Pediatric CancerPhase 1/2TEDDINCT03315546
Radiotherapy Delivery in Deep Inspiration for Pediatric Patients
A Phase 1/2 study testing radiotherapy delivery in deep-inspiration in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
TEDDI is a non-randomised phase II trial in Scandinavia. All pediatric patients, referred for radiotherapy in the thorax or abdomen and irrespective of diagnosis, are eligible. Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a simple radiotherapy technique, which could have a dramatic impact on the risk of late effects in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- radiotherapy delivery in deep-inspiration
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2017to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age 5-17 years.
- Patients with a tumor in the mediastinum or abdomen with possible need of radiotherapy according to current treatment guidelines, irrespective of cancer diagnosis.
- The ability to perform three sequential breath-holds of 20 seconds each during the coaching session.
- Written informed consent from parents or legal guardians.
Who cannot join
- Age younger than 5 years or older than 17 years.
- The need for radiotherapy under general anesthesia.
- CNS tumor or pelvic localization.
- Unable to understand coaching information directly or through interpretation.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Maja V Maraldo, MD, PhD contact
Anni YS Jørgensen, MD contact
3 sites in 2 countries
Denmark2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8000
Akmal Safwat, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Danmark, 2100
Maja V Maraldo, maja.vestmoe.maraldo@regionh.dk
Finland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, 00290
Leila Vaalavirta, MD, Leila.Vaalavirta@hus.fi
About this study
Official title: Radiotherapy Delivery in Deep Inspiration for Pediatric Patients: TEDDI - a NOPHO Feasibility Study
TEDDI is a non-randomised phase II trial in Scandinavia. All pediatric patients, referred for radiotherapy in the thorax or abdomen and irrespective of diagnosis, are eligible.
Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a simple radiotherapy technique, which could have a dramatic impact on the risk of late effects in children. In DIBH, the radiotherapy is delivered while the patient holds his/her breath (4-6 sequential breath-holds). The anatomy is changed and imaging artifacts from respiratory movement are diminished. DIBH is widely used in adult patients with breast cancer and mediastinal lymphoma to minimize the risk of radiation-induced late effects due to a reduced dose to the healthy organs. Also, the technique is simple and cost-efficient.
Read more
For pediatric patients, the investigators aim to:
- Estimate the dosimetric benefit of radiotherapy using DIBH compared to free-breathing
- Establish the compliance of DIBH
- Determine if DIBH is an accurate and reproducible strategy
- Optimize treatment planning considering the risk from loss of tumour control as well as the risk of late effects.
Read the detailed description
Background:
The majority (approximately 80%) of pediatric patients with cancer become long-term survivors. Long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors has documented a substantial treatment-induced increased mortality and morbidity, primarily from cardiovascular disease and second cancers. Specifically, cardiac mortality has been shown to be 5-fold higher, cardiac morbidity 2-fold to 6-fold higher, and the incidence of second cancers 8-fold higher in childhood cancer survivors compared to the general population or siblings. Due to the young age at diagnosis and corresponding long life expectancy of pediatric patients the impact of late effect(s) on patient quality of life, morbidity, and ultimately mortality is non-trivial.
Radiotherapy-induced late effects are severe, yet difficult to assess and quantify as they occur late and, therefore, often are the results of treatment regimens now considered outdated. Nonetheless, the risk of radiation-induced late effects is known to be influenced by both the radiation dose and the volume of irradiated tissue. In adults, the use of more conformal radiotherapy delivery techniques and breathing adaptation has been introduced in order to limit the irradiation of the surrounding healthy organs. However, there has been a reluctance to implement new radiotherapy delivery techniques in the treatment of pediatric patients as late effects data are not available for these new techniques and for the fear of a low compliance with breathing instructions.
Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a simple radiotherapy technique, which could have a dramatic impact on late effects in children. In DIBH, the radiotherapy is delivered while the patient holds his/her breath (defined as 4 to 6 sequential breath-holds of ≥20 sec). In deep inspiration, the patient anatomy is changed and imaging artifacts from respiratory movement are diminished as the organs are not moving. Radiotherapy in DIBH can reduce the irradiation of the heart, breasts, and lungs without impacting the delivered radiation dose to the tumor and with no detriment to other healthy organs. Also, the technique is simple and cost-efficient. DIBH is widely used throughout the world in adult patients with left-sided breast cancer and with mediastinal lymphoma to minimize the risk of radiation-induced late effects.
