Cardiac SurgeryNCT03316183
Cerebral Monitor Guided Therapy on Cerebral Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
A study testing Perioperative and postoperative management in people with Cardiac Surgery and Protein Metabolomics, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare patients' metabolomic profiles who are managed with a brain monitor that measures cerebral oxygen to those who are managed by conventional measures to hopefully decrease postoperative neurologic and cognitive deficits and improve quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Surgery, Protein Metabolomics, Cerebral Function
- What is being tested?
- Perioperative and postoperative management
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 1 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) with cardioplegic arrest (CABG, valves, CABG + valves).
Who cannot join
- History of a stroke within 90 days prior to enrollment, or a history of cerebral vascular disease with significant (> 80%) extra cranial stenosis;
- Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator;
- Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra- aortic balloon counter pulsation;
- Body Mass Index (BMI) > 50 kg/m2;
- Pregnancy;
- Psychiatric disease, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair compliance with the study protocol;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Presence of active, uncontrolled infection;
- Evidence of intrinsic hepatic disease as defined by liver enzyme values;
- Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect study outcome;
- Patient refuses to be enrolled in study;
- Institution inmates
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Kei Togashi, MD MPH, 206-598-1994, ktogashi@uw.edu
G. Burkhard Mackensen, MD PhD FASE, 2065981462, gbmac@uw.edu
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Prospective Clinical Study Aiming to Assess the Impact of Cerebral Monitoring Guided Therapy on Cerebral Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
The purpose of this study is to compare patients' metabolomic profiles who are managed with a brain monitor that measures cerebral oxygen to those who are managed by conventional measures to hopefully decrease postoperative neurologic and cognitive deficits and improve quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Neurologic and cognitive decline remain common complications that adversely affect patients' outcome after cardiac surgery. By incorporating a brain monitor that measures cerebral oxygen content into our perioperative management we aim to decrease postoperative neurologic and cognitive deficits and improve quality of life in this patient population. We also aim to uncover how the compromised brain alters its metabolism in response to ischemic injury and how this new information can guide new preventive treatment methods for vulnerable patients.
Briefly, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) or cerebral oximetry is a non-invasive monitor that estimates cerebral oxygenation through measurements of regional venous saturation. It is based on measuring intravascular oxyhemoglobin fraction in a small sample of cerebral cortex through the skull using near-infrared light spectroscopy. Cerebral oximetry examines all reflected light, from both pulsatile arterial and non-pulsatile venous blood, without requiring pulsatility, hence cerebral oximetry can continue to monitor brain oxygenation during both CPB and circulatory arrest. With this advantage, cerebral oximetry is widely utilized in our daily cardiac anesthesia practice, routinely for surgeries requiring circulatory arrest, and for other elective CABG and valve replacement/repair surgeries in some institutions. Despite its wide use, controversy still exists in its interpretation and ability to optimize cerebral outcome after cardiac surgery. Key questions to be answered are: 1) the desaturation threshold associated with poor prognosis; 2) the absolute desaturation value at which adverse clinical outcome increases, and 3); if the relative trend is more important to signal approaching deterioration. All of these questions are relevant to our clinical practice yet remain unanswered. Our research study aims to take a first step towards identification of the ideal method of utilizing cerebral oximetry in cardiac surgeries to improve neurological outcome through increasing precision in managing hemodynamic as well as laboratory values through a treatment algorithm.
The second component of this study incorporates metabolomic profiling as we refine the perioperative management of cardiac surgery patient to improve their cerebral outcome. Despite enormous research efforts over the last decades, currently there is no specific and single neurologic biomarker (or panels of biomarkers) that has been validated for clinical use. Meanwhile, neuro-imaging (CT and MRI) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of cerebral injury. Organ-specific biomarkers, if identified, have the potential to be a reliable and cost-effective method to diagnose, guide management, classify severity of stroke, anticipate cognitive function, and predict complications. Recently, metabolomic profiling has enabled comprehensive analyses of changes in metabolic fuel selection in a variety of models, including cardioplegic arrest. Advances in analytical technology have enabled quantitative analysis of several hundreds of metabolites in a single measurement with high throughput and sensitivity.
Metabolomic profiling entails quantitating small-molecule metabolites from body fluids or tissues in a single step, and possesses the potential for early diagnosis, therapy monitoring and investigating the pathogenesis of various diseases. This biomarker detection is conducted in cells, tissues, or biofluids by either nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or mass spectrometry (MS) which then undergoes multivariate data analysis. Jung et al., using 1H-NMR spectropy combined with multivariate statistical analysis assessed stroke patients. In this study perturbed metabolic pattern in both plasma and urine from patients with known cerebral infarction incidents were assessed to identify a specific proteome associated with stroke. A similar investigation has been conducted with a wider quantification of neuroproteomics using a rodent model. Biomarker prognostic of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has also been investigated. Despite its potential for wide application, metabolomic profiling has not seen its utilization to guide neuroprotective management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We believe the unique combination of these two methods poses a valuable opportunity not only to improve the patient's neurocognitive outcome, but also to gain insights on which biomarkers represent cerebral ischemia or other signs of cerebral injury.
