AzTrials
AzTrials

Hip FracturesPhase 4NCT03289858

Randomized Controlled Trial for Exparel Hip Fracture

A Phase 4 study testing Exparel and Sodium Chloride in people with Hip Fractures, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, randomized study looking at the effect that a long-acting local anesthetic has on pain control in patients having surgery for hip fractures. The investigators are conducting the study to see if that reduces the amount of pain medicine needed after surgery, and if it reduces other medical… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hip Fractures
What is being tested?
Exparel and Sodium Chloride
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
55 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2017to 22 Jan 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 55 or older
  • Sustaining either an OTA/AO type 31A or 31B fracture undergoing ORIF or hemiarthroplasty
  • Able to consent
  • Isolated injury

Who cannot join

  • OTA/AO 31B1 (Impacted/slightly displaced)
  • Baseline dementia or cognitive deficit
  • Inability to consent
  • Chronic Opioid use
  • End stage liver disease with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) greater than 20.
  • End stage renal disease as defined by patients requiring hemodialysis at least twice weekly
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Polytrauma, defined as: concurrent upper or lower extremity fracture, pelvis fracture, spine fracture, rib fractures, or facial fractures, Blunt chest or abdominal trauma resulting in diagnosed organ injury, Head trauma resulting in intracranial bleed or diagnosed concussion
  • Allergy to amide-type local anesthetics
  • Prisoners (unlikely to be accessible for follow-up)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

  • UMass Memorial Medical Center

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Does the Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine Decrease Narcotic Requirements in Geriatric Hip Fractures? A Randomized, Double Blinded Control Trial

This is a prospective, randomized study looking at the effect that a long-acting local anesthetic has on pain control in patients having surgery for hip fractures. The investigators are conducting the study to see if that reduces the amount of pain medicine needed after surgery, and if it reduces other medical complications after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip are common in the geriatric population, are increasing in frequency, and represent a growing social and economic burden. Pain control after surgical treatment is an area of growing interest, as improvement in post-injury pain is often an important indication for surgical treatment of hip fractures.

Typically a mainstay of post-operative pain control, the use of opiates has come under increasing scrutiny, as it has been shown to be associated with delirium, respiratory depression, and even may even lead to addiction or abuse in the medically frail geriatric population. These concerns have led to efforts to minimize the use of post-operative opiates in hip fracture patients. In that context, a treatment that could reduce the necessity of post-op narcotics while still improving pain control would be potentially valuable.

There has been growing interest in the use of long-acting local anesthetics for improving pain control in orthopaedics, particularly in the elective total joint arthroplasty population. Studies have shown that arthroplasty patients receiving long-acting local anesthetics have decreased opiate requirements, reduced length of stay, and lower costs. Although well-demonstrated in the elective arthroplasty population, the effects of long-acting local anesthetics have yet to be demonstrated in the hip fracture population. Given that these fractures frequently occur in medically frail patients with multiple comorbidities, in whom post-operative confusion and delirium are relatively common, there is the potential for treatments that decrease opiate requirements to demonstrate substantial medical and economic benefits.

Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) and long-acting local anesthetics have been used extensively in hip replacement surgery and have not been shown to be associated with any increased risks. In the case of patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with arthroplasty, the surgical techniques are identical to those being used in this study. Exparel has also been used in trauma surgery as well as foot and ankle surgery without any increased described risks, although its use explicitly in hip fractures has not been published. However, the PI has trained in other medical centers where Exparel is routinely used in hip fracture patients without any identified increased risks or complications, but there is a paucity of data on this subject, which is the rationale for this study.

The investigators hypothesize that in patients with osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip, patients receiving intraoperative long-acting local anesthetics will have decreased pain and decreased post-operative opiate requirements, leading to less delirium and decreased hospital resource utilization during their index hospitalization.

The goal is to conduct a multi-center prospective randomized control trial to determine if liposomal bupivacaine is superior to standard of care by addressing the below separate but related aims:

