AzTrials
AzTrials

Infertility, FemaleNCT03291821

DuoStim in Cases of PGT: Comparison of Embryo Quantity and Embryonic Quality Using MitoScore

A study testing human menopausal gonadotropin, GnRH antagonist and GnRH analog in people with Infertility, Female, run by IVI Madrid at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is being more frequently requested from patients as women pursue infertility treatments at an advanced age with a poorer prognosis, sometimes physicians are compelled to perform several stimulation cycles to obtain more eggs and, consequently, a greater number of biopsied… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 42 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility, Female
What is being tested?
human menopausal gonadotropin, GnRH antagonist and GnRH analog
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Dec 2017to 1 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 42 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent;
  • 35-42 years of age;
  • Patients from the IVI Madrid undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle including PGT analysis for infertility treatment;
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m2;
  • Suspicion of suboptimal or poor response:
  • AMH < 1.5 ng/mL; AFC < 8; FSH > 10; Poor response in a previous cycle (defined as < 6 oocytes).

Who cannot join

  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial or in any other study that could result in a confounding factor.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • IVI Madrid

    Madrid, 28035

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Double Ovarian Stimulation in Cases of Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Comparison of Embryo Quantity and Embryonic Quality Using MitoScore

Since preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is being more frequently requested from patients as women pursue infertility treatments at an advanced age with a poorer prognosis, sometimes physicians are compelled to perform several stimulation cycles to obtain more eggs and, consequently, a greater number of biopsied embryos. Hence, the idea of carrying out this study arises as an attempt to optimize each menstrual cycle to the maximum.

It is believed that the double stimulation (DuoStim) protocol could be an alternative for this group of patients, allowing to obtain a larger number of oocytes in a shorter period, thus, increasing the number of biopsied embryos and possibly decreasing the interval to achieve a successful pregnancy.

Read more

The investigators aim to evaluate the potential usefulness of the DuoStim protocol for patients desiring to obtain oocytes as soon as possible. Using PGT, the investigators will compare the rate of euploid embryos per cycle in patients undergoing DuoStim protocol versus patients undergoing two conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in consecutive cycles. Patients will include women with advanced age and poor response.

This is a unicentric, prospective, randomized, non-blind, parallel-group controlled phase IV clinical study. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of euploid embryos per cycle is similar in the DuoStim group compared to the group undergoing two conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in consecutive cycles.

Furthermore the investigators will evaluate if there are differences regarding the number of total oocytes obtained, the number of mature oocytes, the number of biopsied blastocysts and the MitoScore index of the available euploid embryos.

Read the detailed description

Classically, the follicular development was thought to occur only during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. However, new data demonstrated several waves of cyclic development of the antral follicles within the same menstrual cycle. Some authors insist that follicles formed during the luteal phase may have a similar ovulation potential of those formed in the follicular phase, thus offering new possibilities for ovarian stimulation.

Due to the use of vitrification technique and the appearance of the gonadotropins, physicians have been allowed to innovate the protocols applied to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and have been able to obtain more oocytes in a shorter period for patients requiring rapid intervention, such as oncologic patients. Because of the accumulated experience with these new approaches, some investigators have recently proposed a double stimulation (DuoStim) protocol. Evidence of the competence of oocytes obtained from the luteal phase have been recently defined and published. Also, it has not been related with an increased risk for congenital anomalies.

The DuoStim is a protocol consisting of two stimulations within the same menstrual cycle, one in the follicular phase starting in day 2 of the cycle and the other in the luteal phase starting 5 days after the first ovarian puncture. Trigger is always performed with GnRH agonist.

Additionally, patients demanding infertility treatments are increasingly older and the use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) allows for a finer embryo selection along with better reproductive outcomes. Currently, most of PGTs are carried out at the blastocysts stage, which improve the prognosis but, on the contrary, also oblige to frozen those embryos and perform a deferred transfer, lengthening the procedure.

Another innovative tool for a more accurate embryo selection which has been recently described is the MitoScore. The MitoScore is a mitochondrial biomarker index developed by Igenomix aiming to indicate the energetic status of the embryo. It intends to select those embryos with best implantation potential and, therefore, more likely to result in an ongoing pregnancy after an IVF treatment. It is calculated dividing the number of mitochondrial DNA copies by the amount of nuclear DNA. Although still controversial, it has been proved by some authors to increase success rates of implantation and ongoing pregnancies in IVF cycles and to diminish the number of multiple gestations.

