Stress Urinary IncontinenceNCT03296241
Non-ablative Er:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
A study testing laser in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Dr Adolf Lukanovič.
Trial summary
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common complaint in women after childbirth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of SUI and improvement of sexual gratification in parous women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- laser
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2012to 30 Aug 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence
- sexually active
- at least one vaginal delivery
Who cannot join
- pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage I
- urgency or mixed UI
- infection
- previous gynaecologic surgery or irradiation
- refuse consent
About this study
Official title: Non-ablative Er:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Therapy Effect on Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Related Quality of Life and Sexual Function: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common complaint in women after childbirth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of SUI and improvement of sexual gratification in parous women. 114 premenopausal parous women with SUI were randomized in two groups of 57 women; a laser intervention group and sham control (placebo) group. Both groups were treated according to the IncontiLaseTM clinical treatment protocol for SUI with non-ablative thermal-only Er:YAG laser, except that there was no energy output when treating the sham group. Patients were blinded to the allocation. At baseline and 3 months after treatment patients were clinically examined, answered questionnaires for SUI severity sexual function assessment and their pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function was assessed with perineometry. The improvement in the laser group will be compared to the improvement in the sham group.
Read the detailed description
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common complaint in women after childbirth. It affects their quality of life and sexual satisfaction and is one of the major reasons for gynaecological surgery. There is a need for effective non-invasive treatment alternatives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of SUI and improvement of sexual gratification in parous women. 114 premenopausal parous women with SUI were randomized in two groups of 57 women; a laser intervention group and sham control (placebo) group. Both groups were treated according to the IncontiLaseTM clinical treatment protocol for SUI with non-ablative thermal-only Er:YAG laser, except that there was no energy output when treating the sham group. Patients were blinded to the allocation. At baseline and 3 months after treatment patients were clinically examined, answered questionnaires for SUI severity sexual function assessment and their pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function was assessed with perineometry. Validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) was used as the primary outcome measure. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12) and The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were used to assess the sexual function. Patients were monitored for discomfort and side-effects during treatment and follow up period.
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Being tested
- laser, sham control
- Keywords
- stress urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction, laser, Er:YAG, vaginal laser, vaginal tightening, non-ablative, minimally-invasive
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
laserDevice
Also called IncontiLaseTM, IncontiLase
sham controlDevice
Also called placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Laser | Experimental | One session of non-ablative Er:YAG laser (2940 nm) treatment of the vaginal wall, introitus and vestibule. Receives: Device: laser |
| Sham control | Sham comparator | The sham control group was treated with the same procedure but with zero intensity settings - without receiving therapeutic irradiation (placebo). Receives: Device: sham control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in ICIQ-UI SF score
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form
Measured: at 3 months after intervention
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change from baseline in PISQ-12 score
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire
Measured: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in FSFI score
The Female Sexual Function Index, a validated generalized questionnaire utilized to assess sexual function in women in a general population.
Measured: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in perineometry variable maximal contraction pressure
Measured with Myomed 632 perineometer with the women in supine position.
Measured: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in perineometry variable average contraction pressure
Measured with Myomed 632 perineometer with the women in supine position.
Measured: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in perineometry variable mean muscle endurance (stamina)
Measured with Myomed 632 perineometer with the women in supine position.
Measured: at 3 months after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Aug 2012
- Primary completion30 Aug 2013
- Study completion30 Aug 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stress Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients assigned randomly to two groups: laser-treatment group and sham (control) group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dr Adolf Lukanovič
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Dr Adolf Lukanovič, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03296241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SUI_ErYAG_Sham
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ippolito GM, Crescenze IM, Sitto H, Palanjian RR, Raza D, Barboglio Romo P, Wallace SA, Orozco Leal G, Clemens JQ, Dahm P, Gupta P. Vaginal lasers for treating stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 25;7(7):CD013643. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013643.pub2.