  1. Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce narcotic requirements and pain post operatively after hip fracture treatment. Excess narcotic use in the elderly population is associated with a host of complications often magnified by polypharmacy, including in hospital delirium, increased length of stay, nausea, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression and others. Decreasing narcotic usage in this group of patients following hip fracture can possibly reduce such complications. Patients will receive standard of care medical treatment and be randomized to intra-operative Exparel vs. placebo injections. Opioid requirements, complications, pain score, and length of stay will be assessed in the post-operative period. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total morphine requirements and pain scores will be decreased in this group following the administration of exparel in the geriatric hip fracture fracture population.
  2. Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce delirium in post-operative hip fracture patients. In hospital delirium in elderly patients is associated with poor outcomes, including prolonged length of stay, poor participation in rehabilitation, and falls. Use of a locally administered liposomal bupivacaine could decrease the need for additional medications for pain control in addition to decreased mental stress for patients in this unfamiliar situation, thus resulting in decreased episodes of delirium. The investigators will assess delirium utilizing Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) scores in the post-operative period at regularly scheduled intervals and compare average scores between the treatment / standard of care group. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total episodes of delirium will be decreased in the liposomal bupivacaine group.
  3. Determine if Exparel is cost-effective in hip fracture patients. The costs associated with increased narcotic usage, prolonged stay, resources, and complications can be significant. The use of liposomal bupivacaine may lead to decreased resource utilization to care for hip fractures. The investigators will conduct an economic analysis evaluating total inpatient hospitalization costs including costs associated with length of stay, medication requirements, and resources associated with consultations and diagnostic evaluations. These costs will be compared against the cost of Exparel administration to evaluate the net cost effect of the intervention. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the net cost of inpatient care will be decreased when compared to standard of care.
Conditions
Hip Fractures
Being tested
Exparel, Sodium Chloride
Medical subject headings
Hip Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ExparelDrug

    Also called Liposomal Bupivacaine

    Subcutaneous injection at conclusion of surgical fixation of hip fracture

  • Sodium ChlorideDrug

    Also called Saline

    Saline Injection

Study groups in NCT03289858
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exparel (Liposomal Bupivacaine)ExperimentalExparel (liposomal bupivacaine) is FDA approved, with a labeled indication of "single-dose infiltration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia."
Receives: Drug: Exparel
Saline ControlPlacebo comparatorSaline Solution (Sodium Chloride)
Receives: Drug: Sodium Chloride

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Opiate Requirements

    Morphine meq given

    Measured: 72 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2017
  2. Study start1 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion22 Jan 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03289858
Sponsor's protocol ID
H00013594
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
8 Sep 2017
Last updated
18 Mar 2021
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1573-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1462.

    PubMed 19826027
  • Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113.

    PubMed 17144789
  • Sanzone AG. Current Challenges in Pain Management in Hip Fracture Patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30 Suppl 1:S1-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000562.

    PubMed 27101319
  • Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip Fractures: I. Overview and Evaluation and Treatment of Femoral-Neck Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994 May;2(3):141-149. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199405000-00002.

    PubMed 10709002
  • Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip Fractures: II. Evaluation and Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994 May;2(3):150-156. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199405000-00003.

    PubMed 10709003
  • Chau DL, Walker V, Pai L, Cho LM. Opiates and elderly: use and side effects. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(2):273-8. doi: 10.2147/cia.s1847.

    PubMed 18686750
  • Lonner JH, Scuderi GR, Lieberman JR. Potential utility of liposome bupivacaine in orthopedic surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Mar;44(3):111-7.

    PubMed 25750943
  • Berend ME, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr. Advances in pain management: game changers in knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):7-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34514.

    PubMed 25381400
  • Ma J, Zhang W, Yao S. Liposomal bupivacaine infiltration versus femoral nerve block for pain control in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

    PubMed 27742564
  • Cherian JJ, Muzaffar A, Barrington JW, Elmallah RD, Chughtai M, Mistry JB, Mont MA. Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Better Postoperative Analgesic Outcome and Economic Benefits. J Knee Surg. 2016 Jul;29(5):e2. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584270. Epub 2016 Jun 10. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27285179
  • Chughtai M, Cherian JJ, Mistry JB, Elmallah RD, Bennett A, Mont MA. Liposomal Bupivacaine Suspension Can Reduce Lengths of Stay and Improve Discharge Status of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2016 Apr;29(3):224-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571431. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

    PubMed 26838971
  • Surdam JW, Licini DJ, Baynes NT, Arce BR. The use of exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) to manage postoperative pain in unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

    PubMed 25282071
  • Zuckerman JD. Hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 6;334(23):1519-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606063342307. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8618608
  • Menzies IB, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, Friedman SM. The impact of comorbidity on perioperative outcomes of hip fractures in a geriatric fracture model. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Sep;3(3):129-34. doi: 10.1177/2151458512463392.

    PubMed 23569706
  • Zywiel MG, Hurley RT, Perruccio AV, Hancock-Howard RL, Coyte PC, Rampersaud YR. Health economic implications of perioperative delirium in older patients after surgery for a fragility hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 20;97(10):829-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00724.

    PubMed 25995494

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Exparel and Sodium Chloride in people with Hip Fractures, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Opiate Requirements (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03289858, which also lists 33 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in