Caries of InfancyPhase 4NCT03290625
Intranasal Sedation With Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine in Pediatric Dentistry (NASO II)
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride and Ketamine Hydrochloride in people with Caries of Infancy and Dental Anxiety, run by Universidade Federal de Goias at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Parallel clinical trial focusing on procedural pediatric sedation in the dental setting. Children will be randomized to treatment according to a predetermined sequence of interventions consisting of: 1. intranasal sedation with ketamine-associated dexmedetomidine (Experimental Group), 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 83 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Caries of Infancy, Dental Anxiety
- What is being tested?
- Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride and Ketamine Hydrochloride
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2017to 5 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 83 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children born to term, whose physical condition is categorized as American Society of Anesthesiologists I (healthy) or II (mild and controlled systemic disease - persistent asthma, for example)
- Children with a low risk of airway obstruction (Mallampati less than 2 and / or tonsil hypertrophy occupying less than 50% of the oropharynx)
- Children without neurological or cognitive alterations and who do not use medications that may compromise cognitive functions
- Children with caries requiring dental restoration
Who cannot join
- Children with positive behavior in the consultation without sedation
- Children with facial deformity
- Children using corticosteroid
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Intranasal Sedation With Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine in Pediatric Dentistry (NASO II): Randomized Clinical Trial
Parallel clinical trial focusing on procedural pediatric sedation in the dental setting. Children will be randomized to treatment according to a predetermined sequence of interventions consisting of: 1. intranasal sedation with ketamine-associated dexmedetomidine (Experimental Group), 2. intranasal sedation with dexmedetomidine as sole drug (Control Group). Primary outcome is children's behavior during the dental treatment. Secondary outcomes are: children's pain, memory and stress (salivary cortisol and melatonin); perception of the accompanying adult, dentist and child about dental sedation; cost-effectiveness of this type of sedation; psychosocial variables; children's quality of life.
Read the detailed description
This proposal aims to determine the most effective pharmacological regimen in the treatment of child pain and anxiety during outpatient dental procedures. Advancement in this field is a reflection, on the one hand, of the use of new and more effective routes of drug administration, such as the intranasal route using atomizers with uniform dispersion of the administered jet and, on the other hand, the use of new sedative drugs, such as dexmedetomidine. This is a randomized, parallel, triple-masked clinical trial, using a research protocol with the objectives: 1) To evaluate the efficacy (behavior, pain, memory and stress) of a sedative regimen intranasally mucosal atomizer device (MAD) using a sedative drug (ketamine) and an innovative drug (dexmedetomidine) in the sedation of children from 2 to 6 years of age undergoing dental treatment - our hypothesis is that the use of dexmedetomidine intranasally association with ketamine is more effective than dexmedetomidine itself in isolation; 2) To analyze the level of cortisol and salivary melatonin (stress) according to each sedative protocol and its association with clinical variables; 3) Identify adverse events with the new protocol; 4) To evaluate the association between the child's behavior and psychosocial variables; 5) To verify the impact of treatment under dental sedation on the quality of life related to the oral health of the child. The research will be carried out in the Faculty of Dentistry of the Federal University of Goias, in the Center of Studies in Dental Sedation (NESO), Goiânia, Goias. A non-probabilistic sample of 88 children aged 2 to 6 years (alpha 0.05, 80% power) who present dental caries with restorative need, American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II, patent nasal airways (Mallampati index I or II and obstruction by hypertrophy of tonsils ≤ 50% and effective nasal breathing), in addition to non-cooperative behavior with the examination or a dental procedure. Children with neuropathies, those using growth hormone and / or those who exhibit severe adverse events during sedation will be excluded. Children will be randomized to treatment according to a predetermined sequence of interventions consisting of: 1. intranasal sedation with ketamine-associated dexmedetomidine (Experimental Group), 2. intranasal sedation with dexmedetomidine as sole drug (Control Group). Pediatricians and anesthesiologists will be aware of the randomized intervention, because of safety concerns for the child, in the case of serious adverse events with or without immediate use of antagonists; the other staff members and the child's companion (s) will be "masked". The examination and intervention sessions will be filmed in high definition for later analysis of the behavior and pain according to different scales consecrated and / or validated. In addition, the children will be submitted to four saliva collections to analyze the levels of cortisol and melatonin (stress-related hormones). Other variables of secondary outcome are: perception of the accompanying adult, dentist and child about dental sedation and cost-effectiveness of this type of sedation, psychosocial variables, quality of life. The data will be analyzed by descriptive and bivariate statistics. This proposal will bring benefits in the vast field of health sedation by having original design, using drugs and promising routes, with national and international impact. The project is inserted in a research line that presents experience history and impact publications by the proponent team, as well as involving students of scientific initiation, master's, doctorate, and postdoctoral studies, being developed by a multidisciplinary team. There is a clear expectation of generating results with high impact production, besides the possibility of immediate application in the public and private sectors of a highly effective sedative regime, minimizing the need to refer patients to general anesthesia.