The Department of Radiation Oncology at Rigshospitalet has pioneered the use of DIBH in the treatment of patients with breast cancer and mediastinal lymphoma [Korreman et al., Pedersen et al.] and is currently prospectively testing the DIBH technique in a more frail population of lung cancer patients. The department has extensive experience in the daily delivery and patient coaching of adult patients. While the experience from several centers confirms that the compliance of adult patients to DIBH is excellent, no reports exist of the applicability of DIBH to pediatric patients, especially the very young.
The investigators hypothesize that TEDDI is a feasible and reproducible strategy which will result in a 25% reduction in the mean radiation dose to the heart in pediatric patients referred for radiotherapy to tumors in the thorax or abdomen. This is expected to be true for all pediatric patients, regardless of age.
Through TEDDI, the investigators specifically aim to:
- Estimate the dosimetric benefit of radiotherapy using DIBH compared to free-breathing in pediatric patients.
- Establish the compliance of DIBH in pediatric patients in all age groups.
- Determine if DIBH is an accurate and reproducible strategy for pediatric patients.
Key research questions:
- What is the extent of the dosimetric benefit of DIBH compared to free-breathing radiotherapy? For adult patients with breast cancer, malignant lymphoma, and lung cancer, radiotherapy delivered in DIBH compared to free-breathing significantly lowers the dose to the heart, lungs, and stomach. However, for very young patients the anatomical changes (i.e. inflation of the lungs, increased separation of the heart and the tumor) might be less pronounced than for adults hampering the dosimetric advantage of DIBH. Hypothesis 1 (H1): For more than 75% of patients, treatment in DIBH will be dosimetrically superior to treatment in free-breathing.
- Is DIBH well tolerated by pediatric patients throughout their treatment? At present, the information material regarding DIBH and the visual feedback equipment (consisting of video goggles) is designed for and aimed at adult patients. In TEDDI, all aspects of the current DIBH workflow will be adapted in order to provide a comfortable setting for pediatric patients. Based on preliminary tests on healthy volunteers, children as young as 5 years are able to comply with the DIBH instructions given by the present visual feedback equipment. Hypothesis 2 (H2): over 90% of pediatric patients older than 5 years can perform a stable and comfortable DIBH (in the form of 4 to 6 sequential breath-holds of ≥20 sec) through their course of radiotherapy.
- Can the prescribed radiation dose be delivered accurately and reproducibly to the tumor in DIBH? Interfraction monitoring will ensure reliable treatment between treatment days using the RPM system, and intrafraction monitoring will assess the stability of the patient positioning/breath-hold during the treatment. Image acquisition parameters will be optimized to provide sufficient image quality at the lowest possible radiation exposure.
Hypothesis 3 (H3): The tumor position will be reproducible from day to day, as well as from breath-hold to breath-hold. Variations in position will be less than 5 mm over the whole treatment course.
Treatment planning:
All diagnostic imaging during treatment and treatment planning will be performed according to national guidelines (as per cancer diagnosis). For the radiotherapy planning, a planning CT scan will be performed in DIBH as well as in free-breathing for each patient. On both scans the gross tumor volume (GTV), the clinical target volume (CTV) which comprises the GTV adjusted for normal tissue, and the planning target volume (PTV) which is the CTV including a planning margin, will be defined. All relevant, healthy organs at risk from radiation exposure will be contoured (e.g. heart, female breasts, lungs, esophagus, thyroid, salivary glands, spinal cord, bone marrow, stomach, spleen, kidneys, liver). A DIBH and a free-breathing radiotherapy plan will be calculated, both with similar planning objectives for the tumor and organs at risk. All DIBH treatment plans will be designed to keep the number of breath-holds per fraction as low as reasonably achievable (including image guidance) for patient comfort.
Whenever a PET scanning is considered an integral part of the radiotherapy planning, a PET scanning should also be performed in the treatment position in both DIBH and in free-breathing for optimal image fusion. However, for institutions where this is not feasible, participation in TEDDI is still possible.
Treatment delivery:
Patients will be treated in DIBH, if the calculated treatment plan in DIBH is superior to the treatment plan in free-breathing with respect to the lowest overall dose to the organs at risk while maintaining acceptable tumor coverage. Coverage of the CTV and PTV will have the highest priority, as per ICRU83 guidelines.
