Abdominal PainPhase 4NCT03300674
Intravenous Lidocaine Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial
A Phase 4 study testing Hydromorphone and Lidocaine in people with Abdominal Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, emergency department based, comparative effectiveness study of two medication for acute abdominal pain: intravenous lidocaine and intravenous hydromorphone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Abdominal Pain
- What is being tested?
- Hydromorphone and Lidocaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 154 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2018to 28 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria:Eligible patients are those who present to an ED for treatment of acute abdominal pain. Acute will be defined as pain for no more than seven days. At the time of enrollment, the ED treatment plan must include use of an intravenous opioid.
Exclusion Criteria: Patients will be excluded from participation if they have cardiac conduction system impairment (QTc duration > 0.5s, QRS duration > 0.12s, or PR interval duration > 0.2s), known renal (CKD >2) or liver disease (Childs-Pugh B or greater), are hemodynamically unstable, as determined by the attending physician, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a known allergy to either medication. Patients will also be excluded if they have used prescription or illicit opioids within the previous week, or if they have a chronic pain disorder, defined as use of any analgesic medication on more days than not during the month preceding the acute episode of pain. Patients weighing < 60kg or > 120kg will be excluded.
-
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
About this study
Official title: Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain. A Randomized Trial
This is a randomized, double-blind, emergency department based, comparative effectiveness study of two medication for acute abdominal pain: intravenous lidocaine and intravenous hydromorphone. Patients will be enrolled during an emergency department visit and followed throughout their emergency department course and then by telephone 7 days later.
- Conditions
- Abdominal Pain
- Being tested
- Hydromorphone, Lidocaine
- Medical subject headings
- Abdominal Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HydromorphoneDrug
Hydromorphone intravenous infusion
LidocaineDrug
Lidocaine intravenous infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous hydromorphone | Active comparator | Intravenous hydromorphone 1mg. A second dose can be administered at 30 minutes. Receives: Drug: Hydromorphone |
| Intravenous lidocaine | Active comparator | Intravenous lidocaine 120 mg. A second dose can be administered at 30 minutes Receives: Drug: Lidocaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in 0-10 Pain Scale Between Baseline and 90 Minutes
Participants were asked to describe their pain on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0= no pain and 10= the worst pain imaginable
Measured: up to 90 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
Rescue Medication
no need for off-protocol parenteral pain medication during the ED visit. The following parenteral medications will be considered off protocol pain medication: any opioid, any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
Measured: 4 hours
Adverse Events
Any new symptom development after administration of investigational medication
Measured: 4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Oct 2017
- Study start10 Jan 2018
- Primary completion16 Aug 2018
- Study completion28 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Abdominal PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Benjamin W. Friedman, MD, Montefiore Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03300674
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-8408
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chinn E, Friedman BW, Naeem F, Irizarry E, Afrifa F, Zias E, Jones MP, Pearlman S, Chertoff A, Wollowitz A, Gallagher EJ. Randomized Trial of Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
PubMed 30819520
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain. A Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03300674
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-8408
- Conditions
- Abdominal Pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 26 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, double-blind, emergency department based, comparative effectiveness study of two medication for acute abdominal pain: intravenous lidocaine and intravenous hydromorphone. Patients will be enrolled during an emergency department visit and followed throughout their emergency department course and then by telephone 7 days later.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous hydromorphone | Active comparator | Drug: HydromorphoneIntravenous hydromorphone 1mg. A second dose can be administered at 30 minutes. |
| Intravenous lidocaine | Active comparator | Drug: LidocaineIntravenous lidocaine 120 mg. A second dose can be administered at 30 minutes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HydromorphoneHydromorphone intravenous infusion | Drug | Intravenous hydromorphone |
| LidocaineLidocaine intravenous infusion | Drug | Intravenous lidocaine |
Primary outcome
Change in 0-10 Pain Scale Between Baseline and 90 Minutes
Time frame: up to 90 minutes
Participants were asked to describe their pain on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0= no pain and 10= the worst pain imaginable
2 secondary outcomes
Rescue Medication
Time frame: 4 hours
Adverse Events
Time frame: 4 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30819520Chinn E, Friedman BW, Naeem F, Irizarry E, Afrifa F, Zias E, Jones MP, Pearlman S, Chertoff A, Wollowitz A, Gallagher EJ. Randomized Trial of Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Abdominal Pain
Not yet recruiting
The Mechanism Underlying the Analgesic Effect of the Music of IBS Pain
Abdominal Pain/ Discomfort, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Intravenous Ibuprofen Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy
Post Operative Analgesia
Active, not recruiting
Urinary Catheterization Versus No Catheterization in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernias
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Perioperative Lidocaine and Ketamine in Abdominal Surgery
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
The IMPACT Study: Personalized Physical Therapy for Better Recovery and a Stronger Core After Hernia Surgery
Ventral Hernia, Ventral Incisional Hernia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Hydromorphone and Lidocaine in people with Abdominal Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in 0-10 Pain Scale Between Baseline and 90 Minutes (time frame: up to 90 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03300674, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2020.