AzTrials
AzTrials

InflammationNCT03311048

Airway Inflammatory Profile Among Cleaning Workers From Different Workplaces

A study testing Nasal swab and Questionnaires in people with Inflammation and Work Related Illnesses, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There are consistent evidences through epidemiologic studies in different places, reinforced by occupational asthma records studies, that cleaning workers have a high risk in developing asthma. These risk determinants are not totally known. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Nasal swab and Questionnaires
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
167 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Feb 2015to 1 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cleaning workers from different workplaces
  • Non-cleaning workers (control group)
  • People legally capable (over 18 years old)
  • Must be able to nasal swab collection and answer questionnaires
  • Sign the informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Smokers (active)
  • Pregnant (women)
  • Lactating (women)
  • Not accept the informed consent form
  • Individuals at continuing therapy for airways treating disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Children's Institute of the Clinical Hospital of University of Sao Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246903

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

There are consistent evidences through epidemiologic studies in different places, reinforced by occupational asthma records studies, that cleaning workers have a high risk in developing asthma. These risk determinants are not totally known. The air around the worker may have some higher and lower molecular weight with different concentration peaks from removed dust of the cleaning process and volatile substances from cleaning products. Cleaning activities may occur in different places. Although the relationship between rhinitis and asthma is already established, there are not many studies about occupational rhinitis-related work place. This study aimed to investigate airway inflammation and respiratory symptoms of cleaning workers from different workplaces.

Read the detailed description

Were recruited to participate in the study individuals from four different workplaces: Hospital; University; Housekeeper and Control (office workers). The research was performed in Cacoal city, Rondonia, Brazil. Smokers (active), pregnant, lactating, and individuals at continuing therapy for treating disorders of the airways were excluded.

Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees evaluation were performed using the European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module.

Nasal swab was collected for evaluation of upper airways inflammation, according to Ronchetti et al protocol, using a sterile swab that was moistened with 1mL saline solution; both nostrils were scraped using this swab. Twenty minutes after this, laminas were stained using May-Grunwald-Giemsa to eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages and epithelial cells identification. Cells were analyzed using a Nikon E600 optical microscope (Nikon, Canada), of 1.000 x magnitude. Whenever possible a total of 200 cells were counted in two slides.

Statistical analysis were performed using Anova variance (Kruskal-Wallis) and Dunn's test for comparisons between groups. To evaluate the association between the qualitative variables we used the chi-square, Statistical software Sigma Plot 12.0 and SPSS 21.0. The confidence interval was 95% (p <0.05).

Being tested
Nasal swab, Questionnaires
Keywords
Cleaning workers, Work-related asthma, Work-related rhinitis, Respiratory symptoms, Nasal swab
Medical subject headings
Inflammation, Signs and Symptoms, Asthma, Occupational, Rhinitis, Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nasal swabOther

    Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation.

  • QuestionnairesOther

    Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.

Study groups in NCT03311048
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HospitalExperimentalHospital cleaning workers Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Receives: Other: Nasal swab; Other: Questionnaires
UniversityExperimentalCampus (university) cleaning workers Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Receives: Other: Nasal swab; Other: Questionnaires
HousekeeperExperimentalHousemaid (cleaning workers) Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Receives: Other: Nasal swab; Other: Questionnaires
ControlExperimentalOffice workers (no relationship to cleaning) Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Receives: Other: Nasal swab; Other: Questionnaires

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measure of respiratory symptoms

    Questionnaires to analyze respiratory symptons

    Measured: One day

  2. Cell differentiation for the evaluation of nasal epithelial inflammation

    Nasal swab will be collected to analyze cell differentiation

    Measured: One day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2017
  2. Study start1 Feb 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
: This study included 167 participants, divided in four groups based on workplace: Hospital, University, Housekeeper and Control. Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
167 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03311048
Sponsor's protocol ID
15149013.3.0000.5463
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
19 May 2017
Last updated
30 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ocansey S, Tatton-Brown K. EZH2-Related Overgrowth. 2013 Jul 18 [updated 2025 Jun 26]. In: Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews(R) [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148820/

    PubMed 23865096
  • Aun MV, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Almeida FM, Bruggemann TR, Kalil J, Martins Mde A, Arantes-Costa FM, Giavina-Bianchi P. Sensitization by subcutaneous route is superior to intraperitoneal route in induction of asthma by house dust mite in a murine mode. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015 Oct-Dec;13(4):560-6. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3389.

