AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 3HIMALAYANCT03298451

Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase 3 study testing Durvalumab, Tremelimumab (Regimen 1) and Tremelimumab (Regimen 2) in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by AstraZeneca at 160 sites in 17 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy and durvalumab monotherapy versus sorafenib in the treatment of patients with no prior systemic therapy for unresectable HCC. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Durvalumab, Tremelimumab (Regimen 1) and Tremelimumab (Regimen 2)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,324 participants
Where
160 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
11 Oct 2017to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HCC based on histopathological confirmation
  • No prior systemic therapy for HCC
  • Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (that is not eligible for locoregional therapy) or stage C
  • Child-Pugh Score class A
  • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 at enrollment

Who cannot join

  • Hepatic encephalopathy within past 12 months or requirement for medication to prevent or control encephalopathy
  • Clinically meaningful ascites
  • Main portal vein tumor thrombosis
  • Active or prior documented GI bleeding (eg, esophageal varices or ulcer bleeding) within 12 months
  • HBV and HVC co-infection, or HBV and Hep D co-infection

Trial locations and contacts

160 sites in 17 countries.

160 sites in 17 countries

Japan23 sites
  • Research Site

    Bunkyoku

  • Research Site

    Chiba

  • Research Site

    Fukuoka

  • Research Site

    Hiroshima

  • Research Site

    Iizuka

  • Research Site

    Kanazawa

  • Research Site

    Kōtoku

  • Research Site

    Kumamoto

  • Research Site

    Kurume

  • Research Site

    Matsuyama

  • Research Site

    Mitakashi

  • Research Site

    Musashino

  • Research Site

    Nagoya

  • Research Site

    Ōgaki

  • Research Site

    Okayama

  • Research Site

    Osaka

  • Research Site

    Ōsaka-sayama

  • Research Site

    Saga

  • Research Site

    Sapporo

  • Research Site

    Shiwa

  • Research Site

    Suntogun

  • Research Site

    Tsu

  • Research Site

    Yokohama

Other trials in Japan

United States20 sites
  • Research Site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Research Site

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21231

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28262

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas, 74235

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75216

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Research Site

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33916

  • Research Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Research Site

    Houston, Texas, 77090

  • Research Site

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32224

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Research Site

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Research Site

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Research Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15237

  • Research Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97213

  • Research Site

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Research Site

    San Francisco, California, 94158

  • Research Site

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

  • Research Site

    Westwood, Kansas, 66205

Other trials in United States

China18 sites
  • Research Site

    Beijing

  • Research Site

    Changchun

  • Research Site

    Changsha

  • Research Site

    Chengdu

  • Research Site

    Dalian

  • Research Site

    Fuzhou

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou

  • Research Site

    Harbin

  • Research Site

    Hefei

  • Research Site

    Nanchang

  • Research Site

    Nanjing

  • Research Site

    Nanning

  • Research Site

    Shanghai

  • Research Site

    Suzhou

  • Research Site

    Wuhan

  • Research Site

    Xi'an

  • Research Site

    Zhengzhou

Other trials in China

France14 sites
  • Research Site

    Clichy

  • Research Site

    Lille

  • Research Site

    Marseille

  • Research Site

    Montpellier

  • Research Site

    Nancy

  • Research Site

    Nantes

  • Research Site

    Nice

  • Research Site

    Pessac

  • Research Site

    Poitiers

  • Research Site

    Reims

  • Research Site

    Rouen

  • Research Site

    Saint-Etienne

  • Research Site

    Toulouse

  • Research Site

    Villejuif

Other trials in France

Germany10 sites
  • Research Site

    Aachen

  • Research Site

    Cologne

  • Research Site

    Essen

  • Research Site

    Hanover

  • Research Site

    Heidelberg

  • Research Site

    Leipzig

  • Research Site

    Mainz

  • Research Site

    München

  • Research Site

    Tübingen

  • Research Site

    Ulm

Other trials in Germany

Canada9 sites
  • Research Site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • Research Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Research Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

