Pronator Teres Nerve SyndromeNCT03308279
Prediction Model for Minimizing the Risk of Median Nerve Puncture
An observational study of Pronator Teres Nerve Syndrome, run by Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
Trial summary
The main aim of this study was to correlate anthropometric measures of the forearm in healthy subjects with the ultrasound pronator teres depth to determine the needle length in order to avoid injury of the median nerve during pronator teres dry needle approach. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pronator Teres Nerve Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2016to 15 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Asinthomatic subjets who respond to the researchers calls
Who may be able to join
- Asinthomatic subjets
Who cannot join
- Pain in the 3 moths before in the forearm
About this study
Official title: Ultrasound and Anthropometric Prediction Model for Minimizing the Risk of Median Nerve Puncture With Dry Needling Approach Into the Pronator Teres Muscle
The main aim of this study was to correlate anthropometric measures of the forearm in healthy subjects with the ultrasound pronator teres depth to determine the needle length in order to avoid injury of the median nerve during pronator teres dry needle approach. A cross-sectional study, was carried out in order to perform a predictive model for the median nerve depth into the pronator teres muscle using a decision tree analysis algorithm.
- Conditions
- Pronator Teres Nerve Syndrome
- Being tested
- Ultrasound
- Keywords
- dry needling, median nerve, Pronator Teres
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UltrasoundDiagnostic test
Also called Anthropometric meassures
Ultrasound and Anthropometric meassures
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Asinthomatic | The only group evaluated Receives: Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Muscle thicknesses
With ultrasound
Measured: 10 minutes
Median Nerve depth
With ultrasound
Measured: 5 minutes
Forearm Perimeter
in cm
Measured: 2 minutes
Forearm Longitude
in cm
Measured: 2 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2017
- Study start1 Sep 2016
- Primary completion30 Jun 2017
- Study completion15 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pronator Teres Nerve SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Raúl Ferrer-Peña, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03308279
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pronator Teres Prediction
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gurses IA, Altinel L, Gayretli O, Akgul T, Uzun I, Dikici F. Morphology and morphometry of the ulnar head of the pronator teres muscle in relation to median nerve compression at the proximal forearm. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8):1005-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
PubMed 27843079Dang AC, Rodner CM. Unusual compression neuropathies of the forearm, part II: median nerve. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Dec;34(10):1915-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.017.
PubMed 19969200Kowalska B, Sudol-Szopinska I. Ultrasound assessment on selected peripheral nerve pathologies. Part I: Entrapment neuropathies of the upper limb - excluding carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrason. 2012 Sep;12(50):307-18. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2012.0016. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
PubMed 26674101
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasound and Anthropometric Prediction Model for Minimizing the Risk of Median Nerve Puncture With Dry Needling Approach Into the Pronator Teres Muscle
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03308279
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pronator Teres Prediction
- Conditions
- Pronator Teres Nerve Syndrome
- Keywords
- dry needling, median nerve, Pronator Teres
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de MadridUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main aim of this study was to correlate anthropometric measures of the forearm in healthy subjects with the ultrasound pronator teres depth to determine the needle length in order to avoid injury of the median nerve during pronator teres dry needle approach. A cross-sectional study, was carried out in order to perform a predictive model for the median nerve depth into the pronator teres muscle using a decision tree analysis algorithm.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Asinthomatic | – | Diagnostic Test: UltrasoundThe only group evaluated |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Asinthomatic subjets who respond to the researchers calls
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Asinthomatic subjets
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pain in the 3 moths before in the forearm
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UltrasoundAlso: Anthropometric meassuresUltrasound and Anthropometric meassures | Diagnostic test | Asinthomatic |
Primary outcome
Muscle thicknesses
Time frame: 10 minutes
With ultrasound
Median Nerve depth
Time frame: 5 minutes
With ultrasound
Forearm Perimeter
Time frame: 2 minutes
in cm
Forearm Longitude
Time frame: 2 minutes
in cm
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2017.
- Background: PubMed 27843079Gurses IA, Altinel L, Gayretli O, Akgul T, Uzun I, Dikici F. Morphology and morphometry of the ulnar head of the pronator teres muscle in relation to median nerve compression at the proximal forearm. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8):1005-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 19969200Dang AC, Rodner CM. Unusual compression neuropathies of the forearm, part II: median nerve. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Dec;34(10):1915-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.017.
- Background: PubMed 26674101Kowalska B, Sudol-Szopinska I. Ultrasound assessment on selected peripheral nerve pathologies. Part I: Entrapment neuropathies of the upper limb - excluding carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrason. 2012 Sep;12(50):307-18. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2012.0016. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pronator Teres Nerve Syndrome, run by Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Muscle thicknesses (time frame: 10 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03308279, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.