Facial FractureNCT03292679
Craniofacial Applications of 3D Printing
An observational study of Facial Fracture, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
3D printing is a technology that allows for physical creation of a 3D model (usually made of plastic) based on computer generated 3D images from CT scans. The 3D images of craniofacial skeleton using computer software are routinely generated and, in turn, these 3D images can be used to create a plastic 3D model using… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Facial Fracture
- What is being tested?
- 3D template
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2019to Sep 2020
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients presenting to Shock Trauma Plastic Surgery Division for treatment of facial fractures
Who may be able to join
- Patients with face CT scans
- Patients with facial fractures
- Patient age 12 years or older
Who cannot join
- Patients without CT scan
- Patients with facial fractures that do not require rigid fixation using hardware
- Patients with facial fractures that do not have normal contralateral bony structures
- Patient age less than 12 years
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
3D printing is a technology that allows for physical creation of a 3D model (usually made of plastic) based on computer generated 3D images from CT scans. The 3D images of craniofacial skeleton using computer software are routinely generated and, in turn, these 3D images can be used to create a plastic 3D model using a 3D printer.
Unstable or comminuted facial fractures need to be reduced and rigidly fixated using titanium plates and screws. Bending and shaping of the plates is usually performed by free-hand based on the surgeon's estimation of what best fits the fracture.
Read more
Often, bending the titanium plates to the shape of pre-injury skeletal contour is difficult when the bone is fractured into many pieces or is unstable, or when the patient is edentulous (missing several teeth). The process can increase the time spent in surgery and the bent plates may not snugly fit the fracture. For these difficult cases, one option is to use commercially manufactured 3D printed patient-specific models. The patient-specific models provide the benefit of correct shape / form for increased surgical accuracy, and decreased intra-operative time. However these commercial models are manufactured at distant facilities and usually require more than 7 days before delivery. As such, they delay time to surgery and cannot be used for urgent surgery. Additionally, the commercially manufactured implants are expensive, significantly increasing the cost of treatment.
The purpose of this study is to explore whether custom plastic models 3D printed at Shock Trauma Center and used for bending and shaping plates for facial fracture repair can improve results of facial fracture reconstruction.
Our plastic surgery division will design and produce facial bone 3D model of patients (with facial fractures) using an in-house 3D printer, then use the 3D model to contour the hardware pre-op or intra-op at the time of fracture repair. We believe that we can achieve better repair, shorter surgery time, and save hardware cost.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to:
- produce 3D printed craniofacial models of patients with facial fracture, then use the 3D models
- contour (or pre-bend) the appropriate hardware pre-op that is specific for the patient.
Fracture repair in the operating room entails exposure and reduction of the fracture, followed by contouring the hardware to the correct shape to maintain the fracture reduction. However, in unstable or comminuted fractures or in patients missing several teeth, contouring the plate to the correct shape can be time consuming and, sometimes, the plate shape can be inaccurate. Our hypothesis is that using our own 3D model printed on-site to "pre-bend" plates will save intra-operative time and cost, and achieve superior clinical outcome.
Patients will be enrolled to participate if they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria, and provide informed consent.
Additionally, for study subjects, protected health information such as name, date of birth, medical record number, and demographic information (age, sex, ethnic group), Billing and payment information with medical justification, clinical information related to the procedure and follow-up visits will be handled by research personnel for research purposes.
Otherwise, management of the study subjects will be essentially the same as for patients that are not enrolled in the study. This includes CT scans obtained postoperatively to confirm adequate fracture repair, routine clinic follow-up visits (during post-op week 1, week 4, 3 months, 6 months, and/or 1 year after surgery) and additional follow-up visits as may be deemed necessary based on clinical status.
Prior experience of utilizing on-site 3D printing technology in facial reconstruction surgery is limited. If a patient-specific plate is needed, then the plates must be made by commercial manufacturers which usually takes days to produce, and is therefore not suited to treatment of facial trauma.
Trauma plastic surgery division owns and operates a 3D printer. We have experience with CT image processing and have made 3D models of patients facial skeleton (i.e. midface, mandible) that were used as templates for repairing facial fractures.
Patients with complex facial injuries or defects require reconstruction using hardware to restore facial contour and functional stability. In many complex facial reconstructions, surgeons consult commercial companies for expertise in computer aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants. The advantages of undergoing this process include (1) in-depth anatomic analysis, (2) improved design of hardware leading to better surgical outcome, and (3) shortened OR time. The disadvantages include length of time required for the production of patient-specific implant (usually 3 to 7 days), and high cost: for example, a mandible 3D model and associated patient-specific reconstruction plate is >$3000.