Follow-up:
Enrollment in TEDDI will not affect the standard follow-up program of pediatric patients which is diagnosis specific.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Cancer
- Being tested
- radiotherapy delivery in deep-inspiration
- Keywords
- deep inspiration breath-hold, radiotherapy, late effects, pediatric cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
radiotherapy delivery in deep-inspirationRadiation
Radiotherapy delivery i deep-inspiration versus free-breathing
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The dosimetric benefit of DIBH
For each patient, the radiation treatment plan calculated in DIBH and in FB will be compared
Measured: 1 day prior to treatment start, the superior radiation treatment plan is chosen for treatment delivery
Secondary outcomes (3)
Patient compliance defined as 1) patient comfort
Patient comfort will be assessed through questionnaires (after first, middle and last treatment fraction) which aim to evaluate the level of information and coaching pre-treatment, the physical treatment environment at the departments, and the health care staff.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 month total treatment time
Patient compliance defined as 2) breathhold reproducibility
Tumor position will be used to evaluate the ability of patients to maintain the breath-hold during the whole course of treatment and to investigate the possibility that patients might get weaker and/or more tired and, thus, unable to perform a stable DIBH as the treatment course progresses. This will be done using the respiratory motion management system.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 month total treatment time
The accuracy of the treatment delivery
Treatment accuracy will evaluated based on daily volumetric imaging, planar kV imaging or surface imaging (e.g. Catalyst, VisionRT). If the tumor is not visible on the planar kV images, the sternum (mediastinal tumors) or the diaphragm (abdominal tumors) will be used as a surrogate structure. If the target position appears reproducible within 5 mm, the patient will be deemed compliant. In addition to the daily online positioning at the treatment machine before each fraction, the reproducibility of the target position will be assessed retrospectively by a medical physicist on a weekly basis.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 month total treatment time
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- non-randomised feasiblity study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maja Maraldo, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03315546
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-16035870
- Acronym
- TEDDI
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lundgaard AY, Dejanovic D, Berthelsen AK, Andersen FL, Rechner LA, Borgwardt L, Hjalgrim LL, Specht L, Maraldo MV. Baseline FDG PET/CT in free breathing versus deep inspiration breath-hold for pediatric patients with mediastinal lymphoma. Acta Oncol. 2022 Feb;61(2):239-246. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1974554. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
PubMed 34533416Lundgaard AY, Josipovic M, Rechner LA, Bidstrup PE, Hansen R, Damkjaer SS, Joergensen M, Safwat A, Specht L, Hjalgrim LL, Maraldo MV. The Feasibility of Implementing Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold for Pediatric Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Apr 1;106(5):977-984. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
PubMed 32005489Lundgaard AY, Hjalgrim LL, Rechner LA, Josipovic M, Joergensen M, Aznar MC, Berthelsen AK, Borgwardt L, Johansen C, Loft A, Safwat A, Vaalavirta L, Specht L, Maraldo MV. TEDDI: radiotherapy delivery in deep inspiration for pediatric patients - a NOPHO feasibility study. Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1003-4.
PubMed 29587881
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Radiotherapy Delivery in Deep Inspiration for Pediatric Patients: TEDDI - a NOPHO Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03315546
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TEDDI / H-16035870
- Conditions
- Pediatric Cancer
- Keywords
- deep inspiration breath-hold, radiotherapy, late effects, pediatric cancer
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
TEDDI is a non-randomised phase II trial in Scandinavia. All pediatric patients, referred for radiotherapy in the thorax or abdomen and irrespective of diagnosis, are eligible.
Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a simple radiotherapy technique, which could have a dramatic impact on the risk of late effects in children. In DIBH, the radiotherapy is delivered while the patient holds his/her breath (4-6 sequential breath-holds). The anatomy is changed and imaging artifacts from respiratory movement are diminished. DIBH is widely used in adult patients with breast cancer and mediastinal lymphoma to minimize the risk of radiation-induced late effects due to a reduced dose to the healthy organs. Also, the technique is simple and cost-efficient.
For pediatric patients, the investigators aim to:
- Estimate the dosimetric benefit of radiotherapy using DIBH compared to free-breathing
- Establish the compliance of DIBH
- Determine if DIBH is an accurate and reproducible strategy
- Optimize treatment planning considering the risk from loss of tumour control as well as the risk of late effects.
Detailed description
Background:
The majority (approximately 80%) of pediatric patients with cancer become long-term survivors. Long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors has documented a substantial treatment-induced increased mortality and morbidity, primarily from cardiovascular disease and second cancers. Specifically, cardiac mortality has been shown to be 5-fold higher, cardiac morbidity 2-fold to 6-fold higher, and the incidence of second cancers 8-fold higher in childhood cancer survivors compared to the general population or siblings. Due to the young age at diagnosis and corresponding long life expectancy of pediatric patients the impact of late effect(s) on patient quality of life, morbidity, and ultimately mortality is non-trivial.
