Breast Cancer FemaleNCT03290651
Probiotics and Breast Health
A study testing Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Breast cancer remains a major killer of women and despite major advances in care, the role of 'environmental factors' in the disease remain to be well understood. The investigators have shown that one such factor is the bacteria that inhabit the breast tissue. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Female
- What is being tested?
- Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 2 Jul 2019to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women at high risk of developing breast cancer who have never had breast cancer (≥ 25% lifetime risk and/or BRCA1 or BRCA2 positive) will be included in the high risk group, while female family members of cancer patients or friends of patients, as well as patients to the breast clinic who are seen for other reasons not related to cancer will be offered participation in the control group.
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criteria include: immunosuppression (ongoing high dose steroids, immunosuppressive condition such as HIV), personal history of breast cancer, patients declining needle aspiration biopsy or probiotic/placebo treatment, ongoing daily oral probiotic treatment at time of diagnosis. Patients on chronic or recent (within 2 weeks) antibiotic therapy will also be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Re-setting the Breast Microbiome to Lower Inflammation and Risk of Cancer.
Breast cancer remains a major killer of women and despite major advances in care, the role of 'environmental factors' in the disease remain to be well understood. The investigators have shown that one such factor is the bacteria that inhabit the breast tissue. These bacteria do not cause infections per se, but can produce low amounts of substances known to be able to induce cancer. The investigators have found that the bacteria in the breasts of women with cancer are very different from those found in the breast tissue of healthy women. The investigators would like to test their theory that taking probiotic lactobacilli by mouth can lead to these organisms reaching the breast tissue and help to displace the harmful bacteria and reduce inflammation which has close links to cancer.
Read the detailed description
Certain bacteria, particularly Gram negatives, are major causes of inflammation. In fact, the lipopolysaccharides from these bacteria are used in vast numbers of studies to induce inflammation and study disease. Many cancers are the result of inflammatory processes. Breast cancer is a major cause of illness and death in women and inflammatory processes are one of the foci of investigation; however, not yet from the stand point that bacteria in the breast may be the instigators of cancer development. The investigators were the first in the world to describe the breast microbiota and show that the bacterial profiles are more pathogenic in women with cancer than in tissues of healthy controls. This work has been validated by others. Although this does not prove a cause-and-effect link with breast cancer, such linkages have been shown in stomach and colon cancers. If researchers assume there is a link, then how can the inflammatory microbiota be re-set to one that is somehow beneficial and able to reduce inflammation and potential cancer induction?
The concept of probiotics emerged from the quest to reset the disrupted microbiota of the gut and upper respiratory tract. This investigational group has led the world in doing the same in the urogenital tract of women.
The researchers would like to test their theory that taking probiotic lactobacilli by mouth can lead to these organisms reaching the breast tissue and helping displace the harmful bacteria and reducing inflammation. A study in Spain has shown that oral intake of probiotic lactobacilli can not only cure mastitis, but lead to the lactobacilli reaching the milk glands. Women who breast feed for more than six months (and thereby pass along lactic acid bacteria to the infant from the breast milk) have a reduced risk of breast cancer.
The investigators hypothesize that the breast microbiome of women at risk of cancer has the same profile as women with cancer and that oral administration of probiotic lactobacilli can reset this to one found in healthy women. They also hypothesize the breast tissue of these at-risk patients is contaminated by environmental toxins.
The project plan is to test the concept of re-setting the breast tissue microbiota in women at risk of cancer, to one more aligned with health.
Samples will be tested for relative bacterial abundance to determine any shift in bacterial breast tissue composition by next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics. Samples will also be tested for inflammatory markers using Luminex technology, and for mercury, arsenic and pesticides using LC-MS as described in previous studies.
Twenty women at high-risk for breast cancer (See Inclusion Criteria) will be randomized (10 each) to receive either probiotic or placebo, once a day for 90 days. This capsule is approved in Canada and widely available and contains 2.5 billion CFU viable bacterial cells of each of the following strains: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. Both active capsules and placebo will be provided by the manufacturer Chr Hansen (Denmark). Samples will be collected at t=0 (enrollment), t=1 (end of 90 days) and t=2(30 days post-treatment).
Twenty women will act as healthy controls (See Inclusion Criteria) and will be randomized (10 each) as described above for the high-risk group.
At each time point, samples collected will include:
- Breast skin swab - a cotton tipped swab with be moistened with sterile water and the passed over the skin on the breast 10 times.
- Needle aspirate - a 22-gauge needle into the breast tissue with repeated passage under suction until aspirate material is identified in the needle hub. This material would then be placed in normal saline.
- Nipple aspirate - the participant will be asked to massage their breast from chest wall to nipple for several minutes as needed. Using a hand-held modified breast pump placed over the nipple, nipple aspirate fluid will be drawn out and into a capillary tube.