Since PGT is being more frequently requested from patients as women pursue infertility treatments at an advanced age with a poorer prognosis, sometimes physicians are compelled to perform several stimulation cycles to obtain more eggs and, consequently, a greater number of biopsied embryos. Hence, the idea of carrying out this study arises as an attempt to optimize each menstrual cycle to the maximum.

It is believed that the DuoStim protocol could be an alternative for this group of patients, allowing to obtain a larger number of oocytes in a shorter period, thus, increasing the number of biopsied embryos and possibly decreasing the interval to achieve a successful pregnancy.

The investigators aim to evaluate the potential usefulness of the DuoStim protocol for patients desiring to obtain oocytes as soon as possible. Also, using PGT, the investigators will compare the rate of euploid embryos per cycle in patients undergoing DuoStim protocol versus patients undergoing two conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in consecutive cycles. Patients will include women with advanced age and poor response.

This is a unicentric, prospective, randomized, non-blind, parallel-group controlled phase IV clinical study. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of euploid embryos per cycle is similar in the DuoStim group compared to the group undergoing two conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in consecutive cycles.

Furthermore the investigators will evaluate if there are differences regarding the number of total oocytes obtained, the number of mature oocytes, the number of biopsied blastocysts and the MitoScore index of the available euploid embryos. These variables will be assessed and compared depending on whether the oocytes were obtained in the follicular phase or the luteal phase for the DuoStim group. Resulting data will be compared with those obtained from the conventional stimulation group. The period elapsed from the beginning of the ovarian stimulation until the embryo transfer will also be addressed.

Patients will call the clinic at the Cycle Programing Department to arrange a treatment. After a short period taking contraceptive pills, patients will be referred to a medical appointment. At the time of the first consultation the attending physician will randomize patients desiring to participate and meeting inclusion criteria, using a random allocation software commissioned by the department of informatics. There will be no blinding since this study is an open trial.

Participants have the right to withdraw from the study at any time and for any reason without any inconvenience for their future medical care. Withdrawal means that the subject does not want to receive any further treatment nor does the patient wish to continue participating in the study. Reasons for withdrawal from the study: patient desire, lack of collaboration, toxicity or adverse event affecting patient's safety, decision of the principal investigator whenever the interruption is in favor of the patient's interests, death, and violation or breach of the study protocol.

The trial will be terminated when all participants have completed an adequate follow-up period. It might also be interrupted before completion date due to security reasons, failure to meet expected recruitment deadlines or even if there are any risks concerning patient's safety or health. All participants discontinued from the trial will remain in the follow-up phase, except for those who withdraw their informed consent or die.

Entries made in the Clinical Research Data Capture Profile (CRD) must be in accordance with those contained in the source documents. Data will be exported from the institutional repository software platform which withholds patient´s medical records. Integrity and accuracy will be checked by at least one investigator assuring that both extracted information and all the required regulatory documents are appropriate. Study files and all source documents will be stored for the time needed.

Considering an euploid embryo rate per cycle of 20% for conventional stimulation and a difference between means of 10% (Conventional X DuoStim group), a sample size of 136 patients (68 per arm) was estimated to obtain a power of 80% with an alfa error of 5%. A loss rate of 5% was also considered to calculate the sample size.

Categorical variables will be assessed by the number of subjects as well as absolute and relative frequencies. Continuous variables will be assessed by the means, medians, standard deviations, 25th and 75th percentiles, minimum and maximum. For both categorical and continuous variables, a confidence interval of 95% will be considered. The exploratory analysis of data will allow to determine quality of the data and to detect any abnormality.

The means and proportions of the descriptive variables will be compared to verify if the randomization was correctly performed. Whenever the variables are normally distributed, it will be applied a parametric test such as chi-square test for categorical variables and a T-student test or ANOVA for continuous variables. If the distribution is not normal a non-parametric test such as a Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon test will be applied according to the characteristics of the variable.

If the investigators find statically significant differences for descriptive variables between the two groups, those variables will be included in a regression model to control their interference.