- Conditions
- Caries of Infancy, Dental Anxiety
- Being tested
- Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride, Ketamine Hydrochloride
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dexmedetomidine HydrochlorideDrug
Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (PrecedexTM), presented in ampoule containing 2 mL of 100 mcg / mL solution for injection
Ketamine HydrochlorideDrug
Dextrocetamine hydrochloride (KetaminTM), presented in a 10 mL vial containing 50 mg / mL solution for injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DexKet | Experimental | Intranasal DEXMEDETOMIDINE (2.0 mcg/kg, maximum 100 mcg) + KETAMINE (1.0 mg/kg, maximum 100 mg) Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride; Drug: Ketamine Hydrochloride |
| Dex | Active comparator | DEXMEDETOMIDINE (2.5 mcg/kg, maximum 100 mcg) Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Children's behavior according to observational scale
Children's behavior during the dental treatment under sedation according to the observational scale 'Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale' (OSUBRS) as assessed by trained and calibrated observers in the video files of the procedure
Measured: From the beginning to the end of the dental treatment, which should last around 30-40 minutes
Secondary outcomes (16)
Acceptance of intranasal administration according to observation
Acceptance of intranasal sedative regimen administration using a pre-defined form; trained and calibrated observers will assess children's acceptance through symptoms such as crying, need for physical restraint, and others
Measured: From the beginning to the end of the intranasal sedative administration, which should less than one minute each
Memory of the procedure through questionnaire
Children's memory of facts that happened just before and after the administration of the sedative, through a questionnaire exploring toys showed and procedures occurred just before and during the procedure
Measured: From the children's arrival at the dental clinic until discharge, and then on the day after, up to 36 hours
Salivary cortisol according to ELISA
Children's salivary cortisol related to the dental treatment under sedation assessed through ELISA
Measured: From the night before the procedure until the end of the dental procedure under sedation, up to 24 hours
Salivary melatonin according to ELISA
Children's salivary melatonin related to the dental treatment under sedation assessed through ELISA
Measured: From the night before the procedure until the end of the dental procedure under sedation, up to 24 hours
Pain according to the FLACC scale
Children's pain during the dental treatment under sedation, assessed by trained and calibrated observers using the Faces, Legas, Activity, Consolability and Crying scale (FLACC) in digital video files related to the procedure
Measured: From the beginning to the end of the dental treatment, which should last around 30-40 minutes
Accompanying person perception through VAS
Accompanying person perception on the child's sedation through Visual Analogue Scale
Measured: Just after the end of the child's dental procedure, while in the recovery anesthetic room, an average of 60 minutes
Pediatric dentist perception through VAS
Pediatric dentist perception on the child's sedation through Visual Analogue Scale
Measured: Just after the end of the child's dental procedure, an average of 60 minutes
Child's perception through qualitative interview
Child's perception on the dental procedure under sedation, according to a qualitative interview following a semistructured guide
Measured: One week after the dental sedation procedure
Adverse events
Post-operative adverse events related to the dental sedation procedure
Measured: During the procedure and within the 24 hours after
Child's dental anxiety and sedation efficacy, according to the Venham's picture test
Association of child's dental anxiety with the outcome of the procedural sedation, using the Venham Picture Test
Measured: Fifteen minutes before the administration of the sedative
Child's dental behavior in the reception and sedation efficacy, according to the Sharath Scale
Association of child's dental behavior with the outcome of the procedural sedation, using the Sharath scale
Measured: Fifteen minutes before the administration of the sedative
Parents' anxiety and sedation efficacy, according to the STAI
Association of parental overall anxiety with the outcome of the procedural sedation, using short form of the State-Trate Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Measured: On the day of the inclusion of the child in the RCT, an average of 30 minutes before the child's dental exam
Parents' dental anxiety and sedation efficacy, according to the Corah Scale
Association of parental dental anxiety with the outcome of the procedural sedation, using Dental Anxiety Scale by Corah
Measured: On the day of the inclusion of the child in the RCT, an average of 30 minutes before the child's dental exam
Parents' overall stress and sedation efficacy, according to the Lipp Inventory
Association of parental stress with the outcome of the procedural sedation, using the according to the "Inventário de Sintomas de Stress para Adultos de Lipp - ISSL" (Lipp Adult Stress Symptoms Inventory - ISSL)
Measured: On the day of the inclusion of the child in the RCT, an average of 30 minutes before the child's dental exam
Procedural dental sedation impact according to the B-ECOHIS
Impact of dental treatment under sedation on the oral health related quality of life related to the child and respective family, using the questionnaire B-ECOHIS
Measured: Two weeks and three months after the completion of the dental treatment