- Blood draw - one 6mL EDTA plasma tube using standard phlebotomy procedures. Samples will be analyzed for relative bacterial abundance (next-generation sequencing), inflammatory markers (Luminex technology).
- Urine - 100mL sample that will be tested for heavy metals and pesticides using LC-MS.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Being tested
- Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-BDietary supplement
Participants will take the probiotic or placebo daily for 90 days.
PlaceboDietary supplement
Participants will take the probiotic or placebo daily for 90 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B | Experimental | One capsule contains 2.5 billion CFU of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo. It is the same composition as the active capsule, without the bacteria. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in breast microbiota
The diversity of the breast microbiota analysed using next-generation sequencing.
Measured: 90 days post collection period
Secondary outcomes (3)
Testing of inflammatory markers and pollutants
Blood samples will be testing by luminex for inflammatory cytokine/chemokine markers.
Measured: 90 days post collection period
Testing for environmental pollutants - heavy metals.
Urine and blood will be tested for heavy metals using LC-MS.
Measured: 90 days post collection period
Testing for environmental pollutants - pesticides.
Urine and blood will be tested for pesticides using LC-MS.
Measured: 90 days post collection period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2017
- Study start2 Jul 2019
- Primary completion31 Jul 2021
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Double blind randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muriel Brackstone, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Gregor Reid, Ph.D., Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sMuriel Brackstone, M.D., Principal investigator, St. Joseph's Health Care London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03290651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 110181
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Arroyo R, Martin V, Maldonado A, Jimenez E, Fernandez L, Rodriguez JM. Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation: antibiotics versus oral administration of Lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 15;50(12):1551-8. doi: 10.1086/652763.
PubMed 20455694Urbaniak C, Cummins J, Brackstone M, Macklaim JM, Gloor GB, Baban CK, Scott L, O'Hanlon DM, Burton JP, Francis KP, Tangney M, Reid G. Microbiota of human breast tissue. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3007-14. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00242-14. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
PubMed 24610844Urbaniak C, Gloor GB, Brackstone M, Scott L, Tangney M, Reid G. The Microbiota of Breast Tissue and Its Association with Breast Cancer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jul 29;82(16):5039-48. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01235-16. Print 2016 Aug 15.
PubMed 27342554Hieken TJ, Chen J, Hoskin TL, Walther-Antonio M, Johnson S, Ramaker S, Xiao J, Radisky DC, Knutson KL, Kalari KR, Yao JZ, Baddour LM, Chia N, Degnim AC. The Microbiome of Aseptically Collected Human Breast Tissue in Benign and Malignant Disease. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 3;6:30751. doi: 10.1038/srep30751.
PubMed 27485780Chan AA, Bashir M, Rivas MN, Duvall K, Sieling PA, Pieber TR, Vaishampayan PA, Love SM, Lee DJ. Characterization of the microbiome of nipple aspirate fluid of breast cancer survivors. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 21;6:28061. doi: 10.1038/srep28061.
PubMed 27324944Zackular JP, Baxter NT, Iverson KD, Sadler WD, Petrosino JF, Chen GY, Schloss PD. The gut microbiome modulates colon tumorigenesis. mBio. 2013 Nov 5;4(6):e00692-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00692-13.
PubMed 24194538Mira-Pascual L, Cabrera-Rubio R, Ocon S, Costales P, Parra A, Suarez A, Moris F, Rodrigo L, Mira A, Collado MC. Microbial mucosal colonic shifts associated with the development of colorectal cancer reveal the presence of different bacterial and archaeal biomarkers. J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;50(2):167-79. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0963-x. Epub 2014 May 9.
PubMed 24811328Sitas F. Twenty five years since the first prospective study by Forman et al. (1991) on Helicobacter pylori and stomach cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;41:159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
PubMed 26922171Macklaim JM, Clemente JC, Knight R, Gloor GB, Reid G. Changes in vaginal microbiota following antimicrobial and probiotic therapy. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 Aug 14;26:27799. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.27799. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26282697Bisanz JE, Enos MK, Mwanga JR, Changalucha J, Burton JP, Gloor GB, Reid G. Randomized open-label pilot study of the influence of probiotics and the gut microbiome on toxic metal levels in Tanzanian pregnant women and school children. mBio. 2014 Oct 7;5(5):e01580-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01580-14.