  • Research Site

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7

  • Research Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4L6

  • Research Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9

  • Research Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6

  • Research Site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

Other trials in Canada

India9 sites
  • Research Site

    Bangalore

  • Research Site

    Bhubneshwar

  • Research Site

    Chennai

  • Research Site

    Hubli

  • Research Site

    Hyderabad

  • Research Site

    Karmsad

  • Research Site

    Mumbai

  • Research Site

    Nashik

  • Research Site

    New Delhi

Other trials in India

Italy8 sites
  • Research Site

    Benevento

  • Research Site

    Meldola

  • Research Site

    Milan

  • Research Site

    Naples

  • Research Site

    Perugia

  • Research Site

    Pisa

  • Research Site

    Roma

  • Research Site

    Rozzano

Other trials in Italy

Russia8 sites
  • Research Site

    Moscow

  • Research Site

    Murmansk

  • Research Site

    Nizhny Novgorod

  • Research Site

    Novosibirsk

  • Research Site

    Obninsk

  • Research Site

    Omsk

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg

  • Research Site

    Ufa

Other trials in Russia

South Korea8 sites
  • Research Site

    Busan, 49241

  • Research Site

    Daegu, 41944

  • Research Site

    Ilsan, Gyeonggi-do, 10408

  • Research Site

    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 3080

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 3722

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 5505

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 6351

Other trials in South Korea

Ukraine8 sites
  • Research Site

    Dnipro

  • Research Site

    IvanoFrankivsk

  • Research Site

    Kharkiv

  • Research Site

    Kropyvnitskyi

  • Research Site

    Kyiv

  • Research Site

    Lviv

  • Research Site

    Odesa

  • Research Site

    Uzhhorod

Other trials in Ukraine

Brazil6 sites
  • Research Site

    Barretos

  • Research Site

    Curitiba

  • Research Site

    Florianópolis

  • Research Site

    Porto Alegre

  • Research Site

    Rio de Janeiro

  • Research Site

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Taiwan6 sites
  • Research Site

    Chiayi City

  • Research Site

    Kaohsiung City

  • Research Site

    Taichung

  • Research Site

    Tainan

  • Research Site

    Taipei

  • Research Site

    Taoyuan

Other trials in Taiwan

Spain5 sites
  • Research Site

    Barcelona

  • Research Site

    Madrid

  • Research Site

    Oviedo

  • Research Site

    Pamplona Madrid

  • Research Site

    Santander

Other trials in Spain

Thailand5 sites
  • Research Site

    Bangkok

  • Research Site

    Chang Mai

  • Research Site

    Khon Kaen

  • Research Site

    Phitsanulok

  • Research Site

    Songkhla

Other trials in Thailand

Vietnam2 sites
  • Research Site

    Hanoi

  • Research Site

    Hochiminh

Other trials in Vietnam

Hong Kong1 site
  • Research Site

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy and durvalumab monotherapy versus sorafenib in the treatment of patients with no prior systemic therapy for unresectable HCC. The patients cannot be eligible for locoregional therapy

Read the detailed description

The study population includes patients 18 years of age or older with advanced HCC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B not eligible for locoregional therapy or stage C, and Child-Pugh A classification liver disease. Patients must not have received any prior systemic therapy for unresectable HCC.

Patients in all treatment arms may continue receiving their originally assigned treatment, at the Investigator's discretion, until progression

Patients in all arms with confirmed PD who, in the Investigator's opinion, continue to receive benefit from their assigned treatment and meet the criteria for treatment in the setting of PD may continue to receive their assigned treatment.

If a patient discontinues study drug(s) due to disease progression, the patient will enter survival follow-up. Patients who have discontinued treatment due to toxicity or symptomatic deterioration or who have commenced subsequent anticancer therapy, will have tumor assessments until confirmed PD and will be followed for survival

Being tested
Durvalumab, Tremelimumab (Regimen 1), Tremelimumab (Regimen 2), Sorafenib, Durvalumab (Regimen 1)
Keywords
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-Resectable
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DurvalumabDrug

    Also called MEDI4736

    Durvalumab IV (intravenous infusion).

  • Tremelimumab (Regimen 1)Drug

    Tremelimumab IV (intravenous infusion).

  • Tremelimumab (Regimen 2)Drug

    Tremelimumab IV (intravenous infusion).

  • SorafenibDrug

    Sorafenib, as per standard of care

  • Durvalumab (Regimen 1)Drug

    Durvalumab IV (intravenous infusion).

  • Durvalumab (Regimen 2)Drug

    Durvalumab IV (intravenous infusion).