PubMed 40709601
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-ablative Er:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Therapy Effect on Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Related Quality of Life and Sexual Function: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03296241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUI_ErYAG_Sham
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Keywords
- stress urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction, laser, Er:YAG, vaginal laser, vaginal tightening, non-ablative, minimally-invasive
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dr Adolf LukanovičUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common complaint in women after childbirth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of SUI and improvement of sexual gratification in parous women. 114 premenopausal parous women with SUI were randomized in two groups of 57 women; a laser intervention group and sham control (placebo) group. Both groups were treated according to the IncontiLaseTM clinical treatment protocol for SUI with non-ablative thermal-only Er:YAG laser, except that there was no energy output when treating the sham group. Patients were blinded to the allocation. At baseline and 3 months after treatment patients were clinically examined, answered questionnaires for SUI severity sexual function assessment and their pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function was assessed with perineometry. The improvement in the laser group will be compared to the improvement in the sham group.
Detailed description
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common complaint in women after childbirth. It affects their quality of life and sexual satisfaction and is one of the major reasons for gynaecological surgery. There is a need for effective non-invasive treatment alternatives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of SUI and improvement of sexual gratification in parous women. 114 premenopausal parous women with SUI were randomized in two groups of 57 women; a laser intervention group and sham control (placebo) group. Both groups were treated according to the IncontiLaseTM clinical treatment protocol for SUI with non-ablative thermal-only Er:YAG laser, except that there was no energy output when treating the sham group. Patients were blinded to the allocation. At baseline and 3 months after treatment patients were clinically examined, answered questionnaires for SUI severity sexual function assessment and their pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function was assessed with perineometry. Validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) was used as the primary outcome measure. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12) and The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were used to assess the sexual function. Patients were monitored for discomfort and side-effects during treatment and follow up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients assigned randomly to two groups: laser-treatment group and sham (control) group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Laser | Experimental | Device: laserOne session of non-ablative Er:YAG laser (2940 nm) treatment of the vaginal wall, introitus and vestibule. |
| Sham control | Sham comparator | Device: sham controlThe sham control group was treated with the same procedure but with zero intensity settings - without receiving therapeutic irradiation (placebo). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence
- sexually active
- at least one vaginal delivery
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage I
- urgency or mixed UI
- infection
- previous gynaecologic surgery or irradiation
- refuse consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| laserAlso: IncontiLaseTM, IncontiLase | Device | Laser |
| sham controlAlso: placebo | Device | Sham control |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in ICIQ-UI SF score
Time frame: at 3 months after intervention
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form
5 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in PISQ-12 score
Time frame: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in FSFI score
Time frame: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in perineometry variable maximal contraction pressure
Time frame: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in perineometry variable average contraction pressure
Time frame: at 3 months after intervention
Change from baseline in perineometry variable mean muscle endurance (stamina)
Time frame: at 3 months after intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40709601Ippolito GM, Crescenze IM, Sitto H, Palanjian RR, Raza D, Barboglio Romo P, Wallace SA, Orozco Leal G, Clemens JQ, Dahm P, Gupta P. Vaginal lasers for treating stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 25;7(7):CD013643. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013643.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron in Female Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence Who Have Obesity or Overweight
Urinary Incontinence,Stress
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Return to Physical Activity After Retropublic Transvaginal Sling and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
RecruitingPhase 1
Allogeneic Use of Expanded Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Adipose Tissue (HC106), Female Urinary Incontinence Women Over 50 Years Old
Urinary Incontinence Stress
Recruiting
The Application of Somatosensory Interactive Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Men Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Prostate Cancer (Post Prostatectomy)
RecruitingObservational study
Standardized 4D Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of Urethrovesical Junction Mobility After Vaginal Laser Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Urinary Incontinence , Stress, Laser Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing laser in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Dr Adolf Lukanovič.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in ICIQ-UI SF score (time frame: at 3 months after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03296241, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2017.