Three-dimensional printing is an actively evolving technology, especially in surgery. Design modifications and improvement in extrusion technology have made 3D printing made this process much more affordable and relatively easy. It is now possible for individuals (and surgeons!) to generate these 3D models.
Repair of mandible fractures is especially challenging when the patient is edentulous (missing several or all teeth) for several reasons including the smaller bulk of the edentulous mandible, requiring larger reconstructive plates spanning a bigger section of the jaw. Surgery generally takes longer for these patients when compared with non-edentulous patients. A substantial portion of the lengthiness is due to time spent bending the plate.
The rationale for this IRB proposal is to explore the efficacy of 3D models of the patient's fracture that are printed in house as aids for facial fracture reconstruction. We hypothesize that reconstruction with the aid of the models will require shorter OR time, improve bony fixation, without significant increase in overall cost of treatment.
- Conditions
- Facial Fracture
- Being tested
- 3D template
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3D templateProcedure or surgery
A 3D-printed model of relevant portions of the patient's facial skeleton, based on patient's CT scan will be created. This model will be used to bend titanium reconstruction plates that are used to stabilize the facial fracture for subjects in the treatment group.
Bending of the plates will be performed in the operating room during the patient's surgery. Titanium reconstruction plates are used to stabilize the fracture whether or not the individual is in the study. However, for patients that are in the treatment arm of the study, the plates are bent with the aid of the 3D-printed model as template, rather than by free-hand.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3D template | Subjects will have custom models of relevant portions of their facial skeleton printed and used as templates for bending and shaping plates for stabilizing the fracture(s). Receives: Procedure: 3D template |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Operative time
Duration of fracture fixation
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2017
- Study startJun 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2020 (estimated)
Why it stopped: There was lack of internal staff support and could not enroll participants.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Facial FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Arthur Nam, University of Maryland, Baltimore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03292679
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HP-00071854
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Craniofacial Applications of 3D Printing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03292679
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HP-00071854
- Conditions
- Facial Fracture
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: There was lack of internal staff support and could not enroll participants.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
3D printing is a technology that allows for physical creation of a 3D model (usually made of plastic) based on computer generated 3D images from CT scans. The 3D images of craniofacial skeleton using computer software are routinely generated and, in turn, these 3D images can be used to create a plastic 3D model using a 3D printer.
Unstable or comminuted facial fractures need to be reduced and rigidly fixated using titanium plates and screws. Bending and shaping of the plates is usually performed by free-hand based on the surgeon's estimation of what best fits the fracture.
Often, bending the titanium plates to the shape of pre-injury skeletal contour is difficult when the bone is fractured into many pieces or is unstable, or when the patient is edentulous (missing several teeth). The process can increase the time spent in surgery and the bent plates may not snugly fit the fracture. For these difficult cases, one option is to use commercially manufactured 3D printed patient-specific models. The patient-specific models provide the benefit of correct shape / form for increased surgical accuracy, and decreased intra-operative time. However these commercial models are manufactured at distant facilities and usually require more than 7 days before delivery. As such, they delay time to surgery and cannot be used for urgent surgery. Additionally, the commercially manufactured implants are expensive, significantly increasing the cost of treatment.
The purpose of this study is to explore whether custom plastic models 3D printed at Shock Trauma Center and used for bending and shaping plates for facial fracture repair can improve results of facial fracture reconstruction.
Our plastic surgery division will design and produce facial bone 3D model of patients (with facial fractures) using an in-house 3D printer, then use the 3D model to contour the hardware pre-op or intra-op at the time of fracture repair. We believe that we can achieve better repair, shorter surgery time, and save hardware cost.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to:
- produce 3D printed craniofacial models of patients with facial fracture, then use the 3D models
- contour (or pre-bend) the appropriate hardware pre-op that is specific for the patient.
Fracture repair in the operating room entails exposure and reduction of the fracture, followed by contouring the hardware to the correct shape to maintain the fracture reduction. However, in unstable or comminuted fractures or in patients missing several teeth, contouring the plate to the correct shape can be time consuming and, sometimes, the plate shape can be inaccurate. Our hypothesis is that using our own 3D model printed on-site to "pre-bend" plates will save intra-operative time and cost, and achieve superior clinical outcome.
