SepsisINTELLIGENCE-1NCT03306186
Hemospec Device for the Diagnosis of Sepsis
A study testing HemoSpec in people with Sepsis, run by University of Athens at 5 sites in Greece.
Trial summary
A diagnostic devise, namely HemoSpec, had been developed that integrates clinical information, along with information on circulating protein biomarkers and the morphology of white blood cells to achieve early diagnosis of sepsis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- HemoSpec
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 183 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesGreece
- Study dates
- 9 Oct 2017to 31 Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age above or equal to 18 years old
- Both genders
- Written consent provided from patients or their first-degree relatives for patients unable to consent
- Patients with acute pancreatitis or post-operative or with clinical signs of infection
- Considerable risk of death as as indicated by the presence of at least one of the following: i) sudden alteration of mental status; ii) systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg; and iii) high respiratory rate defined as more than or equal to 22 breaths per minute.
Who cannot join
- Known infection by the human immunodeficiency virus-1;
- Neutropenia defined as an absolute neutrophil count lower than 1000 neutrophils/mm3 due to reasons other than an infection.
- Single trauma or multiple injuries
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Greece5 sites
1st Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Ippokration General Hospital
Athens, 11521
Intensive Care Unit, Ippokration General Hospital
Athens, 11521
4th Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital
Athens, 12462
Intensive Care Unit, Aghia Olga Konstantopouleion General Hospital
Athens, 14232
Intensive Care Unit, Tzanio Hospital of Piraeus
Piraeus, 18536
About this study
Official title: Integration of Clinical and Laboratory Information to Generate Technological Advance for the Diagnosis of Sepsis
A diagnostic devise, namely HemoSpec, had been developed that integrates clinical information, along with information on circulating protein biomarkers and the morphology of white blood cells to achieve early diagnosis of sepsis. The current study is aiming to validate and improve performance of HemoSpec for the rapid assessment of the critically ill patient.
Read the detailed description
Sepsis is a life-threating organ dysfunction resulting from the dysregulated response of the host to an infection. It is estimated that 1.5 million people present with sepsis annually in Northern America and another 1.5 million people in Europe; 30 to 50% of them die making sepsis the leading cause of death. The key-point in the management of sepsis is the early resuscitation with broad-spectrum antimicrobials and intravenous fluids, if possible within the first hour. The great mortality of sepsis indicates that this goal is not easy to be achieved for two main reasons: the first is the delay in recognition of the septic patients and the second is the resistance of the implicated pathogen to broad-spectrum antimicrobials.
In an attempt to improve the failure of physicians for early sepsis recognition, several markers have been developed. Some of them rely on clinical signs of the host and others on the measurements of circulating biomarkers. Recently, qSOFA (quick SOFA score) has been introduced to help the early recognition of sepsis in patients who present with infection outside the Intensive care Unit (ICU) i.e. either in the community or during hospitalization in the general ward1. However, there are concerns of the sensitivity of qSOFA and many introduce the need to measure biomarkers in serum. These biomarkers are usually protein molecules that are over-produced in the host as a result of the interaction with an infective insult. However, these protein molecules are produced by white blood cells. What is currently known is that although most of patients present with a similar phenotype, their pathophysiology is diverse. More precisely, although the majority of patients with sepsis present with high concentrations of protein molecules like interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in their blood, in some patients circulating white blood cells remain over-active and in other patients they are significantly anergic, a situation often known as sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Another molecule, called soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), is the shed uPAR receptor on neutrophils and is released in the circulation as a result of neutrophil activation; concentrations greater than 12 ng/ml can trace with negative predictive value almost 95% the patient at great chance of unfavorable outcome. As such, the robust diagnosis of sepsis may rely on a combination of clinical assessment, measurement of protein biomarkers and validation of the activity of circulating white blood cells.
One FrameWork 7-funded initiative from seven European countries aims to develop a rapid score that can integrate all clinical and laboratory information and provide early diagnosis whether a patient has sepsis or not. The vision of this initiative is to build a device that is called HemoSpec. With this approach, whole blood coming from patients will be in parallel analyzed into three aspects: a) absolute white blood cell counting; b) information on the fluidity and activity of the white blood cells using Raman spectroscopy; and c) measurement of serum levels of IL-6, CRP, PCT and suPAR. The end result is building a diagnostic algorithm where clinical information is also taken into consideration.
The project was started in November 2013 and the HemoSpec device is anticipated to be ready by February 2017. The diagnostic performance of HemoSpec is currently based on preliminary data coming from 60 patients (20 controls, 20 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and 20 with sepsis) hospitalized in Jena University Hospital. The current study is aiming to validate and improve performance of HemoSpec for the rapid assessment of the critically ill patient in a larger phase II diagnostic study.
