AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT03304587

Effects of Bright Light on Co-occurring Cancer-related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors

A study testing Polysomnography (PSG), Rectal thermistor 400 Series and Bright blue-green light in people with Breast Cancer, run by Michigan State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will implement therapeutic bright light that is tailored to the individual's circadian typology and will estimate its effects on circadian rhythms, 4 common cancer-associated symptoms, and impact on quality of life in survivors living with cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Polysomnography (PSG), Rectal thermistor 400 Series and Bright blue-green light
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Nov 2017to 31 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Females
  • 21 years of age or older 1-3 years post-completion of chemotherapy or/and radiation therapy for stage I-III breast cancer
  • Experience ≥ 2 concurrent symptoms (fatigue, sleep disruption, depressive symptoms, and/or cognitive dysfunction as measured by 4 screening instruments)
  • Be either phase advanced or delayed (morning or evening types by the Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) ≥59 or ≤41)
  • Sighted
  • Mentally competent to consent
  • Able to understand English.

Who cannot join

  • Undergoing cancer treatment for another malignancy
  • Have metastatic cancer
  • Engaged in shift work or travel across more than three time zones within 2 weeks prior to study
  • Current diagnosis of seasonal affective disorder or substance abuse Current diagnosis of major Axis I psychiatric disorders (e.g. depressive disorders), neurological impairments, or muscular dystrophies
  • Report severe depressive mood (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) >24)
  • Take prescribed sedative hypnotics or steroids Have eye conditions (glaucoma or retinal disease), problems triggered by bright light (e.g., migraine), or take photosensitizing medications (e.g., some porphyrin drugs, antipsychotics, antiarrhythmic agents)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Michigan State University

    East Lansing, Michigan, 48824

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effects of Bright Light on Co-occurring Cancer-related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Personalized Intervention

This study will implement therapeutic bright light that is tailored to the individual's circadian typology and will estimate its effects on circadian rhythms, 4 common cancer-associated symptoms, and impact on quality of life in survivors living with cancer. Examining a selected phase marker (core body temperature) in relation to the associated clinical features (symptoms) is the starting point for future investigation of the biological mechanisms of symptoms.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a home-based, personalized bright light intervention, and to estimate the effects of bright light on 4 common long-term or late effects of cancer (sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, cognitive dysfunction) and on quality of life in post-treatment survivors of breast cancer. The three specific aims include:

Aim #1: To assess the feasibility of implementing a home-based, personalized bright light intervention and the proposed data collection plan in post-treatment survivors of breast cancer.

Aim #2: To estimate the effects of the personalized bright light intervention on sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, cognitive dysfunction, and quality of life in survivors of breast cancer.

Aim #3: To estimate the effects of a personalized bright light intervention on circadian rhythms in survivors of breast cancer.

The participants of this randomized, controlled pilot study will be randomized to either 30-minute blue-green light therapy at 12,000 lux or dim red light control at 5 lux. Light will be self-administered using a light visor cap at home for 14 consecutive days. Tailored to the individual's circadian pattern, light will be delivered either within 30 minutes of waking in the morning or between 1900-2000 hours in the evening. The nocturnal sleep patterns will be monitored by all-night in-lab polysomnography; sleep quality, fatigue, depression, and quality of life will be self-reported; cognition will be objectively assessed before and after the intervention. Circadian rhythm will be indexed by nocturnal core body temperature before and after the intervention. Feasibility will be determined by the proportion of contacted, recruited, and retained subjects, and completeness of the data collected. Subjective feedback and burden will be assessed at study exit.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Polysomnography (PSG), Rectal thermistor 400 Series, Bright blue-green light, Dim red light, Digital foot candle datalogging light meter
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Polysomnography (PSG)Diagnostic test

    Also called PSG

    Sleep patterns will be measured by in-lab PSG following a standardized protocol. 10mm silver/silver chloride electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) electrodes and 11mm silver/silver chloride electroculography (EOG) electrodes will be connected to a Nihon Kohden system, 912 model (Nihon Kohden, Irvine, CA). A standard sleep montage following the 10/20 procedure for electrode placement, left and right electrooculography referenced to the opposite mastoid and mentalis electromyography will be followed. Data will be visually scored by a polysomnographer blind to study conditions following the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Manual.

  • Rectal thermistor 400 SeriesDiagnostic test

    Nocturnal core body temperature will be measured using a rectal thermistor 400 series manufactured by YSI (Yellow Springs, OH, USA) inserted up to a depth of 7 cm. and taped in place. The thermistor will be connected to a Model 4600 thermometer (YSI, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) that will be interfaced with the PSG via cabling. Core temperature readings will be continuously monitored and recorded every 5 minutes during the all-night sleep studies.

