AzTrials
AzTrials

SeromaPhase 4SAMNCT03305757

Seroma Reduction After Mastectomy

A Phase 4 study testing Artiss, vicryl sutures and Conventional in people with Seroma and Aspiration, run by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rationale: Seroma formation and its sequelae form the mainstay of complications in breast cancer surgery. Seroma has an incidence of 3% to 85%. Complications vary from delayed wound healing, infection, skin flap necrosis, patient discomfort and repeated visits to the out patient clinic. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Seroma, Aspiration, Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Artiss, vicryl sutures and Conventional
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
339 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
1 Jun 2014to 31 Aug 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Older than 18 years
  • Female sex
  • Indication for mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy

Who cannot join

  • Patients undergoing breast conserving therapy
  • Patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction
  • Unable to comprehend implications and extent of study and sign for informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

    Sittard, Limburg, 6162 BG

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Multi-center, Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Closure of the Dead Space After Mastectomy Using Sutures or Tissue Glue Versus Conventional Closure. Protocol for the Seroma Reduction After Mastectomy (SAM) Trial

Rationale: Seroma formation and its sequelae form the mainstay of complications in breast cancer surgery. Seroma has an incidence of 3% to 85%. Complications vary from delayed wound healing, infection, skin flap necrosis, patient discomfort and repeated visits to the out patient clinic. The key to reducing seroma formations seems to partly lie in the obliteration of dead space. The use of electrocautery has been demonstrated to increase seroma formation following mastectomy, however no other surgical devices (laser scalpel, argon diathermy and ultrasonic scalpel) or substances have proven to be superior in seroma reduction.

No prospective randomized controlled trials have been able to demonstrate which techniques are superior in reducing seroma and as a consequence patient discomfort in patients undergoing mastectomy. In a previous retrospective observational study these investigators demonstrated that mastectomy flap fixation significantly reduced seroma formation and the number of seroma aspirations. In a pilot study that was recently performed in one of the investigators hospitals, ARTISS tissue glue was used for skin flap fixation and showed promising results. The investigators hypothesize that obliteration of the dead space following mastectomy will significantly reduce seroma formation, its complications and the discomfort it causes patients undergoing mastectomy.

Read the detailed description
  1. INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE Seroma formation is a common side effect after surgery for breast cancer, with an incidence of 3% to 85%. Seroma is a collection of serous fluid that contains blood plasma and/ or lymph fluid. Some surgeons regard seroma formation as a necessary evil after breast cancer surgery. Seroma formation and its sequelae form the mainstay of complications in breast cancer surgery. Complications vary from delayed wound healing, infection, skin flap necrosis, patient discomfort and repeated visits to the out patient clinic to deal with seroma and its sequelae. The key to reducing seroma formations seems to partly lie in the obliteration of dead space. However, the techniques used to achieve this goal are subjects of much controversy and debate. In a randomized controlled study it was difficult to elucidate whether reducing the dead space or ligation of lymphatics or a combination of both were responsible of reduction of seroma formation. The use of electrocautery has been demonstrated to increase seroma formation following mastectomy, however no other surgical devices (laser scalpel, argon diathermy and ultrasonic scalpel) or substances have proven to be superior in seroma reduction. Seroma formation after axillary dissection for breast cancer cannot be avoided but hopefully it can be minimized by mechanical dead space closure. This systematic review highlights the fact that seroma formation is multifactorial and prevention of seroma is difficult at present. Certain prospective trials have been performed that demonstrate that flap anchoring and therefore dead space reduction could be very beneficial. The trial performed by Laurence et al analysed flap fixation and closed suction drainage. In this study there was no difference in seroma rates, but patients without drains were discharged earlier. In the trial performed by Sakkary et al the amount of fluid drained was significantly less in the flap fixation group however patient discomfort (seroma aspirations and out patient visits) were not assessed. A Cochrane review was published in 2013 regarding Fibrin Glue (Tissuecol), Fibrin Glue did not influence the incidence of postoperative seroma, the mean volume of seroma, wound infections, complications and the length of hospital stays in people undergoing breast cancer surgery. Due to significant methodological and clinical diversity among the included studies this conclusion may be considered weak and biased. Therefore, a major multicentre and high-quality RCT is required to validate these findings. ARTISS tissue glue is a two-component fibrin sealant matrix of human fibrinogen and human thrombin wich has the advantage of setting in 60 seconds. This means that the surgeon has 60 seconds to correctly position the skin flaps before the tissue sealant sets, The investigators hypothesize that obliteration of the dead space following mastectomy will significantly reduce seroma formation. This study aims to reduce seroma formation after mastectomy, proving that obliteration of dead space following mastectomy is vital in preventing seroma formation and its sequelae. The investigators current standard of treatment for patients undergoing mastectomy in Atrium Medical Centre Heerlen is flap fixation using interrupted Vicryl sutures and closed suction drainage. In Orbis Medical Centre Sittard current standard of wound closure in patients undergoing mastectomy is ARTISS Tissue Glue. A retrospective study (13-N-77) has been conducted in our centre in which flap fixation seemed to be an effective surgical technique in reducing dead space and therefore seroma formation in patients undergoing mastectomy for invasive breast cancer. Patients undergoing flap fixation required fewer seroma aspirations and had fewer seroma related complications (infection).
  2. OBJECTIVES