Radiotherapy-induced late effects are severe, yet difficult to assess and quantify as they occur late and, therefore, often are the results of treatment regimens now considered outdated. Nonetheless, the risk of radiation-induced late effects is known to be influenced by both the radiation dose and the volume of irradiated tissue. In adults, the use of more conformal radiotherapy delivery techniques and breathing adaptation has been introduced in order to limit the irradiation of the surrounding healthy organs. However, there has been a reluctance to implement new radiotherapy delivery techniques in the treatment of pediatric patients as late effects data are not available for these new techniques and for the fear of a low compliance with breathing instructions.
Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a simple radiotherapy technique, which could have a dramatic impact on late effects in children. In DIBH, the radiotherapy is delivered while the patient holds his/her breath (defined as 4 to 6 sequential breath-holds of ≥20 sec). In deep inspiration, the patient anatomy is changed and imaging artifacts from respiratory movement are diminished as the organs are not moving. Radiotherapy in DIBH can reduce the irradiation of the heart, breasts, and lungs without impacting the delivered radiation dose to the tumor and with no detriment to other healthy organs. Also, the technique is simple and cost-efficient. DIBH is widely used throughout the world in adult patients with left-sided breast cancer and with mediastinal lymphoma to minimize the risk of radiation-induced late effects.
The Department of Radiation Oncology at Rigshospitalet has pioneered the use of DIBH in the treatment of patients with breast cancer and mediastinal lymphoma [Korreman et al., Pedersen et al.] and is currently prospectively testing the DIBH technique in a more frail population of lung cancer patients. The department has extensive experience in the daily delivery and patient coaching of adult patients. While the experience from several centers confirms that the compliance of adult patients to DIBH is excellent, no reports exist of the applicability of DIBH to pediatric patients, especially the very young.
The investigators hypothesize that TEDDI is a feasible and reproducible strategy which will result in a 25% reduction in the mean radiation dose to the heart in pediatric patients referred for radiotherapy to tumors in the thorax or abdomen. This is expected to be true for all pediatric patients, regardless of age.
Through TEDDI, the investigators specifically aim to:
- Estimate the dosimetric benefit of radiotherapy using DIBH compared to free-breathing in pediatric patients.
- Establish the compliance of DIBH in pediatric patients in all age groups.
- Determine if DIBH is an accurate and reproducible strategy for pediatric patients.
Key research questions:
- What is the extent of the dosimetric benefit of DIBH compared to free-breathing radiotherapy? For adult patients with breast cancer, malignant lymphoma, and lung cancer, radiotherapy delivered in DIBH compared to free-breathing significantly lowers the dose to the heart, lungs, and stomach. However, for very young patients the anatomical changes (i.e. inflation of the lungs, increased separation of the heart and the tumor) might be less pronounced than for adults hampering the dosimetric advantage of DIBH. Hypothesis 1 (H1): For more than 75% of patients, treatment in DIBH will be dosimetrically superior to treatment in free-breathing.
- Is DIBH well tolerated by pediatric patients throughout their treatment? At present, the information material regarding DIBH and the visual feedback equipment (consisting of video goggles) is designed for and aimed at adult patients. In TEDDI, all aspects of the current DIBH workflow will be adapted in order to provide a comfortable setting for pediatric patients. Based on preliminary tests on healthy volunteers, children as young as 5 years are able to comply with the DIBH instructions given by the present visual feedback equipment. Hypothesis 2 (H2): over 90% of pediatric patients older than 5 years can perform a stable and comfortable DIBH (in the form of 4 to 6 sequential breath-holds of ≥20 sec) through their course of radiotherapy.
- Can the prescribed radiation dose be delivered accurately and reproducibly to the tumor in DIBH? Interfraction monitoring will ensure reliable treatment between treatment days using the RPM system, and intrafraction monitoring will assess the stability of the patient positioning/breath-hold during the treatment. Image acquisition parameters will be optimized to provide sufficient image quality at the lowest possible radiation exposure.
Hypothesis 3 (H3): The tumor position will be reproducible from day to day, as well as from breath-hold to breath-hold. Variations in position will be less than 5 mm over the whole treatment course.