Additionally, linear or logistic regression models will be defined, depending on whether the outcome variable is quantitative or categorical, respectively. It will allow to adjust possible confounding factors that may potentially influence the results.

Being tested
human menopausal gonadotropin, GnRH antagonist, GnRH analog, Trophectoderm biopsy, MitoScore
Keywords
DuoStim, MitoScore, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, MII oocyte
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Female

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • human menopausal gonadotropinDrug

    Also called menopur, meriofert

    human menopausal gonadotropin subcutaneously

  • GnRH antagonistDrug

    Also called orgalutran, cetrotide

    GnRH antagonist subcutaneously

  • GnRH analogDrug

    Also called decapeptyl

    GnRH analog subcutaneously

  • Trophectoderm biopsyProcedure or surgery

    Also called embryo biopsy, blastocyst biopsy

    Trophectoderm biopsy is the process of removing few cells from an in vitro fertilization embryo.

  • MitoScoreDiagnostic test

    The cells removed from an in vitro fertilization embryo during the trophectoderm biopsy will be used to assess the mitochondrial DNA content as a viability indicator in the euploid embryos.

  • Intracytoplasmic sperm injectionProcedure or surgery

    Also called ICSI

    ICSI is an in vitro fertilization procedure in which a single sperm is injected directly into an oocyte.

  • Ovarian punctureProcedure or surgery

    Also called pick up, egg retrieval

    Egg retrieval is a simple procedure. It is performed in an operating room for safety reasons. It is performed vaginally and involves aspirating the follicular fluid through a thin needle. Embryologists then retrieve from this fluid the eggs that have matured during stimulation. It lasts for 5 to 15 minutes, and a mild sedative is administered to prevent any kind of pain during the procedure.

  • Preimplantation genetic testDiagnostic test

    The cells removed from an in vitro fertilization embryo during the trophectoderm biopsy will be tested for chromosomal normalcy before transferring the embryo to the uterus.

  • Embryo transferProcedure or surgery

    Embryo transfer refers to a step in the process of assisted reproduction in which embryos are placed into the uterus

  • Pregnancy testDiagnostic test

    A pregnancy test is used to determine whether a woman is pregnant.

  • Embryo freezingProcedure or surgery

    Also called embryo cryopreservation, embryo vitrification

    Embryo freezing is a method for cryopreserving embryos.

  • Embryo thawingProcedure or surgery

    Embryo thawing is the procedure to recover previously frozen embryos prior to an embryo transfer.

Study groups in NCT03291821
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DuoStimExperimentalTwo controlled ovarian stimulation within the same menstrual cycle using human menopausal gonadotropin 225 IU/day subcutaneously, GnRH antagonist in a dose of 0.25 mg/day subcutaneously and 0.2 mg of GnRH analog to induce oocyte maturation. It will be followed by ovarian puncture, oocyte isolation, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and trophectoderm biopsy at the blastocyst stage. Preimplantation genetic test and MitoScore will be performed in all the embryos prior to the embryo transfer. At this step embryos will be frozen to wait for the results. Chromossomally normal embryos will be thawed and transferred to the uterus in a deferred cycle. A pregnancy test will be performed when appropriate.
Receives: Drug: human menopausal gonadotropin; Drug: GnRH antagonist; Drug: GnRH analog; Procedure: Trophectoderm biopsy; Diagnostic Test: MitoScore; Procedure: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Procedure: Ovarian puncture; Diagnostic Test: Preimplantation genetic test; Procedure: Embryo transfer; Diagnostic Test: Pregnancy test; Procedure: Embryo freezing; Procedure: Embryo thawing
Conventional StimulationActive comparatorTwo controlled ovarian stimulation in different menstrual cycles using human menopausal gonadotropin 225 IU/day subcutaneously, GnRH antagonist in a dose of 0.25 mg/day subcutaneously and 0.2 mg of GnRH analog to induce oocyte maturation. It will be followed by ovarian puncture, oocyte isolation, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and trophectoderm biopsy at the blastocyst stage. Preimplantation genetic test and MitoScore will be performed in all the embryos prior to the embryo transfer. At this step embryos will be frozen to wait for the results. Chromossomally normal embryos will be thawed and transferred to the uterus in a deferred cycle. A pregnancy test will be performed when appropriate.
Receives: Drug: human menopausal gonadotropin; Drug: GnRH antagonist; Drug: GnRH analog; Procedure: Trophectoderm biopsy; Diagnostic Test: MitoScore; Procedure: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Procedure: Ovarian puncture; Diagnostic Test: Preimplantation genetic test; Procedure: Embryo transfer; Diagnostic Test: Pregnancy test; Procedure: Embryo freezing; Procedure: Embryo thawing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of euploid embryos per cycle

    Rate of chromosomally normal embryos per cycle in the DuoStim group compared to the group undergoing two controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in consecutives cycles.