Primary Objective:

To assess:

  1. The number of seroma aspirations

Secondary Objective(s):

To assess:

  1. The number of out patient clinic visits
  2. Infection rate
  3. Shoulder function
  4. Cosmesis
  5. Quality of life, costs and cost-effectiveness (cost/QALY)
  6. STUDY DESIGN

Study design is a double-blind randomized controlled trial. All patients are > 18 years and will be enrolled after obtaining informed consent in the surgical out patient clinics of Zuyderland Medical Center (Heerlen and Sittard), Maastricht University Medical Center, St Jans Gasthuis, Weert and Albert Schweitser Hospital, Dordrecht. All patients have an indication to undergo mastectomy due to invasive breast cancer or DCIS.

Follow up will be performed until 1 year after surgery. Patients will be evaluated in the out patient clinic 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively.

Study population:

Female patients > 18 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or DCIS with an indication to perform mastectomy

Intervention:

  1. Conventional mastectomy with closed suction drainage
  2. Mastectomy with flap fixation using absorbable sutures and closed suction drainage
  3. Mastectomy with flap fixation using ARTISS tissue glue and closed suction drainage

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary endpoint: Number of seroma aspirations

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will be informed about the study before inclusion in the out patient clinic. Informed consent will be obtained in the out patient clinic a week after patients were initially informed. Postoperative check ups will de done more frequently.

Standard postoperative check ups:

2 weeks, 3 months, 12 months

Additional study postoperative check ups:

6 weeks, 6 months Therefore patients will be required to undergo two additional check ups. During out patients' visits, patients will hand in questionnaires regarding shoulder function and a questionnaire scale regarding cosmesis.

Patients will be clinically examined as they usually would be.

Out-patient follow up identical for all three groups

2 weeks post operatively, DASH + cosmesis questionnaire, clinical assessment seroma 6 weeks post operatively, DASH + cosmesis questionnaire + EQ-5D, clinical assessment seroma 3 months post operatively, DASH + cosmesis questionnaire + EQ-5D + cost questionnaire, clinical assessment seroma 6 months post operatively, DASH + cosmesis questionnaire + EQ-5D + cost questionnaire, clinical assessment seroma 12 months post operatively, DASH + cosmesis questionnaire +EQ-5D + cost questionnaire, clinical assessment seroma

EXIT FROM TRIAL 1 YEAR POST OPERATIVELY 4. STUDY POPULATION 4.1 Population (base ) All patients will be recruited from the surgical breast cancer clinic after evaluation for invasive breast cancer or DCIS. Patients will be recruited from two breast cancer clinics, treating 500 patients annually for breast cancer. Patients undergoing mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy are eligible for inclusion.

4.2 Inclusion criteria Older than 18 years Female sex Indication for mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy

4.3 Exclusion criteria Patients undergoing breast conserving therapy Patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction Unable to comprehend implications and extent of study and sign for informed consent

4.4 Sample size calculation The number of seroma aspirations is not normally distributed. Therefore, sample size estimations based on normally distributed continuous variables cannot be used. It is possible to use formulas based on non-parametric analysis methods, estimating the chance of a random patient in the treatment group having fewer aspirations than a random patient in the control group. However, since the majority of patients will have the same number of aspirations (i.e. 0), this method of sample size estimation does not seem to be applicable to our study.