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Being tested
- HemoSpec
- Keywords
- diagnosis, prognosis
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HemoSpecDevice
Blood sampling for analysis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HemoSpec | Experimental | Diagnosis of sepsis using HemoSpec device Receives: Device: HemoSpec |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity of HemoSpec for the diagnosis of sepsis
The sensitivity of HemoSpec output to diagnose the presence of sepsis compared to the absence of sepsis. HemoSpec output will be considered to provide a satisfactory diagnosis of sepsis if sensitivity for the diagnosis is greater than 85%.
Measured: 3 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Diagnostic performance for sepsis
The diagnostic performance of HemoSpec output to diagnose the presence of sepsis compared to the absence of sepsis. The diagnostic performance is composed by the aggregation of specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
Measured: 3 days
Prognostics performance for sepsis
The prognostic performance of HemoSpec output to predict unfavorable outcome compared to survivors. The prognostic performance is composed by the aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
Measured: 28 days
Prognostic performance for organ dysfunction
The prognostic performance of HemoSpec output to predict progression into organ dysfunction. The prognostic performance is composed by the aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
Measured: 28 days
Diagnostic performance over qSOFA
The aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of HemoSpec output to indicate patients with infection among those scoring positive for qSOFA.
Measured: 3 days
Diagnostic performance and microbiology
The diagnostic performance of HemoSpec output to diagnose the presence of sepsis between patients with microbiologically-proven infection and patients without microbiologically-proven infection. The diagnostic performance is composed by the aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
Measured: 3 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2017
- Study start9 Oct 2017
- Primary completion30 Dec 2017
- Study completion31 Mar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 183 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Athens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ippokration General Hospital, Tzanion General Hospital of Piraeus, Aghia Olga Konstantopouleion General Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, M.D., University of Athens
- Investigators
- Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD, PhD, Study chair, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensKonstantinos Toutouzas, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthanasios Prekates, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Tzaneion General HospitalStylianos Karatzas, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Ippokration General HospitalChristos Mathas, MD, Principal investigator, Aghia Olga General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03306186
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INTELLIGENCE1
- Acronym
- INTELLIGENCE-1
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 15 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
PubMed 26903338Becker KL, Snider R, Nylen ES. Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):941-52. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318165BABB.
PubMed 18431284Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Norrby-Teglund A, Mylona V, Savva A, Tsangaris I, Dimopoulou I, Mouktaroudi M, Raftogiannis M, Georgitsi M, Linner A, Adamis G, Antonopoulou A, Apostolidou E, Chrisofos M, Katsenos C, Koutelidakis I, Kotzampassi K, Koratzanis G, Koupetori M, Kritselis I, Lymberopoulou K, Mandragos K, Marioli A, Sunden-Cullberg J, Mega A, Prekates A, Routsi C, Gogos C, Treutiger CJ, Armaganidis A, Dimopoulos G. Risk assessment in sepsis: a new prognostication rule by APACHE II score and serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor. Crit Care. 2012 Aug 8;16(4):R149. doi: 10.1186/cc11463.
PubMed 22873681
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integration of Clinical and Laboratory Information to Generate Technological Advance for the Diagnosis of Sepsis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03306186
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTELLIGENCE-1 / INTELLIGENCE1
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Keywords
- diagnosis, prognosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 183 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AthensUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ippokration General Hospital, Tzanion General Hospital of Piraeus, Aghia Olga Konstantopouleion General Hospital
- Study start
- 9 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A diagnostic devise, namely HemoSpec, had been developed that integrates clinical information, along with information on circulating protein biomarkers and the morphology of white blood cells to achieve early diagnosis of sepsis. The current study is aiming to validate and improve performance of HemoSpec for the rapid assessment of the critically ill patient.
Detailed description
Sepsis is a life-threating organ dysfunction resulting from the dysregulated response of the host to an infection. It is estimated that 1.5 million people present with sepsis annually in Northern America and another 1.5 million people in Europe; 30 to 50% of them die making sepsis the leading cause of death. The key-point in the management of sepsis is the early resuscitation with broad-spectrum antimicrobials and intravenous fluids, if possible within the first hour. The great mortality of sepsis indicates that this goal is not easy to be achieved for two main reasons: the first is the delay in recognition of the septic patients and the second is the resistance of the implicated pathogen to broad-spectrum antimicrobials.
In an attempt to improve the failure of physicians for early sepsis recognition, several markers have been developed. Some of them rely on clinical signs of the host and others on the measurements of circulating biomarkers. Recently, qSOFA (quick SOFA score) has been introduced to help the early recognition of sepsis in patients who present with infection outside the Intensive care Unit (ICU) i.e. either in the community or during hospitalization in the general ward1. However, there are concerns of the sensitivity of qSOFA and many introduce the need to measure biomarkers in serum. These biomarkers are usually protein molecules that are over-produced in the host as a result of the interaction with an infective insult. However, these protein molecules are produced by white blood cells. What is currently known is that although most of patients present with a similar phenotype, their pathophysiology is diverse. More precisely, although the majority of patients with sepsis present with high concentrations of protein molecules like interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in their blood, in some patients circulating white blood cells remain over-active and in other patients they are significantly anergic, a situation often known as sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Another molecule, called soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), is the shed uPAR receptor on neutrophils and is released in the circulation as a result of neutrophil activation; concentrations greater than 12 ng/ml can trace with negative predictive value almost 95% the patient at great chance of unfavorable outcome. As such, the robust diagnosis of sepsis may rely on a combination of clinical assessment, measurement of protein biomarkers and validation of the activity of circulating white blood cells.
