AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Kidney InjuryRAD-AKINCT03305549

Recovery After Dialysis-Requiring Acute Kidney Injury

A study testing Conservative dialysis strategy and TIW dialysis strategy in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Recovery After Dialysis-Requiring Acute Kidney Injury (RAD-AKI) Pilot Study is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial of hospitalized patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (RAD-AKI), comparing conventional thrice-weekly intermittent hemodialysis dialysis (control) to a "conservative dialysis strategy" in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Kidney Injury
What is being tested?
Conservative dialysis strategy and TIW dialysis strategy
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
29 Sep 2017to 13 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult inpatients with AKI-D due to acute tubular necrosis who have already initiated renal replacement therapy
  • If initiated on CRRT, patients will be eligible only if they have already tolerated 1 intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) session at the research site.
  • If transferred from an outside hospital, eligible patients must have tolerated 1 IHD session at the research site prior to enrollment.
  • Not requiring vasopressor support
  • Not intubated and not having a supplemental oxygen requirement of >5 L/min via nasal cannula
  • Treating MDs (nephrology and primary team attendings) and patient (or legally authorized representative) consent to enrollment

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or chronic dialysis prior to hospitalization
  • Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73m2
  • Liver transplant unit patients
  • Patients who underwent kidney transplantation during index hospitalization
  • Cause of AKI-D is complete nephrectomy
  • Current pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UCSF Medical Center Moffitt-Long Hospital

    San Francisco, California, 94143

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Recovery After Dialysis-Requiring Acute Kidney Injury Pilot Study

The Recovery After Dialysis-Requiring Acute Kidney Injury (RAD-AKI) Pilot Study is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial of hospitalized patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (RAD-AKI), comparing conventional thrice-weekly intermittent hemodialysis dialysis (control) to a "conservative dialysis strategy" in which hemodialysis is not continued unless specific metabolic or clinical indications for RRT are present. The overall hypothesis is that the current practice of thrice-weekly acute intermittent hemodialysis for AKI-D masks evidence of renal recovery and may actually delay or preclude recovery. The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the safety and feasibility of the proposed intervention and study design.

Read the detailed description

The recent landmark Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury (AKIKI) trial showed that a delayed strategy for RRT initiation among patients with incident stage 3 AKI - in which RRT was delayed unless specific metabolic or clinical indications for RRT were present - was safe and averted the need for RRT in nearly half of the critically ill participants, in comparison to an early RRT initiation strategy. The hypothesis for this study is: for prevalent patients with established AKI-D, a conservative dialysis strategy - in which hemodialysis is not continued unless specific metabolic or clinical indications for RRT are present - will shorten time to RRT-independence and improve the likelihood of renal recovery.

The RAD-AKI Pilot Study is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial of hospitalized patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (RAD-AKI) that will compare conventional thrice-weekly intermittent hemodialysis dialysis (control) to a "conservative dialysis strategy." The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the safety and feasibility of the proposed intervention and study design.

Being tested
Conservative dialysis strategy, TIW dialysis strategy
Keywords
Dialysis-requiring Acute Kidney Injury, Renal Recovery
Medical subject headings
Acute Kidney Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Conservative dialysis strategyOther

    Participants will receive RRT only when meeting 1 of the following indications (patterned after the AKIKI trial's delayed RRT initiation arm):

    • Blood urea nitrogen >112 mg/dL (40 mmol/L)
    • Serum potassium concentration >6 mmol/L
    • Serum potassium concentration >5.5 mmol/L despite medical treatment (e.g., bicarbonate, glucose-insulin infusion, albuterol, diuretics, sodium polystyrene sulfonate)
    • Arterial blood gas pH <7.15 in a context of pure metabolic acidosis (PaCO2 <35 mmHg) or in a context of mixed acidosis with PaCO2 50 mmHg despite medical treatment to reverse respiratory acidosis (e.g., naloxone), or in the absence of an available arterial blood gas, serum bicarbonate <12 mmol/L
    • Acute pulmonary edema due to fluid overload, responsible for hypoxemia requiring oxygen flow rate >5 L/min to maintain SpO2 >95% or requiring FiO2 >50% in patients already on invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation and despite diuretic therapy
  • TIW dialysis strategyOther

    Thrice-weekly acute intermittent hemodialysis schedule.

Study groups in NCT03305549
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TIW Dialysis StrategyActive comparatorConventional thrice-weekly acute intermittent hemodialysis treatment schedule.
Receives: Other: TIW dialysis strategy
Conservative Dialysis StrategyExperimentalConservative acute intermittent hemodialysis strategy, in which hemodialysis is not continued unless specific metabolic or clinical indications for RRT are present.
Receives: Other: Conservative dialysis strategy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Protocol adherence [feasibility measure]

    Number of times a participant in the "conservative dialysis" arm receives dialysis despite not meeting one of the pre-specified indications for dialysis, number of times a participant in the "TIW dialysis" arm is dialyzed off-schedule

    Measured: Through completion of active study participation (anticipated <2 weeks for each participant)

  2. Number of participants with adverse events in each arm [safety measure]

    Both serious and non-serious adverse events will be monitored, including arrhythmias due to metabolic disturbances, death, emergent dialysis needs, and transfer to ICU or intubation after enrollment

    Measured: Through completion of active study participation (anticipated <2 weeks for each participant)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Patient-reported symptoms

    Survey will assess dyspnea, light-headedness, intradialytic cramping, pain and impaired mobility due to edema

    Measured: Through completion of active study participation (anticipated <2 weeks for each participant)

  2. Hospital length of stay

    Length of inpatient admission, starting after study enrollment

    Measured: Through completion of active study participation (anticipated <2 weeks for each participant)

  3. Recovery status at 30, 60, and 90 days after dialysis initiation

    Assessment of recovery status via phone call or e-mail contact

    Measured: From enrollment to 90 days after dialysis initiation for each patient

  4. Screen-to-enroll ratio [feasibility measure]

    Ratio of number of participants who meet eligibility criteria to number of participants who actually enroll into the study

    Measured: Through study completion (anticipated 2 years total)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2017
  2. Study start29 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion13 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion13 Nov 2019

Why it stopped: Study stopped because sufficient pilot data collected to proceed to next clinical trial.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Pilot 2-arm parallel-comparison randomized clinical trial comparing TIW dialysis (control) to a "conservative dialysis strategy."
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03305549
Sponsor's protocol ID
F32DK115030
Other IDs
F32DK115030
Acronym
RAD-AKI
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
29 Sep 2017
Last updated
19 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Conservative dialysis strategy and TIW dialysis strategy in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Study stopped because sufficient pilot data collected to proceed to next clinical trial.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Protocol adherence [feasibility measure] (time frame: Through completion of active study participation (anticipated <2 weeks for each participant)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in