PubMed 25293764Bisanz JE, Seney S, McMillan A, Vongsa R, Koenig D, Wong L, Dvoracek B, Gloor GB, Sumarah M, Ford B, Herman D, Burton JP, Reid G. A systems biology approach investigating the effect of probiotics on the vaginal microbiome and host responses in a double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of post-menopausal women. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e104511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104511. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25127240
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Re-setting the Breast Microbiome to Lower Inflammation and Risk of Cancer.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03290651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 110181
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Breast cancer remains a major killer of women and despite major advances in care, the role of 'environmental factors' in the disease remain to be well understood. The investigators have shown that one such factor is the bacteria that inhabit the breast tissue. These bacteria do not cause infections per se, but can produce low amounts of substances known to be able to induce cancer. The investigators have found that the bacteria in the breasts of women with cancer are very different from those found in the breast tissue of healthy women. The investigators would like to test their theory that taking probiotic lactobacilli by mouth can lead to these organisms reaching the breast tissue and help to displace the harmful bacteria and reduce inflammation which has close links to cancer.
Detailed description
Certain bacteria, particularly Gram negatives, are major causes of inflammation. In fact, the lipopolysaccharides from these bacteria are used in vast numbers of studies to induce inflammation and study disease. Many cancers are the result of inflammatory processes. Breast cancer is a major cause of illness and death in women and inflammatory processes are one of the foci of investigation; however, not yet from the stand point that bacteria in the breast may be the instigators of cancer development. The investigators were the first in the world to describe the breast microbiota and show that the bacterial profiles are more pathogenic in women with cancer than in tissues of healthy controls. This work has been validated by others. Although this does not prove a cause-and-effect link with breast cancer, such linkages have been shown in stomach and colon cancers. If researchers assume there is a link, then how can the inflammatory microbiota be re-set to one that is somehow beneficial and able to reduce inflammation and potential cancer induction?
The concept of probiotics emerged from the quest to reset the disrupted microbiota of the gut and upper respiratory tract. This investigational group has led the world in doing the same in the urogenital tract of women.
The researchers would like to test their theory that taking probiotic lactobacilli by mouth can lead to these organisms reaching the breast tissue and helping displace the harmful bacteria and reducing inflammation. A study in Spain has shown that oral intake of probiotic lactobacilli can not only cure mastitis, but lead to the lactobacilli reaching the milk glands. Women who breast feed for more than six months (and thereby pass along lactic acid bacteria to the infant from the breast milk) have a reduced risk of breast cancer.
The investigators hypothesize that the breast microbiome of women at risk of cancer has the same profile as women with cancer and that oral administration of probiotic lactobacilli can reset this to one found in healthy women. They also hypothesize the breast tissue of these at-risk patients is contaminated by environmental toxins.
The project plan is to test the concept of re-setting the breast tissue microbiota in women at risk of cancer, to one more aligned with health.
Samples will be tested for relative bacterial abundance to determine any shift in bacterial breast tissue composition by next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics. Samples will also be tested for inflammatory markers using Luminex technology, and for mercury, arsenic and pesticides using LC-MS as described in previous studies.
Twenty women at high-risk for breast cancer (See Inclusion Criteria) will be randomized (10 each) to receive either probiotic or placebo, once a day for 90 days. This capsule is approved in Canada and widely available and contains 2.5 billion CFU viable bacterial cells of each of the following strains: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. Both active capsules and placebo will be provided by the manufacturer Chr Hansen (Denmark). Samples will be collected at t=0 (enrollment), t=1 (end of 90 days) and t=2(30 days post-treatment).
Twenty women will act as healthy controls (See Inclusion Criteria) and will be randomized (10 each) as described above for the high-risk group.
At each time point, samples collected will include:
- Breast skin swab - a cotton tipped swab with be moistened with sterile water and the passed over the skin on the breast 10 times.
- Needle aspirate - a 22-gauge needle into the breast tissue with repeated passage under suction until aspirate material is identified in the needle hub. This material would then be placed in normal saline.
- Nipple aspirate - the participant will be asked to massage their breast from chest wall to nipple for several minutes as needed. Using a hand-held modified breast pump placed over the nipple, nipple aspirate fluid will be drawn out and into a capillary tube.
- Blood draw - one 6mL EDTA plasma tube using standard phlebotomy procedures. Samples will be analyzed for relative bacterial abundance (next-generation sequencing), inflammatory markers (Luminex technology).
- Urine - 100mL sample that will be tested for heavy metals and pesticides using LC-MS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Double blind randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-BOne capsule contains 2.5 billion CFU of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: PlaceboPlacebo. It is the same composition as the active capsule, without the bacteria. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women at high risk of developing breast cancer who have never had breast cancer (≥ 25% lifetime risk and/or BRCA1 or BRCA2 positive) will be included in the high risk group, while female family members of cancer patients or friends of patients, as well as patients to the breast clinic who are seen for other reasons not related to cancer will be offered participation in the control group.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Exclusion criteria include: immunosuppression (ongoing high dose steroids, immunosuppressive condition such as HIV), personal history of breast cancer, patients declining needle aspiration biopsy or probiotic/placebo treatment, ongoing daily oral probiotic treatment at time of diagnosis. Patients on chronic or recent (within 2 weeks) antibiotic therapy will also be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-BParticipants will take the probiotic or placebo daily for 90 days. | Dietary supplement | Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B |
| PlaceboParticipants will take the probiotic or placebo daily for 90 days. | Dietary supplement | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in breast microbiota
Time frame: 90 days post collection period
The diversity of the breast microbiota analysed using next-generation sequencing.
