with multiple comorbidities, in whom post-operative confusion and delirium are relatively common, there is the potential for treatments that decrease opiate requirements to demonstrate substantial medical and economic benefits.
Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) and long-acting local anesthetics have been used extensively in hip replacement surgery and have not been shown to be associated with any increased risks. In the case of patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with arthroplasty, the surgical techniques are identical to those being used in this study. Exparel has also been used in trauma surgery as well as foot and ankle surgery without any increased described risks, although its use explicitly in hip fractures has not been published. However, the PI has trained in other medical centers where Exparel is routinely used in hip fracture patients without any identified increased risks or complications, but there is a paucity of data on this subject, which is the rationale for this study.
The investigators hypothesize that in patients with osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip, patients receiving intraoperative long-acting local anesthetics will have decreased pain and decreased post-operative opiate requirements, leading to less delirium and decreased hospital resource utilization during their index hospitalization.
The goal is to conduct a multi-center prospective randomized control trial to determine if liposomal bupivacaine is superior to standard of care by addressing the below separate but related aims:
- Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce narcotic requirements and pain post operatively after hip fracture treatment. Excess narcotic use in the elderly population is associated with a host of complications often magnified by polypharmacy, including in hospital delirium, increased length of stay, nausea, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression and others. Decreasing narcotic usage in this group of patients following hip fracture can possibly reduce such complications. Patients will receive standard of care medical treatment and be randomized to intra-operative Exparel vs. placebo injections. Opioid requirements, complications, pain score, and length of stay will be assessed in the post-operative period. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total morphine requirements and pain scores will be decreased in this group following the administration of exparel in the geriatric hip fracture fracture population.
- Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce delirium in post-operative hip fracture patients. In hospital delirium in elderly patients is associated with poor outcomes, including prolonged length of stay, poor participation in rehabilitation, and falls. Use of a locally administered liposomal bupivacaine could decrease the need for additional medications for pain control in addition to decreased mental stress for patients in this unfamiliar situation, thus resulting in decreased episodes of delirium. The investigators will assess delirium utilizing Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) scores in the post-operative period at regularly scheduled intervals and compare average scores between the treatment / standard of care group. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total episodes of delirium will be decreased in the liposomal bupivacaine group.
- Determine if Exparel is cost-effective in hip fracture patients. The costs associated with increased narcotic usage, prolonged stay, resources, and complications can be significant. The use of liposomal bupivacaine may lead to decreased resource utilization to care for hip fractures. The investigators will conduct an economic analysis evaluating total inpatient hospitalization costs including costs associated with length of stay, medication requirements, and resources associated with consultations and diagnostic evaluations. These costs will be compared against the cost of Exparel administration to evaluate the net cost effect of the intervention. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the net cost of inpatient care will be decreased when compared to standard of care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exparel (Liposomal Bupivacaine) | Experimental | Drug: ExparelExparel (liposomal bupivacaine) is FDA approved, with a labeled indication of "single-dose infiltration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia." |
| Saline Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: Sodium ChlorideSaline Solution (Sodium Chloride) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 55 or older
- Sustaining either an OTA/AO type 31A or 31B fracture undergoing ORIF or hemiarthroplasty
- Able to consent
- Isolated injury
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- OTA/AO 31B1 (Impacted/slightly displaced)
- Baseline dementia or cognitive deficit
- Inability to consent
- Chronic Opioid use
- End stage liver disease with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) greater than 20.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExparelAlso: Liposomal BupivacaineSubcutaneous injection at conclusion of surgical fixation of hip fracture | Drug | Exparel (Liposomal Bupivacaine) |
| Sodium ChlorideAlso: SalineSaline Injection | Drug | Saline Control |
Primary outcome
Opiate Requirements
Time frame: 72 hours
Morphine meq given
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19826027Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1573-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1462.
- Background: PubMed 17144789Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113.
- Background: PubMed 27101319Sanzone AG. Current Challenges in Pain Management in Hip Fracture Patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30 Suppl 1:S1-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000562.
- Background: PubMed 10709002Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip Fractures: I. Overview and Evaluation and Treatment of Femoral-Neck Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994 May;2(3):141-149. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199405000-00002.
- Background: PubMed 10709003Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip Fractures: II. Evaluation and Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994 May;2(3):150-156. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199405000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 18686750Chau DL, Walker V, Pai L, Cho LM. Opiates and elderly: use and side effects. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(2):273-8. doi: 10.2147/cia.s1847.
- Background: PubMed 25750943Lonner JH, Scuderi GR, Lieberman JR. Potential utility of liposome bupivacaine in orthopedic surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Mar;44(3):111-7.
- Background: PubMed 25381400Berend ME, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr. Advances in pain management: game changers in knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):7-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34514.
- Background: PubMed 27742564Ma J, Zhang W, Yao S. Liposomal bupivacaine infiltration versus femoral nerve block for pain control in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 27285179Cherian JJ, Muzaffar A, Barrington JW, Elmallah RD, Chughtai M, Mistry JB, Mont MA. Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Better Postoperative Analgesic Outcome and Economic Benefits. J Knee Surg. 2016 Jul;29(5):e2. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584270. Epub 2016 Jun 10. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26838971Chughtai M, Cherian JJ, Mistry JB, Elmallah RD, Bennett A, Mont MA. Liposomal Bupivacaine Suspension Can Reduce Lengths of Stay and Improve Discharge Status of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2016 Apr;29(3):224-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571431. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
- Background: PubMed 25282071Surdam JW, Licini DJ, Baynes NT, Arce BR. The use of exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) to manage postoperative pain in unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Related trials for Hip Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft Tissue Infiltration With Local Anesthesia Feasibility Trial
Hip Fracture Surgeries, Intertrochanteric Fracture
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
BDSF Vs DHS With Anterotational Screw in Vertical FNF
Evaluation of BDSF in FNF
RecruitingObservational study
Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture: A Prospective Observational Study
Pelvic Fracture, Acetabular Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Acute Traumatic Fracture of the Femoral Head or Neck
Not yet recruiting
Trochanteric Bursa Repair and Lateral Hip Pain After Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture
Femoral Neck Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric Swart, MD principal investigator
UMass Memorial Health
Paul Matuszewski, MD principal investigator
University of Kentucky
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Exparel and Sodium Chloride in people with Hip Fractures, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Opiate Requirements (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03289858, which also lists 33 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2021.