  • Bright blue-green lightOther

    -The cap visor-mounted device controls the distance of the light exposure, and positions the light source above eye level to target on the lower retina for better effect

  • Dim red lightOther

    -The cap visor-mounted device controls the distance of the light exposure, and positions the light source above eye level to target on the lower retina for better effect

  • Digital foot candle datalogging light meterDiagnostic test

    On 2 random days during the 2-week bright light treatment, ambient light will be recorded continuously during waking hours using a digital foot candle datalogging light meter (Extech Instruments, Waltham, MA) Model SDL400. The 7.1" x 2.9" x 1.0" light meter (12.21 oz) has the capacity to measure up to 10,000 footcandles (accuracy: ± 4% reading). The light-weight light sensor is approximately 2 inches in diameter and comes with a clip and strap that makes it comfortable to wear just below the neck.

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-FatigueOther

    Also called PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue

    8 items with a 5-point rating scale (1=not at all to 5 =very much) measuring fatigue experience and fatigue impact. Higher scores indicate worse fatigue. PROMIS-Fatigue was developed based on rigorous methodologies. The psychometric properties have been established across chronic illnesses including cancer.

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression.

    But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep DisturbanceOther

    Also called PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance

    8 items with 5-point rating scales measuring overall sleep and sleep-related impairments. Higher scores indicate worse sleep disturbances. Validity was supported by moderate to high correlations with the existing scales, e.g. PSQI, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The scores significantly differed participants with and without sleep disorders.

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression.

    But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-DepressionOther

    Also called PROMIS-Depression

    8 items with 5-point rating scales (1=never to 5=always) measuring affective and cognitive manifestations of depressive mood. Higher scores indicate worse depression. In a sample of depressed outpatients, PROMIS-Depression showed greater reliability when compared to the CES-D and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Convergent validity with the CES-D and PHQ-9 was supported by strong correlations, ranged 0.72 to 0.84

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression.

    But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical FunctionOther

    Also called PROMIS-Physical Function

    8 items with 5-point rating scales measuring the individual's ability to complete daily activities. Higher scores indicate worse functioning. Validity was tested in 1,415 adults with diverse clinical conditions. The PROMIS Physical Function scores corresponded to the expected positive or negative changes in the individual's physical function.

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression.

    But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Other

    Also called PSQI

    19 self-report items measuring sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbance, medication use, and daytime dysfunction. Each item is rated on a 0-3 rating scale. The global PSQI score ranges 0-21, with higher scores indicating more severe sleep disturbance. A global PSQI score greater than 5 was found to have a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.5% in differentiating good and poor sleepers.

  • Center for Epidemiological Studies - DepressionOther

    Also called CES-D

    20-item self-report instrument commonly used to measure depressive symptoms in cancer patients. Each item is rated on a 4-point rating scale (0=rarely or none of the time to 3=all of the time) describing the frequency of occurrence during the past week. Score can range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Other

    Also called MoCA

    The MoCA is highly sensitive for screening patient with mild cognitive impairment. The MoCA is a 30-point scale with 7 cognitive subtests: visuo-executive, naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. It scores from 0 to 30, where higher scores indicate better cognition and a score below 26 indicates cognitive impairment. The MoCA is highly sensitive for screening patient with mild cognitive impairment.

  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Other

    Also called EORTC QLQ-C30

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items with a 4-point rating scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) measuring functioning, symptom intensity, and global health status/quality of life during the past week.

  • Daily LogOther

    -A log where the participants will indicate date, wake time, sleep time answer 3 questions regarding the previous nights sleep (answers range from 1=not at all to 5=very much), have an area to indicate if naps occurred during the day, and 2 questions about fatigue \& sleepiness (answers ranging from 0=no fatigue/sleepiness to 10=worst fatigue/sleepiness

Study groups in NCT03304587
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: Bright blue-green lightExperimental* Bright blue-green light (~515nm; 12,000 lux) for 30 minutes once a day. * For those who have scores of ≤41 (evening types) on Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), light will be delivered within 30 minutes of waking for 14 consecutive mornings. For those who receive scores of ≥59 (morning types), light will be delivered between 1900-2000 hours for 14 consecutive evenings. * Light therapy will be self-administered using a light visor cap * Each participant will make (3) overnight visits to the sleep laboratory * On 2 randomly selected days, the participants will wear a light meter during wake time
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Polysomnography (PSG); Diagnostic Test: Rectal thermistor 400 Series; Other: Bright blue-green light; Diagnostic Test: Digital foot candle datalogging light meter; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep Disturbance; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function; Other: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); Other: Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression; Other: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); Other: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30); Other: Daily Log
Arm 2: Dim red lightActive comparator* Dim red light (5 lux) (control group) for 30 minutes once a day. --For those who have scores of ≤41 (evening types) on Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), light will be delivered within 30 minutes of waking for 14 consecutive mornings. For those who receive scores of ≥59 (morning types), light will be delivered between 1900-2000 hours for 14 consecutive evenings. * Light therapy will be self-administered using a light visor cap * Each participant will make (3) overnight visits to the sleep laboratory --On 2 randomly selected days, the participants will wear a light meter during wake time
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Polysomnography (PSG); Diagnostic Test: Rectal thermistor 400 Series; Other: Dim red light; Diagnostic Test: Digital foot candle datalogging light meter; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep Disturbance; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression; Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function; Other: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); Other: Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression; Other: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); Other: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30); Other: Daily Log

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Study Attrition and Adherence

    Study participants kept a daily log where they listed the dates and times they used the light visor - noting time they put it on, and the time they took it off. The light exposure were recorded to assess adherence to the treatment protocol.