Patients will be enrolled to participate if they meet inclusion and exclusion criteria, and provide informed consent.
Additionally, for study subjects, protected health information such as name, date of birth, medical record number, and demographic information (age, sex, ethnic group), Billing and payment information with medical justification, clinical information related to the procedure and follow-up visits will be handled by research personnel for research purposes.
Otherwise, management of the study subjects will be essentially the same as for patients that are not enrolled in the study. This includes CT scans obtained postoperatively to confirm adequate fracture repair, routine clinic follow-up visits (during post-op week 1, week 4, 3 months, 6 months, and/or 1 year after surgery) and additional follow-up visits as may be deemed necessary based on clinical status.
Prior experience of utilizing on-site 3D printing technology in facial reconstruction surgery is limited. If a patient-specific plate is needed, then the plates must be made by commercial manufacturers which usually takes days to produce, and is therefore not suited to treatment of facial trauma.
Trauma plastic surgery division owns and operates a 3D printer. We have experience with CT image processing and have made 3D models of patients facial skeleton (i.e. midface, mandible) that were used as templates for repairing facial fractures.
Patients with complex facial injuries or defects require reconstruction using hardware to restore facial contour and functional stability. In many complex facial reconstructions, surgeons consult commercial companies for expertise in computer aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants. The advantages of undergoing this process include (1) in-depth anatomic analysis, (2) improved design of hardware leading to better surgical outcome, and (3) shortened OR time. The disadvantages include length of time required for the production of patient-specific implant (usually 3 to 7 days), and high cost: for example, a mandible 3D model and associated patient-specific reconstruction plate is >$3000.
Three-dimensional printing is an actively evolving technology, especially in surgery. Design modifications and improvement in extrusion technology have made 3D printing made this process much more affordable and relatively easy. It is now possible for individuals (and surgeons!) to generate these 3D models.
Repair of mandible fractures is especially challenging when the patient is edentulous (missing several or all teeth) for several reasons including the smaller bulk of the edentulous mandible, requiring larger reconstructive plates spanning a bigger section of the jaw. Surgery generally takes longer for these patients when compared with non-edentulous patients. A substantial portion of the lengthiness is due to time spent bending the plate.
The rationale for this IRB proposal is to explore the efficacy of 3D models of the patient's fracture that are printed in house as aids for facial fracture reconstruction. We hypothesize that reconstruction with the aid of the models will require shorter OR time, improve bony fixation, without significant increase in overall cost of treatment.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3D template | – | Procedure: 3D templateSubjects will have custom models of relevant portions of their facial skeleton printed and used as templates for bending and shaping plates for stabilizing the fracture(s). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients presenting to Shock Trauma Plastic Surgery Division for treatment of facial fractures
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with face CT scans
- Patients with facial fractures
- Patient age 12 years or older
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients without CT scan
- Patients with facial fractures that do not require rigid fixation using hardware
- Patients with facial fractures that do not have normal contralateral bony structures
- Patient age less than 12 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3D templateA 3D-printed model of relevant portions of the patient's facial skeleton, based on patient's CT scan will be created. This model will be used to bend titanium reconstruction plates that are used to stabilize the facial fracture for subjects in the treatment group. Bending of the plates will be performed in the operating room during the patient's surgery. Titanium reconstruction plates are used to stabilize the fracture whether or not the individual is in the study. However, for patients that are in the treatment arm of the study, the plates are bent with the aid of the 3D-printed model as template, rather than by free-hand. | Procedure or surgery | 3D template |
Primary outcome
Operative time
Time frame: 24 hours
Duration of fracture fixation
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2023.
Related trials for Facial Fracture
Recruiting
Optimized Osteosynthesis: Bone Mineral Density Recovery in Mandibular Body Fractures Using Patient-Specific Versus Conventional Plates
Mandibular Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Using 3D Titanium Miniplate Versus Standard Two Plate Fixation
Mandible Fracture, Force Measurement
Recruiting
Comparing Pre-adaptation of In-stock Mesh Over In-house 3D Patient Specific Model to Reconstruct Unilateral Primary Orbital Fracture With and Without Intraoperative Navigation vs Conventional Intraoperative Free-hand Mesh Bending
Orbital Fractures, Unilateral
Recruiting
Custom-Made Titanium Plates Versus Custom-Made Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Plates
Mandibular Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Surgical Planning and Preoperative Plate Bending for Maxillofacial Fractures
Mandibular Fractures, Maxillofacial Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Facial Fracture, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Operative time (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2023.