Treatment planning:
All diagnostic imaging during treatment and treatment planning will be performed according to national guidelines (as per cancer diagnosis). For the radiotherapy planning, a planning CT scan will be performed in DIBH as well as in free-breathing for each patient. On both scans the gross tumor volume (GTV), the clinical target volume (CTV) which comprises the GTV adjusted for normal tissue, and the planning target volume (PTV) which is the CTV including a planning margin, will be defined. All relevant, healthy organs at risk from radiation exposure will be contoured (e.g. heart, female breasts, lungs, esophagus, thyroid, salivary glands, spinal cord, bone marrow, stomach, spleen, kidneys, liver). A DIBH and a free-breathing radiotherapy plan will be calculated, both with similar planning objectives for the tumor and organs at risk. All DIBH treatment plans will be designed to keep the number of breath-holds per fraction as low as reasonably achievable (including image guidance) for patient comfort.
Whenever a PET scanning is considered an integral part of the radiotherapy planning, a PET scanning should also be performed in the treatment position in both DIBH and in free-breathing for optimal image fusion. However, for institutions where this is not feasible, participation in TEDDI is still possible.
Treatment delivery:
Patients will be treated in DIBH, if the calculated treatment plan in DIBH is superior to the treatment plan in free-breathing with respect to the lowest overall dose to the organs at risk while maintaining acceptable tumor coverage. Coverage of the CTV and PTV will have the highest priority, as per ICRU83 guidelines.
Follow-up:
Enrollment in TEDDI will not affect the standard follow-up program of pediatric patients which is diagnosis specific.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Model description
- non-randomised feasiblity study
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 5-17 years.
- Patients with a tumor in the mediastinum or abdomen with possible need of radiotherapy according to current treatment guidelines, irrespective of cancer diagnosis.
- The ability to perform three sequential breath-holds of 20 seconds each during the coaching session.
- Written informed consent from parents or legal guardians.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age younger than 5 years or older than 17 years.
- The need for radiotherapy under general anesthesia.
- CNS tumor or pelvic localization.
- Unable to understand coaching information directly or through interpretation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| radiotherapy delivery in deep-inspirationRadiotherapy delivery i deep-inspiration versus free-breathing | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
The dosimetric benefit of DIBH
Time frame: 1 day prior to treatment start, the superior radiation treatment plan is chosen for treatment delivery
For each patient, the radiation treatment plan calculated in DIBH and in FB will be compared
3 secondary outcomes
Patient compliance defined as 1) patient comfort
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month total treatment time
Patient compliance defined as 2) breathhold reproducibility
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month total treatment time
The accuracy of the treatment delivery
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month total treatment time
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34533416Lundgaard AY, Dejanovic D, Berthelsen AK, Andersen FL, Rechner LA, Borgwardt L, Hjalgrim LL, Specht L, Maraldo MV. Baseline FDG PET/CT in free breathing versus deep inspiration breath-hold for pediatric patients with mediastinal lymphoma. Acta Oncol. 2022 Feb;61(2):239-246. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1974554. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32005489Lundgaard AY, Josipovic M, Rechner LA, Bidstrup PE, Hansen R, Damkjaer SS, Joergensen M, Safwat A, Specht L, Hjalgrim LL, Maraldo MV. The Feasibility of Implementing Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold for Pediatric Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Apr 1;106(5):977-984. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29587881Lundgaard AY, Hjalgrim LL, Rechner LA, Josipovic M, Joergensen M, Aznar MC, Berthelsen AK, Borgwardt L, Johansen C, Loft A, Safwat A, Vaalavirta L, Specht L, Maraldo MV. TEDDI: radiotherapy delivery in deep inspiration for pediatric patients - a NOPHO feasibility study. Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1003-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pediatric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Codrituzumab in Children and Young Adults With Solid Tumors and Have Not Responded to Treatment or Have Come Back After Treatment
Primary Extra-cranial Solid Tumor, Recurrent or Refractory Glypican 3 (GPC3)
RecruitingObservational study
Biorepository in Participants Who Undergo OTC for Gonadotoxic Therapy
Acute Ovarian Failure, Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
NCI Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI) Led Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Rare Cancer Registry for Very Rare Solid Tumors
Very Rare Tumors, Very Rare Cancers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Maja V Maraldo, MD, PhD contact
Anni YS Jørgensen, MD contact
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing radiotherapy delivery in deep-inspiration in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Denmark, Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Maja V Maraldo, MD, PhD (maja.vestmoe.maraldo@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The dosimetric benefit of DIBH (time frame: 1 day prior to treatment start, the superior radiation treatment plan is chosen for treatment delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03315546, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2020.