    Measured: up to 9 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Number of oocytes obtained

    Total number of oocytes obtained in both arms after ovarian puncture

    Measured: up to 9 months

  2. Number of fertilized oocytes

    Number of fertilized oocytes in both arms after FIV/ICSI procedure

    Measured: up to 9 months

  3. Number of biopsied blastocysts

    Number of biopsied blastocysts in both arms

    Measured: up to 9 months

  4. MitoScore index of the euploid embryos

    Analysis of the MitoScore index of the euploid embryos obtained in both arms

    Measured: up to 9 months

  5. Implantation rate

    Implantation rate of euploid embryos in both arms after single or double embryo transfer

    Measured: up to 9 months

  6. Pregnancy rate

    Pregnancy rate of euploid embryos in both arms after single or double embryo transfer

    Measured: up to 9 months

  7. Abortion rate

    Abortion rate presented by each arm after single or double embryo transfer

    Measured: up to 9 months

  8. Time until embryo transfer

    Period elapsed from the beginning of the ovarian stimulation until the embryo transfer

    Measured: up to 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2017
  2. Study start1 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Unicentric, prospective, randomized, non-blind, parallel-group controlled phase IV clinical study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03291821
Sponsor's protocol ID
1702-MAD-014-MC
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
18 Sep 2017
Last updated
29 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00544-2.

    PubMed 12849812
  • Cakmak H, Katz A, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Effective method for emergency fertility preservation: random-start controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1992. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

    PubMed 23987516
  • Cakmak H, Rosen MP. Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;27(3):215-21. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000180.

    PubMed 25919235
  • Sonmezer M, Turkcuoglu I, Coskun U, Oktay K. Random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for emergency fertility preservation in letrozole cycles. Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):2125.e9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.030. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

    PubMed 21292255
  • von Wolff M, Thaler CJ, Frambach T, Zeeb C, Lawrenz B, Popovici RM, Strowitzki T. Ovarian stimulation to cryopreserve fertilized oocytes in cancer patients can be started in the luteal phase. Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1360-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Oct 18.

    PubMed 18930226
  • Bedoschi GM, de Albuquerque FO, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA. Ovarian stimulation during the luteal phase for fertility preservation of cancer patients: case reports and review of the literature. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010 Aug;27(8):491-4. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9429-0. Epub 2010 May 9.

    PubMed 20455017
  • Kuang Y, Chen Q, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Shoham Z. Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol). Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

    PubMed 25444501
  • Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Colamaria S, Alviggi C, Trabucco E, Venturella R, Vajta G, Rienzi L. Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1488-1495.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

    PubMed 27020168
  • Bentov Y, Esfandiari N, Gokturk A, Burstein E, Fainaru O, Casper RF. An ongoing pregnancy from two waves of follicles developing during a long follicular phase of the same cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):350.e8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.033.

    PubMed 20138269
  • Kuang Y, Hong Q, Chen Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Shoham Z. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is feasible for producing competent oocytes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, with optimal pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

    PubMed 24161646
  • Chen H, Wang Y, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Tian H, Cai R, Hong Q, Chen Q, Shoham Z, Kuang Y. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1194-1201.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

    PubMed 25813280
  • Diez-Juan A, Rubio C, Marin C, Martinez S, Al-Asmar N, Riboldi M, Diaz-Gimeno P, Valbuena D, Simon C. Mitochondrial DNA content as a viability score in human euploid embryos: less is better. Fertil Steril. 2015 Sep;104(3):534-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

    PubMed 26051102

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing human menopausal gonadotropin, GnRH antagonist and GnRH analog in people with Infertility, Female, run by IVI Madrid at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of euploid embryos per cycle (time frame: up to 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03291821, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03291821 | AzTrials