One FrameWork 7-funded initiative from seven European countries aims to develop a rapid score that can integrate all clinical and laboratory information and provide early diagnosis whether a patient has sepsis or not. The vision of this initiative is to build a device that is called HemoSpec. With this approach, whole blood coming from patients will be in parallel analyzed into three aspects: a) absolute white blood cell counting; b) information on the fluidity and activity of the white blood cells using Raman spectroscopy; and c) measurement of serum levels of IL-6, CRP, PCT and suPAR. The end result is building a diagnostic algorithm where clinical information is also taken into consideration.
The project was started in November 2013 and the HemoSpec device is anticipated to be ready by February 2017. The diagnostic performance of HemoSpec is currently based on preliminary data coming from 60 patients (20 controls, 20 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and 20 with sepsis) hospitalized in Jena University Hospital. The current study is aiming to validate and improve performance of HemoSpec for the rapid assessment of the critically ill patient in a larger phase II diagnostic study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HemoSpec | Experimental | Device: HemoSpecDiagnosis of sepsis using HemoSpec device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age above or equal to 18 years old
- Both genders
- Written consent provided from patients or their first-degree relatives for patients unable to consent
- Patients with acute pancreatitis or post-operative or with clinical signs of infection
- Considerable risk of death as as indicated by the presence of at least one of the following: i) sudden alteration of mental status; ii) systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg; and iii) high respiratory rate defined as more than or equal to 22 breaths per minute.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Known infection by the human immunodeficiency virus-1;
- Neutropenia defined as an absolute neutrophil count lower than 1000 neutrophils/mm3 due to reasons other than an infection.
- Single trauma or multiple injuries
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HemoSpecBlood sampling for analysis | Device | HemoSpec |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity of HemoSpec for the diagnosis of sepsis
Time frame: 3 days
The sensitivity of HemoSpec output to diagnose the presence of sepsis compared to the absence of sepsis. HemoSpec output will be considered to provide a satisfactory diagnosis of sepsis if sensitivity for the diagnosis is greater than 85%.
5 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic performance for sepsis
Time frame: 3 days
Prognostics performance for sepsis
Time frame: 28 days
Prognostic performance for organ dysfunction
Time frame: 28 days
Diagnostic performance over qSOFA
Time frame: 3 days
Diagnostic performance and microbiology
Time frame: 3 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 26903338Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
- Background: PubMed 18431284Becker KL, Snider R, Nylen ES. Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):941-52. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318165BABB.
- Background: PubMed 22873681Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Norrby-Teglund A, Mylona V, Savva A, Tsangaris I, Dimopoulou I, Mouktaroudi M, Raftogiannis M, Georgitsi M, Linner A, Adamis G, Antonopoulou A, Apostolidou E, Chrisofos M, Katsenos C, Koutelidakis I, Kotzampassi K, Koratzanis G, Koupetori M, Kritselis I, Lymberopoulou K, Mandragos K, Marioli A, Sunden-Cullberg J, Mega A, Prekates A, Routsi C, Gogos C, Treutiger CJ, Armaganidis A, Dimopoulos G. Risk assessment in sepsis: a new prognostication rule by APACHE II score and serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor. Crit Care. 2012 Aug 8;16(4):R149. doi: 10.1186/cc11463.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
ICU-SUCCEED for Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure and Their Caregivers
Acute Respiratory Failure, Critical Illness
RecruitingPhase 3
THE ROLE OF PANCREATIC STONE PROTEIN (PSP) AND PSP-GUIDED EARLY MEROPENEM TREATMENT TO MITIGATE SEPSIS RISK AT THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: THE PROMISE DOUBLE BLIND, PHASE III, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of an AI-Assisted Tool for CLABSI Surveillance at VA Medical Centers
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI), Bacteremia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound-Calibrated Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Monitoring: Value and Accuracy in Hemodynamic Care
Sepsis, Circulatory Instability
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Trajectories of Myocardial Work in Patients With Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock Hyperdynamic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD, PhD study chair
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Konstantinos Toutouzas, MD, PhD principal investigator
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Athanasios Prekates, MD, PhD principal investigator
Tzaneion General Hospital
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HemoSpec in people with Sepsis, run by University of Athens at 5 sites in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity of HemoSpec for the diagnosis of sepsis (time frame: 3 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03306186, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.