HypertensionNCT03292900
Association Between Genetic Algorithm to Predict Hypertension Therapy and Response to Treatment
An observational study of Hypertension, run by Geneticure, LLC at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To assess the effectiveness of the use of a patient's genes to predict which hypertension therapy is successful Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- How many people
- 758 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2018to 15 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Hypertensive patients who have achieved blood pressure control
Who may be able to join
- Subject is able and willing to provide informed consent
- Subject is ≥ 20 and ≤ 85 years of age
- Subject with diagnosis of Hypertension for a minimum of 1 year
- Subject has been on the same class/classes of blood pressure medication for a minimum of 6 months. Note: A change in dosage, frequency, or specific medication is acceptable as long as there have been no changes to the class/classes of medications prescribed.
- Subject with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 19 and ≤ 45
- Subject is currently prescribed and taking one of the following classes of medications alone or in combination with each other.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Diuretics (thiazide or thiazide-like)
- ACE Inhibitors
- Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)
- Beta-blockers
- Ca+ Channel Blockers
Who cannot join
- Subject has a diagnosis of secondary hypertension or is experiencing a complication of pregnancy.
- Subject is currently prescribed and taking any additional class of medication(s) for high blood pressure not included in the list above
- Subject has Systolic BP > 190 or Diastolic BP > 120 documented within the six months prior to visit.
- Any other reason that the subject is inappropriate for study enrollment in the opinion of the Investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Fairview Clinic - New Brighton
New Brighton, Minnesota, 55112
About this study
Official title: Association Between a Pharmacogenetic Algorithm to Predict Blood Pressure Therapy With Blood Pressure Response to Anti-Hypertensive Therapy
To assess the effectiveness of the use of a patient's genes to predict which hypertension therapy is successful
Read the detailed description
Hypertension is known to have a strong heritable component. Previous work has demonstrated that sons of hypertensive patients are more likely to be hypertensive when compared to sons of normotensive individuals. Additionally, monozygotic twins are more likely to share hypertension than dizygotic twins who are more likely than non-twin siblings to share hypertension. Each of these previous studies demonstrate that genetics plays a role in the development of hypertension. For each major class of drugs (diuretic, vasodilator, and β-blocker) the effectiveness rate ranges from 40-60%. Contrary to common belief, even a small ~10-20% of patients have an increase in blood pressure with a given anti-hypertensive medication. These effectiveness rates go far beyond adherence in that these previous trials have controlled for medication adherence. In addition to this controlled studies, epidemiologic data has demonstrated that 40% of patients who take their medication, as prescribed by their clinician, do not have their blood pressure under control.
Unfortunately, despite a significant impulse in the medical community to move towards an "individualized medicine" approach to patient centered treatment, the current clinical treatment strategy is based on a set algorithm which does not take into account individual patient differences. Rather, physicians are guided to choose a drug (one out of many options) in a given class of drugs and use that specific drug as a "first line therapy" (typically initiating with the diuretic class) and titrate that specific drug of choice to therapeutic dosage regardless of efficacy2. It is only after a prolonged course of treatment with that specific class of drug that clinical efficacy is determined (typically three months). At this stage, if clinical guideline goals for blood pressure have not been met, it is often recommended that the patient remain on the "first line therapy" whilst an additional drug from a different class of drugs (typically an Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE inhibitor) or Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)) is added to the pharmacologic regimen. Again, this drug is titrated to recommended therapeutic dosage and another prolonged course of treatment is initiated before clinical efficacy is determined (an additional three months - six months since initiation of treatment). If at this point, clinical guideline goals for blood pressure have not been met, a third drug from a third class of drugs (typically a beta-blocker) is added and the process is repeated (another three months - nine months from initiation of treatment). Further, if clinical guideline goals have continued to be elusive, the diagnosis of refractory hypertension is added and the process is reinitiated with a different combination of drugs, different classes of drugs, different drug options within a given class of drugs, different dosages, or all of the above. Thus, from the time of initial diagnosis and the start of treatment to the point in which blood pressure is adequately controlled may take anywhere from three months to well over one year. This trial-and-error standard of care is clearly not optimal.
The blood pressure panel created by Geneticure has been created to comprehensively assess seventeen common genetic variants in the liver (drug metabolizing enzyme) cardiac, vascular, and renal systems that can improve therapeutic guidance for the clinician based on known functional alterations of the protein through these genetic changes, as well as demonstrated effects of certain drug classes on these various genotypes. Based on this information, a clinician can guide therapy with knowledge specific to their patient, rather than "trial-and-error" based on population data and using drugs with least side effects initially.