Study groups in NCT03298451
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalDurvalumab
Receives: Drug: Durvalumab
Arm 2ExperimentalDurvalumab in combination with tremelimumab (Regimen 1)
Receives: Drug: Tremelimumab (Regimen 1); Drug: Durvalumab (Regimen 1)
Arm 3ExperimentalDurvalumab in combination with tremelimumab (Regimen 2)
Receives: Drug: Tremelimumab (Regimen 2); Drug: Durvalumab (Regimen 2)
Arm 4Active comparatorSorafenib
Receives: Drug: Sorafenib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival (OS) - Treme 300 mg x1 Dose + Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Any participant not known to have died at the DCO date was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. If the last known date alive or if the date of death was after the DCO date, participants were censored at the DCO date. This primary outcome measure presents OS analysis of Treme 300mg x1 dose + Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg at the time of the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).

    Measured: From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Overall Survival (OS) - Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Any participant not known to have died at the DCO date was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. If the last known date alive or if the date of death was after the DCO date, participants were censored at the DCO date. This secondary outcome measure presents OS analysis of Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg at the time of the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).

    Measured: From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

  2. Overall Survival (OS) at 18, 24, and 36 Months After Randomization

    Percentage of participants who were alive at fixed time points (18, 24, and 36 months) after randomization. The estimated percentage of survival along with the 95% confidence interval were calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique on the full analysis set.

    Measured: At 18, 24, and 36 months post-randomization. Assessed at the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1] using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death by any cause in the absence of progression, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from study treatment or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Progression (i.e., PD) was defined as a at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir) - this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir.

    Measured: Tumor scans performed at baseline, every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks following randomization, and every 12 weeks thereafter until RECIST 1.1-defined progression. Assessed up to DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months)

  4. Time To Progression (TTP)

    TTP was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression in the absence of death. If participants died without tumor progression, they were censored at the time of death.

    Measured: From the date of randomization until objective tumor progression, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

  5. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator) was defined as the number (%) of participants with at least 1 confirmed visit response of CR or PR until progression, or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Participants who go off treatment without progression, receive a subsequent therapy, and then respond will not be included as responders in the ORR. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: From the date of randomization until objective tumor progression, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

  6. Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    Number (%) of participants with a Best Objective Response (BoR) of CR, PR, or SD. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (ie., SD) was defined as neither sufficient decrease in sum of diameters to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progression.

    Measured: From the date of randomization until objective tumor progression or date of death, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

  7. Duration of Objective Response (DoR)

    Time from the date of first documented confirmed response (complete or partial response) until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: From the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

  8. Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1

    Overall survival by baseline PD-L1 expression levels (positive vs. negative). PD-L1 expression level is based on the Tumor and Immune Cell Positivity (TIP) score method as: PD-L1 Positive (TIP ≥ 1%) or PD-L1 Negative (TIP < 1%).

    Measured: From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

  9. EORTC QLQ-C30 Time to Global Health Status/QoL Deterioration

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), which consists of 30 questions combined to produce a global health status/QoL scale. Higher scores indicate better health. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as a decrease in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.

    Measured: At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.

  10. EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Abdominal Pain) Deterioration

    EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.

    Measured: At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.

  11. EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Shoulder Pain) Deterioration

    EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.

    Measured: At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.

  12. EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Abdominal Swelling) Deterioration

    EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.

    Measured: At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.

  13. Presence of ADA for Durvalumab

    Number of participants with Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) response to Durvalumab. ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA. Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA and treatment-boosted ADA. Results are reported as number of participants with ADA responses to Durvalumab for each indicated category.

    Measured: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of durvalumab. Assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).

  14. Presence of ADA for Tremelimumab

    Number of participants with Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) response to Tremelimumab. ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA. Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA and treatment-boosted ADA. Results are reported as number of participants with ADA responses to Tremelimumab for each indicated category.

    Measured: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of tremelimumab. Assessed up to approximately 46 months after the first randomization.

  15. Summary of Durvalumab Concentration Over Time

    Blood sample were collected at pre-specified timepoints and Durvalumab concentrations in serum (ug/mL) were reported over time.

    Measured: To evaluate the PK of Durvalumab, samples were collected pre-dose at week 4 and week 12 and post-dose at week 12. Assessed at the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).