    Adherence: percentage that the study participant used the light visor for 30 minutes per day during the 14-day light therapy intervention (based on the daily log that reported use or not use of the light visor for 30 minutes for the 14 days of the intervention and the time they put it on each day and took it off each day)

    Attrition: study participants withdrew from the study prior to completing the intervention

    Measured: Up to 3 weeks from registration

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Effects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep disturbance T-Score.

    A higher PROMIS-Sleep disturbance T-score represents greater\worse sleep disturbance.

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores mean worse sleep disturbance

    Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  2. Effects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PSQI

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global score:

    The PSQI has 7 components, with each component self-rated from 0-3, with 3 being worse sleep quality. Global PSQI sleep score is the sum of all 7 components, with score range from 0-21, with higher score meaning worse sleep quality.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  3. Effects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue T-Score.

    A higher PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue T-score represents greater\worse fatigue.

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores mean worse fatigue

    Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  4. Effects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the Daily Log

    Fatigue self-report is rated numerically from 1-5, with greater score meaning more fatigue

    Measured: Kept throughout the approx 3 weeks of the study

  5. Effects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the PROMIS-Depression

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression T-Score.

    A higher PROMIS-Depression T-score represents greater\worse Depression.

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores mean worse worse depression.

    Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  6. Effects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the CES-D

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score:

    Total CES-D range is 0-60, with higher score meaning more depressed.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  7. Effects of Bright Lights on Cognitive Dysfunction as Measured by the MoCA

    MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment):

    Test conducted by researcher, with total score range 0-30. Higher score means less cognitive dysfunction.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  8. Effect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS-Physical Function

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function T-Score.

    A higher PROMIS-Physical Function T-score represents greater\better Physical Function.

    PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population.

    Higher scores mean better functioning.

    Note: A T-score of 60 is one SD greater than average; A T-Score of 40 is one SD lower than average.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  9. Effect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by EORTC QLQ-30

    Quality of Life (QOL)-Global Health score: Range 0-100, higher score is better global health quality of life Quality of Life (QOL) Symptom score: Range 0-100, Higher score is worse symptoms quality of life Quality of Life (QOL)-Function: Range 0-100, Higher score is better functional quality of life

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  10. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Total Sleep Time

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of total sleep time is reported.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  11. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Efficiency

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Sleep efficiency is reported as percentage of total sleep time.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  12. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Onset Latency

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of latency to sleep onset is reported.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  13. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Awakenings

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of awakenings during sleep is recorded.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  14. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousals

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Arousal minutes during sleep are recorded

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  15. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousal Index

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Arousal index is total number of arousals per hour of sleep.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  16. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes till wake after sleep onset is reported.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  17. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (Min)

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) used to measure effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes spent in each sleep stage is reported.

    Stage 1 is when a person first falls asleep, normally lasts 1-7minutes. Body has not fully relaxed, though body and brain activities start to slow with periods of brief movements.

    Stage 2 the body enters a more subdued state including a drop in temperature, relaxed muscles and slowed breathing and heart rate.

    Stage 3 muscle tone, pulse and breathing rate decrease as body relaxes. REM brain activity picks up, body experiences atonia-a temporary paralysis of muscles except for eyes and muscles that control breathing. Usually takes 90 minutes to reach REM stage.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  18. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (%)

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Percentage of time in each sleep stage is reported.

    Stage 1 is when a person first falls asleep, normally lasts 1-7minutes. Body has not fully relaxed, though body and brain activities start to slow with periods of brief movements.

    Stage 2 the body enters a more subdued state including a drop in temperature, relaxed muscles and slowed breathing and heart rate.

    Stage 3 muscle tone, pulse and breathing rate decrease as body relaxes. REM brain activity picks up, body experiences atonia-a temporary paralysis of muscles except for eyes and muscles that control breathing. Usually takes 90 minutes to reach REM stage.

    Measured: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Oct 2017
  2. Study start6 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03304587
Sponsor's protocol ID
201703147
Other IDs
1R15NR016828-01A1
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
3 Oct 2017
Last updated
10 Jun 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Wu HS, Gao F, Davis JE, Given CW. Effects of chronotype-tailored bright light intervention on post-treatment symptoms and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2023 Nov 17;31(12):705. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08157-9.

    PubMed 37975923
  • Wu HS, Gao F, Davis JE, Given CW. Effects of Chronotype-tailored Bright Light Intervention on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023 Aug 25:rs.3.rs-3286350. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3286350/v1.

    PubMed 37674711

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Polysomnography (PSG), Rectal thermistor 400 Series and Bright blue-green light in people with Breast Cancer, run by Michigan State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Study Attrition and Adherence (time frame: Up to 3 weeks from registration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03304587, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in