Economic analysis
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the two sedative regimens
Measured: After the completion of data collection for the primary outcome, an average of 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2017
- Study start9 Nov 2017
- Primary completion12 Sep 2019
- Study completion5 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Caries of InfancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Goias
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Research Support Foundation of the State of Goiás
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luciane Ribeiro de Rezende Sucasas da Costa, Universidade Federal de Goias
- Investigators
- Luciane Costa, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidade Federal de Goias
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03290625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PV0939-2017
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intranasal Sedation With Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine in Pediatric Dentistry (NASO II): Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03290625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PV0939-2017
- Conditions
- Caries of Infancy, Dental Anxiety
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de GoiasUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Research Support Foundation of the State of Goiás
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Parallel clinical trial focusing on procedural pediatric sedation in the dental setting. Children will be randomized to treatment according to a predetermined sequence of interventions consisting of: 1. intranasal sedation with ketamine-associated dexmedetomidine (Experimental Group), 2. intranasal sedation with dexmedetomidine as sole drug (Control Group). Primary outcome is children's behavior during the dental treatment. Secondary outcomes are: children's pain, memory and stress (salivary cortisol and melatonin); perception of the accompanying adult, dentist and child about dental sedation; cost-effectiveness of this type of sedation; psychosocial variables; children's quality of life.
Detailed description
This proposal aims to determine the most effective pharmacological regimen in the treatment of child pain and anxiety during outpatient dental procedures. Advancement in this field is a reflection, on the one hand, of the use of new and more effective routes of drug administration, such as the intranasal route using atomizers with uniform dispersion of the administered jet and, on the other hand, the use of new sedative drugs, such as dexmedetomidine. This is a randomized, parallel, triple-masked clinical trial, using a research protocol with the objectives: 1) To evaluate the efficacy (behavior, pain, memory and stress) of a sedative regimen intranasally mucosal atomizer device (MAD) using a sedative drug (ketamine) and an innovative drug (dexmedetomidine) in the sedation of children from 2 to 6 years of age undergoing dental treatment - our hypothesis is that the use of dexmedetomidine intranasally association with ketamine is more effective than dexmedetomidine itself in isolation; 2) To analyze the level of cortisol and salivary melatonin (stress) according to each sedative protocol and its association with clinical variables; 3) Identify adverse events with the new protocol; 4) To evaluate the association between the child's behavior and psychosocial variables; 5) To verify the impact of treatment under dental sedation on the quality of life related to the oral health of the child. The research will be carried out in the Faculty of Dentistry of the Federal University of Goias, in the Center of Studies in Dental Sedation (NESO), Goiânia, Goias. A non-probabilistic sample of 88 children aged 2 to 6 years (alpha 0.05, 80% power) who present dental caries with restorative need, American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II, patent nasal airways (Mallampati index I or II and obstruction by hypertrophy of tonsils ≤ 50% and effective nasal breathing), in addition to non-cooperative behavior with the examination or a dental procedure. Children with neuropathies, those using growth hormone and / or those who exhibit severe adverse events during sedation will be excluded. Children will be randomized to treatment according to a predetermined sequence of interventions consisting of: 1. intranasal sedation with ketamine-associated dexmedetomidine (Experimental Group), 2. intranasal sedation with dexmedetomidine as sole drug (Control Group). Pediatricians and anesthesiologists will be aware of the randomized intervention, because of safety concerns for the child, in the case of serious adverse events with or without immediate use of antagonists; the other staff members and the child's companion (s) will be "masked". The examination and intervention sessions will be filmed in high definition for later analysis of the behavior and pain according to different scales consecrated and / or validated. In addition, the children will be submitted to four saliva collections to analyze the levels of cortisol and melatonin (stress-related hormones). Other variables of secondary outcome are: perception of the accompanying adult, dentist and child about dental sedation and cost-effectiveness of this type of sedation, psychosocial variables, quality of life. The data will be analyzed by descriptive and bivariate statistics. This proposal will bring benefits in the vast field of health sedation by having original design, using drugs and promising routes, with national and international impact. The project is inserted in a research line that presents experience history and impact publications by the proponent team, as well as involving students of scientific initiation, master's, doctorate, and postdoctoral studies, being developed by a multidisciplinary team. There is a clear expectation of generating results with high impact production, besides the possibility of immediate application in the public and private sectors of a highly effective sedative regime, minimizing the need to refer patients to general anesthesia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DexKet | Experimental | Drug: Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride, Drug: Ketamine HydrochlorideIntranasal DEXMEDETOMIDINE (2.0 mcg/kg, maximum 100 mcg) + KETAMINE (1.0 mg/kg, maximum 100 mg) |