3 secondary outcomes
Testing of inflammatory markers and pollutants
Time frame: 90 days post collection period
Testing for environmental pollutants - heavy metals.
Time frame: 90 days post collection period
Testing for environmental pollutants - pesticides.
Time frame: 90 days post collection period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 20455694Arroyo R, Martin V, Maldonado A, Jimenez E, Fernandez L, Rodriguez JM. Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation: antibiotics versus oral administration of Lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 15;50(12):1551-8. doi: 10.1086/652763.
- Background: PubMed 24610844Urbaniak C, Cummins J, Brackstone M, Macklaim JM, Gloor GB, Baban CK, Scott L, O'Hanlon DM, Burton JP, Francis KP, Tangney M, Reid G. Microbiota of human breast tissue. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3007-14. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00242-14. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 27342554Urbaniak C, Gloor GB, Brackstone M, Scott L, Tangney M, Reid G. The Microbiota of Breast Tissue and Its Association with Breast Cancer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jul 29;82(16):5039-48. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01235-16. Print 2016 Aug 15.
- Background: PubMed 27485780Hieken TJ, Chen J, Hoskin TL, Walther-Antonio M, Johnson S, Ramaker S, Xiao J, Radisky DC, Knutson KL, Kalari KR, Yao JZ, Baddour LM, Chia N, Degnim AC. The Microbiome of Aseptically Collected Human Breast Tissue in Benign and Malignant Disease. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 3;6:30751. doi: 10.1038/srep30751.
- Background: PubMed 27324944Chan AA, Bashir M, Rivas MN, Duvall K, Sieling PA, Pieber TR, Vaishampayan PA, Love SM, Lee DJ. Characterization of the microbiome of nipple aspirate fluid of breast cancer survivors. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 21;6:28061. doi: 10.1038/srep28061.
- Background: PubMed 24194538Zackular JP, Baxter NT, Iverson KD, Sadler WD, Petrosino JF, Chen GY, Schloss PD. The gut microbiome modulates colon tumorigenesis. mBio. 2013 Nov 5;4(6):e00692-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00692-13.
- Background: PubMed 24811328Mira-Pascual L, Cabrera-Rubio R, Ocon S, Costales P, Parra A, Suarez A, Moris F, Rodrigo L, Mira A, Collado MC. Microbial mucosal colonic shifts associated with the development of colorectal cancer reveal the presence of different bacterial and archaeal biomarkers. J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;50(2):167-79. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0963-x. Epub 2014 May 9.
- Background: PubMed 26922171Sitas F. Twenty five years since the first prospective study by Forman et al. (1991) on Helicobacter pylori and stomach cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;41:159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
- Background: PubMed 26282697Macklaim JM, Clemente JC, Knight R, Gloor GB, Reid G. Changes in vaginal microbiota following antimicrobial and probiotic therapy. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 Aug 14;26:27799. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.27799. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 25293764Bisanz JE, Enos MK, Mwanga JR, Changalucha J, Burton JP, Gloor GB, Reid G. Randomized open-label pilot study of the influence of probiotics and the gut microbiome on toxic metal levels in Tanzanian pregnant women and school children. mBio. 2014 Oct 7;5(5):e01580-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01580-14.
- Background: PubMed 25127240Bisanz JE, Seney S, McMillan A, Vongsa R, Koenig D, Wong L, Dvoracek B, Gloor GB, Sumarah M, Ford B, Herman D, Burton JP, Reid G. A systems biology approach investigating the effect of probiotics on the vaginal microbiome and host responses in a double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of post-menopausal women. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e104511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104511. eCollection 2014.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer Female
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Advanced Solid Tumors, The ComboMATCH Screening Trial
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Recruiting
Mainstreaming Genetics: Evaluation of a Digital Application to Scale and Spread Oncologist-initiated Genetic Testing
Cancer, Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Treatment Experience of Patients With Breast, Lung, Ovarian, Multiple Myeloma, or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Using Remote Symptom Monitoring
Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Administration of Autologous T-Cells Genetically Engineered to Express T-Cell Receptors Reactive Against Neoantigens in People With Metastatic Cancer
Endocrine Tumors, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregor Reid, Ph.D. principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Muriel Brackstone, M.D. principal investigator
St. Joseph's Health Care London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in breast microbiota (time frame: 90 days post collection period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03290651, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2022.