Our specific aims are to: 1. Assess the transcerebral metabolomic profile and neurocognitive outcome in response to cerebral injury in patients monitored and treated according to cerebral oximetry (NIRS) and those that are just monitored with NIRS.
Based on available literature, our working hypothesis is that compared to monitored only patients, cerebral fuel utilization will be differentially affected in patients monitored and treated by tightly following a specific neuroprotective algorithm.
1.a. Test the plasma concentrations of metabolites representing the amino acid, carbohydrate, energy, lipid, and nucleotide pathways using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry.
1.b. Compare the neurocognitive function of treated and untreated patients using a comprehensive test battery consisting of 5 assessment modalities at baseline, at the time of discharge and 6 weeks postoperatively.
- Being tested
- Perioperative and postoperative management
- Keywords
- cerebral oximetry, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), metabolomic profiling, neurocognitive outcomes, Cerebral protection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Perioperative and postoperative managementOther
Cerebral oximetry informed perioperative management
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | * Maintain rSO2 values at or above 75% of the baseline
* Midline position
* Target CO2 of ≥40 mmHg, target MAP >60 mm Hg
* Maintain cerebral perfusion pressure >50 mm Hg
* Target pump flow 2.5 L/m2/min
* If rSO2 persistently below treatment threshold:
* FiO2 is increased
* or propofol 50-100 mg bolus is administered
* If Hct below 20% packed red blood cells will be transfused
timeline: before induction, after time-out has been performed, and will continue until 24 hours post surgery. Receives: Other: Perioperative and postoperative management |
| Control Group | No intervention | Patients in the control group will be managed under the attending physician's discretion. Cerebral oximetry data will be collected in the same fashion as in the intervention group, but the measurements will be blinded to the physician. Blood samples will be collected for metabolomic profiling in the same fashion and at identical time points as the intervention group for later analysis. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessing Change in Metabolomic Profile via Mass Spectrometry and NMR
Blood samples will be tested for potential organ-specific biomarker to diagnose and classify cerebral protein consumption to assess neurological activity.
Measured: Blood samples taken1) At baseline following placement, 2) 30 min after initiation of bypass; 3) 10 min before separation from bypass; 4) 2 hours after separation from bypass and 5) before removal of the catheter or 12 hours after the end of surgery
Secondary outcomes (2)
Neurocognitive
Neurocognitive test battery
Measured: baseline, 6 weeks post-operation
Neurologic via CAM ICU and RASS Score During the Acute Post-Operative ICU Stay
Neurologic clinical testing
Measured: To be gathered as a part of routine critical care assessment throughout the participant's ICU stay. Up to 2 weeks post surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2017
- Study start1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kei Togashi, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Kei Togashi, MD MPH, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03316183
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00002376
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Prospective Clinical Study Aiming to Assess the Impact of Cerebral Monitoring Guided Therapy on Cerebral Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03316183
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00002376
- Keywords
- cerebral oximetry, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), metabolomic profiling, neurocognitive outcomes, Cerebral protection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare patients' metabolomic profiles who are managed with a brain monitor that measures cerebral oxygen to those who are managed by conventional measures to hopefully decrease postoperative neurologic and cognitive deficits and improve quality of life.
Detailed description
Neurologic and cognitive decline remain common complications that adversely affect patients' outcome after cardiac surgery. By incorporating a brain monitor that measures cerebral oxygen content into our perioperative management we aim to decrease postoperative neurologic and cognitive deficits and improve quality of life in this patient population. We also aim to uncover how the compromised brain alters its metabolism in response to ischemic injury and how this new information can guide new preventive treatment methods for vulnerable patients.
Briefly, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) or cerebral oximetry is a non-invasive monitor that estimates cerebral oxygenation through measurements of regional venous saturation. It is based on measuring intravascular oxyhemoglobin fraction in a small sample of cerebral cortex through the skull using near-infrared light spectroscopy. Cerebral oximetry examines all reflected light, from both pulsatile arterial and non-pulsatile venous blood, without requiring pulsatility, hence cerebral oximetry can continue to monitor brain oxygenation during both CPB and circulatory arrest. With this advantage, cerebral oximetry is widely utilized in our daily cardiac anesthesia practice, routinely for surgeries requiring circulatory arrest, and for other elective CABG and valve replacement/repair surgeries in some institutions. Despite its wide use, controversy still exists in its interpretation and ability to optimize cerebral outcome after cardiac surgery. Key questions to be answered are: 1) the desaturation threshold associated with poor prognosis; 2) the absolute desaturation value at which adverse clinical outcome increases, and 3); if the relative trend is more important to signal approaching deterioration. All of these questions are relevant to our clinical practice yet remain unanswered. Our research study aims to take a first step towards identification of the ideal method of utilizing cerebral oximetry in cardiac surgeries to improve neurological outcome through increasing precision in managing hemodynamic as well as laboratory values through a treatment algorithm.