To assess the effectiveness of the use of a patient's genes to predict which hypertension therapy is successful, as measured by:
- Level of blood pressure control (<140/<90)
- Change in blood pressure from baseline to control
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of Blood Pressure Control
how many participants are <140/<90 with genetic prediction
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of medications needed to obtain blood pressure control
Do those whose genes match therapy need fewer medications
Measured: 5 years
Time to blood pressure control
If control faster if associated with genes that predict control
Measured: 5 years
Number of office visits to obtain blood pressure control
Are office visits fewer if genes would have been used to predict control
Measured: 5 years
side effects from hypertension therapy
Do patients have more side effects on therapies that do not align with their predictive genes
Measured: 5 years
Hypertension associated adverse events during the course of treatment
Do patients have more side adverse events on therapies that do not align with their predictive genes
Measured: 5 years
Change in BP from treatment to control
Modeled by BP genes
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Mar 2018
- Primary completion15 Dec 2018
- Study completion15 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 758 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Geneticure, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Fairview Health Services
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pamela Phelps, PharmD, Principal investigator, Fairview Health System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03292900
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Geneticure600
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Association Between a Pharmacogenetic Algorithm to Predict Blood Pressure Therapy With Blood Pressure Response to Anti-Hypertensive Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03292900
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Geneticure600
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 758 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Geneticure, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Fairview Health Services
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To assess the effectiveness of the use of a patient's genes to predict which hypertension therapy is successful
Detailed description
Hypertension is known to have a strong heritable component. Previous work has demonstrated that sons of hypertensive patients are more likely to be hypertensive when compared to sons of normotensive individuals. Additionally, monozygotic twins are more likely to share hypertension than dizygotic twins who are more likely than non-twin siblings to share hypertension. Each of these previous studies demonstrate that genetics plays a role in the development of hypertension. For each major class of drugs (diuretic, vasodilator, and β-blocker) the effectiveness rate ranges from 40-60%. Contrary to common belief, even a small ~10-20% of patients have an increase in blood pressure with a given anti-hypertensive medication. These effectiveness rates go far beyond adherence in that these previous trials have controlled for medication adherence. In addition to this controlled studies, epidemiologic data has demonstrated that 40% of patients who take their medication, as prescribed by their clinician, do not have their blood pressure under control.
Unfortunately, despite a significant impulse in the medical community to move towards an "individualized medicine" approach to patient centered treatment, the current clinical treatment strategy is based on a set algorithm which does not take into account individual patient differences. Rather, physicians are guided to choose a drug (one out of many options) in a given class of drugs and use that specific drug as a "first line therapy" (typically initiating with the diuretic class) and titrate that specific drug of choice to therapeutic dosage regardless of efficacy2. It is only after a prolonged course of treatment with that specific class of drug that clinical efficacy is determined (typically three months). At this stage, if clinical guideline goals for blood pressure have not been met, it is often recommended that the patient remain on the "first line therapy" whilst an additional drug from a different class of drugs (typically an Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE inhibitor) or Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)) is added to the pharmacologic regimen. Again, this drug is titrated to recommended therapeutic dosage and another prolonged course of treatment is initiated before clinical efficacy is determined (an additional three months - six months since initiation of treatment). If at this point, clinical guideline goals for blood pressure have not been met, a third drug from a third class of drugs (typically a beta-blocker) is added and the process is repeated (another three months - nine months from initiation of treatment). Further, if clinical guideline goals have continued to be elusive, the diagnosis of refractory hypertension is added and the process is reinitiated with a different combination of drugs, different classes of drugs, different drug options within a given class of drugs, different dosages, or all of the above. Thus, from the time of initial diagnosis and the start of treatment to the point in which blood pressure is adequately controlled may take anywhere from three months to well over one year. This trial-and-error standard of care is clearly not optimal.
The blood pressure panel created by Geneticure has been created to comprehensively assess seventeen common genetic variants in the liver (drug metabolizing enzyme) cardiac, vascular, and renal systems that can improve therapeutic guidance for the clinician based on known functional alterations of the protein through these genetic changes, as well as demonstrated effects of certain drug classes on these various genotypes. Based on this information, a clinician can guide therapy with knowledge specific to their patient, rather than "trial-and-error" based on population data and using drugs with least side effects initially.
To assess the effectiveness of the use of a patient's genes to predict which hypertension therapy is successful, as measured by:
- Level of blood pressure control (<140/<90)
- Change in blood pressure from baseline to control
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Hypertensive patients who have achieved blood pressure control
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Subject is able and willing to provide informed consent
- Subject is ≥ 20 and ≤ 85 years of age
- Subject with diagnosis of Hypertension for a minimum of 1 year
- Subject has been on the same class/classes of blood pressure medication for a minimum of 6 months. Note: A change in dosage, frequency, or specific medication is acceptable as long as there have been no changes to the class/classes of medications prescribed.
- Subject with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 19 and ≤ 45
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject has a diagnosis of secondary hypertension or is experiencing a complication of pregnancy.
- Subject is currently prescribed and taking any additional class of medication(s) for high blood pressure not included in the list above
- Subject has Systolic BP > 190 or Diastolic BP > 120 documented within the six months prior to visit.
- Any other reason that the subject is inappropriate for study enrollment in the opinion of the Investigator.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Level of Blood Pressure Control
Time frame: 5 years
how many participants are <140/<90 with genetic prediction
6 secondary outcomes
Number of medications needed to obtain blood pressure control
Time frame: 5 years
Time to blood pressure control
Time frame: 5 years
Number of office visits to obtain blood pressure control
Time frame: 5 years
side effects from hypertension therapy
Time frame: 5 years
Hypertension associated adverse events during the course of treatment
Time frame: 5 years
Change in BP from treatment to control
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hypertension
RecruitingPhase 4
Initial Triple Therapy Including Parenteral Treprostinil vs Initial Double Oral Therapy in PAH Group I Patients
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Smartphone Use and Television Viewing on Standardized BP Measurement: The SCREENS-BP Study
Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Care COMPASS Study
Diabetes Mellitus ( Type 1 and Type 2), Hypertension
RecruitingPhase 4
De-implementing Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
RecruitingPhase 2
Spironolactone for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pamela Phelps, PharmD principal investigator
Fairview Health System
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hypertension, run by Geneticure, LLC at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of Blood Pressure Control (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019.