| Dex | Active comparator | Drug: Dexmedetomidine HydrochlorideDEXMEDETOMIDINE (2.5 mcg/kg, maximum 100 mcg) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 83 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children born to term, whose physical condition is categorized as American Society of Anesthesiologists I (healthy) or II (mild and controlled systemic disease - persistent asthma, for example)
- Children with a low risk of airway obstruction (Mallampati less than 2 and / or tonsil hypertrophy occupying less than 50% of the oropharynx)
- Children without neurological or cognitive alterations and who do not use medications that may compromise cognitive functions
- Children with caries requiring dental restoration
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children with positive behavior in the consultation without sedation
- Children with facial deformity
- Children using corticosteroid
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine HydrochlorideDexmedetomidine hydrochloride (PrecedexTM), presented in ampoule containing 2 mL of 100 mcg / mL solution for injection | Drug | Dex, DexKet |
| Ketamine HydrochlorideDextrocetamine hydrochloride (KetaminTM), presented in a 10 mL vial containing 50 mg / mL solution for injection | Drug | DexKet |
Primary outcome
Children's behavior according to observational scale
Time frame: From the beginning to the end of the dental treatment, which should last around 30-40 minutes
Children's behavior during the dental treatment under sedation according to the observational scale 'Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale' (OSUBRS) as assessed by trained and calibrated observers in the video files of the procedure
16 secondary outcomes
Acceptance of intranasal administration according to observation
Time frame: From the beginning to the end of the intranasal sedative administration, which should less than one minute each
Memory of the procedure through questionnaire
Time frame: From the children's arrival at the dental clinic until discharge, and then on the day after, up to 36 hours
Salivary cortisol according to ELISA
Time frame: From the night before the procedure until the end of the dental procedure under sedation, up to 24 hours
Salivary melatonin according to ELISA
Time frame: From the night before the procedure until the end of the dental procedure under sedation, up to 24 hours
Pain according to the FLACC scale
Time frame: From the beginning to the end of the dental treatment, which should last around 30-40 minutes
Accompanying person perception through VAS
Time frame: Just after the end of the child's dental procedure, while in the recovery anesthetic room, an average of 60 minutes
Pediatric dentist perception through VAS
Time frame: Just after the end of the child's dental procedure, an average of 60 minutes
Child's perception through qualitative interview
Time frame: One week after the dental sedation procedure
Adverse events
Time frame: During the procedure and within the 24 hours after
Child's dental anxiety and sedation efficacy, according to the Venham's picture test
Time frame: Fifteen minutes before the administration of the sedative
Child's dental behavior in the reception and sedation efficacy, according to the Sharath Scale
Time frame: Fifteen minutes before the administration of the sedative
Parents' anxiety and sedation efficacy, according to the STAI
Time frame: On the day of the inclusion of the child in the RCT, an average of 30 minutes before the child's dental exam
Parents' dental anxiety and sedation efficacy, according to the Corah Scale
Time frame: On the day of the inclusion of the child in the RCT, an average of 30 minutes before the child's dental exam
Parents' overall stress and sedation efficacy, according to the Lipp Inventory
Time frame: On the day of the inclusion of the child in the RCT, an average of 30 minutes before the child's dental exam
Procedural dental sedation impact according to the B-ECOHIS
Time frame: Two weeks and three months after the completion of the dental treatment
Economic analysis
Time frame: After the completion of data collection for the primary outcome, an average of 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Caries of Infancy
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in Preventing Early Childhood Caries Among Mothers of Infants in Terengganu.
Healthy Women, Caries of Infancy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luciane Costa, PhD principal investigator
Universidade Federal de Goias
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride and Ketamine Hydrochloride in people with Caries of Infancy and Dental Anxiety, run by Universidade Federal de Goias at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Children's behavior according to observational scale (time frame: From the beginning to the end of the dental treatment, which should last around 30-40 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2020.