    PubMed 26761554
  • da Silva RA, Almeida FM, Olivo CR, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Perini A, Martins MA, Carvalho CR. Comparison of the effects of aerobic conditioning before and after pulmonary allergic inflammation. Inflammation. 2015;38(3):1229-38. doi: 10.1007/s10753-014-0090-0.

    PubMed 25537797
  • Brito JM, Macchione M, Yoshizaki K, Toledo-Arruda AC, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Andrade Mde F, Mauad T, Rivero DH, Saldiva PH. Acute cardiopulmonary effects induced by the inhalation of concentrated ambient particles during seasonal variation in the city of Sao Paulo. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Sep 1;117(5):492-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00156.2014. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

    PubMed 25012028
  • Possa SS, Charafeddine HT, Righetti RF, da Silva PA, Almeida-Reis R, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Perini A, Prado CM, Leick-Maldonado EA, Martins MA, Tiberio Ide F. Rho-kinase inhibition attenuates airway responsiveness, inflammation, matrix remodeling, and oxidative stress activation induced by chronic inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012 Dec 1;303(11):L939-52. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00034.2012. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

    PubMed 23002076
  • Manzano RM, Carvalho CR, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Vieira JE. Chest physiotherapy during immediate postoperative period among patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008 Sep;126(5):269-73. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802008000500005.

    PubMed 19099160
  • de Amorim CG, Sa Malbouisson LM, Saraiva BM, Pedro FM, Martins MA, Carmona MJ. Evaluation of exhaled nitric oxide in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 May-Jun;59(3):286-96. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000300003. English, Portuguese.

    PubMed 19488541
  • Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Barnabe V, Carvalho AL, Martins MA, Saldiva PH, Nunes Mdo P. Comparison of three methods for differential cell count in induced sputum. Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):1060-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.3.1060.

    PubMed 12970038
  • Palomino AL, Bussamra MH, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Martins MA, Nunes Mdo P, Rodrigues JC. [Induced sputum in children and adolescents with asthma: safety, clinical applicability and inflammatory cells aspects in stable patients and during exacerbation]. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005 May-Jun;81(3):216-24. Portuguese.

    PubMed 15951906
  • Paro-Heitor ML, Bussamra MH, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Martins MA, Okay TS, Rodrigues JC. Exhaled nitric oxide for monitoring childhood asthma inflammation compared to sputum analysis, serum interleukins and pulmonary function. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 Feb;43(2):134-41. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20747.

    PubMed 18085692
  • Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Machado FS, Almeida FM, Nunes Mdo P, Martins MA, Vieira JE. Non-asthmatic patients show increased exhaled nitric oxide concentrations. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(1):5-10. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000100002.

    PubMed 19142544
  • Mendes FA, Goncalves RC, Nunes MP, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Cukier A, Stelmach R, Jacob-Filho W, Martins MA, Carvalho CR. Effects of aerobic training on psychosocial morbidity and symptoms in patients with asthma: a randomized clinical trial. Chest. 2010 Aug;138(2):331-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2389. Epub 2010 Apr 2.

    PubMed 20363839
  • Hizume DC, Toledo AC, Moriya HT, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Almeida FM, Arantes-Costa FM, Vieira RP, Dolhnikoff M, Kasahara DI, Martins MA. Cigarette smoke dissociates inflammation and lung remodeling in OVA-sensitized and challenged mice. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2012 Apr 30;181(2):167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

    PubMed 22446562
  • Silva RA, Almeida FM, Olivo CR, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Martins MA, Carvalho CR. Exercise reverses OVA-induced inhibition of glucocorticoid receptor and increases anti-inflammatory cytokines in asthma. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Jan;26(1):82-92. doi: 10.1111/sms.12411. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

    PubMed 25652754
  • da Paz ER, de Lima CMF, Felix SN, Schaeffer B, Galvao CES, Correia AT, Righetti RF, de Arruda Martins M, de Fatima Lopes Calvo Tiberio I, Saraiva-Romanholo BM. Airway inflammatory profile among cleaning workers from different workplaces. BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Apr 29;22(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01949-5.

    PubMed 35488256

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nasal swab and Questionnaires in people with Inflammation and Work Related Illnesses, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measure of respiratory symptoms (time frame: One day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03311048, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in