The second component of this study incorporates metabolomic profiling as we refine the perioperative management of cardiac surgery patient to improve their cerebral outcome. Despite enormous research efforts over the last decades, currently there is no specific and single neurologic biomarker (or panels of biomarkers) that has been validated for clinical use. Meanwhile, neuro-imaging (CT and MRI) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of cerebral injury. Organ-specific biomarkers, if identified, have the potential to be a reliable and cost-effective method to diagnose, guide management, classify severity of stroke, anticipate cognitive function, and predict complications. Recently, metabolomic profiling has enabled comprehensive analyses of changes in metabolic fuel selection in a variety of models, including cardioplegic arrest. Advances in analytical technology have enabled quantitative analysis of several hundreds of metabolites in a single measurement with high throughput and sensitivity.
Metabolomic profiling entails quantitating small-molecule metabolites from body fluids or tissues in a single step, and possesses the potential for early diagnosis, therapy monitoring and investigating the pathogenesis of various diseases. This biomarker detection is conducted in cells, tissues, or biofluids by either nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or mass spectrometry (MS) which then undergoes multivariate data analysis. Jung et al., using 1H-NMR spectropy combined with multivariate statistical analysis assessed stroke patients. In this study perturbed metabolic pattern in both plasma and urine from patients with known cerebral infarction incidents were assessed to identify a specific proteome associated with stroke. A similar investigation has been conducted with a wider quantification of neuroproteomics using a rodent model. Biomarker prognostic of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has also been investigated. Despite its potential for wide application, metabolomic profiling has not seen its utilization to guide neuroprotective management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We believe the unique combination of these two methods poses a valuable opportunity not only to improve the patient's neurocognitive outcome, but also to gain insights on which biomarkers represent cerebral ischemia or other signs of cerebral injury.
Our specific aims are to: 1. Assess the transcerebral metabolomic profile and neurocognitive outcome in response to cerebral injury in patients monitored and treated according to cerebral oximetry (NIRS) and those that are just monitored with NIRS.
Based on available literature, our working hypothesis is that compared to monitored only patients, cerebral fuel utilization will be differentially affected in patients monitored and treated by tightly following a specific neuroprotective algorithm.
1.a. Test the plasma concentrations of metabolites representing the amino acid, carbohydrate, energy, lipid, and nucleotide pathways using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry.
1.b. Compare the neurocognitive function of treated and untreated patients using a comprehensive test battery consisting of 5 assessment modalities at baseline, at the time of discharge and 6 weeks postoperatively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Perioperative and postoperative management* Maintain rSO2 values at or above 75% of the baseline * Midline position * Target CO2 of ≥40 mmHg, target MAP >60 mm Hg * Maintain cerebral perfusion pressure >50 mm Hg * Target pump flow 2.5 L/m2/min * If rSO2 persistently below treatment threshold: * FiO2 is increased * or propofol 50-100 mg bolus is administered * If Hct below 20% packed red blood cells will be transfused timeline: before induction, after time-out has been performed, and will continue until 24 hours post surgery. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Patients in the control group will be managed under the attending physician's discretion. Cerebral oximetry data will be collected in the same fashion as in the intervention group, but the measurements will be blinded to the physician. Blood samples will be collected for metabolomic profiling in the same fashion and at identical time points as the intervention group for later analysis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) with cardioplegic arrest (CABG, valves, CABG + valves).
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of a stroke within 90 days prior to enrollment, or a history of cerebral vascular disease with significant (> 80%) extra cranial stenosis;
- Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator;
- Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra- aortic balloon counter pulsation;
- Body Mass Index (BMI) > 50 kg/m2;
- Pregnancy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Perioperative and postoperative managementCerebral oximetry informed perioperative management | Other | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Assessing Change in Metabolomic Profile via Mass Spectrometry and NMR
Time frame: Blood samples taken1) At baseline following placement, 2) 30 min after initiation of bypass; 3) 10 min before separation from bypass; 4) 2 hours after separation from bypass and 5) before removal of the catheter or 12 hours after the end of surgery
Blood samples will be tested for potential organ-specific biomarker to diagnose and classify cerebral protein consumption to assess neurological activity.
2 secondary outcomes
Neurocognitive
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks post-operation
Neurologic via CAM ICU and RASS Score During the Acute Post-Operative ICU Stay
Time frame: To be gathered as a part of routine critical care assessment throughout the participant's ICU stay. Up to 2 weeks post surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiac Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Recruiting
Change in Platelet Lipid Metabolism and Procoagulant Phenotype Induced by Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Impact on Postoperative Inflammatory Response and Bleeding Complications During Cardiac Surgery.
Cardiac Surgery, Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kei Togashi, MD MPH principal investigator
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Perioperative and postoperative management in people with Cardiac Surgery and Protein Metabolomics, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kei Togashi, MD MPH (2065981994, ktogashi@uw.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessing Change in Metabolomic Profile via Mass Spectrometry and NMR (time frame: Blood samples taken1) At baseline following placement, 2) 30 min after initiation of bypass; 3) 10 min before separation from bypass; 4) 2 hours after separation from bypass and 5) before removal of the catheter or 12 hours after the end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2021.