Sample size estimation based on ordinal regression is in line with the data distribution and limited possibilities (maximum number of aspirations in the observational retrospective study was 4) of the outcome variable (Walters SJ. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004: 2(1); 26). Using alpha=0.025 (correction for 2 comparisons with 3 study groups), beta=0.10, and a proportional odds ratio=2.67 (corresponding to an absolute difference of 20% in the need for seroma punctions), the sample size is estimated at 112 patients per study group.

  1. TREATMENT OF SUBJECTS Group 1: conventional treatment and closed suction drainage Group 2: flap fixation with vicryl sutures and closed suction drainage Group 3: Artiss tissue glue and closed suction drainage
Being tested
Artiss, vicryl sutures, Conventional
Medical subject headings
Seroma, Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ArtissDrug

    Also called Artiss glue

    Application of ARTISS Glue to skin flaps after mastectomy

  • vicryl suturesProcedure or surgery

    Flap fixation with vicryl sutures after mastectomy

  • ConventionalProcedure or surgery

    Conventional closure after mastectomy

Study groups in NCT03305757
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
conventional wound closureActive comparatorThe skin flaps will not undergo further treatment in this group.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional
flap fixation with vicryl suturesExperimentalThe skin flaps will be sutured on to the pectoral muscle after having performed the mastectomy.
Receives: Procedure: vicryl sutures
Artiss tissue glueExperimentalARTISS tissue glue will be applied to the skin flaps after mastectomy
Receives: Drug: Artiss

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of seroma aspirations

    Number of seroma aspirations performed post mastectomy

    Measured: 1 year following surgery

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Number of out patient clinic visits

    Number of out patient clinic visits

    Measured: 1 year following surgery

  2. Infection rate

    Post operative surgical site infections

    Measured: 1 year following surgery

  3. Shoulder function

    Shoulder function as measured by the disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH score)

    Measured: 1 year following surgery

  4. Cosmesis

    Subjective post operative cosmesis after mastectomy by questionnaire

    Measured: 1 year following surgery

  5. Impact on Quality of life

    QALY (EQ-5D)

    Measured: 1 year following surgery

  6. Cost effectiveness

    Cost effectiveness as assessed by a validated cost effectiveness questionnaire

    Measured: 1 year following surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2014
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Study design is a double-blind randomized controlled trial. All patients are \> 18 years and will be enrolled after obtaining informed consent in the surgical out patient clinics of Zuyderland Medical Center (Heerlen and Sittard), Maastricht University Medical Center, St Jans Gasthuis, Weert and Albert Schweitser Hospital, Dordrecht. All patients have an indication to undergo mastectomy due to invasive breast cancer or DCIS. Follow up will be performed until 1 year after surgery. Patients will be evaluated in the out patient clinic 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
339 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03305757
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-T-21
Acronym
SAM
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
23 Jan 2017
Last updated
3 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • van Bastelaar J, Beckers A, Snoeijs M, Beets G, Vissers Y. Flap fixation reduces seroma in patients undergoing mastectomy: a significant implication for clinical practice. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 8;14:66. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0830-8.

    PubMed 26952040
  • de Rooij L, van Kuijk SMJ, Granzier RWY, Hintzen KFH, Heymans C, Theunissen LLB, von Meyenfeldt EM, van Essen JA, van Haaren ERM, Janssen A, Vissers YLJ, Beets GL, van Bastelaar J. Reducing Seroma Formation and Its Sequelae After Mastectomy by Closure of the Dead Space: A Multi-center, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial (SAM-Trial). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2599-2608. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09225-8. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

    PubMed 33078318
  • van Bastelaar J, Granzier R, van Roozendaal LM, Beets G, Dirksen CD, Vissers Y. A multi-center, double blind randomized controlled trial evaluating flap fixation after mastectomy using sutures or tissue glue versus conventional closure: protocol for the Seroma reduction After Mastectomy (SAM) trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4740-8.

    PubMed 30119663

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Artiss, vicryl sutures and Conventional in people with Seroma and Aspiration, run by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of seroma aspirations (time frame: 1 year following surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03305757, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in