  16. Summary of Tremelimumab Concentration Over Time

    Blood sample were collected at pre-specified timepoints and Tremelimumab concentrations in serum (ug/mL) were reported over time.

    Measured: To evaluate the PK of Tremelimumab, samples were collected at week 0 (post-dose), week 4, and week 12. Assessed at the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2017
  2. Study start11 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion27 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,324 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03298451
Sponsor's protocol ID
D419CC00002
Other IDs
2024-512212-21-00, 2016-005126-11, 2016
Acronym
HIMALAYA
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
19 Sep 2017
Last updated
7 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Rimassa L, Chan SL, Sangro B, Lau G, Kudo M, Reig M, Breder V, Ryu MH, Ostapenko Y, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Varela M, Tougeron D, Crysler OV, Bouattour M, Dao TV, Tam VC, Faccio A, Furuse J, Jeng LB, Kang YK, Kelley RK, Kurland JF, Balaji K, Abou-Alfa GK. Plain language summary of five-year overall survival update from the HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer). Future Oncol. 2026 May;22(12):1359-1372. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2026.2665323. Epub 2026 May 10.

    PubMed 42108643
  • Chan SL, Kudo M, Sangro B, Kelley RK, Kim JH, Pham B, Hong JY, Waldschmidt DT, Marino D, Joycelyn Lee JX, Gerolami R, Burgoyne AM, Li Q, Nakamura H, Sun P, Baur B, Rimassa L. Early Safety Results from the Phase 3b SIERRA Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-Line Treatment for Participants with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma and a Poor Prognosis. Liver Cancer. 2025 Dec 18. doi: 10.1159/000549955. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 41585428
  • Rimassa L, Chan SL, Sangro B, Lau G, Kudo M, Reig M, Breder V, Ryu MH, Ostapenko Y, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Varela M, Tougeron D, Crysler OV, Bouattour M, Van Dao T, Tam VC, Faccio A, Furuse J, Jeng LB, Kang YK, Kelley RK, Paskow MJ, Ran D, Xynos I, Kurland JF, Negro A, Abou-Alfa GK. Five-year overall survival update from the HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable HCC. J Hepatol. 2025 Oct;83(4):899-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.033. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

    PubMed 40222621
  • Lau G, Abou-Alfa GK, Cheng AL, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Van Dao T, Kang YK, Thungappa SC, Kudo M, Sangro B, Kelley RK, Furuse J, Park JW, Sunpaweravong P, Fasolo A, Yau T, Kawaoka T, Azevedo S, Reig M, Assenat E, Yarchoan M, He AR, Makowsky M, Gupta C, Negro A, Chan SL. Outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the phase III randomised HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2025 Feb;82(2):258-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.07.017. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

    PubMed 39089633
  • Sangro B, Galle PR, Kelley RK, Charoentum C, De Toni EN, Ostapenko Y, Heo J, Cheng AL, Wilson Woods A, Gupta C, Abraham J, McCoy CL, Patel N, Negro A, Vogel A, Abou-Alfa GK. Patient-Reported Outcomes From the Phase III HIMALAYA Study of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 10;42(23):2790-2799. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01462. Epub 2024 May 28.

    PubMed 38805668
  • Abou-Alfa GK, Lau G, Kudo M, Chan SL, Kelley RK, Furuse J, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Kang YK, Van Dao T, De Toni EN, Rimassa L, Breder V, Vasilyev A, Heurgue A, Tam VC, Mody K, Thungappa SC, Ostapenko Y, Yau T, Azevedo S, Varela M, Cheng AL, Qin S, Galle PR, Ali S, Marcovitz M, Makowsky M, He P, Kurland JF, Negro A, Sangro B. Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022 Aug;1(8):EVIDoa2100070. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100070. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

    PubMed 38319892
  • Addendum 1: Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Sep;11(9):e002794add1. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002794add1. No abstract available.

    PubMed 37678916
  • Patel TH, Brewer JR, Fan J, Cheng J, Shen YL, Xiang Y, Zhao H, Lemery SJ, Pazdur R, Kluetz PG, Fashoyin-Aje LA. FDA Approval Summary: Tremelimumab in Combination with Durvalumab for the Treatment of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 17;30(2):269-273. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2124.

    PubMed 37676259

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in